Behind Trump's South Korea deal, a plan to transform global shipbuilding
Advertisement
US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States and South Korea had agreed a 'full and complete' trade deal, which would see the US impose a 15 per cent tariff on South Korean goods and receive US$350 billion of investment from its Asian ally.
Shortly after, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung stated that US$150 billion of the promised investment would be dedicated to shipbuilding – an industry where South Korean firms are second only to China in global market share.
The capital would provide 'solid support' for South Korean companies entering the US shipbuilding industry, Lee wrote in a Facebook post on Thursday. The wider US$350 billion investment package was intended to solidify bilateral cooperation in strategic industries, including semiconductors, he added.
Seoul clarified in a media briefing on Thursday morning that the promised funds would not come in the form of direct equity investments, but 'will primarily consist of loans and guarantees'.
Advertisement
Earlier this week, local media outlets in South Korea reported that Seoul had proposed a multibillion-dollar project to Washington named 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again' during their trade negotiations, which would involve large-scale investments in the US by Korean shipbuilders and government financial support measures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
28 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Competition should be about innovation and quality, not the price
As Beijing works aggressively to make sure the economy meets the 5 per cent growth target at year end, one new tool in its arsenal is to amend a key law to discourage vicious price wars that have plagued multiple sectors in recent years. From food delivery and e-commerce to solar power and electric cars, steep price cuts – with the aim to drive out competitors but which also undercut one's own profits – are fuelling deflationary pressure. That has led regulators to propose urgent amendments to an old pricing law. A public consultation is open until August 23. With transparency and an open mind, the authorities can use positive public feedback to fine-tune the changes. In the existing law, firms are banned from selling goods below cost to eliminate competitors or monopolise the market. The new amendment adds the condition that businesses cannot fight each other by dumping products at below-cost prices. With more transparent price regulation and oversight, they will also be prohibited from 'leveraging data, algorithms and technological tools' to chase clients and beat rivals. So far, market reactions have been positive. Listed companies in consumer services, non-ferrous metals and financial companies – sectors that have experienced cutthroat competition or what officials have termed 'involution' – have seen share prices move up since the news broke. There is, of course, a counterargument that market forces alone should decide prices. But in such cases of market failure, supervision and regulatory intervention are called for. Companies ought to compete on quality and innovation rather than price. A proper legal framework will work better to guide businesses and promote healthy competition, rather than for authorities to deliver ad hoc admonitions to offending firms when the situation has already become dire. In early July, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology warned 14 major solar firms against a vicious price war and overcapacity. The share prices of some of them rose on the news, as markets expected price cutting eating into profits would stop. But such intervention is unsystematic. A transparent legal framework should be business-friendly with clear rules and regulations. Moderating or even eliminating involution will allow more time for companies to phase out outdated practices to better compete.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why movie studios are still seen as good investments despite falling box offices
Box office takings are down. It is harder than ever to get people out of their homes and into the cinema. The business model for movies in streaming is still a work in progress. Given all these challenges, who would want to buy a movie studio now? Many people, it turns out. It is far from the only deal news in the film business. Timothee Chalamet in a still from Dune: Part Two. Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures In June, independent film finance and production firm Alcon Media Group – known for Blade Runner 2049 and The Blind Side – bought the film library of Joker and Ocean's Eleven producer and financier Village Roadshow Entertainment for US$417.5 million after an auction process that was part of the latter's bankruptcy proceedings.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China's central bank vows to boost money supply, cut borrowing costs in growth push
China's central bank has pledged more liquidity and lower borrowing costs in the second half of the year, as part of a broader strategy to boost growth and implement long-term financial reforms. At a key mid-year meeting on Friday, the People's Bank of China said it would maintain a moderately loose monetary policy by cutting reserve requirement ratios and key interest rates, while making full use of targeted tools to lower overall financing costs. Amid external uncertainties, sluggish domestic demand , as well as persistent deflationary pressure, the central bank also vowed to refine its monetary policy framework, guide market expectations more effectively, and strengthen coordination with fiscal policies to support innovation, consumption, small and micro businesses, and exports. In particular, the bank said it would target 'idle capital circulation and ' involution style ' competition in the financial industry', a reference to self-defeating competition that drains resources without improving outcomes. This kind of competition has been a key concern for policymakers in various parts of the economy. However, Xu Tianchen, senior China economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said that a new round of rate cuts or reserve requirement ratio reductions was unlikely in the third quarter.
