Dalai Lama insists process to find his successor must follow traditional Tibetan Buddhist practices; China differs
Traditionally, a child believed to be the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama is identified and educated to prepare him for the role.
However, there is a concern among several Tibetan Buddhist monks over the potential interference of China in the selection of 15th Dalai Lama.
As if to confirm the concern of the Tibetan monks, the Chinese state media and officials have asserted that Beijing will determine the next Dalai Lama.
"The reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, the Panchen Lama (second only to Dalai Lama) and other great Buddhist figures must be chosen by drawing lots from a golden urn, and approved by the central government," Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told news agency AFP.
Meanwhile, according to The New York Times, in a recorded statement to a meeting of senior Tibetan Buddhist monks in Dharamsala on Wednesday, the Dalai Lama offered few specifics, but made a suggestion that was seen as blocking any Chinese influence from the process of identifying the future reincarnation of the Tibetan spiritual leader. He said that the Dalai Lama's office has 'sole authority' to recognize such a reincarnation.
'No one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter,' he said.
The selection of the next Dalai Lama is considered one of the significant problems in the contemporary China-Tibet issue.
According to a paper by Kota Kanemaki (Part-time lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Keio University) titled The 'Ageing' Dalai Lama and China: Focus on the Selection of New Dalai Lama, the author recalls that in 2011, after China's intervention in the selection of the 11th Panchen Lama, who is second to Dalai Lama, the 14th Dalai Lama stated 'When I reach around 90 years old... I would like to reconsider whether it is necessary to continue the system of recognizing the Dalai Lama as reincarnation.'
In 1999, the 14th Dalai Lama, anticipating Chinese intervention, stated:
'If my reincarnation is to be selected through traditional methods, there will be no reincarnation of mine in Tibet or areas under Chinese rule', thereby checking China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dalai Lama succession dispute: Understanding who he is, how his successor is chosen, and what students need to know about growing tensions
Dalai Lama The Dalai Lama is not only a globally recognised figure of peace and compassion but also the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhism . For many, he symbolises the preservation of Tibetan culture and religious identity in exile. The current 14th Dalai Lama, based in India since fleeing Tibet in 1959, has long been at the centre of a delicate political and religious balance, especially between India and China. As the 14th Dalai Lama advances in age, attention has turned to the sensitive question of his successor. This issue is not merely spiritual but heavily political, with China and Tibet's exiled leadership offering starkly different visions. The Dalai Lama has made it clear that the Chinese government has no role to play in selecting his successor, igniting fresh tension with Beijing. Who is the Dalai Lama and why does his succession matter? The Dalai Lama is believed to be the reincarnation of Avalokiteshvara, the Bodhisattva of Compassion. Each Dalai Lama is considered a 'Living Buddha', whose soul is reborn in a new child after his death. The process of identifying the reincarnation involves a range of spiritual signs, visions, and consultations by senior Tibetan monks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Guararapes (consulte o preço) Alarmes Undo The current Dalai Lama, the 14th in the line, fled to India in 1959 after a failed uprising in Tibet. Since then, he has lived in exile in Dharamshala, where the Tibetan government-in-exile is based. His influence is not just spiritual but also political, although he stepped down from political responsibilities in 2011, handing over authority to the elected Tibetan leadership. Despite this, Beijing often attributes political motives to his religious activities and has objected to his visits to Indian states like Arunachal Pradesh, which China claims as part of its territory. In contrast, the Chinese state enforces a more regulated and political process involving the Golden Urn, a system introduced in 1792 by the Qing dynasty. This method requires drawing lots from a gilded urn containing names of potential successors. According to Beijing, this process ensures authenticity and is backed by centuries of tradition and legal authority. A deeply political process cloaked in religious tradition While the Dalai Lama has previously stated that his next reincarnation could be born among his followers in India, China insists that any legitimate successor must be born within China and selected through the Golden Urn method. The Chinese ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, recently reaffirmed that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama and other Tibetan lamas must comply with 'religious rituals and historical conventions as well as Chinese laws and regulations. ' Beijing has warned that bilateral ties with India could suffer if New Delhi refuses to accept its chosen successor. Although India has long hosted the Tibetan government-in-exile and offers the Dalai Lama asylum, it has refrained from making official statements on the issue. By contrast, the U.S. has declared that reincarnation is a matter of religious freedom, not state authority, and has threatened to raise the matter at the UN. Implications for India–China relations India, home to the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan exile community, has so far remained silent on the issue. Unlike the U.S., which sees the succession as a matter of religious freedom and human rights, India has chosen to stay neutral, likely to avoid diplomatic fallout with China. However, Beijing has previously warned that ignoring the 'traditional' selection process could strain bilateral ties. A Chinese research delegation in 2019 cautioned Indian journalists that no 'wise leader' would challenge China's role in the process, but suggested India could simply stay neutral without endorsing the Chinese choice. The succession issue could become another flashpoint in Sino-Indian ties, especially given recent efforts to improve bilateral relations. Past events, such as the Dalai Lama's visit to Arunachal Pradesh followed by the Doklam standoff, demonstrate how quickly religious matters can escalate into geopolitical disputes. Why students should care about this issue For students, the Dalai Lama succession dispute highlights the complex relationship between religion, politics, and international diplomacy. It also offers insight into how historical traditions are sometimes used to assert state power, and how countries like India and China navigate sensitive cultural and geopolitical matters. Understanding the implications of the Dalai Lama's succession dispute offers students more than just insight into a religious tradition—it provides a valuable lens through which to examine how religion, identity, and political power intersect on the global stage. This issue highlights not only the historical and spiritual significance of the Dalai Lama's role, but also the broader themes of diplomacy, cultural preservation, and the tensions that arise when state authority seeks to influence deeply personal and sacred matters. For students, following this story is an opportunity to engage critically with international affairs and explore the complex dynamics between faith and governance in today's world. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Degraded': US strikes set back Iran's nuclear programme, says Pentagon; estimates upto 2-year delay
This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows the Isfahan nuclear technology center in Iran after US strikes Recent US intelligence reports reveal that military operations have substantially impacted Iran's nuclear capabilities, setting it back approximately two years, according to Pentagon sources, quoted by AFP on Wednesday. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell informed reporters, "We have degraded their program by one to two years at least -- intel assessments inside the (Defense) Department assess that." He subsequently clarified: "We're thinking probably closer to two years." Last month, US forces deployed B-2 bombers to strike two Iranian nuclear facilities using powerful GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, whilst a third location was targeted by Tomahawk cruise missiles from a submarine. On June 13, Israel conducted an extensive aerial operation against Iranian nuclear installations, targeting facilities, nuclear scientists, and senior military officials. The campaign aimed to halt Iran's nuclear programme, which Tehran maintains is peaceful, though Washington and allies contend it is directed towards developing nuclear weapons. US President Donald Trump had initially sought diplomatic solutions to replace the nuclear agreement he cancelled in 2018 during his first term. However, he ultimately opted for military intervention. The American military operation was extensive, employing over 125 aircraft, including stealth bombers, fighter jets, and refuelling aircraft, alongside a missile-equipped submarine.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Can't be half-measures in defense of liberty': US congressman demands urgent briefing on Ukraine aid freeze; writes to Trump
US Republican Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick wrote to Donald Trump demanding urgent briefing on Ukraine aid freeze as Russia launched largest aerial assault, firing over 500 weapons in a single week, since the war began. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "I respectfully request an emergency briefing from the White House and the Department of Defense on the Pentagon's recent review of our nation's weapons and munitions stockpiles, as well as the decision to withhold urgent, lifesaving military assistance to Ukraine," he said in the letter. "Mr President, Ukrainian soldiers and pilots are not just protecting their homeland-they are holding the line for the entire democratic world. This is a defining moment: Ukraine's courage must continue to be met with action, and the United States must continue to lead with clarity and purpose. There can be no half-measures in the defense of liberty. We must, as we always have, stand for peace through strength," he said. Meanwhile, US officials on Wednesday sought to play down concerns after the White House said it was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, leaving Kyiv surprised and seeking clarification. "The Department of Defense continues to provide the president with robust options regarding military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told journalists as quoted by AFP. State department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, however, said that "this is not a cessation of us assisting Ukraine or of providing weapons. This is one event, and one situation, and we'll discuss what else comes up in the future." The White House announced Tuesday that it was pausing certain promised weapons shipments to Ukraine, without specifying which programs were impacted. The move followed a review of US defense needs and military aid to other nations.
