Adult social care vacancies down but domestic recruitment still ‘challenging'
The Government has previously pledged to 'end the reliance on overseas recruitment' but Skills for Care's latest report has said there must be a focus on 'how we attract and keep more people domestically'.
In the most recent year alone, the twelve months to March, the number of posts filled by British nationals fell by 30,000, the organisation, which is the strategic workforce development and planning body for adult social care in England, said.
The organisation measures posts filled rather than the number of people, because a person might hold more than one post and roles might also be shared.
In rules which came into effect last week, new applications for care workers and senior care workers under the skilled worker visa were closed, as part of Government efforts in 'restoring control over the immigration system'.
In April the Government implemented new rules saying that care providers would have to prove they had attempted to recruit a worker from within England, before looking overseas.
The latest Skills for Care report said domestic recruitment 'remains challenging for the sector' and that the new immigration rules from July 'will make it more challenging for the sector to continue to grow in line with demand'.
The organisation re-stated its previous projection that an extra 470,000 people will need to be employed in the sector by 2040 to meet the needs of a growing older population.
The report said: 'A substantial increase in recruitment and retention of staff with a British nationality would likely be required to achieve this level of growth.'
Under the previous Conservative government, a ban on international care workers bringing dependants to the UK led to a sharp drop in health and care visas in the months after the measure came in.
The latest Skills for Care report said an estimated 50,000 people arrived in the UK in 2024/25 to start direct care-providing roles in the independent sector, down from 105,000 the previous year.
Of the 50,000 recruited internationally, an estimated 10,000 came on a health and care worker visa, while the rest came on other routes, potentially including student visas and family members of people arriving in the UK on other visa types.
Overall, the number of adult social care posts filled between 2023/24 and 2024/25 rose by 52,000 to 1.6 million.
The vacancy rate has also fallen to 7.0%, with 111,000 vacant posts on any given day in the year to March.
This is down from an 8.3% vacancy rate in the year to March 2024, when there were 126,000 vacant posts on any given day.
The vacancy rate hit a high of 152,000 vacant posts a day in the 12 months to March 2022.
Oonagh Smyth, Skills for Care's chief executive, said while the falling vacancy rate is 'encouraging', the sector 'can't afford to be complacent'.
She said: 'We need to protect ourselves from the wild swings in vacancy rates driven by the wider economic picture.
'It's important to recognise that, while the vacancy rate in social care has reduced, it's still three times that of the wider economy.'
She urged investment in 'stable recruitment and retention' and efforts to make roles 'more attractive to the domestic workforce over the long term' including through development opportunities, improving the quality of roles and supporting positive cultures within organisations.
She added: 'We know there's lots more to do, though. Everyone, from Government to care providers, from regulators to frontline staff, has a role to play in building the workforce we need to deliver the best possible care and support for the people in our communities who draw on local services.'
The Government has been contacted for comment.
The Social Care Institute for Excellence said the drop in the vacancy rate was a 'cause for optimism' but the system remained 'precariously dependent' on overseas workers.
Chief executive Kathryn Marsden said: 'This overreliance is not a sustainable strategy and it leaves the entire care system vulnerable to policy changes and political headwinds beyond its control.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave
For the 25 years up to 1997, according to the Centre for Policy Studies, net migration was 68,000. In the 25 years that followed, however, that figure shot up to nearly 6 million. Our immigration system is out of control. It isn't just about the number of people who've come here, unsustainable though that is. Our migration system has also been highly un-selective. The vast majority of those who've arrived in the last few years haven't come to work, and didn't need to be earning a particular salary – or often anything at all – to get their visa. Even those who did come here to work are often employed in low-paid jobs, and won't be paying enough in tax to account for the pressure that they put on public services, or the costs that they'll incur later in life. According to the researcher Karl Williams, 72 per cent of those who came as 'skilled workers' in 2022-23 earned below the UK average salary, with 54 percent likely earning less than half of that average. But after just five years here, most of these people will qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain, or ILR. With ILR, migrants can access welfare, social housing, and free healthcare, as well as stay permanently in the UK and apply for citizenship. On average, the Government spends £34,000 looking after somebody in the last year of their life. Only a small minority of recent migrants will pay enough in tax to cover those costs over the entire time that they're here – let alone to cover the cost of the benefits and services that they and their family will use over their lifetimes. It's going to cost us hundreds of billions of pounds. We simply can't afford it. But it can be fixed. Earlier this year, the Conservatives proposed a plan to reform our immigration system, including by introducing a hard cap on visas and stopping ILR from entitling people to state support. We also proposed extending the qualifying period from five years to ten. This wouldn't just mean that it takes longer for migrants to be eligible for ILR status. It would also give us an opportunity to review the visas of those who are already here. Those who come to Britain from abroad must be able to support themselves, and must be earning enough to contribute more in tax than they will cost over their lifetime. If they can't, their visa must not be renewed, and they must leave. The Government voted against that plan, but they've committed to a consultation on ILR in the autumn. We must use that opportunity to push them not just to extend the qualifying period for ILR, including for those who are already here, but also to refuse to reissue visas to those who won't end up contributing enough. The era of mass migration has been a disaster. People can see it in their rising rents, in the pressure on their public services, and in their increasingly divided communities. Most disgracefully of all, the British people have voted to avert that disaster, time and time again. Government after government has failed to heed their warning. It's a complete scandal, and it's probably the single biggest reason why trust in our political system is in such short supply. Rebuilding that trust means building a migration system that's limited and selective – but it also means undoing the harm that has already been done. We can still avert the coming disaster around ILR, and we must.
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Former UK PM Johnson rejects China's bullying of Taiwan, calls for deeper ties with West
TAIPEI, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Former British prime minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday that Taiwan did not deserve to be bullied by China and urged the West to build economic and political relations with Taipei in the face of Beijing's campaign against the democratic island. Johnson is the third former British prime minister to visit Taiwan, after Liz Truss in 2023 and Margaret Thatcher in the 1990s, and his trip comes at a time when Britain and China are seeking to further stabilise ties as Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to visit Beijing later this year. Britain, like most countries, has no formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan but the two governments have close economic and culture exchanges. Beijing has in recent years ramped up military and diplomatic pressure campaigns against Taiwan, including daily military activities near the island, to assert territorial claims the government in Taipei strongly rejects. "In very difficult and intense times, this is the moment for all western countries to build economic and political relations with Taiwan, not to tiptoe away from Taiwan at the pressure from any other country," Johnson told Taiwan President Lai Ching-te in the presidential office in Taipei. "There's absolutely no case for the current Chinese bullying of Taiwan. This is a free, peaceful society. It does not deserve to be intimidated in this way. There's no point in it and I hope it stops as soon as possible," Johnson said in video footage by Lai's office. China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Beijing has previously condemned visits by British lawmakers to Taiwan for what it calls interference in China's internal affairs. Johnson was invited to deliver a speech at a security forum by Taipei-based think tank, the Prospect Foundation, which was also attended by Lai earlier on Tuesday. At the forum, Lai vowed to build a "democratic supply chain" with allies by deepening economic cooperation and said he would boost Taiwan's defence spending to more than 3% of its GDP next year. "I'm confident that if democracies can join hands in creating more robust, more resilient global democratic supply chains, we can spur even more economic prosperity and further consolidate our democracy," Lai said. A British Royal Navy patrol vessel sailed through the sensitive Taiwan Strait in June.
Fashion United
an hour ago
- Fashion United
India-UK FTA: Balancing trade dynamics amid US tariff concerns
The highly anticipated Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the UK and India has been officially signed, promising to significantly reshape the trade landscape for both nations. The agreement, signed in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer, is expected to increase annual trade by 34.53 billion dollars and aims to double bilateral trade to 120 billion dollars by 2030. A key feature of the pact is the elimination of import duties on major Indian export goods, including apparel, leather goods, and footwear. A game-changer for India's apparel sector The removal of tariffs, which typically range from 8-12 percent, is set to make Indian apparel and home textiles more competitive and affordable in the UK. This will particularly benefit exporters in major hubs like Ludhiana, Surat, and Tirupur. The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) vice chairman, A. Sakthivel, hailed the agreement as a historic achievement, projecting that India's ready-made garment (RMG) exports to the UK will more than double from the current 1.45 billion dollars to 3.25 billion dollars in the near future. Knitwear exports alone are expected to surge from 0.8 billion dollars to nearly 2 billion dollars, accounting for roughly 70 percent of total RMG exports to the UK. Rajeev Gupta, joint managing director of RSWM Ltd, echoed this sentiment, stating that the FTA is a "game-changing shift" that removes the 9-12 percent tariff disadvantage, allowing Indian exporters to compete directly with zero-duty countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan. He added that the agreement reflects a growing trust in India's manufacturing capabilities and will lay the groundwork for export growth, innovation, and greater integration with global fashion supply chains. The FTA also includes provisions for digital, paperless trade and the mutual acceptance of safety and hygiene standards, which will streamline trade processes and guarantee product quality. Balancing global trade dynamics The signing of the India-UK FTA comes at a crucial time, as New Delhi navigates complex trade relations with other major partners. The agreement stands in stark contrast to the current dynamic with the U.S., where a recent tariff threat has created a layer of uncertainty for Indian exporters. President Donald Trump has been vocal about India's high tariffs, suggesting a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods and an "unspecified penalty" for its relationship with Russia. Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData, and Dr. Sheng Lu of the University of Delaware, have both expressed concern that this U.S. tariff threat could make India less competitive as a manufacturing hub and potentially hinder new commitments from U.S. fashion companies. However, the India-UK FTA provides a counterbalance to this uncertainty. As Rajeev Gupta of RSWM Ltd. commented, "The 25% tariff by the U.S. comes as a temporary setback... Our Free Trade Agreement with the UK opens up varied opportunities and is a welcoming move for the industry." New opportunities and challenges for both sides The FTA promises benefits for both Indian and British consumers and businesses. For Indian buyers, the agreement means lower prices on British footwear brands like Clarks and Dr. Martens, and on high-end fashion houses such as Burberry and Ted Baker. This increased affordability is expected to drive new fashion trends and expand the market for British goods in India. For Indian brands, the FTA "unlocks a powerful runway... to export both product and purpose," said Rakesh Bali, senior vice president and head of marketing at Reliance Industries Limited. He highlighted the opportunity for Indian fashion and lifestyle brands to launch in the UK with a strong sustainability story, noting that this "can catalyse business, product and knowledge exchange" between the two nations. Bali also pointed out a key challenge for Indian exporters, stating that "the key challenge will be aligning with the UK's high expectations around ESG, circularity, and transparency." He stressed that while cost and capacity are strengths, "long-term success will require embedding sustainability into brand and product DNA." For UK businesses entering the Indian market, Bali said they will need to adapt to regional consumer nuances and evolving sustainability preferences. He explained that "Indian consumers, especially Gen Z and Millennials, are increasingly drawn to eco-conscious, craft-based brands with a strong cultural storytelling." The India-UK FTA is seen as a comprehensive economic enabler that will not only boost trade in key sectors but also foster greater market access, regulatory cooperation, and job creation in both nations.
