logo
What does it mean IDF's laser will be fully deployed within four months?

What does it mean IDF's laser will be fully deployed within four months?

Yahoo20-07-2025
Israel's enemies have known that 85%-95% of their short-range rockets would be shot down by Iron Dome. But they also knew some would get through.
In dual revelations on May 28 and June 4, the IDF and Rafael said they have developed three laser platforms to use for air defense, and that one of the platforms shot down about 40 Hezbollah drones last fall.
They also confirmed earlier announcements that the laser would be fully and regularly deployed by the end of 2025, which is now only four months away.
How will this change Israeli security and life on the home front? There are several aspects that need to be addressed to answer that question. The most important one, cost, has been the most covered so far.
Iron Dome interceptors currently cost Israel $40,000 to $100,000. Before the war, Hamas spent an estimated $300 to $800 on its cheaper rockets, with costs less well-known regarding some of its better rockets.
Iron Beam, Iron Beam M (mobile), and Lite Beam cost almost nothing, since each time they fire, it is equivalent in many ways to turning on a light with a brief burst of electricity.
Less covered has been how Israeli lasers will project greater power to intimidate enemies from even bothering to fire short-range rockets and drones.
These lasers can shoot down threatening projectiles much faster and earlier in their trajectory, because a laser moves basically at the speed of light. They can also fire multiple laser beams at once to provide wider defense coverage than one defensive shot by Iron Dome.
How motivated will a Hamas or Hezbollah terrorist be to keep firing rockets when he sees the rocket shot down just over his head shortly after it leaves its launcher and long before it gets into any position of being able to be a threat?
Israel's enemies have known that 85%-95% of their short-range rockets would be shot down by Iron Dome. But they also knew some would get through, and they got to watch their rockets sail off into the distance, with the moment they were shot down usually being too far off for them to see.
This change of hitting the threatening rocket or drone much earlier in their trajectory could also extraordinarily change life on the home front.
Until now, as soon as Israel's enemies' rockets lifted off, IDF warning sirens had to go off in a number of areas to give civilians enough time to reach safe rooms and bomb shelters should the rocket succeed at striking a residential area.
If the lasers can shoot down the rockets earlier in their trajectory, there may be no need to activate the air-raid sirens.
The psychological war, in which Israel's enemies feel they have accomplished something by getting two million Israelis to run into safe areas in the middle of the night, even if they do not kill anyone, could be removed, thereby decreasing the motivation for firing such rockets.
Terrorist organizations have been shown to adapt
But Hezbollah and Hamas have shown they can learn and adapt. After all, the tunnel, rocket, and drone threats were all adaptations to use asymmetric, cheap weapons against Israel in areas where the Jewish state's defenses were costlier and less hermetic. One alternative would be for these groups to switch to the Iranian and Houthi ballistic-missile threat.
Their problem would be that ballistic missiles are a much more complex operation to build, set up to fire, train firing teams, conceal before firing, and pay for. But if they can gain ballistic missiles, the lasers would likely still be useless for now, with a range limited to about 10 kilometers and focused on following much slower targets.
The Arrow 2 and 3 missile-defense systems shoot down ballistic missiles much higher in the Earth's atmosphere, a place where lasers are not even close to reaching. Lasers lose their intensity over distance, especially if they have to travel through clouds and other inclement weather.
No one knows how long it will take to provide lasers that can shoot down long-range threats such as ballistic missiles, but no one is even really working on that yet. Given how long it took to develop Iron Beam, a 10-year waiting period could be a realistic prediction, and a lot can change in war and security in 10 years.
There is another time factor that could delay Iron Beam's effectiveness.
Each shot is cheap, but producing enough laser batteries for it to be used on a large-scale basis, like Iron Dome, will be very expensive.
Iron Dome was first deployed in 2011, but there was a limited number of batteries. The real number is classified, but over time, public reports have placed the number of Iron Dome batteries as high as 12.
How long will it take to produce enough Iron Beam batteries to cover what 12 Iron Dome batteries can cover? While it will probably take less than 10 years, it will also probably take more than a year or two.
Make no mistake, the Iron Beam is a game changer, but it still may take some time for that change to be fully felt.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Houthis Vow to Step Up Shipping Attacks to Press Israel on Gaza
Houthis Vow to Step Up Shipping Attacks to Press Israel on Gaza

Bloomberg

time4 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Houthis Vow to Step Up Shipping Attacks to Press Israel on Gaza

Houthi militants pledged to target ships of any company that deals with Israeli ports, escalating their military operations in a bid to increase pressure on Israel to further ease restrictions on the hunger-ravaged Gaza Strip. The targeted ships will be attacked 'in any location within the reach of our armed forces,' a spokesman for the Iranian-backed group, Yahya Saree, said in televised comments. 'All our military operations will be ceased immediately upon the cessation of aggression against Gaza and the lifting of the blockade.'

Letters to the Editor: Readers call on U.S. to help starving Gazans: 'We need to be better than this'
Letters to the Editor: Readers call on U.S. to help starving Gazans: 'We need to be better than this'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: Readers call on U.S. to help starving Gazans: 'We need to be better than this'

To the editor: It is agonizing to witness the mass malnutrition and starvation in Gaza, and the fact that our own government is enabling this horror shames our country ('Israel is pushing Gaza into starvation, global aid groups say,' July 24). More than 165 major international charities have called for an end to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group, backed by Israel and the U.S., requires that starving people travel long distances to aid hubs where there are near-daily reports of deadly shootings by Israeli forces. Since the start of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, at least 1,000 Gazans have been killed while trying to get food, according to the latest numbers from the U.N. human rights office. Israel blames Hamas for this travesty, but in fact, it is Israel that could call off its forces immediately. The U.S. must put pressure on Israel to end the blockade, reject the militarization of aid distribution and demand an immediate ceasefire. Betty Guthrie, Portola Valley, Calif. .. To the editor: Why are our American dollars being used to contribute to the malnutrition and deaths of civilians and children in Gaza? It is not right and needs to end. We can help Israel most by helping to end this suffering now. We need to be better than this. George Saade, Pico Rivera .. To the editor: Little babies and young children starving. The photos are gut-wrenching. With all of the food and food waste in this world, there should be no excuse for this. Maybe the excuse is politics — the gift that keeps on giving. Georgette Rieck, Santa Monica This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword

Israeli aid airdrop injures Palestinians in north Gaza; Hamas condemns move
Israeli aid airdrop injures Palestinians in north Gaza; Hamas condemns move

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Israeli aid airdrop injures Palestinians in north Gaza; Hamas condemns move

At least 11 Palestinians have been injured due to aid airdrops in northern Gaza as one of the pallets fell directly on tents where displaced people are living, medical sources say. The Israeli military on Saturday announced that it 'carried out an airdrop of humanitarian aid as part of the ongoing efforts to allow and facilitate the entry of aid into the Gaza Strip'. But local sources in Gaza told Al Jazeera some of the aid pallets hit tents near al-Rasheed Road, a main road that runs along the coast of the enclave from north to south. Many other pallets were dropped in areas far from the displacement sites in northern Gaza and close to where the Israeli military is stationed. Meanwhile, after months of international pressure, the Israeli military on Sunday began a daily 'tactical pause' of its operations in parts of Gaza and established new aid Palestinian group Hamas said it considers Israel's airdrop operations and limited humanitarian corridors in Gaza a 'symbolic, deceptive move aimed at whitewashing its image before the world'. In a statement on Sunday, Hamas said Israel is 'deflecting international demands to lift the siege and end the starvation campaign against Palestinians', calling it part of 'a calculated policy to manage famine, impose coercive realities, and subject civilians to danger and humiliation'. 'The arrival of food and medicine to Gaza is not a favour, it is a natural right and an urgent necessity to stop the catastrophe imposed by the Nazi-like occupation,' Hamas said. Hamas also held Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'directly responsible' for policies that have led to mass civilian deaths, calling his handling of aid and the starvation deaths of Palestinians 'clear-cut war crimes'. Al Jazeera's Hani Mahmoud, reporting from Gaza City, said airdrops carried out in the past in Gaza 'were not effective, they did not reach enough people, let alone the chaos and violence they have caused'. 'The airdrops confirm what we have reported in the past – that Gaza has turned into a testing lab and the Israeli military is experimenting with every attack, every policy,' he agencies said they are deeply sceptical that airdrops could deliver enough food safely to tackle a deepening hunger crisis facing Gaza's more than two million inhabitants while also calling it a 'grotesque distraction'. A number of Western and Arab governments carried out airdrops in Gaza in 2024 when aid deliveries by land also faced Israeli restrictions, but many in the humanitarian community consider them ineffective. 'Airdrops will not reverse the deepening starvation,' Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, said on Saturday. 'They are expensive, inefficient and can even kill starving civilians.' But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer backed the idea last week, promising to work with Jordan to restart airdrops. The United Arab Emirates also said it would resume airdrops 'immediately'. The humanitarian situation in Gaza has gravely deteriorated in recent days, and more than 100 NGOs warned that 'mass starvation' was spreading in Gaza. Israel's military claims it does not limit the number of aid trucks going into Gaza and alleges that UN agencies and relief groups are not collecting aid once it is inside the territory. But humanitarian organisations accuse the army of imposing excessive restrictions while tightly controlling road access within Gaza. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store