Parts of Chester city centre set for barbecue and alcohol ban
A PSPO has been in force since 2016 but is due to expire in May, and is set to be replaced with a new order which would run until April 2028.The area has had powers to control jumping from the Queens Park Suspension Bridge into the river or onto a vessel since a bye-law was introduced in 1983.A report to councillors said that between September 2021 and September 2024 there were eight instances seen on CCTV of people jumping from the bridge.The report said there was "strong support" for this bye-law to be part of the PSPO during a recent public consultation.
The report also said that Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service had seen an increase in anti-social behaviour linked to lighting fires and using disposable barbecues.It said the service had attended 11 deliberate fires in the city centre between April 2019 and September 2024.A measure banning events and activities on streets and paths which "impede the passage of any other person" without a licence or written consent to do so, excluding protests, is also set to be introduced.The report said there had been six "large scale obstructions" over the last few years and that just over half of those who responded to a consultation supported the measure.In 2016, the authority had planned to ban rough sleeping in the area through a PSPO but this was scrapped after a backlash.Breaches of the PSPO can lead to a £100 fixed penalty notice or prosecution with a maximum fine of £1,000.The plans will be discussed by Cheshire West and Chester's Cabinet on Wednesday.
Read more stories from Cheshire on the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Labour's welfare climbdown ‘will have financial consequences'
There will be 'financial consequences' to the government's climbdown on welfare reform, a senior cabinet minister has said, in a hint that tax rises could be needed to fill the financial gap left by Labour's rebellion. Taxes on 'working people' will not rise, Pat McFadden said, but he left the door open to other types of revenue raising. McFadden, the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, told Times Radio that Labour would stick by its promise not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT on 'working people'. He said: 'This is a decision that will have financial consequences. The process of the last couple of weeks does have financial consequences. They will all be taken together with all the other moving parts that there are in the economy and the fiscal picture of the budget. And that will be set out at the time.'
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Minister declines to rule out tax rises amid welfare climbdown warning
There will be 'financial consequences' to Sir Keir Starmer's last-minute climbdown on welfare reform, a Cabinet minister has said, as he declined to rule out tax rises. Pat McFadden said that ministers 'will keep to the tax promises' in their election manifesto. Rachel Reeves has seen the £4.8 billion predicted savings from welfare changes whittled away through the Government's changes to plans designed to keep backbenchers onside. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. The Prime Minister had a revolt of almost 50 MPs regardless of the changes. The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster told Times Radio on Wednesday that there will be 'financial consequences' to the decision, and indicated that would be set out at the budget expected in the autumn. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. Mr McFadden told BBC Breakfast he is 'not going to speculate' on what could be in the budget, due in the autumn, but said that ministers 'will keep to the tax promises' in their manifesto. Asked explicitly whether he could rule out tax rises, the Cabinet Office minister told the programme: 'I'm not going to speculate on the budget. 'We will keep to the tax promises that we made in our manifesto when we fought the election last year. But it doesn't make sense for me to speculate on something where, as I say, there are so many moving parts of which this is only one element.' Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. My speech today as I voted against the UC&PIP Bill after proposing my reasoned amendment #York #UC #PIP #Welfare — 💙Rachael Maskell MP (@RachaelMaskell) July 1, 2025 But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30. The Institute for Fiscal Studies' incoming director Helen Miller said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely. 'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much.' Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'Tax rises are on the way to pay for Labour's mismanagement of the economy. 'Hard working families will have an agonising summer waiting to hear how Rachel Reeves will claw back the cash to make up for the failings of this weak Prime Minister.' The UK is in a welfare crisis. About 23% of the working-age population are on welfare and more than half of all households receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes. Keir Starmer is too weak to make even minor cuts to Britain's ballooning welfare bill. And, as the Prime… — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) July 2, 2025 Despite the last-minute concessions, a total of 49 Labour MPs rebelled and voted against the legislation, the largest revolt of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership. Overall, the legislation cleared its first parliamentary hurdle by 335 votes to 260, a majority of 75. The changes were announced by minister Sir Stephen Timms to MPs in the Commons, and came after a first round of concessions offered last week did not seem enough to quell the rebellion. Mr McFadden described the wrangling as a 'difficult process' but told Times Radio that the Government 'got to a position where the second reading of the Bill was passed'. York Central MP Rachael Maskell had tabled an amendment designed to halt the legislation, which was backed by a total of 44 Labour MPs. Ms Maskell said on Wednesday that the concessions signalled a 'change in power between the Prime Minister' and disabled people. She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Tuesday saw 'the Bill disintegrating before our eyes'. Ms Maskell added: 'And I think throughout the day, what we saw was a change in power between the Prime Minister and his Government and disabled people across our country, they having their voice at the heart of Parliament, and that's why I put the reasoned amendment down.' She said that she is 'glad' that the debate was 'had in public' and 'now disabled people should feel empowered to have their voice at long last in an ableist parliament'.
The Independent
18 hours ago
- The Independent
PM braced for revolt over welfare after defending his record of a year in power
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is braced for a revolt in a key vote on his Government's welfare reforms, after defending his record of a year in power. Some 39 Labour MPs have indicated they will vote to halt an overhaul of the benefits system on Tuesday evening, though that number is far lower than the 83 needed to overturn the Prime Minister's working majority. However, more are expected to join them in what could be the largest revolt of Sir Keir's time in office. Ahead of the parliamentary showdown, the Prime Minister insisted at a meeting with his senior ministers that the Government could look back with a 'real sense of pride and achievement' as the July 5 anniversary of his first year in office nears. Ministers have given working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', Sir Keir also told the Cabinet meeting, according to a No 10 spokesman. Downing Street pointed to trade deals, economic growth, the extra long-term investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on. The spokesman added: '(The Prime Minister) said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' Cabinet ministers, and even Sir Keir himself, were said to be involved in efforts to persuade Labour MPs not to join the rebels ahead of the crunch Commons debate. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels. As the second reading of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill began in the Commons, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said reforms to the welfare system are needed to ensure its longevity. 'I do not believe that this is sustainable if we want a welfare state that protects people who most need our help for generations to come,' the senior minister said. She added: 'There is no responsibility in leaving our system of social security to continue as it is, and risk support for it becoming so frayed that it is no longer there to provide a safety net for those who can never work, and who most need our help and support.' To see off the threat of far greater rebellion by some 126 Labour MPs led by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher universal credit rate for those already claiming the health-related element. As a result of the U-turn, the reforms are expected to save less than half the £5 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. In the Commons, Ms Kendall faced warnings the Timms review could be published after the reforms themselves are implemented. She insisted any changes to be made following the review will be done so 'as soon as is practically possible via primary or secondary legislation', though Downing Street would earlier not guarantee Sir Stephen's review would be completed by the time reforms are implemented. No 10 was also insistent that Government modelling, which predicts the welfare proposals will push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, was 'subject to uncertainty'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the Government's plans were 'driven not by principle but by panic'. Indicating that the Tories will not support the Government, Mrs Badenoch told the Commons: 'By 2030, on this Government's spending plans, we will hit £100 billion on health and disability benefits alone, that is more than what we spend on defence, and this should make everyone in this House stop and think, because this Bill does nothing to fix that problem, and that is why we cannot support it.' She described the Bill as a 'fudge', adding: 'A fundamental and serious programme to reform our welfare system is required, and this Bill is not it.' Rachael Maskell, the leading force of the rebellion which seeks to halt the Bill in its tracks on Tuesday night, urged MPs to join her in the voting lobbies. The York Central MP told the Commons: 'These Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party. 'They are far from what this Labour Party is for, a party to protect the poor, as is my purpose, for I am my brother's keeper.' Ahead of the Commons debate, Ms Maskell indicated she believed 'many more' Labour MPs than the 39 who had signed her 'reasoned amendment' would join her in rebelling. The Liberal Democrats are also expected to back the rebel amendment, the party's work and pensions spokesman Steve Darling told the Commons. Ministers have been coy about whether rebel Labour MPs will face disciplinary action, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds telling broadcasters he was 'not aware' they would lose the party whip, but said 'those issues are for the chief whip'. Elsewhere, critic of the Bill Andy Burnham, the Labour Mayor of Greater Manchester, hit out at the parliamentary process it will undergo, claiming it was all wrong. On social media site X, he wrote: 'Third Reading in eight days? A timetable like that diminishes the role of MPs in getting this legislation right, shuts out disabled people and puts too many at risk.'
