Taoiseach calls on ‘strong EU response' to Israel over war in Gaza
It is 'incomprehensible' to European citizens that the bloc does not seem to be in a position to pressure Israel to stop the war in Gaza, the Taoiseach has said.
Micheál Martin said he would be raising the 'dire, catastrophic humanitarian situation' in Gaza with other EU leaders during a high-level meeting in Brussels on Thursday.
Advertisement
He said the situation 'cries out for a strong political response from Europe', adding that he will call on his counterparts to consider the EU-Israel Association Agreement.
A review of the agreement found indications that Israel had breached human rights obligations contained within the deal.
Mr Martin has previously said he wants the agreement to be suspended after saying Israel has 'clearly broken' the human rights clauses.
However, he said there are historical reasons why some member states have differing perspectives on the matter, but added: 'From a humanitarian perspective, it is incomprehensible what is going on, what continues to go on, and Europe needs to really articulate that in the strongest possible way.'
Advertisement
He said Israel should respect 'all clauses' of its association agreement with the EU, including those on human rights.
Mr Martin said other countries, for example, the UK, Norway and Canada, had issued further sanctions against settlers in the West Bank and against Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.
'These are issues that the European Union should look at, as well as the Association Agreement.'
Mr Martin told reporters: 'I will be saying to my European colleagues that the people of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seem to be in a position to pressure on Israel and leverage on Israel to stop this war in Gaza, to stop the continuing slaughter of children and innocent civilians.
Advertisement
'The war must stop.
'There must be a humanitarian response and a surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza and an end to the blockade.'
Mr Martin said Ireland will be seeking to pursue mechanisms to ensure that 'this war stops and that humanitarian aid gets in urgently to Gaza'.
Asked about Israel's criticism of the review as 'outrageous', Mr Martin said: 'Israel needs to stop denouncing every report that comes out using objective criteria to describe the situation in Gaza.
Advertisement
'It's not an outrage.
'The review, in some respects, some could argue, is quite a modest document that seeks to objectively present the facts in relation to Gaza.'
'But it avoids emotional language and so on, so I think that kind of tactic and pattern of undermining those who would even question what's happening in Gaza, that also has to stop.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Heads will roll': BBC reckons with bias accusations over Israel and Palestine coverage
When the BBC's director general, Tim Davie, held a virtual town hall meeting with staff this month, most assumed it would be dominated by disputes over pay and redundancies. When the questions came in, however, the top query to the boss was clear: why was the corporation refusing to show a long-awaited documentary about medics in Gaza? The answer most desired by staff was in relation to delays in broadcasting Gaza: Doctors Under Attack. They wanted to know why it had been shelved while an investigation took place into another documentary, Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, which was pulled from the iPlayer earlier this year after it emerged its child narrator is the son of a Hamas official. 'The lack of transparency over these decisions is hugely concerning,' Davie was told. Another staffer asked: 'Are you aware this [delay] has negatively impacted the BBC's reputation and ability to tell Palestine stories?' A third question seen by the Guardian went further. 'I'm often confronted about the BBC being a propaganda machine and biased about Gaza,' it said. 'I love my job, but sometimes I can't tell anyone I work here for fear of arguments. What can be done about this?' It went on: 'I know I am not alone in feeling this way and believe my question will resonate with colleagues across the corporation.' Davie fielded the questions, saying no one should be falling out with friends and family members in defence of the BBC's coverage of the conflict, and admitting the editorial decisions involved in covering Gaza were 'as tough as it gets'. Since that event, the BBC has completely axed the medics documentary, causing further anger. Channel 4 announced this weekend that it would air the documentary on Wednesday night. Meanwhile, executives are braced for the findings from its internal inquiry into the making of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone. It is expected in the coming weeks and will bring internal and external criticism from those who accuse the BBC of an anti-Israel bias. 'Deputy heads will roll,' said one industry figure closely watching the outcome. The corporation came in for renewed criticism from both sides this weekend for livestreaming a Glastonbury festival performance of the rap punk duo Bob Vylan, where chants of 'Death, death to the IDF' were heard, and opting not to livestream a performance by the band Kneecap, one of whom has been charged with a terror offence for allegedly displaying a Hezbollah flag at a gig in November. Long before that all-staff session, BBC bosses were acutely aware of the fraught atmosphere in Broadcasting House over Gaza coverage. Just weeks earlier, Davie had decided to end Gary Lineker's tenure at the BBC after the Match of the Day presenter reposted a social media video appearing to refer to Jewish people as rats – an antisemitic slur used by the Nazis. It led to accusations of an anti-Israel bias. The episode left some Jewish staff saying they felt betrayed, with one accusing their bosses of doing the 'bare minimum of damage limitation'. Some now focus on BBC Arabic. One staffer said it operated 'in its own way when it comes to the Israel-Palestinian conflict' and that contributors had been found making 'opinionated postings on social media'. Two BBC employees said the service needed to be reformed. A BBC source said BBC Arabic's journalists had 'decades of extensive knowledge and experience in covering the region' and that any mistakes made were corrected. They added that appropriate action was taken against anyone breaking the BBC's social media guidance. The former BBC director of television Danny Cohen, who has made repeated allegations of anti-Israel bias against his former employer, said there was a wider issue at the corporation. 'This left-of-centre structural bias in the BBC newsroom informs a lot of the journalism,' he said. 'Amongst younger journalists it seems to be a particular problem when it comes to anti-Israel bias.' The incidents have resulted in uncomfortable internal claims of both anti-Israel and anti-Palestinian bias. More unrest followed the corporation's decision to sever its ties with Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, stating that broadcasting it 'risked creating a perception of partiality'. It handed ownership back to its independent producer, Basement Films. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The Guardian has been told the BBC suggested editorial changes that Basement deemed unnecessary, but the working relationship had been good during the production process. Once the investigation was launched into the production of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, however, the medics documentary was shelved until that was completed. This outraged its supporters inside and outside the BBC, who accuse Davie of making an unnecessary and panicked call, rather than relying on the editorial judgments of the teams involved. BBC insiders said it was right to delay the documentary because it could conceivably be affected by recommendations stemming from the investigation into a similar programme. BBC figures insisted they had been trying to find a way to publish at least parts of the medics documentary in news coverage, though the nature of those talks is disputed. Even in mid-May, Basement Films was already saying publicly that it was 'doubtful' the BBC would release the programme – a prediction that proved correct. Some supportive figures worry the saga has shown the BBC has lost confidence in producing such programmes. 'The BBC has, in my view, performed strongly in coverage of the Middle East and I do not believe it is institutionally biased,' said Roger Mosey, the former head of BBC television news. 'It has highly skilled journalists who do the very best they can in an area where access is restricted and where the actions of both sides can be heavily contested. 'That said, it is clearly a problem that the BBC has not been able to deliver satisfactory long-form TV documentaries on conditions in Gaza. The editorial complexities are real, but equally it's a subject that must be reported in current affairs films.' This is disputed by the BBC, with insiders pointing to award-winning documentaries, such as Life and Death in Gaza, and Gaza 101, as well as the podcast Finding Freedom in the Water: Gaza's Swimming Teacher. BBC figures point out internal complaints come from both directions, with two recent reports each claiming to prove bias either against Israel or Palestinians. Senior journalists say many problems stem from Israel's refusal to grant international journalists access to Gaza. 'More broadly, we strongly reject the notion – levelled from different sides of this conflict – that we are pro or anti any position,' a BBC source said. There is no let-up for the corporation. The forthcoming publication of its investigation into Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone will be followed by a 'thematic review' into its Middle East coverage. Both will ensure attention from all sides continues to focus on the corporation's approach.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer says he lost grip on Labour welfare revolt due to focus on foreign affairs
Keir Starmer has said he did not get a grip on the Labour rebellion over disability benefits earlier because he was focused on foreign affairs. The prime minister acknowledged he had not got it right, and said he would have wanted to make the concessions earlier. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did,' Starmer said in an interview with the Sunday Times. 'I'm putting this as context rather than an excuse. 'I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. From the moment I got back from the G7, I went straight into a Cobra meeting. My full attention really bore down on this on Thursday. At that point, we were able to move relatively quickly.' He insisted there had been 'a lot of outreach' over the bill to backbench MPs but acknowledged more should have been done. 'Would I rather have been able to get to a constructive package with colleagues earlier? Yeah, I would. [But] I believe in the world we live in, not the world we want to live in,' he said. It is Starmer's third admission of having taken the wrong course in recent days, indicating he may be moving to try to reset his premiership. He gave an interview to the Observer saying he 'deeply regrets' having used the phrase 'island of strangers' about immigration and that he made the wrong choice in having originally appointed former civil servant Sue Gray to be his shortlived chief of staff. Starmer will be attempting this week to draw a line under the welfare rebellion, with whips working to persuade Labour MPs to back the bill with new concessions on Tuesday. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, offered the changes at midnight last Thursday, which would protect all existing claimants of personal independence payment (Pip) and raise the health element of universal credit in line with inflation. However, dozens of Labour MPs remain unconvinced, with No 10 facing a battle over the next 48 hours to minimise the size of the revolt. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said he is confident the government will win the vote on Tuesday, telling Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the changes 'have put us in a much better position'. 'As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected,' he said. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion One of the original leading rebels, Louise Haigh, a former transport secretary, said she would now vote in favour, as long as the details confirmed the changes promised by Kendall. But she said Starmer should now reset the government's relationship with the public and backbenchers. She told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme it was welcome that Starmer has 'acknowledged that mistakes have been made and that things need to change'. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she said. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Farage dubbed ‘wolf in Wall Street clothing' over cabinet plan
Nigel Farage 's Reform UK is attempting to attract business leaders by promising them ministerial positions if the party wins the next general election. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer criticised Mr Farage's proposal, labelling him a "wolf in Wall Street clothing" who "has no idea what he's talking about". A recent poll indicated Reform UK could become Britain's largest party, potentially enabling Mr Farage to form a minority government with 271 MPs. The same poll suggested a significant decline in Labour's popularity, potentially reducing their seats from 403 to 178. Proposals to appoint non-elected business leaders as ministers, potentially through peerages, have been controversial in the past due to concerns about democratic accountability.
