logo
Children with poor mental health less likely to work as adults

Children with poor mental health less likely to work as adults

Leader Live19-05-2025
The Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) said investing in children's mental health is 'crucial to reducing long-term barriers to work'.
One in five children in England are currently having a probable mental health issue, while Government figures suggest the number of workers aged 16 to 34 who say mental ill health limits the work they can do has increased more than fourfold over the past decade.
Poor mental health is now the leading work-limiting health condition among people aged 44 and younger.
For its research, the IPPR calculated that children with severe mental or behavioural issues are much more likely to be depressed adults and suffer a physical or mental condition which impacts their chances of working.
The think tank drew on a new analysis of the 1970 British Cohort Study, which is following the lives of around 17,000 people born in England, Scotland and Wales in a single week of 1970.
The latest findings show that mental health problems at age 10 have significant implications 40 years on.
Children with severe mental and behavioural problems are 85% more likely to have symptoms of depression at age 51 and 68% more likely to have a long-term condition that impacts their ability to work, the report showed.
A long-term condition is defined as any physical or mental condition that people are expecting to last 12 months or more.
The correlation also extended to poor physical health, with children with a physical health problem being 38% more likely to have limited capacity for work later in life.
Furthermore, for every four children developing a long-term health condition, one of their mothers is likely to leave the workforce altogether, the IPPR said.
With rising rates of poor mental health impacting the NHS, council services and social security system, action is needed now, the think tank added.
'Improving children's health is not just morally right – it is a social and economic necessity,' the study said.
'A healthier generation of children is essential to delivering this government's core missions: improving the nation's health, spreading opportunity, and securing sustainable economic growth…
'Poor childhood health casts a 'long shadow'. Children who grow up in poor health are likely to experience worse health outcomes in adulthood, achieve less at school, earn less and rely more heavily on public services throughout their lives.'
The team called for targeted investment on 'high-impact, cost-saving interventions that can deliver early wins', such as mental health support for 14 to 19-year-olds soon to enter the labour market.
Spending on children's mental health needs to be ringfenced, it suggested, while preventative spending should be 'hardwired' in the NHS and other public services.
Dr Jamie O'Halloran, senior research fellow at IPPR, said: 'The earlier we address both physical and mental health challenges children, the more likely we can prevent costly health conditions and worklessness later in life.
'This is not just a matter of improving individual lives, but also of alleviating long-term pressures on the state.'
Amy Gandon, IPPR associate fellow and former senior Department of Health official on children's health, said: 'Successive governments have failed to face up to the long-term consequences of poor child health.
'If this Government is serious about building a preventative state, it must act decisively to improve the prospects of our children and young people.
'What's more, the dividends from doing so need not be decades away; the right action now, for example, for those joining the workforce within a few years, can deliver better health, opportunity and growth within this Parliament.'
Figures show that the number of working-age adults in England claiming disability benefits has risen 41%, from 1.9 million in November 2019 to 2.7 million in May 2024.
Meanwhile, the number of people claiming incapacity benefits increased 40% over the same period, from two million to 2.9 million.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manager denies health board sought to 'punish' trans row nurse
Manager denies health board sought to 'punish' trans row nurse

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Manager denies health board sought to 'punish' trans row nurse

An NHS Fife manager who led an investigation into allegations against nurse Sandie Peggie has told a tribunal that nobody higher up in the organisation was telling her what to Glancy dismissed suggestions from Ms Peggie's lawyers that the health board had a "determination to punish" the nurse for an altercation with trans doctor Beth Upton in a hospital changing witness told the tribunal she had not shared details of the investigation with the health board's senior leadership said "nobody higher up was telling me what to do" and her decisions were based "on what I've found" in the investigation. Ms Peggie and Dr Upton had an encounter on Christmas Eve 2023 that led to the nurse being suspended from work after a row over whether the doctor should be in the women's changing rooms at the Victoria Hospital in Glancy became involved in the case in late February Glancy said a combination of diary commitments, sickness and annual leave meant she could not conduct interviews until late April and her final report into the matter was completed in December told NHS Fife and Dr Upton's lawyer Jane Russell she believed staff "shouldn't be confronting colleagues" and that if someone had an issue or a problem with a colleague they should speak to a line manager. The clinical nurse manager denied a suggestion from Ms Peggie's lawyer Naomi Cunningham she deliberately put off informing the nurse about further allegations against Cunningham suggested the delays were because NHS Fife was in "turmoil" about whether the additional claims - regarding whether Ms Peggie had previously refused to engage with the doctor about a patient - could be "pinned" on the Glancy said this was not true, as she had not shared any details of her findings with also rejected the suggestion she was "very anxious" about challenging Dr Upton regarding evidence in the Cunningham asked if Ms Glancy had looked into claims by Ms Peggie that the junior doctor was a "known troublemaker", to which she replied that she was looking into the Christmas Eve incident, not Dr Upton. Timeline of the Sandie Peggie tribunal The lawyer queried whether the fact that Dr Kate Searle, Dr Upton's supervisor, had sent emails to other members of staff expressing support for the junior doctor had compromised Ms Glancy's Cunningham said Dr Searle - who gave evidence over two days earlier in the week - had been "vigorously briefing" against Ms Peggie with her actions. Ms Glancy replied that none of the people in the email chain were involved in her investigation and therefore it did not affect her findings. Dr Searle gave evidence during the internal investigation and also attended Dr Upton's session with Ms Glancy, which Ms Peggie's legal team said was bending the Glancy said it was allowed for people in a tribunal to have a colleague there for support, and "not unusual". No notes kept for second meeting Ms Cunningham suggested an email exchange between Dr Upton and Ms Glancy regarding the 18 December incident indicated "a clear steer" to the clinical nurse manager to not investigate it any lawyer said this was because it would be proven to be false and "should be career-ending for Dr Upton."Ms Glancy disagreed with this, saying she had continued to investigate the 18 December incident by speaking to a healthcare assistant on shift on that day. She later added she felt the healthcare worker's evidence - that Dr Upton and and Ms Peggie had a conversation but she could not recall details - did not contradict Dr Upton's prior claim that Ms Peggie had left without saying anything, as it was uncertain how much was said between them. Ms Glancy confirmed she had a second meeting with Dr Upton after their initial session during the investigation, where they discussed changes to the doctor's said these changes were mostly grammatical but admitted there were no notes kept of this Hamilton, an HR adviser with NHS Fife, later told the tribunal this was "not ideal" but that meetings did not need to always have notes taken. The respective legal teams also clashed over language used by Ms Cunningham, where she repeatedly referred to Dr Upton as male and said this was the "correct sex".Ms Russell said this was creating a hostile environment for the witness and confusing Ms Glancy into accidently misgendering the doctor - something Ms Cunningham denied. Ms Hamilton later said she agreed Ms Glancy's report had been made without interference from added Dr Searle giving both evidence and then supporting Dr Upton during the investigation was not ideal, but there was nothing in policy against it. The tribunal continues.

South East patients advised on services ahead of doctors' strike
South East patients advised on services ahead of doctors' strike

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

South East patients advised on services ahead of doctors' strike

Patients across south-east England have been told to think carefully about which NHS services they use as resident doctors go on Kent and Medway has said they will prioritise emergency and critical services and hope to operate as usual while industrial action goes ahead from 07:00 BST Friday until Wednesday. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust said it expected to be "exceptionally busy" and that "disruption should be expected".Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust said it had "robust plans in place to make sure our patients continue to receive safe, quality care". Patients have been told to attend scheduled appointments unless they are contacted and told otherwise. NHS Kent and Medway's chief medical officer Kate Langford said: "We are urging everyone to make sure they use the appropriate services and keep emergency care for those who really need it."Anyone needing medical help should use 111 as the first port of call, according to NHS Kent and Medway. Ms Langford said: "Regardless of any strike action taking place, it is important patients who need urgent medical care continue to come forward as normal, especially in emergency and life-threatening cases – when someone is seriously ill or injured, or their life is at risk."The integrated care board has also said it is working hard to protect emergency treatment, critical care, neonatal care, maternity, and trauma, as well as those undergoing cancer surgery. Resident doctors, previously called junior doctors, voted to take strike action over a long-running pay dispute at the start of were awarded a 5.4% pay rise for this financial year, following a 22% increase over the previous two British Medical Association (BMA) says wages are still around 20% lower in real terms than in 2008.

English doctors to strike in face-off with government over pay
English doctors to strike in face-off with government over pay

Reuters

time43 minutes ago

  • Reuters

English doctors to strike in face-off with government over pay

LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - Resident doctors in England will begin a five-day strike on Friday over pay, challenging Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party government that promised to end industrial unrest when taking office a year ago. The government is refusing to meet demands for higher pay from the British Medical Association, which says the 5.4% rise awarded to resident doctors - qualified physicians who make up nearly half of the medical workforce - does little to undo years of pay erosion. The result is a return to picket lines outside hospitals from 0600 GMT Friday - a throwback to 2023 when high inflation and stagnant pay brought doctors, nurses and other staff from the publicly-funded National Health Service (NHS) out on strike. "We don't want to strike, but we have to," said Bishoy Yassa, a 24-year-old recently qualified resident doctor. "Even after fair negotiations ... we were completely ignored." "There's a misconception that doctors are being greedy," he added. "This isn't just about pay. This is about getting the government to listen to the state of the NHS." After winning an election last year, Labour quickly reached a settlement with doctors for a 22% pay rise, but this year, as it grapples with increasingly strained public finances, it has refused to move beyond a 5.4% increase. Health minister Wes Streeting has called the decision to strike "reckless and needless." "All I asked of the them (BMA's leadership) was the postponement of strikes for a few weeks so we could work together on a detailed package that could form an offer to you to end this dispute," Streeting said in a letter addressed to resident doctors posted on X on Thursday. Public backing for the strikes is limited, with 52% now opposing them and 34% in favour, according to a YouGov survey of 4,954 adults conducted on Monday. That represents a shift from May, when 48% opposed and 39% supported the action. Views among doctors also differ. Adam Boggon, a 33-year-old resident doctor and a BMA member, told Reuters he voted against the strike action, fearing it would harm patients. "I would like for a settlement to be achieved very soon and in the absence of strike action which doesn't help anybody and which nobody wants," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store