logo
Climate change is coming for Florida's real estate. Why don't prices reflect it?

Climate change is coming for Florida's real estate. Why don't prices reflect it?

Miami Herald06-05-2025
Climate Change Climate change is coming for Florida's real estate. Why don't prices reflect it?
Despite a 'rain bomb' that flooded this home in the Edgewood neighborhood of Fort Lauderdale in April 2023, property values there have largely rebounded in the months since.
mocner@miamiherald.com
Despite a 'rain bomb' that flooded this home in the Edgewood neighborhood of Fort Lauderdale in April 2023, property values there have largely rebounded in the months since. Matias J. Ocner
As a University of Miami doctoral student studying climate change, Mayra Cruz knew more than most about the risks of sea rise and wetter storms and hurricanes.
So when she and her husband bought their first home in 2021, they picked inland Miami Springs and bought federal flood insurance. They felt good, learning the only previous claim had come long ago, after Hurricane Andrew.
Then three storms in three years sloshed 18 inches of water into their backyard. And when the city posted a warning about flooding on Instagram, it used pictures of her impassable street.
Last summer, the couple decided to sell because of the repeated flooding. They wrote a 'crystal clear' disclosure: the home escaped damage, but water got unnervingly close. Cruz worried if anyone would buy it. 'My Realtor said it would still sell. I asked 'Are you sure?' I wouldn't buy this house knowing what I know.'
They got an offer almost immediately, selling for nearly $250,000 more than they paid for it.
It's a paradox of South Florida's super-heated real estate market: When homeowners like Cruz move out because of growing flood risks, somebody else always seems willing to move in — and often at a much higher price.
'Our housing value almost doubled in that time,' Cruz said. 'That's absolutely insane. Our house should not have been worth that much.'
The value of her home and thousands of others in Florida have been buoyed at least in part by what some experts call a climate denial bubble. A wave of reports in the last five years has pegged the size of the bubble in the billions and suggested a correction is looming, potentially a major one. It has yet to come.
The Holiday Acres Mobile Home Park in Hialeah after an intense rainstorm in June 2024. Some experts believe it's only a matter of time before flooding risks like this begin to affect home prices in Florida. Al Diaz
adiaz@miamiherald.com
In 2020, the consulting firm McKinsey predicted coastal home values could drop by as much as 15 percent by 2030 as flood risks from sea rise, hurricanes and more intense thunderstorms are factored in. Another paper the same year found that Miami-Dade County was the most overvalued county in the nation — about $3.5 billion higher than it should be because of flood risks. One recent report estimated that real estate statewide was overvalued by $50 billion based on flood risks alone.
As part of a continuing series investigating flood risks, the Herald consulted more than a dozen economists, academics and real estate professionals on when, how or even if the increasing threat will impact cost and demand.
While some see signs that frequent hurricane strikes and associated skyrocketing insurance costs may be finally cooling things off, the South Florida real estate market, in particular, has so far remained remarkably resilient to flood risks – more resilient than many of the actual homes.
One veteran analyst agreed to chart home sales for the Herald in four South Florida neighborhoods that experienced extreme flooding events in the last decade. She found property values increased after every disaster – sometimes dramatically. They even continued rising in a Key Largo neighborhood that remained flooded for 90 straight days.
So, despite dire warnings from environmentalists and some economists, the South Florida real estate industry looks at the numbers and doesn't see evidence of a bubble ready to burst. Rafael Corrales, a senior Redfin agent in Miami, acknowledges hearing more questions about flooding but says it's not a deal-breaker for most buyers. Yet.
'It's all fun and games until it's not,'' Corrales said, 'and that's what we're all bracing for, God forbid, as residents of South Florida.'
Floods outside a parking garage on 25th street in Miami in April 2023. Climate change is producing wetter rainstorms like this one, experts say, which is raising the flood threats in South Florida. Alie Skowronski
askowronski@miamiherald.com
A slow leaking bubble?
Most experts the Herald spoke to don't expect a sudden nosedive in home values from flood or climate change threats. When it comes, they say, it may be more of a slow leak from the denial bubble.
'The short version is that it's true that we should expect house prices to decline, but this is one of those instances where the long run may still be a long way off,' said Ben Keys, a real estate professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania who's published research on sea level rise and property value.
Keys points out what anyone who has shopped for an apartment in South Florida knows. Rents remain high, even in the spots where flooding is already a problem, like sections of Little Havana. That's a sign that the benefits of finding a place to live in a market with a shortage of affordable housing still outweigh the costs of living here — even with the chance of financially ruinous floods.
'I think it's going to be a very gradual process. I don't think it's a tipping point,' he said. 'Housing markets are very durable assets. Things that affect house values move very slowly.'
Home sale data from South Florida backs him up. The market is still relatively hot, even in the South Florida spots most vulnerable to flooding. Despite a slight sales slowdown in recent months, home values are still creeping upward. Many factors have driven the market up in recent years, including a pandemic-era buying frenzy and an influx of northern residents. But so far, climate and flood risk have yet to make a visible mark.
That's underlined by a custom analysis of home sales in some of the most infamously flooded spots in South Florida, conducted by Ana Bozovic of Analytics Miami for the Miami Herald.
Bozovic, a Miami-based realtor and real estate analyst who consults with prominent Miami developers, examined single-family home sales in four communities that experienced headline-making flooding in recent years. In all four, her findings were the same. Prices rose in the wake of flood disasters.
'If I were to guess, OK, an area got a lot of bad press, one may assume that would lead to a decrease in demand,' she said. 'But that was not the case.'
In the Stillwright Point neighborhood in Key Largo in the Florida Keys, residents endured 90 days straight of flooded streets in October 2019, with water levels pushed up by hurricanes and unusually high tides. It was so deep that police couldn't patrol, and delivery drivers couldn't reach homes. The saga became a national news story.
In the months following, plenty of residents put homes up for sale. Despite the publicity and the flooding problem, year-over-year sales rose by 40%, and so did the median sale price — by $20,000. Six years later, the roads have yet to be fixed, although a project is in the works. Now, the median sales price for a single-family home in that neighborhood is almost $200,000 higher.
In Miami's Little Havana, where another rainstorm swamped homes and apartments in June 2022, the same story played out. Bozovic found the median price for homes sold in the floodprone neighborhood rose $20,000 the following year, to $655,000.
In Fort Lauderdale's Edgewood, ground zero of a 'biblical rain bomb' in April 2023 that swamped hundreds of homes, flooded major downtown streets and inundated runways at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, the results were similar: a $15,000 jump in median price for single-family homes the year after the flood.
In the Shorecrest neighborhood in Miami, Hurricane Irma inundated pricey coastal homes in September 2017. The next year, the median sale price jumped $60,000.
Those catastrophic floods — which left some residents in financial ruins or sparked multimillion-dollar government drainage projects — aren't even visible blips in the sales data, Bozovic said.
'If people really want to be in a region, they're willing to overlook things like this. Six months later, it's like it never happened,' said Bozovic. 'People have short memories.'
A 2022 study looking at pre-pandemic values shows the same trend going back decades. The report, by several researchers, including one from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, looked at Florida from 2000 to 2016 and found that home prices in hard-hit parts of the state actually bumped up in the immediate aftermath of a storm — about 5% — because people were desperate for housing. After three years, things even out.
A for sale sign sticks out from a flooded street near a temporary pump at Miami's Little River Pocket Park during a king tide in October 2023. As climate change makes flooding more frequent, home values may eventually suffer. MATIAS J. OCNER
mocner@miamiherald.com
Why no impact?
Despite a string of dire or damaging predictions for South Florida's future, sea rise-induced flooding still does not appear to be a major factor for real estate purchases, according to the Miami Association of Realtors, which surveys brokers annually on their clients' top concerns.
As of 2021, flooding resilience ranked 14th out of 20 buyer concerns. More pressing concerns sit at the top of their list: affordability, proximity to work, quality of schools and neighborhoods and other family-related issues.
Julia Poliadis, with ONE Sotheby's Realty in Miami, said she's had plenty of clients ask about flooding, particularly from out of state. But many don't plan to hold onto homes for decades when the worst is expected to come. To Poliadis, and many of her clients, the idea of seas reclaiming low-lying Miami neighborhoods feels very far away.
'At least not in my lifetime. I don't see it being a huge concern. I don't see those predictions that they're showing. I think that's in the long run,' she said. 'I don't think we're going to see South Florida underwater for a very long time.'
With increasingly wet hurricanes and storms, South Florida's flooding threat isn't confined to the coast as this November 2023 scene from Hialeah shows. That's debris, not a fish, swirling around an overwhelmed storm drain. Pedro Portal
The view that significant threats are far in the future is common. Risa Palm, a Georgia State University professor of urban geography, surveyed nearly 700 South Florida real estate agents and found that while most understood sea level rise was a big risk, they saw no dampening of desire for coastal real estate.
'I had a grad student working on this project, and she wanted to ask the real estate agent what it looks like 20 years out and they laughed at us,' Palm said. 'Who looks 20 years out? Nobody does.'
Well, not nobody.
Researchers and economists crunching long-term risk data may think the price for a ground-floor home on a canal is too high. But in the market, all that matters is that some buyer is willing to pay that price.
'Property values are a weird indicator because they're set by one person,' said Miyuki Hino, a researcher at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill whose 2020 paper found Miami-Dade was the most overvalued county in the U.S.
Key, the Wharton professor, echoed that. Florida has been raked by hurricanes over the years, but the lure of the coastal lifestyle remains powerful. 'As long as there are people out there willing to pay a fortune to live by a beach, there will be a market for it.'
Despite science showing that rising tides will reach front doors in a matter of decades, many people who making their living buying and selling property downplay warnings of a potential market crash due to increasing climate change impacts.
'History is full of the powers that be, of professors, of politicians, being horribly wrong about things,' said Bozovic, a skeptic that climate concerns will roil the market — a view echoed by many real estate pros. 'I'm always wary of politicized data and professors with no skin in the game.'
There are those on the other end of the spectrum, however, who see a potentially dark future, one that could emerge slowly in coming decades or perhaps suddenly triggered by a major hurricane strike in the most populated areas of Florida, where billions in real estate are at risk.
Some experts — ones that some in the real estate industry liken to Chicken Little — worry the spiraling impacts could mirror the 2008 real estate crash, with property values plunging along with the tax revenues that make local governments run. This time, the downward spiral could be supercharged by already skyrocketing insurance rates.
U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, took a deep dive into overvaluation of property values across the country, including Florida, when he was chair of the Senate Budget Committee in 2024.
In an interview with the Herald, he said he was worried that insurance companies and steeply climbing rates will be the first domino that leads to a 'systemic' collapse of property values, the federal mortgage companies backing them and maybe even some banks.
That's what he's heard from the chief economist for federal mortgage giant Freddie Mac.
'His estimate was that, just for coastal property values crashing, is a sufficient economic shock to do to the U.S. economy how the 2008 mortgage meltdown went. That was his model for when this ends,' Whitehouse said. 'It was pretty damned grim.'
The Shore Acres neighborhood in St. Petersburg saw deep flooding after Hurricane Idalia passed by Florida's Gulf Coast in August 2023. Some of those homes have repeatedly flooded since then, and home values are shifting. Max Chesnes
Tampa Bay Times
More 'climate attention'
While many real estate experts and buyers still see climate-driven floods as too far off to worry about, a growing body of research suggests fewer buyers have their heads in the sand on flooding and sea rise risks.
Popular real estate websites like Zillow and Redfin began to feature flooding and other climate risks prominently beginning in 2020. Some internal research suggests it's making a difference. A Redfin study in 2022 found buyers provided information are more likely to choose a home with a lower flood risk over homes with a 'severe' or 'extreme' level — although they still see 'moderate' risk as a gamble worth taking.
But as the tides inch higher and flooding becomes more common, more builders and home buyers are also starting to seek elevated land along Miami's ancient limestone ridge — and sometimes emphasizing it as a selling point.
Johannes Stroebel, a professor of finance at the New York University Stern School of Business, analyzed how often phrases like 'high and dry' or 'not in a flood zone' appeared in the text descriptions alongside properties listed on Zillow over several years.
His research found that after a flood, ads prominently feature the safety of a property. But a few years later, with no recent floods, those same properties would go on the market highlighting other selling points instead.
Stroebel calls it 'climate attention.' When there's attention on actual flooding, properties exposed to it see a relative drop in value. When it disappear, people pay less attention and the value rises right back up again.
'It certainly shows that climate risk is priced in the real estate market,' he said.
On Gulf Coast, a turning tide?
After a string of hurricane strikes on Florida's Gulf Coast, there are signs in some markets that climate attention isn't fading as fast.
Shore Acres, a beautiful but flood-prone neighborhood in St. Petersburg, will be one of Florida's latest tests of the power of climate denial.
Walloped by both hurricanes Helene and Milton last year, prices for many homes have plunged to 'land value' or other steep declines in recent months. Zillow's Zestimate for one flood-damaged home in Shore Acres, for one example, shows a 37 percent decline from September when Helene's storm surge plowed ashore.
Dozens of Shore Acres homes for sale tout themselves as an 'excellent opportunity to build a new home' with interior images of gutted homes missing the bottom half of their drywall. Some ads are already appealing to buyers to forget what happened, suggesting it was a rarity already in the past.
'While the home experienced flooding during Hurricane Helene, it was the first time it had in 60 years,' read one pitch.
If history holds, the buyers will return, probably building bigger and more expensive homes. But perhaps the Gulf Coast damage, combined with soaring insurance, will prove a pivot point on property values.
The Shore Acres neighborhood in St. Petersburg saw high water and road closures following Hurricane Idalia in August 2023. As a well-known floody neighborhood, it could be part of a vanguard of homes where prices suffer from repeated floods. Jennifer Glenfield
Tampa Bay Times
When Elijah de la Campa, a senior economist with Redfin, looks at where people are moving to and from in the U.S., he sees indications of a slow, subtle shift away from the riskiest spots. While more people moved into flood-prone areas of Florida than out of them in 2023, de la Campa's research found the reverse for the first time in Miami-Dade County.
Climate risk likely isn't the biggest driver of that shift. Miami-Dade is a notoriously expensive place to live. Other equally flood-prone communities in Florida, like Tampa Bay and Naples, saw a net inflow of new residents. But, de le Campa noted, the population growth in both areas did slow from 2022 to 2023.
'I would argue people are becoming more responsive to climate risk and it could be the start of something,' he said. 'Perhaps the tides are shifting.'
Credits
Alex Harris | Environmental Reporter
Susan Merriam | Data Journalist
Matias J. Ocner | Photography
Al Diaz | Photography
Alie Skowronski | Photography
Pedro Portal | Videography
Curtis Morgan | Editor
Carolina Zamora| Audience Engagement Partners
This series is part of the Pulitzer Center's nationwide Connected Coastlines reporting initiative. How we reported this series
The Miami Herald spoke with more than three dozen realtors, real estate agents, politicians, bureaucrats, residents, lawyers, home buyers, sellers and academics for this series. That included reviewing dozens of academic articles published on the subject of climate change and real estate value in the last twenty years.
For this series, Analytics Miami reviewed the Multiple Listing Service data for four neighborhoods selected by the Herald to see how sales volume and median sales price shifted in the year or more following a specific flood event.
Alex Harris
Miami Herald Go to X Email this person 305-376-5005
Alex Harris is the lead climate change reporter for the Miami Herald's climate team, which covers how South Florida communities are adapting to the warming world. Her beat also includes environmental issues and hurricanes. She attended the University of Florida.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cramer's week ahead: Fed meeting, nonfarm payrolls, Big Tech earnings
Cramer's week ahead: Fed meeting, nonfarm payrolls, Big Tech earnings

CNBC

time7 hours ago

  • CNBC

Cramer's week ahead: Fed meeting, nonfarm payrolls, Big Tech earnings

Next week could be a game changer for Wall Street, CNBC's Jim Cramer said. He told investors to pay attention to a slew of market-moving events, including the Federal Reserve's meeting, the latest nonfarm payroll report and earnings tech titans Apple, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft. "Next week, no hyperbole, is pivotal. It's significant. I'm willing to make it a free-fire zone of superlatives," he said. "In short, next week determines the market's direction for the duration. Or at least the rest of the summer." On Monday, Cramer said he'll be paying attention to earnings from Celestica and Whirlpool. Cramer said electronics manufacturer Celestica will give insight into how a number of tech companies are doing. President Donald Trump's tariffs might bode well for home appliance maker Whirlpool, which does substantial manufacturing in the U.S., he continued. Tuesday brings reports from UnitedHealth, Boeing, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks and Visa. Cramer suggested UnitedHealth's cooperation with the government in a probe into its Medicare billing practices is a positive, even though the insurer remains "an un-investible story." Cramer said he hopes Boeing will detail its dealings with the government, and he predicted the stock will head higher. To Cramer, Procter & Gamble's business is "a question of raw costs and tariffs versus marketing muscle," but added that he thinks the dollar's weakness abroad is a tailwind for the company. Starbucks will likely reveal plans for its business in China, Cramer said, adding that he thinks the coffee chain will also report improved throughput. According to Cramer, Visa's quarter is usually met with selling because its financials are hard to understand. He said he would be a buyer on the dip. The Federal Reserve will meet on Wednesday, and Cramer said he thinks Fed Chair Jerome Powell will express the need for caution with respect to tariff-driven inflation. It's also likely Powell will say he intends to stay in his role until the end of his term next spring, Cramer added. Wednesday also brings earnings from Microsoft and Meta, and Cramer said their stock moves indicate better-than-expected results. Cramer recommended waiting to hear from Microsoft management before making a move on the stock. He said he thinks Meta will report success in advertising, specifically from social media platform Instagram. He also wondered if the company would start charging for messaging program WhatsApp, saying the new revenue stream could be a windfall. Big Tech earnings continue on Thursday, with Apple and Amazon set to report, and Cramer noted both companies stocks have been climbing steadily. While he said he still believes investors should own, not trade, Apple, he's expecting an "unexciting quarter" and a slowdown in growth from its services revenue stream. Cramer said he expects a solid quarter from Amazon, saying he thinks its business segments are performing well, namely its online retail, advertising and web services. Friday, the Labor Department will release the nonfarm payroll report, which measures employment. Cramer said it would be ideal to see continued growth in hiring and stables wages. President Donald Trump can't "hector" Powell to cut rates if wages are higher, he continued. Oil giants Chevron and Exxon Mobil will report Friday, and Cramer said he is unsure about what the latter will say. But he said he expects Chevron to raise its outlook, noting the company just completed its acquisition of Hess after winning a legal battle with Exxon over disputed oil assets. Click here to download Jim Cramer's Guide to Investing at no cost to help you build long-term wealth and invest The CNBC Investing Club Charitable Trust owns shares of Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft and Starbucks.

Pemberton's Slow Food Cycle to celebrate 20th anniversary on Aug.17
Pemberton's Slow Food Cycle to celebrate 20th anniversary on Aug.17

Hamilton Spectator

time9 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Pemberton's Slow Food Cycle to celebrate 20th anniversary on Aug.17

One of Pemberton's signature summer events is set to return for its 20th year. The Slow Food Cycle will roll through Pemberton Meadows on Sunday, Aug. 17, inviting cyclists to join in on a 40-kilometre round-trip while stopping at farms and small businesses along the way to purchase local produce, crafts and prepared food. 'There's nothing else quite like it,' said Andy Meeker, president of Tourism Pemberton in a release. 'It's a unique day where you can meet the people who grow your food, taste the flavours of the valley and enjoy the open road with your friends and family. We're thrilled to celebrate 20 years of this incredible community tradition.' The event, originally founded in 2005 by local farmers Anna Helmer and Lisa Richardson, has grown over two decades. Slow Food Cycle now regularly draws thousands of participants—an estimated 75 per cent of whom travel in from outside the region. 'It's heartening to see people still so eager to enjoy the simple joy of biking through farmland,' Helmer said in the release. 'We always knew it was a winning combination.' The event runs annually on the third Sunday in August and follows a single route north along Pemberton Meadows Road to the foot of the Hurley Forest Service Road. Cyclists are invited to stop at farms and vendors along the way—many of which offer fresh produce, handmade goods, prepared meals and live music. The road will be closed to most motor vehicle traffic. The event is not a race. Tourism Pemberton executive director Christine Raymond previously described it as 'a leisurely exploration.' She said its success has inspired similar events in B.C. and abroad. 'When it started, founding farmers [Helmer and Richardson] wanted people to know where their food was coming from and to have conversations with farmers,' Raymond said in a June interview. 'They just created this little event that sparked up and became a signature event.' While often celebrated for its community atmosphere, the event also plays a role in tourism and farmland advocacy. Organizers say it helps promote the value of preserving agricultural land in the Pemberton Valley and encourages farm-direct sales. The event was voted 'Pemberton's Favourite' in 2023, despite being cancelled due to wildfire smoke and access concerns. Tickets are now available at a 50-per-cent discount through . The early-bird rate applies to tickets purchased before Aug. 16. Updates are available via the event's Instagram page, @slowfoodcyclesunday. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Some Republicans push to undo gambling tax hike they passed in Trump's megabill
Some Republicans push to undo gambling tax hike they passed in Trump's megabill

NBC News

time9 hours ago

  • NBC News

Some Republicans push to undo gambling tax hike they passed in Trump's megabill

WASHINGTON — Some top Republicans are regretting that they inserted a tax hike on gamblers into President Donald Trump's megabill, with several lawmakers who supported the legislation now calling for rolling back that policy. Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., the chair of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, told NBC News that the provision was a 'mistake' and needs to be undone. 'It was definitely not something that we did in the House. I don't understand why the Senate decided to do something like that,' Smith said in a brief interview Wednesday. 'And so it is definitely a provision that — I'm interested in making sure that we fix the Senate's mistake.' The new law cuts the tax deduction on 'wagering losses' from 100% to 90% of losses starting in 2026, disrupting the current dynamic where bettors can offset losses with gains and pay taxes only on net earnings. The new policy could tax gamblers even in years where they break even or net-out losses. For instance, a bettor who wins $100,000 and loses $100,000 in the same year would be stuck with a taxable income of $10,000. 'It would be potentially catastrophic for the industry as it would disproportionately affect high volume gamblers,' said Jack Andrews, the professional sports bettor who goes by that alias. 'Those high volume players are the lifeblood of most casinos,' he added. 'If they realize they could lose, and still have taxable income to pay that they didn't make, they'll stop playing. Or find ways to play that don't generate a paper trail.' Andrews said the new law 'could result in players losing money gambling, but still owing taxes on 'income' they didn't make.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the gambling tax change will raise $1.1 billion over a decade. At least a couple of senators who supported the megabill — which passed with only GOP votes — want to undo the gambling tax. Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Bill Hagerty of Tennessee have signed on to legislation to roll it back, alongside Nevada's two Democratic senators, Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen. The bill is called the Facilitating Useful Loss Limitations to Help Our Unique Service Economy Act, or the FULL HOUSE Act. 'It's unfair. It makes no sense,' Cruz, who plays poker in his spare time, said in an interview of the tax provision. 'The income tax is designed to tax actual income,' he said. 'For example, playing poker for profession — not allowing them to deduct their losses means they're paying taxes not on their actual income.' 'I think we should fix it,' he added. Cruz said most Republicans voted to pass the gambling tax change without knowing about it, a damning indictment of the legislative process for the bill. 'Nobody really takes responsibility for introducing it,' Cruz said. 'None of us knew about it. It's a very big, beautiful bill, and so there are lots of provisions there that at the end, things were moving very fast. I don't know of anyone who was aware of the provision at the time it passed.' The provision was introduced in the mid-June version of the bill, with Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, overseeing the tax portion as chair of the Senate Finance Committee. And he, too, is open to revisiting it. 'Senator Crapo is open to receiving feedback from affected stakeholders and learning more about industry reporting and compliance,' a Crapo spokesperson said. 'To comply with the rules of reconciliation, every provision from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act needed to be modified to create a budgetary effect. In order to retain the gambling loss provision, it was changed to 90 percent,' the spokesperson added. 'While the committee heard from gaming associations on other provisions after text was released on June 16th, there were no concerns raised with lowering the threshold.' The blowback from bettors has since grown since Trump signed the bill into law on July 4, and Democrats have added it to their list of grievances with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'Republicans' hastily put-together bill is full of provisions that are completely counterproductive and harmful to Americans. The provision limiting the wagering loss deduction will have a negative impact on Nevada, and it's one of the many reasons I voted no,' Cortez Masto, the author of the FULL HOUSE Act. On July 10, she sought unanimous consent on the Senate floor to pass the legislation but was met with an objection from Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., which prevented speedy passage. Her office said she will 'continue to explore all options available to restore the 100% dedication for gambling losses and protect Nevada's gaming and hospitality industries.' If the tax change isn't undone, it will come as a shock to some bettors, as 'many of them wouldn't realize this until they do their 2026 taxes, which would be early 2027,' Andrews said. But reversing it won't be so easy. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., poured cold water on the proposals from some Republicans to roll back parts of the bill. Asked by NBC News on Tuesday whether measures offered by his colleagues to undo the Medicaid cuts and gambling tax were going to succeed, Thune said flatly, 'No.' 'There are members out there who are saying, we'd like to do this or that differently. That's always the case,' Thune said. 'This was a big piece of legislation that had a lot of moving parts. Not everybody got everything they wanted, but at the end of the day, it's historic in its breadth and the things that it addresses.' The White House didn't immediately return a message seeking comment on whether Trump is open to revisiting the provision. Other Republicans say they're unfamiliar with the industry blowback to the gamblers' tax change. 'I honestly, frankly, haven't had a chance to look at it. So I don't even know what they're talking about,' Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., the second ranking Republican on Ways and Means, said. On the other hand, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, sounded surprised by how much attention the issue is getting. 'Why do so many people care about the gamblers tax?' he quipped. 'I'm kind of agnostic. I don't, frankly, understand why it's such a big deal. But happy to look at anything they propose.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store