Milan's mayor denies wrongdoing in a corruption probe into the city's construction boom
Milan prosecutors last week announced a widespread investigation into the real estate boom that has seen skyscrapers transform the city's skyline and entire neighborhoods rebuilt, including the construction of an Olympic village for the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Games.
The investigation targets more than 70 people, including Sala, as prosecutors allege corruption that made Italy's financial and fashion capital 'a commodity to be plundered.'' The probe alleges that developers bribed officials to speed building permits and win approval for projects.
Prosecutors are seeking the arrest of six people, including Giancarlo Tancredi, an architect who has been the city's top urban development official since 2021. Tancredi announced his resignation to focus on his defense but denied any wrongdoing. 'My conscience is clear,'' he said.
Sala, a member of the center-left Democratic Party who is serving his second term as mayor, denied any wrongdoing during an address to the city council, saying, 'All I have done is in the interest of the city.''
Sala pledged to continue in his mandate, which expires at the end of 2026, and underlined the necessity of continuing projects that are in the works, including determining the future of Milan's San Siro stadium, home to soccer clubs AC Milan and Inter Milan. The teams want the city to jointly buy the stadium so they can tear it down and build a new one.
The investigation has led to calls by the center-right majority that governs from Rome for Sala to step down. But he has received the support of Lombardy 's regional governor, Attilio Fontana, a prominent center-right politician, while Premier Giorgia Meloni urged caution, saying an investigation should not automatically lead to resignation.
Milan's extraordinary development around the 2015 Expo and now the Olympics has sent real estate prices skyrocketing. Many say ordinary workers have been priced out in gentrification.
'Do we need to do more to make Milan more fair, healthy and balanced? By definition, we must always do more,'' Sala said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
OpenAI and UK sign deal to use AI in public services
OpenAI, the firm behind ChatGPT, has signed a deal to use artificial intelligence to increase productivity in the UK's public services, the government has agreement signed by the firm and the science department could give OpenAI access to government data and see its software used in education, defence, security, and the justice Secretary Peter Kyle said that "AI will be fundamental in driving change" in the UK and "driving economic growth".The Labour government's eager adoption of AI has previously been criticised by campaigners, such as musicians' who oppose its unlicensed use of their music. The text of the memorandum of understanding says the UK and OpenAI will "improve understanding of capabilities and security risks, and to mitigate those risks".It also says that the UK and OpenAI may develop an "information sharing programme", adding that they will "develop safeguards that protect the public and uphold democratic values".OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the plan would "deliver prosperity for all"."AI is a core technology for nation building that will transform economies and deliver growth," he deal comes as the UK government looks for ways to improve the UK's stagnant economy, which is forecast to have grown at 0.1% to 0.2% for the April to June UK government has also made clear it is open to US AI investment, having struck similar deals with OpenAI's rivals Google and Anthropic earlier this said its OpenAI deal "could mean that world-changing AI tech is developed in the UK, driving discoveries that will deliver growth".Generative AI software like OpenAI's ChatGPT can produce text, images, videos, and music from prompts by technology does this based on data from books, photos, film footage, and songs, raising questions about potential copyright infringement or whether data has been used with technology has also come under fire for giving false information or bad advice based on prompts.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK targets 135 Russian 'shadow fleet' tankers with fresh sanctions
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain on Monday imposed new sanctions on Russia's so-called "shadow fleet", targeting 135 oil tankers along with two Russian firms, shipping company Intershipping Services LLC and oil trader Litasco Middle East DMCC. The oil tankers are critical to Russia's energy and oil sectors, with the British government saying they form part of the fleet responsible for carrying $24 billion worth of cargo since the start of 2024. Foreign minister David Lammy said the new sanctions would further "dismantle" Russian President Vladimir Putin's so-called "shadow fleet and drain Russia's war chest of its critical oil revenues". The government said Intershipping Services LLC is responsible for registering vessels under the Gabonese flag, enabling them to transport up to $10 billion worth of goods annually on behalf of the Russian state. Sanctions were also imposed on Litasco Middle East DMCC for its continued role in shipping large volumes of Russian oil, the government said. The Russian embassy in London did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the latest sanctions. Moscow has previously called Western sanctions illegal and said they destabilise global energy markets. On Friday, the European Union agreed an 18th package of sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine, including measures aimed at dealing further blows to the Russian oil and energy industry. As part of that, the EU and Britain set out plans to lower the crude oil price cap from $60 per barrel to $47.60 to disrupt Russia's oil revenues.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Pressure grows to leave 'mad' Aarhus Convention used to block UK building projects
Pressure is growing to renegotiate or leave an international convention blamed for slowing building projects and increasing costs after a judge warned campaigners they are in danger of "the misuse of judicial review". Under the Aarhus Convention, campaigners who challenge projects on environmental grounds but then lose in court against housing and big infrastructure have their costs above £10,000 capped and the rest met by the taxpayer. Government figures say this situation is "mad" but ministers have not acted, despite promising to do so for months. The Tories are today leading the call for change with a demand to reform or leave the convention. In March, Sky News revealed how a computer scientist from Norfolk had challenged a carbon capture and storage project attached to a gas-fired power station on multiple occasions. Andrew Boswell took his challenge all the way the appeal court, causing delays of months at a cost of over £100m to the developers. In May, the verdict handed down by the Court of Appeal was scathing about Dr Boswell's case. "Dr Boswell's approach is, we think, a classic example of the misuse of judicial review in order to continue a campaign against a development… once a party has lost the argument on the planning merits," wrote the judges. They added: "Such an approach is inimical to the scheme enacted by parliament for the taking of decisions in the public interest," adding his case "betrays a serious misunderstanding of the decision of the Supreme Court" and "the appeal must therefore be rejected". Another case - against a housing development in a series of fields in Cranbrook, Kent - was thrown out by judges in recent weeks. The case was brought by CPRE Kent, the countryside challenge, to preserve a set of fields between two housing developments alongside an area of outstanding natural beauty. John Wotton, from CPRE Kent, suggested it would have been hard to bring the challenge without the costs being capped. "We would've had to think very carefully about whether we could impose that financial risk on the charity," he told Sky News. After his case was dismissed, Berkeley Homes said the situation was "clearly absurd and highlights how incredibly slow and uncertain our regulatory system has become". They added: "We welcome the government's commitment to tackle the blockages which stop businesses from investing and frustrate the delivery of much needed homes, jobs and growth. "We need to make the current system work properly so that homes can actually get built instead of being tied-up in bureaucracy by any individual or organisation who wants to stop them against the will of the government." 'Reform could breach international law' Around 80 cases a year are brought under the Aarhus Convention, Sky News has learned. The way Britain interprets Aarhus is unique as a result of the UK's distinctive legal system and the loser pays principle. Barrister Nick Grant, a planning and environment expert who has represented government and campaigns, said the convention means more legally adventurous claims. "What you might end up doing is bringing a claim on more adventurous grounds, additional grounds, running points - feeling comfortable running points - that you might not have otherwise run. "So it's both people bringing claims, but also how they bring the claims, and what points they run. This cap facilitates it basically." However, Mr Grant said that it would be difficult to reform: "Fundamentally, the convention is doing what it was designed to do, which is to facilitate access to justice. "And it then becomes a question for the policymakers as to what effect is this having and do we want to maintain that? It will be difficult for us to reform it internally without being in breach of our international law obligations" In March, Sky News was told Number 10 is actively looking at the convention. Multiple figures in government have said the situation with Britain's participation in the Aarhus Convention is "mad" but Sky News understands nothing of significance is coming on this subject. The Tories, however, want action. Robert Jenrick, shadow justice secretary and former housing minister, said the Tories would reform or leave the convention. He told Sky News: "I think the country faces a choice. Do we want to get the economy firing on all cylinders or not? "We've got to reform the planning system and we've got to ensure that judicial review... is not used to gum up the system and this convention is clearly one of the issues that has to be addressed. "We either reform it, if that's possible. I'm very sceptical because accords like this are very challenging and it takes many many years to reform them. "If that isn't possible, then we absolutely should think about leaving because what we've got to do is put the interest of the British public first." Mr Jenrick also attacked the lawyers who work on Aarhus cases on behalf of clients. "A cottage industry has grown. In fact, it's bigger than a cottage industry," he said.
