
Can Rachel Reeves be trusted not to bring in a wealth tax?
Reeves will almost certainly have to break her election pledge not to raise any of the three main taxes
The spin could hardly be clearer. Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader who in many ways still speaks for the soul of the party, may have backed a wealth tax, suggesting a 2 per cent annual levy on fortunes over £10 million, and it may have been backed by an increasing number of MPs. Even so, the Chancellor is standing firm. She is not going to go anywhere near it. It will damage the economy too much, and countries such France, Ireland and Denmark have tried wealth taxes and quickly concluded that they don't work. The only reason Reeves is not ruling it out in public, apparently, is because taxes such as a capital gains tax, which could be construed as a levy on wealth, may go up, and she doesn't want to be boxed in. The better-off can breathe a sigh of relief. It is not going to happen.
But why would anyone believe Reeves any more? She told us she was going to scrap the winter fuel allowance, but reversed that after losing a by-election. She told us she was going to reform welfare, but caved in to pressure from the left of her party. She told us she was not going to raise taxes on 'working people' but raised them on employer's National Insurance instead, which amounts to the same thing. And she told us her tax rises last autumn would not be repeated, but now it is clear she will raise them again in October. The list goes on and on. Reeves shamelessly breaks every promise she makes. It is hard to understand why this one will be any different.
With the fiscal mess getting worse and worse, Reeves will almost certainly have to break her election pledge not to raise any of the three main taxes. A 2 per cent increase in either the basic rate of income tax or VAT is the only real way to bring in the money she needs. And yet, with ordinary working people forced to pay more, surely the left will demand a wealth tax in the interests of 'fairness' and 'social justice'? Against that backdrop, it may be the only way to hold the party together. Reeves can spend the summer briefing that is not going to happen – but she is no more likely to keep that promise than any of the others.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
25 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire County Council 'key decisions' not published
Monmouthshire County Council agreed a change to its constitution in April that 'key decisions' made by council officers be published on the authority's website. The intention is doing so would allow councillors outside of the Labour-led cabinet to call them in for review if necessary. But Conservative member for Shirenewton, Cllr Louise Brown, questioned if that has happened. She told the full council's July meeting: 'I haven't seen any key decisions published. There must be some?'. She asked how the council will ensure the decisions are published and Labour cabinet member Councillor Angela Sandles said the decisions have to be published on the council website within two days of them being taken and they can't be implemented for five days to allow them to be called in. But the Magor East and Undy councillor said she didn't know the answer as to why seemingly no decisions have been published and said she would get back to Cllr Brown. Cllr Sandles, also in response to Cllr Brown, confirmed the council is working to 'improve' its forward planner. There has been repeated criticism over some decisions not being included on the planner and Cllr Sandles said the intention is to mark which have already been listed to go before a scrutiny committee so councillors and committee chairs can also see which others they may want to discuss.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lloyds boss warns Reeves against raising bank taxes amid growth mission
The boss of Lloyds has warned Rachel Reeves against raising bank taxes in her autumn Budget, saying it would be at odds with the Government's plans to drive economic growth. It comes as the banking giant revealed its earnings beat expectations for the first half of 2025, with both customer lending and savings balances growing. Charlie Nunn, the group's chief executive, said raising taxes on banks is a 'political decision' and the group has had 'no engagement' with the Government about it. But he highlighted the Chancellor's Mansion House speech last week where she told of 'the need for a stronger economy and needing a strong financial services sector'. Mr Nunn said: 'We therefore believe that's the important thing to focus on and obviously, therefore, wouldn't be consistent with tax rises.' Ms Reeves is facing pressure over the UK's public finances following higher-than-expected Government borrowing figures last month, raising some expectations that she could hike taxes in her autumn Budget. Mr Nunn added: 'We already have the highest tax regime on the financial services sector of any major economy… we're completely comfortable with that. 'But it is important when you look at the competitiveness of the City of London and the financial services sector that we remain a competitive tax regime.' The bank boss also welcomed Ms Reeves's plans to loosen regulation in the sector, which she described as a 'boot on the neck of businesses' in many areas. Referring to rules around retail investment, Mr Nunn said: 'We really believe that regulation over the last 15 years has constrained our ability to provide advice to those that most need it.' He also said 'now is the right time' to look at potentially scrapping the bank ring-fencing regime, which requires banks to separate their retail from their investment banking activities. Ms Reeves announced plans to reform the system as part of wider measures. Meanwhile, the banking group – which incorporates Lloyds Bank, Halifax and Bank of Scotland – reported a pre-tax profit of £3.5 billion for the first six months of the year. This was 5% higher than a year ago, and ahead of the £3.2 billion that analysts had been expecting. Lloyds said total lending to customers increased by £11.9 billion over the period, or 3%, driven by UK mortgages with some 33,000 first-time buyers borrowing on a home. Customer deposits also grew by £11.2 billion, or 2%, following a strong season for ISAs, while more people moved money out of current accounts and into savings. Higher levels of saving partly reflected consumers trying to lock in higher savings rates before they come down, Mr Nunn said. But it also comes off the back of wage growth, and many people choosing to save surplus cash rather than spending more on nonessential items. 'There's still obviously customers who are really actively managing their finances and who are struggling to make ends meet,' he said. 'But year-on-year, all of those stats are looking slightly healthier, less people are worried a little bit about what's going on, and less people are looking to shop around.' He said those factors could lead to a 'more positive outlook than we're currently forecasting'. Economic forecasts from the bank show a 'modest deterioration' in the outlook, with gross domestic product (GDP) growing more slowly than previously thought. It also predicts the UK's unemployment rate rising to peak at 5% next year.


Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Urgent warning for thousands of drivers with cars made between these years
The car tax warning has been issued to drivers and road users who own a vehicle between a certain period of time. Here's what you need to know about the tax increase Motorists with vehicles manufactured between 2001 and 2017 have been issued with an urgent warning. A car tax alert has been sent out to drivers and road users following changes to Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) under the Labour government. Older motors, including contemporary classics registered between 1 March 2001 and 31 March 2017, remain subject to the emissions-based system, with those producing under 100g/km still exempt from charges, whilst everyone else faces a £10 hike from 2024 rates Car insurance firm Hagerty noted: "That means owners of older cars emitting more than 255g/km of CO2 will pay £735 a year for the privilege of driving on Britain's beautifully-maintained road network. Ahem." "Cars registered before 1 March 2001, that were still younger than 40 years old on 1 January 2025, are charged based on engine capacity. That's £210 a year for those under 1,549cc and £345 for anything above." It explained: "The Government considers any car older than those to be a "historic vehicle" and is therefore exempt from paying road tax, or, indeed, being required to have an annual MOT test." Vehicles registered afterwards operate under a separate framework, reports Birmingham Live. During their inaugural registration year, owners must pay a "showroom tax" calculated on the motor's CO2 output. John Cassidy, managing director of sales at Close Brothers Motor Finance, suggests certain purchasers are already deterred by insufficient battery charging networks for electric vehicles. "Applying VED to EVs provides one less incentive for buyers to make the switch," he says. Lorna Macpherson, a motor finance expert at Ocean Finance, which offers car loans, suggests that while the changes to the tax regime do make cleaner cars cheaper to run, drivers may be unable to switch due to the escalating cost of motoring. "For petrol and diesel cars, an increase in VED means higher running costs for owners, making newer, more efficient cars even more attractive," she says. "But with rising interest rates on car finance and the general cost of living crisis, many will hold on to their current vehicles for longer rather than upgrading." This has become concerning since the DVLA raised VED rates on April 1 for owners of petrol, diesel and electric vehicles, which led to significant price increases for some drivers. Motorists can quickly find out the engine size (cc), power (kW) and CO2 (g/km) of their vehicle using free online sites such as WeBuyAnyCar's number plate checker.