
Bill 33 attacks local democracy, public education and Ontario's most vulnerable kids
'Bill 33 is a power grab, and a dangerous one,' said OPSEU/SEFPO President JP Hornick. 'This government is using isolated examples of financial mismanagement to justify sweeping changes to multiple levels of our public education system, instead of addressing the real issue—underfunding.'
If passed, Bill 33 would: make it easier for the province to take control of democratically elected local school boards; mandate School Resource Officers (i.e., police) in schools (even though such programs have previously been ended for their discriminatory and harmful impacts and do not offer the solutions needed to address increasing violence in schools); regulate which fees post-secondary students can pay (opening the door to defunding crucial student supports); and threaten access to education with new admissions policies at the province's colleges and universities, among other measures.
'These moves represent an unwarranted expansion of provincial authority. Instead of fixing the funding crisis it created, the Ford government is seizing control and calling it reform,' said Hornick. 'Our colleges, our schools, and our students deserve better.'
Public educational institutions are meant to be built on equitable access and student success, but Bill 33 will undercut these principles while failing to address the systemic issues that face Ontario's education system.
'The mandated placement of SROs outlined in this bill does nothing to support the students and staff that are dealing with unprecedented levels of violence in Ontario schools,' said Kelly Martin, President of OPSEU/SEFPO Local 330, representing workers at Simcoe County District School Board. 'We need solutions that give children access to the wrap around supports that they need to thrive – like more education workers, smaller class sizes, increased mental health supports and special education supports that meet the needs of students.'
'It is unconscionable that this government is considering mandating police in schools when the Ontario Human Rights Commission and mountains of evidence have already found that a police presence not only introduces unnecessary surveillance but also significantly impacts the mental health and education of Indigenous, black and racialized kids,' said Hornick.
The legislation reaches into post-secondary education as well. Requiring colleges and universities to adopt rigid and restrictive admissions policies – defined by the province – ignores decades of work done to widen access for underrepresented groups. Stripping away access-focused admissions pathways threatens the socio-economic mobility of entire communities.
'They want to surveil and criminalize our kids from a young age and then make it even harder to access post-secondary education later on in their academic careers. Ontario's future depends on an inclusive education system, not one that intentionally keeps people out,' said Hornick.
The province's colleges system is already in crisis, receiving the lowest level of provincial funding per student in the country. Bill 33 threatens to further destabilize campuses by adding more ministerial oversight over ancillary fees that fund student-led services like mental health supports, food banks, and student career services.
'This legislation would not only strip students of their ability to democratically decide which of these services matter to them,' said Hornick. 'It is clearly intended to defund these services in our colleges.'
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
A Bid to Undo a Colonial-Era Wrong Touches a People's Old Wounds
First it was the British. Then the Christian missionaries. Then the Indian state they had never asked to be a part of. For centuries, the Indigenous Naga people of the Indian subcontinent have struggled to preserve their culture against external forces. Now, Nagas are trying to reclaim a part of that lost history, but the process has been anything but straightforward. Their efforts to repatriate ancestral remains, which have been in a British museum for more than a century, have been 'a trigger for the Nagas,' said Dolly Kikon, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who is Naga herself. Naga society has changed immensely since those remains were taken. To contemplate their return means reckoning with those changes, and with how many of them are the result of external forces and violence. ARUNACHAL PRADESH NEPAL Longleng ASSAM NAGALAND Dimapur INDIA MANIPUR MYANMAR CHINA New Delhi INDIA Mumbai Bay of Bengal 200 mileS By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Hamilton Spectator
15 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trial for Maine man accused of illegally fishing lobster set for 2026
A Maine lobster fisher claiming Indigenous fishing rights after his 2022 arrest off the coast of Deer Island will face a two-week trial next year. Erik D. Francis, 55, of Perry, Maine, appeared by phone Thursday and confirmed court dates in April and May 2026. He faces Coastal Fisheries Protection Act charges related to allegations of fishing from a foreign vessel in New Brunswick waters. According to court documents, he was stopped on Nov. 15, 2022, off the coast of Deer Island by fisheries officials, who seized 36 lobster traps owned by Francis. Francis, who is self-represented, has claimed Indigenous fishing rights as a part of the Peskotomuhkati (Passamaquoddy) Nation, which has communities in Maine and Charlotte County. The Peskotomuhkati people, part of the Peace and Friendship Treaties of 1725, have not been federally recognized in Canada as a First Nation since 1951. In February, lawyer Paul Williams was granted intervenor status on behalf of the three Peskotomuhkati chiefs in order to protect and promote their treaty rights. In June, he had suggested they may need as many as four weeks, given four court days a week and a maximum of eight witnesses. Last week on Thursday, Williams as well as Crown prosecutors Scott Millar and Len McKay appeared by video, with Francis unreachable by phone. Williams said that they were 'trying to simplify the matter' in discussion with the Crown. McKay said they needed to see full reports from experts to decide what they did or did not want to challenge, and suggested setting a few weeks aside. Judge Kelly Ann Winchester said that two weeks had been selected from April 27 to May 1 and May 4 to May 8 in 2026, with a pre-trial conference in February. Williams and the Crown agreed, with Francis needing to confirm the dates. On Thursday this week, Francis apologized for missing the earlier hearing, saying there was a family emergency and he was out of cellphone service. He confirmed that the trial dates worked for him, and Winchester said he would have to appear in person. Francis is also facing a trial in December on Coastal Fisheries Protection Act charges related to a second incident Sept. 20, 2023, of unlawfully fishing for lobster in a foreign vessel and obstructing a fisheries officer along with Erik S. Francis, 28, of Perry, Maine, and Tyler Francis, 26, of Herrington, Maine. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Ecuador joins regional push to control NGO funding
Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa has introduced a bill in the National Assembly to regulate the funding and activities of non-governmental organizations, particularly those that receive money from abroad. The proposal would create a mandatory registry for nonprofit entities, require regular financial reporting and allow the government to suspend or revoke operating permits if NGOs engage in "activities incompatible with the national interest." If approved, Ecuador would join a regional push that has taken shape over the past year in countries such as Peru, El Salvador and Paraguay. According to the Ecuadorian government, the bill aims to bring greater transparency to the operations of NGOs, many of which it says operate without clearly disclosing their funding sources, international ties or true objectives. "I'm not attacking NGOs. Some of them do honorable work and help people in Ecuador. Those organizations won't have problems because they'll be able to explain where their money comes from," Noboa said. Although the bill does not yet specify penalties, it would require organizations to disclose their donors, provide documentation for expenses and avoid political activities not explicitly authorized in their charters. Civil society groups in Ecuador have voiced concern, warning the measure could open the door to arbitrary restrictions and potential censorship. In March, Peru's Congress passed a law expanding the powers of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation to audit foreign-funded projects. The law allows fines of up to $500,000 and authorizes the suspension of organizations that use those funds to bring legal action against the state -- a common practice in human rights and Indigenous advocacy. Despite opposition from more than 70 domestic NGOs and international groups, including the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and Human Rights Watch, President Dina Boluarte's government defended the law as a way to "organize" international cooperation. In El Salvador, the ruling-party-controlled legislature approved the Foreign Agents Law in May. The law imposes a 30% tax on foreign donations, requires registration in a special government registry and gives the executive branch authority to sanction or shut down organizations it accuses of meddling in domestic affairs. Human rights groups have condemned the Salvadoran law, saying it restricts the work of humanitarian organizations and independent media. In Paraguay, a regulation enacted in November 2024 requires all nonprofit organizations to register with the Ministry of Economy and Finance, file biannual reports on income and expenses and disclose any ties to international agencies. The measure prohibits unregistered NGOs from signing agreements with the state and includes penalties ranging from suspension of activities to the permanent revocation of legal status. Paraguayan and regional organizations have warned that the law criminalizes international cooperation and could seriously undermine human rights advocacy. Critics say these measures echo laws previously adopted in Venezuela and Nicaragua, where "foreign agent" and "sovereignty defense" legislation has been used to shut down organizations that report human rights violations or criticize the government, under the pretext of foreign interference. Governments backing these laws argue they aim to strengthen transparency, prevent illicit financing and block foreign influence. But organizations including Amnesty International, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights and the IACHR warn the measures are part of a broader pattern of shrinking democratic space in the region, where state control is prioritized over civic participation. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.