
How the SNP wrecked Scottish education
A small but not insignificant morsel of data on the state of education after 18 years of the SNP running Scotland. New figures show the gap between the poorest and wealthiest school leavers has widened to a five-year high. In the least deprived areas, just 3 per cent of school leavers fail to go to a 'positive destination', the Scottish Government's term for higher or further education, training, employment or voluntary work. Yet in the most deprived areas, areas like the former Lanarkshire industrial town from which I'm writing this, more than one in ten children leave school to what is euphemistically called 'other destinations', i.e. unemployment.
Scottish Labour's education spokeswoman Pam Duncan-Glancy accuses the SNP of 'leaving Scotland's most disadvantaged pupils behind'. It's hard to disagree. Education used to be all the rage at Holyrood, the subject of speeches and pledges and reports and, most of all, photo ops. In 2015, early in her first ministership, Nicola Sturgeon – remember her? – gave a grand speech declaring that her defining priority would be closing the attainment gap between poor children and those from affluent families. These days Sturgeon tours the country chatting literature with minor celebs and touting her own forthcoming memoirs, but her legacy remains.
And what a legacy it is. The attainment gap she undertook to close is widening. Children from the poorest parts of Scotland are 23 per cent less likely than those in the richest areas to leave school with at least one National 5, the Scottish equivalent of the GCSE. At Higher level (comparable to the A-Level), the gap is 38 per cent. Just 57 per cent leave school with a Higher and one in seven leave before even getting to that level. In reading, there is an 88-point performance gap between the richest and poorest children; in science, it's 92 points; in maths, 98.
While the most deprived children bear the brunt of the Scottish education slump, no one escapes unharmed. Data from Pisa, an international study of school performance, shows that, almost two decades after the SNP came to power at Holyrood, test scores in science have fallen by 32 points and in maths by 35 points. Reading is the soaraway success story, with a drop of a mere six points in test performance. Children in Scottish schools are behind their English counterparts in all three disciplines. Little wonder the Institute for Fiscal Studies says 'something, somewhere is going wrong in Scottish education'.
It's something, somewhere, all at once. Subject choice has narrowed under the SNP's Curriculum for Excellence. More than 40 per cent of pupils are persistently absent from Scottish high schools. A survey by teaching union NASUWT found 44 per cent of respondents north of the border suffered physical abuse or violence at the hands of their pupils last year. There were more than 40,000 violent incidents in local authority schools in 2024 and since the pandemic there has been a 76 per cent increase in offensive weapons in the classroom, with Police Scotland recording 194 cases in the past three years. Even in the most conducive education environment, learning can be very difficult for some pupils. In a culture of chaos, it can become impossible.
Back in 2015, when Nicola Sturgeon gave her landmark speech on closing the educational attainment gap, she said:
Let me be clear: I want to be judged on this. If you are not, as first minister, prepared to put your neck on the line on the education of our young people then what are you prepared to. It really matters.
It does matter, but did it ever really matter to Sturgeon? A decade on, the balance of the evidence confirms that outcomes in Scottish education declined on her watch and that children from the poorest families shouldered the worst of it. Schools have been struggling to recover ever since Sturgeon made haste for the exit and a media career. As she offers election night punditry, tours theatres and playhouses with her novelist pals, and chips in the odd book review, it is difficult to discern where or when she put her neck on the line. Perhaps its high brass content made things difficult.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour could make paternity leave a ‘day-one right'
Angela Rayner has announced a full review of parental leave policies that could see more paternity leave enshrined in law. Ministers believe the current rules, which allow women to take 39 weeks of leave on reduced pay and men to take two weeks, may be holding back productivity. Meanwhile, the Department of Business and Trade, which is carrying out the 18-month review into parental leave, will explore making paternity leave and unpaid parental leave a 'day one right' for employees. One in three new fathers do not take up paternity leave, while the uptake of shared parental leave, when the period of absence can be shared between a couple, is low. The Government could also change the rules to allow paternity leave to be taken after a period of shared parental leave, which is not currently permitted. Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, said: 'Those early years are the most special time for families, but too many struggle to balance their work and home lives. 'Supporting working parents isn't just the right thing to do – it's vital for our economy. 'Through our Plan to Make Work Pay, we're already improving the parental leave system with new day 1 rights. This ambitious review will leave no stone unturned as we deliver for working families.' 'The best chance in a generation' The review was welcomed by paternity leave campaigners, who have long argued that unequal rules for men and women can be harmful to both partners and their child. George Gabriel, co-founder of The Dad Shift, said: 'The Government's review of parental leave is the best chance in a generation to improve the system and make sure it actually works for working families. 'When the last Labour government introduced paternity leave it was groundbreaking. But that offer, unchanged since, is now the least generous in Europe. 'Our broken parental leave has been overlooked for years, and finally sorting it out would be good not only for parents and children but for businesses too.' 'Precious early years' The review comes amid warnings about the UK's productivity levels, which lag behind other rich countries. The UK's fiscal watchdog is widely expected to downgrade Britain's productivity forecast this summer. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, who is facing a backlash to her welfare reforms among Labour MPs, said changes to the rules would be appreciated by parents and businesses. 'Every parent should have the chance to spend time with their children during those precious early years,' she said. 'This review delivers on our Plan for Change to support families and give children the best start in life. 'By listening to parents and employers across the country, we'll build a system that works for today's working families.'


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Labour's cynical attempt at concession on social security cuts
Disabled people wake up every day in fear of what the UK Government will announce next. The news that their cruel social security cuts will only affect new recipients is not a U-turn. It is a sad and cynical attempt at concession following a rebellion of Labour MPs, and it will still have a horrific impact on the lives of disabled people across the UK. Also in 2021 a BBC investigation included the case of Errol Graham who starved to death in 2018 after his benefits were stopped when he failed to attend a work capability assessment due to his ill health. Even the former Conservative welfare secretary Iain Duncan Smith resigned following the publication of a similar plan to Labour's saying that it would be 'indefensible' and that 'top slicing never works'. Following the backlash there appeared to be a deal made between Starmer and over 100 MPs who rebelled which confirmed that people already in receipt of PIP and UC will continue as normal. It will only be new claimants facing harsh eligibility assessments which will see people go without the crucial support they need. This is not good enough. How does this help people who acquire disabilities in later life? How does this help people who are disabled in accidents? Anyone can become disabled in their lifetime, and with our ageing population, more and more people will experience disability in old age. Starmer has created a two-tier benefits system. It's astonishing that a Labour Government would contemplate such cruel and inhuman cuts at all. However, we've seen over the past 11 months of Starmer in No.10 that he's nothing more than a Tory in Labour clothing. We don't know how these reforms will impact our society long term. But we do know now that disabled people are not safe, respected, or supported under Labour in Holyrood or Westminster.


ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Mum of murdered Ronan Kanda, 16, pleads to surrender ninja swords before ban
The mother of a teenager murdered with a ninja sword is pleading with people to give up their weapons before a ban comes into force so 'children can walk home without fear'. A national Surrender and Compensation scheme is being launched for ninja swords in July, ahead of the ban from August 1. Under Ronan's Law, it will be illegal to possess, sell, make or import the knives. The law is named after 16-year-old Ronan Kanda, who was yards away from his Wolverhampton home when he was murdered with a ninja sword in 2022, in a case of mistaken identity. His family and mother Pooja Kanda have been campaigning for the ban since his death. Ms Kanda said: 'It has been three years since Ronan's life was tragically taken as a result of the wounds inflicted by a ninja sword. 'Since then, we have relentlessly campaigned for ninja swords to be taken off the streets as they have no place in society. 'The Government has now introduced a much-needed ban on ninja swords, and we encourage those in possession to surrender them to make the community a safer place where children can walk home without fear.' As part of the Government's new knife surrender scheme, anti-knife crime campaigner Faron Paul, of FazAmnesty, will tour London, the West Midlands and Greater Manchester in an 'amnesty van' to help get rid of dangerous blades. Mr Paul added: 'By taking this service directly into communities, I hope we can reach more individuals, encourage positive decisions, and help reduce the number of harmful items on our streets.' The Home Office is also funding 37 new surrender bins, made by charity Word 4 Weapons, across the same locations where 45% of knife crime in England and Wales takes place. Anyone handing in a ninja sword can also claim compensation of £5 – the wholesale price of the weapon – if they return it to a designated police station. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said: 'The launch of today's scheme is a result of months of collaborative working with the Coalition to Tackle Knife Crime and I'm optimistic about what we can achieve together over the next month and then the years to come as part of our plan for change. 'This scheme is just one part of addressing knife crime. 'We will not stop listening to those who are directly working with those impacted by this crime.'