Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov says NATO buildup won't have 'any significant effect' on Russia
Moscow: NATO's recent decision to ramp up military spending will not significantly impact Russia's security, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Thursday, according to a report by Russia Today.
Speaking at a press conference, Lavrov dismissed the West's claim of a Russian threat as unfounded and reiterated Moscow's openness to peace talks if the core issues behind the Ukraine conflict are addressed. His remarks came after the NATO summit in The Hague, where member states pledged to increase defense expenditure to 5% of GDP by 2035, citing the "long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security."
US President Donald Trump described the agreement as a "monumental win," having long urged European allies to contribute more to their defense.
Responding to a question on whether Russia views the NATO buildup as a threat, Lavrov stated, "I don't think it will have any significant effect." He added, "We know what goals we are pursuing; we don't hide them, we state them openly, and they are absolutely legitimate in terms of any interpretation of the UN Charter and international law. We know by what means we will always ensure these goals."
RT reported that Moscow has consistently denied any plans to attack NATO countries, calling such accusations "nonsense" used by Western officials to justify increased military budgets.
Lavrov also said Russia remains willing to engage in dialogue if NATO addresses root concerns, including its expansion toward Russia's borders and continued military support for Ukraine's NATO ambitions.
According to RT, the European Commission earlier this month approved the allocation of approximately Euro 335 billion in pandemic recovery funds for military purposes. In May, it introduced a Euro 150 billion debt facility to support defense initiatives. Ukraine is also allowed access to these resources alongside EU member states.
Moscow has condemned these developments as evidence of NATO's sustained hostility. RT noted that President Vladimir Putin has accused the alliance of fabricating threats to manipulate public sentiment and escalate an arms race.
At the summit, when asked what NATO's warnings of a Russian threat were based on, Secretary General Mark Rutte reportedly failed to cite any specific intelligence assessments, instead pointing to broad concerns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
17 hours ago
- Observer
Supreme Leader says Iran would strike back if attacked again
DUBAI: Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday, in his first televised remarks since a ceasefire was reached between Iran and Israel. Khamenei, 86, claimed victory after 12 days of war, culminating in an Iranian attack on the largest US base in the region, located in Qatar, after Washington joined the Israeli strikes. In his pre-recorded remarks, aired on state television, Khamenei promised that Iran would not surrender despite US President Donald Trump's calls. "The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than surrender... such an event will never happen," Khamenei said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made," he added. Trump said "sure" on Wednesday when asked if the United States would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme. Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms. Khamenei said the US "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system. "The US directly entered the war as it felt that if it did not get involved, the Zionist regime (Israel) would be fully destroyed. It entered the war to save it," he said. "The US attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The US president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added. Trump said over the weekend that the US deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme. However, this appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment from one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared "a historic victory" on Tuesday, after the fragile ceasefire took effect, saying Israel had achieved its goal of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat. Shortly after Khamenei's speech, Netanyahu posted a message with a picture of himself and Trump holding hands with the message: "We will continue to work together to defeat our common enemies." Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend with more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. - Reuters
Observer
17 hours ago
- Observer
China, US ease trade restrictions after deal
China and the United States have agreed to ease some trade restrictions, according to statements from both sides. China's Ministry of Commerce announced on Friday that it will review and approve applications for the export of 'controlled goods' that comply with regulations, while the US would lift a series of 'restrictive measures' against China. US President Donald Trump previously mentioned a signed agreement with China but left many questions unanswered. "We just signed with China yesterday," the Republican said at an event at the White House while talking about making deals with other countries. Trump also suggested that there could 'maybe' be a 'very big' deal with India. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later confirmed in an interview with financial news agency Bloomberg that the deal with China had been signed. He said China would supply rare earths, while the US will end its countermeasures. Since Trump launched a trade war with Beijing in February, the world's two largest economies have been locked in a tit-for-tat tariff fight that has unnerved global markets. In April, Trump increased tariffs on goods from China to as much as 145 per cent. In response, Beijing imposed counter-tariffs of 125 per cent and introduced export controls on industrially important rare earths and magnets made from them, on which China holds a near-monopoly. At the height of the tariff dispute in May, high-level delegations from both sides agreed in Geneva to significantly reduce tariffs for 90 days while continuing negotiations. It remains unclear, however, what will happen after the August deadline. The US has since imposed further restrictions on the export of important technology, such as software for computer chips and aviation components, for which China still relies on foreign manufacturers. Another meeting between the two sides, in London in early June, focused on the trade restrictions. US representatives eventually agreed with their Chinese counterparts on a reduction, although for a long time no details emerged. Observers interpreted the outcome as a return to the state of play after the Geneva meeting. Both countries' presidents were expected to approve the decisions following the London talks. Beijing's export restrictions on rare earths has put significant pressure on industries outside of China. The measures affected all countries, not just the US. In Germany's important automotive and mechanical engineering sectors, companies are concerned about the supply of important metals used in sensors or electric motors. China justified the controls by stating that the raw materials can have both civilian and military uses. Companies said it was taking along time for China's Ministry of Commerce to process applications, without certainty of approval. Concerns have grown about potential production halts. The Ministry of Commerce in Beijing has repeatedly said it has approved applications for companies in the EU and intends to speed up the process. — dpa
Times of Oman
17 hours ago
- Times of Oman
India looking at option of buying more S-400 air defence systems from Russia
New Delhi: With the S-400 air defence missile systems performing very well during Operation Sindoor, India is considering the option of buying two more squadrons of S-400 long range surface-to-air missile systems from Russia, defence sources told ANI. The sources said more systems of the S-400 are being considered due to security threats in view of the recent hostilities and the time to be taken in the development and deployment of the indigenous LRSAM programme, codenamed Project Kusha by the Defence Research and Development Organisation, with Solar Defence and Aerospace Limited and Bharat Dynamics Limited as its development and production partners. The Indian side would prefer to get S-500 air defence system which has more range than the S-400 but it would require a clearance from the top Russian leadership for its sale, they said. The S-400 performed exceptionally in Operation Sindoor taking out multiple Pakistan Air Force fighter and airborne early warning aircraft. It also managed to create a record of sorts by successfully hitting an aircraft at a range of 300 plus kilometres. India is also awaiting the delivery of two more squadrons of the five S-400 squadrons that it had ordered in a 2018 deal. The first three squadrons have already been received and operationally deployed. Just before the delivery of the fourth squadron, war broke out between Russia and Ukraine. The systems meant for India were probably used in the war. The Russian side has now assured the delivery of the remaining two systems in the next financial year. Indian defence teams have also raised the issue with the Russian side and they have given assurances to not extend the schedule further.
