logo
This 49-Point Buck Was Promoted as a New State Record. Critics Say It Was Pen Raised

This 49-Point Buck Was Promoted as a New State Record. Critics Say It Was Pen Raised

Yahoo10-04-2025
The authenticity of a massive 49-point buck that was recently panel-scored by the Wisconsin Buck and Bear Club has been called into question by wildlife authorities and the hunting community.
The buck, which reportedly has a net score exceeding 306 inches, was displayed at the Open Season Deer and Turkey Expo in Wisconsin Dells on March 29, where it was promoted as the pending 'non-typical state-record gun (muzzleloader)' buck. If these claims are correct, the deer would shatter the existing 253-inch record and make it the largest nontypical ever taken in the state. But critics argue the buck is clearly a pen-raised deer that is being passed off as a free-range animal, pointing — in part — to the mount's bleach-white antlers and unbroken tines.
Neither the Wisconsin Buck and Bear Club nor the hunter have publicly addressed the criticism, which has fueled speculation. Now the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has opened an investigation into the buck, a DNR spokesperson told Outdoor Life Wednesday. Because it's an active investigation, the agency declined to provide any details around the case.
Outdoor Life tried contacting the hunter, who is identified on the score sheet as Richard Waters, but did not receive a response. Waters has not said anything publicly about the deer nor spoken on the record with any media outlets. The chairman of the WBBC told OL in an emailed statement that the organization 'is presently not commenting' on the situation.
Waters, who attended the Expo according to several attendees who spoke on background to OL, reportedly claimed that he had killed the buck under fair chase conditions in December with a muzzleloader. The deer was panel-scored at the Expo by official measurers with the Wisconsin Buck and Bear Club, according to multiple sources who were present at the show. But that score would have to be verified by the Boone & Crockett Club to become a legitimate record. Neither B&C nor the Wisconsin Buck and Bear Club accepts animals that are raised in pens or killed behind high fences.
One of those sources, Dan Cole, is a freelance outdoor writer who traveled from Minnesota to attend the Expo and write an article about what he'd heard was a pending record buck.
'I was shown a picture [of the buck] by a person prior to the show, about a month and a half ago, and we both knew it was most likely a game-farm deer,' says Cole. 'I just held out hope that it was going to be wild.'
Cole says WBBC scorers told him they first measured Waters' buck a few months ago. The fact that the buck was going to be panel-scored at the Expo in April made him think the deer might be legitimate, after all. He traveled to the show to find out.
'When they first brought out the shoulder mount, I walked up and put my hand on the burring area near the bases, and all those points were razor sharp — if you'd have grabbed them tight enough, you could've drawn blood. That, to me, was an indication of a deer that died right out of velvet,' Cole tells Outdoor Life. Deer shed their velvet in late August and early September — months ahead of Wisconsin's gun season. 'Well, at the time, I said, 'Hey this deer is right out of velvet.' And that measurer's face just went completely pale.'
Read Next: The Real Story Behind the Casey Brooks Bull, the Pending World Record Elk
Cole, who was previously an official scorer with Minnesota clubs for more than 30 years, tells OL that the extremely sharp tines are one red flag. He also notes that none of the 49 points were chipped or broken, or even showed signs of rubbing. This would be unusual for a wild deer of this size that had survived the rut and was tagged during the late season.
'The big talk at the show was that Buck and Bear was going to let Boone & Crockett make the final decision,' Cole says. 'But then I also heard just recently that that score sheet never actually left their file and never went to Boone & Crockett.'
B&C's deputy director of big-game records confirmed with OL Wednesday that they have not received a score sheet on the deer.
Aside from the shoulder mount that was shown at the Wisconsin Dells Expo, there are few pictures circulating of the pending record deer not taken on the show floor. There are no known trail cam photos or pictures of the buck before it was killed, and the closest thing to a post-hunt photo is so blurred and shadowy that the hunter appears to be sitting on a shoulder mount and not an actual deer.
The buck's antlers are also chalk-colored, or 'napkin white,' as Cole puts it. This is common among pen-raised deer, as they don't usually have access to the trees and shrubs that wild deer rub their antlers on. The only other time you see antlers that white, Cole explains, is when a buck has just shed its velvet, which suggests there's no way Waters killed the buck in December. Wisconsin's 2024 muzzleloader season ran from December 2 to 11.
'I went around the display board and [looked at] every deer, and there wasn't one of them that had white antlers like that,' Cole says. 'It really doesn't matter what [the hunter's] story is. It isn't the truth. Because this deer died in late August, early September.'
Deer & Deer Hunting posted an article Tuesday showing the Waters buck alongside a photo of a pen-raised buck that allegedly came from a Wisconsin deer farm and died several years ago. The similarities between the two bucks are striking, D&DH noted, but the source of the photo is unverified. D&DH has also reported that Waters signed an affidavit with WBBC saying the buck was a free-range whitetail, and that he shot it with a muzzleloader near Harrisville in Marquette County.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Deer & Deer Hunting (@deeranddeerhunting)
'When you sign a score sheet, you are stating that one, the deer was taken by means of fair chase and two, that the deer was killed in the wild … If someone lied there, I don't know if that's fraud or what the charges would be,' says Cole, who notes that Waters left the show before he could interview him. 'But I do know that the Buck and Bear Club isn't going to escape this without getting a big black eye on social media.'
Cole adds that there was some disruption in the measuring room at one point during the show on March 29. He says he heard multiple comments about how some of the WBBC measurers were not on board with scoring the deer and didn't even want it at the Expo. As is common in other record-keeping organizations, official measurers can refuse to score a buck if they don't think it was taken legitimately, or for any other reason.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tea app hit with 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images
Tea app hit with 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images

Business Insider

time6 days ago

  • Business Insider

Tea app hit with 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images

The Tea app saga continues to brew — and has taken a legal turn. On Monday, the viral app, which lets women post anonymous reviews of men, was hit with two class-action lawsuits. Both lawsuits were filed in response to the data breach Tea experienced last week, which exposed about 72,000 images — including selfies and IDs used for verification — and private messages. A Tea spokesperson declined to comment. The two lawsuits, filed in the Northern District of California, allege negligence, breach of implied contract, and other claims. One lawsuit, filed on behalf of Griselda Reyes, says that she submitted a photo while signing up for Tea that was accessed in the breach. "I don't think that this organization intended to violate people's rights," Scott Cole, the lead attorney on Reyes' case, told BI. "I think they were just sloppy." "They went viral very, very recently, and their numbers just went through the roof as a result of that," Cole added. Reyes' case seeks an injunction requiring Tea to encrypt all data and purge private information, as well as monetary damages as determined by the court. A Tea spokesperson previously told BI in regards to the data breach, "We are working to identify any users whose personal information was involved and will be offering free identity protection services to those individuals." The second lawsuit, brought on behalf of an anonymous Jane Doe, says she "joined Tea for one simple reason: she wanted to anonymously warn other women in her Northern California community about a man who sexually assaulted at least two other women." "The app promised her that anonymity," the suit continues. "It promised her safety. It promised to delete her verification data. Tea broke every one of those promises." The second lawsuit also names X and 4chan as defendants and says sensitive information was circulated on those platforms. X and 4chan did not respond to requests for comment. "In an age where data breaches have become commonplace, this case stands out for the particular cruelty of its impact: a safety app that made its users less safe, an anonymity platform that exposed identities, social media platforms that weaponized stolen data, and a tool meant to protect women that instead delivered their personal information to those who would do them harm," the second suit says. Cole said that his firm was in conversation with other attorneys — including some who had not yet filed — and was working toward consolidating their cases. Leading up to last week's data breach, the Tea app had gone viral and hit the No. 1 spot in Apple's App Store. As of Tuesday, it was No. 2 on the chart, behind OpenAI's ChatGPT. Tea lets women anonymously review men with "red" or "green" flags, leave comments about their experiences with men they've dated or know, and seek broader dating advice in a forum. The app also offers paywalled features like background checks and the ability to reverse-image-search to find someone's social media profile.

The Tea app is facing 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images
The Tea app is facing 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images

Business Insider

time6 days ago

  • Business Insider

The Tea app is facing 2 class-action lawsuits after a data breach exposed private messages and 72K images

The Tea app saga continues to brew — and has taken a legal turn. On Monday, the viral app, which lets women post anonymous reviews of men, was hit with two class-action lawsuits. Both lawsuits were filed in response to the data breach Tea experienced last week, which exposed about 72,000 images — including selfies and IDs used for verification — and private messages. A Tea spokesperson declined to comment. The two lawsuits, filed in the Northern District of California, allege negligence, breach of implied contract, and other claims. One lawsuit, filed on behalf of Griselda Reyes, says that she submitted a photo while signing up for Tea that was accessed in the breach. "I don't think that this organization intended to violate people's rights," Scott Cole, the lead attorney on Reyes' case, told BI. "I think they were just sloppy." "They went viral very, very recently, and their numbers just went through the roof as a result of that," Cole added. Reyes' case seeks an injunction requiring Tea to encrypt all data and purge private information, as well as monetary damages as determined by the court. A Tea spokesperson previously told BI in regards to the data breach, "We are working to identify any users whose personal information was involved and will be offering free identity protection services to those individuals." The second lawsuit, brought on behalf of an anonymous Jane Doe, says she "joined Tea for one simple reason: she wanted to anonymously warn other women in her Northern California community about a man who sexually assaulted at least two other women." "The app promised her that anonymity," the suit continues. "It promised her safety. It promised to delete her verification data. Tea broke every one of those promises." The second lawsuit also names X and 4chan as defendants and says sensitive information was circulated on those platforms. X and 4chan did not respond to requests for comment. "In an age where data breaches have become commonplace, this case stands out for the particular cruelty of its impact: a safety app that made its users less safe, an anonymity platform that exposed identities, social media platforms that weaponized stolen data, and a tool meant to protect women that instead delivered their personal information to those who would do them harm," the second suit says. Cole said that his firm was in conversation with other attorneys — including some who had not yet filed — and was working toward consolidating their cases. Leading up to last week's data breach, the Tea app had gone viral and hit the No. 1 spot in Apple's App Store. As of Tuesday, it was No. 2 on the chart, behind OpenAI's ChatGPT. Tea lets women anonymously review men with "red" or "green" flags, leave comments about their experiences with men they've dated or know, and seek broader dating advice in a forum. The app also offers paywalled features like background checks and the ability to reverse-image-search to find someone's social media profile.

Jacksonville sheriff airs video of traffic stop arrest after stressing need for 'context'
Jacksonville sheriff airs video of traffic stop arrest after stressing need for 'context'

USA Today

time23-07-2025

  • USA Today

Jacksonville sheriff airs video of traffic stop arrest after stressing need for 'context'

Jacksonville police are reviewing a traffic stop and arrest that inflamed an online audience, but prosecutors have decided the arresting officer didn't commit any crimes, Sheriff T.K. Waters said July 21. 'One video devoid of context can be very misleading,' Waters told reporters after screening bodycam footage from three officers connected to the Feb. 19 arrest of William Anthony McNeil Jr. Video shot inside McNeil's car, apparently recorded by the driver, prompted almost 2,000 comments and thousands of 'likes' after being posted on Instagram and drawing attention to the encounter which ended with a window being broken on the locked car door and McNeil ending up on the ground under officers' control. Sheriff T.K. Waters is holding a news conference regarding the investigation into a traffic stop from February 19, 2025. We will be releasing body-worn camera footage and additional details. McNeil, 22, retained civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Harry Daniels, the lawyers' publicist reported in a email where the pair called for public release of video of the arrest. 'This wasn't law enforcement, it was brutality. All video from JSO should be released to ensure there is transparency for McNeil and the community,' said a statement attributed to 'the legal team.' It added that 'We demand full accountability from the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office and justice for William McNeil Jr.' Two days after his arrest, McNeil pleaded guilty to resisting police without violence and driving with a suspended license, court records show. He was sentenced to two days already served in jail and a misdemeanor marijuana charge was dropped. During an evening news conference, the sheriff said he knew nothing of McNeil's arrest until July 20 when he was notified about a social media post describing the arrest but showing only a portion of the encounter. A post shared by Ben Crump (@attorneycrump) He said McNeil had done enough within the first 21 seconds of his contact with police to justify a resisting charge but the Sheriff's Office was still looking at whether there had been problems with the police response that should be addressed administratively. The sheriff said McNeil hadn't filed a complaint about his handling during the arrest. If he had, Waters said, 'we would have been all over' that. Waters said he could neither condone nor condemn officer actions during the stop and arrest because it was still under review by his agency. The video Waters released followed Officer D.J. Bowers' engagement with McNeil, whom Bowers told he had stopped around Commonwealth Avenue for not having headlights on during 'inclement weather.' After McNeil said headlights weren't needed and Bowers told him to step out of the vehicle, McNeil answered 'no, no' and told the officer to call his supervisor. 'Uncooperative adult driver,' Bower said into his radio, apparently advising someone of the situation. Again being told to step out, the driver answered no and closed the door. Bowers put his hand on the door and radioed that it was locked. About 45 seconds later, Bowers said 'right now, you're under arrest for resisting. … The longer you take … the worse it's gonna be.' 'Open the door and exit or we are going to break the window,' Bowers said about 35 seconds later, then repeatedly ordered the driver to open the door and said the driver was under arrest for resisting. More than two minutes later, after more officers arrived and another officer talked to McNeil and told him he had to get out, Bowers told a colleague he was about to break the window and was told 'all right, go for it' and smashed the window, unlocking the door and pulling the driver out. Video from McNeil's appeared to show his head was hit by a hand or fist before he got out of the car, then again during a scuffle, and he ended up on the ground with several officers around him, one of whom radioed for a rescue unit to look at a cut on his lip.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store