Indian exporters worried over US tariff hikes on steel, aluminium goods
FIEO
) has expressed concern over the recent announcement by US President
Donald Trump
to double import tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, citing potential disruption to
India
's steel and aluminium exports, particularly in value-added and finished steel products and auto- components.
Reacting to the development, FIEO president S.C. Ralhan stated that the proposed increase in US steel and aluminium import tariffs will have a significant bearing on India's steel exports, especially in semi-finished and finished categories like stainless steel pipes, structural steel components, and automotive steel parts.
"These products are part of India's growing engineering exports, and higher duties could erode our price competitiveness in the American market," he said.
India exported approximately $6.2 billion worth of steel and finished steel products to the USA in the financial year 2024-25, including a wide range of engineered and fabricated steel components and about $0.86 billion of aluminium and its products. The US is among the top destinations for Indian steel manufacturers, who have been gradually increasing their market share through high-quality production and competitive pricing.
The FIEO president further added that while it is understandable that the decision stems from domestic policy considerations in the US, such sharp increases in tariffs send discouraging signals to global trade and manufacturing supply chains.
"We urge the Government to take up the issue at the bilateral level to ensure that Indian exporters are not unfairly disadvantaged as 25 per cent additional duty on steel shipments will be a huge burden, which is difficult to be absorbed by the exporter or importer.
The FIEO chief also emphasised the need for Indian exporters to diversify their markets and invest in higher-grade value-added products to mitigate the impact of such protectionist measures.
Meanwhile, as part of ongoing discussions on the India-US
Bilateral Trade Agreement
, representatives of India's Department of Commerce and the Office of the US Trade Representative held fruitful discussions at a meeting in Washington from April 23-25 to conclude the first tranche of the Bilateral Trade Agreement by Fall (September-October) of 2025,
The ongoing discussions are part of bilateral efforts in line with the Leaders' Statement. Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
, during his visit to Washington in February this year, held talks with US President Donald Trump on negotiating the first tranche of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement by the fall of 2025.
The two leaders resolved to deepen the US-India trade relationship to promote growth that ensures fairness, national security and job creation. To this end, the leaders set a bold new goal for bilateral trade - 'Mission 500' -- aiming to more than double total bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030.
--IANS
sps/uk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Govt may put retail trade policy on back burner as India-US trade talks enter final leg
New Delhi: The Union government is likely to put the proposed National Retail Trade Policy on the back burner, a move seen as a conciliatory gesture towards Washington as negotiations for the India-US bilateral trade agreement enter the final stretch. The retail policy, which was first proposed in 2019, was meant to address structural challenges faced by brick-and-mortar traders and small businesses due to rising digitisation and platform-driven commerce. Shelving the policy may indirectly benefit major US-based retail giants—particularly e-commerce platforms and global retail chains like Walmart Inc.—by allowing them to continue operating in India without additional regulatory oversight. Domestic retail chains such as DMart, owned by Avenue Supermart Ltd, Reliance Retail Ltd, and Tata Retail Ltd would also benefit from the policy shift. With India's e-commerce policy, originally due in 2023,pushed to the sidelines, government officials said a separate retail policy is no longer necessary. Much of what the National Retail Trade Policy set out to achieve is already being implemented through decentralised platforms such as the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) and cooperative-led initiatives like the app-based taxi service 'Sahkar', said a person familiar with the government's thinking. 'A policy is a set of actions—and those actions are being taken," this person said, citing ONDC's success in leveling the playing field across sectors. 'Creating compliances when the purpose has already been largely achieved doesn't make sense," said a second person. Both of them declined to be identified as the government hasn't made a final decision yet. A US team of negotiators is scheduled to visit New Delhi in the second week of August to resolve the deadlock over contentious issues in the talks for the India-US bilateral trade agreement. India has made several gestures, starting with the Union Budget, to improve the trade climate, but feedback from the US suggests that its focus remains largely on pushing for exports and greater market access for GM maize and soy-based products. The US's dairy industry also has been lobbying for access to India's vast consumer market. Spokespersons of the ministries of commerce and consumer affairs, the Retailers Association of India, Amazon India, Walmart-owned Flipkart, Tata Group-owned BigBasket, DMart, and Reliance Retail did not immediately reply to emailed queries. A missed opportunity India's rapidly expanding organized retail sector is expected to reach $230 billion by 2030, Deloitte and the Retailers Association of India said in a joint report in February. The report added that private consumption in India had grown from $1 trillion in 2013 to $2.1 trillion in 2024 at a compound annual growth rate of 7.2%, surpassing the growth rates of the US, China, and Germany. A draft National Retail Trade Policy had been prepared to streamline and support the development of all formats of the retail trade sector in a harmonious manner, the ministry of commerce and industry informed the Lok Sabha on 22 December 2021. According to the ministry, the policy aimed to improve the ease of doing business, ensure easy and quick access to affordable credit, facilitate modernisation and digitisation of retail trade, and develop physical infrastructure across the retail distribution chain. The retail trade policy also sought to promote skill development to improve labour productivity, create large-scale employment opportunities, and establish a grievance redressal mechanism for the welfare of traders and their employees, the ministry had said. 'The policy has been in the works for a long time, and we have been waiting for it. The challenges in the sector—particularly those affecting MSMEs (micro, small, and medium enterprises))—must be addressed comprehensively through this policy," said Vinod Kumar, president of the India SME Forum. The second unnamed person quoted earlier pointed to ONDC, an initiative of the commerce ministry's Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, as an alternative. The digital platform offers a bouquet of services, including ride-booking, food-delivery, and e-commerce. 'Sellers are getting onboarded without any hassle, making the process seamless," said this person. According to data available on the ONDC website, about 64 million orders were placed in 2024-25 across 860 districts, and 166,691 vendors had been onboarded. Data for previous years was not available. Kuljeet Singh, chief financial officer at GI Group Holding, a staffing solution provider in the retail sector, said delaying the National Retail Trade Policy may slow the momentum of employment growth in the retail sector. 'The policy was expected to support small traders, shopkeepers, improve access to credits, and encourage formal job expansion. Without it, growth in some areas like logistics, warehousing, etc., may take a bit longer," Singh said. 'However, in our view, retail will continue to provide jobs as it does today. This delay may be a missed opportunity but with the right steps taken later, the sector can still grow stronger."
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Nimisha Priya's death sentence overturned by Yemen authorities: Grand Mufti's office
The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, an Indian nurse convicted of murder in Yemen, has been "completely overturned," according to a statement released Monday by the office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar. The Grand Mufti's office said the decision came following a high-level meeting in Yemen's capital, Sanaa, where authorities agreed to fully revoke the death penalty, which had previously been under temporary suspension. According to the statement, as reported by ANI 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier' Nimisha Priya, a 37-year-old Indian nurse from Kerala, was scheduled to be executed on July 16, after she was convicted of killing a Yemeni national in June 2018, a decision that was upheld by the country's Supreme Judicial Council in November 2023. However, her execution was postponed, following "concerted efforts" by the Government of India. Earlier on July 17, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that it was actively working to support Nimisha Priya and was extending all possible assistance in the case. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during a press briefing, stated that the MEA had appointed a lawyer to assist Priya's family in navigating the complex legal process in Yemen. This includes exploring options for clemency or pardon under Sharia law. Nimisha Priya is a trained nurse and has worked in private hospitals in Yemen for a few years. Her husband and minor daughter returned to India in 2014 because of financial reasons, and in that same year, Yemen was gripped by civil war, and they could not go back as the country stopped issuing new visas. Later in 2015, Nimisha joined hands with a Yemeni citizen, Talal Abdo Mahdi, to set up her clinic in Sanaa. She sought Mahdi's support because, under Yemen's law, only nationals are allowed to set up clinics and business firms. In 2015, Mahdi accompanied Nimisha Priya to Kerala when she came for a month-long holiday. During the visit, he stole a wedding photograph of Nimisha, which he later manipulated to claim that he was married to her. A plea made by the mother of Nimisha Priya had stated, "After a while, Nimisha's clinic began, Mahdi manipulated the ownership documents of the clinic. He also began to take money out of her monthly earnings after telling everyone that Nimisha was his wife. Nimisha had alleged that Mahdi had been harassing her and her family for years. Mahdi also seized her passport. This was done to ensure that she would not leave Yemen. He tortured her under the influence of drugs. He threatened her at gunpoint several times. He took all the money from the clinic and her ornaments." The plea further alleged that, unable to cope with the torture, Nimisha complained to the police in Sanaa, but instead of taking action against Mahdi, the police arrested her and put her in jail for six days. It was further alleged that on her return from jail, the severity of the torture increased manifold. In July 2017, Nimisha took the help of a warden of a jail located near her clinic. The warden suggested that she should try to sedate him and then convince him to give her the passport. However, sedation did not affect Mahdi, who was a substance abuser. She tried sedating him again, using a stronger sedative in order to retrieve her passport, but he died within a few minutes due to a drug overdose. (ANI)
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades
(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. Jane Street said on Monday it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, SEBI lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($560 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from SEBI detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinized. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2% at the open and fell further during the day. SEBI alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. SEBI's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16% and 25% of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10% of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. SEBI did not respond to a request for comment. Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at SEBI's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said. --With assistance from Chiranjivi Chakraborty. More stories like this are available on
