Hopes Newcastle Centre for Writing will help bridge funding gap
"There is not enough national money – we do seem to have been a bit forgotten about up here," she said.Think tank IPPR North said its analysis had found a £450m "culture chasm" between London and the North of England, which had added to a "vicious cycle of regional inequality"."It is unbelievable that this is happening in this day and age," McGuinness said.
'Bold step'
Leaders hope the Centre for Writing will cement the region as a hub for writing and literature and attract big-name publishers to the area, as well as supporting Newcastle's Seven Stories and The National Centre for the Written Word in South Shields.Neca will acquire a Newcastle property to house the centre, which will then be run by Tyneside-based charity New Writing North and Northumbria University, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.The Department for Culture Media and Sport has confirmed it will provide £5m towards the Centre for Writing, while Northumbria University is set to provide £2.5m in funding.Neca said it would provide £2m and Newcastle City Council is expected to provide £1m. It is hoped the remaining £850,000 will be secured through additional grants.
Newcastle City Council deputy leader Alex Hay said the creation of the centre was a "bold step" for the region's creative industries."This is more than just a building – it is about growing jobs, attracting investment and giving people of all ages a way into the creative industries, ensuring the North East has a strong voice in UK culture," he said.
Follow BBC Newcastle on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
7 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Car finance compensation: am I eligible?
You can't go on social media or switch on the television these days and fail to hear about the ongoing car finance scandal. Lenders have put aside billions of pounds in potential compensation for consumers, but court rulings have shaken things up a bit, meaning fewer people are now eligible. Advertisement - Article continues below The Supreme Court recently overturned a decision made by the Court of Appeal last October that declared that any type of hidden commission involved within a car finance deal was unlawful. Such a decision originally led to thousands signing up with claims firms in the hope of securing a slice of the billions set aside by lenders in case the Supreme Court ruled against them. Now, however, it looks as if only those who had previously signed up to a finance deal involving a Discretionary Commission Arrangement (DCA), or potentially those whose finance deals involved 'excessive' levels of commission, will be able to claim. Already lost? We don't blame you, so let us answer all of your most burning questions. The ongoing car finance scandal started at the beginning of 2024 when the UK regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, announced that it was launching an investigation into what's known as Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs). Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Outlawed in 2021, DCAs essentially mean lenders artificially inflating interest rates in order to provide the dealer with additional commission, thus pushing up the cost of finance for the customer. This, according to experts, was the case in roughly 40 per cent of finance deals between 2017 and 2021, costing consumers as much as £500 million per year as opposed to flat commission rates. Advertisement - Article continues below This came to a head after a Court of Appeal case between customers and some of the UK's largest lending firms ruled that any part of a finance deal involving commission that's not overtly outlined and agreed to by the consumer is unlawful. Such a decision sent shockwaves through the industry because this meant almost all car finance deals from 2007 could be eligible, with experts originally estimating as much as £40 billion being up for grabs in compensation. In early August, the UK's highest court, the Supreme Court, overturned the Court of Appeal's judgement, claiming that dealers do not have a fiduciary duty to act in their customer's interest, rather than their own. Lord Reed, the President of the Supreme Court, delivered the judgement, saying that 'At no point did the dealer give any kind of express undertaking or assurance to the customer that in finding a suitable credit deal it was putting aside its own commercial interest as seller'. However, the Court did uphold a ruling in which the amount of commission paid to a dealer was deemed excessive, accounting for as much as 55 per cent of what the customer had paid. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below After originally trying to push its own influence over the Court's verdict, the Treasury said in a statement that it 'respect[s] this judgment from the Supreme Court and will now work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers.' Following the Supreme Court's judgement, the FCA said it would launch a consultation into a potential redress scheme for those having signed up to finance deals involving DCAs, as well as those including 'non-disclosure of other facts relating to the commission that [made] the relationship unfair.' Advertisement - Article continues below What does this mean? Well, it appears those with DCA finance agreements, as well as those who will be able to claim that their finance deal was misleading in any way, will be entitled to compensation. In some sense, this is bad news for consumers because it means that far fewer people will be eligible to receive redress. However, it's a slightly less severe blow to the industry, given that the issue is expected to cost around £18 billion, rather than the £40-50 billion originally expected. Nevertheless, the Finance and Leasing Association – the trade body that represents lenders – called the idea of an official redress scheme 'impractical', saying that it has 'concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007 when firms have not been required to hold such dated information, and the evidence base will be patchy at best.' Unfortunately, the payout for those affected looks to be a lot less than what was originally expected; while estimates suggested that most claimants would be able to walk away with four-figure sums, the FCA suggested that the majority will likely get less than £950 per finance deal. This will come as a disappointment to some, however the FCA insists this is in an attempt to balance the impact on both businesses and consumers. But with such a low figure and many paying tens of thousands of pounds out on the average finance deal – several thousands being that of the inflated DCA interest rates – many might not get back all of what they are technically owed. For the time being we recommend simply filing a complaint with your lender; there are several free tools available online, such as the one from Martin Lewis' MoneySavingExpert, which can help you find old finance agreements and draft such a letter. There is also the option of sitting tight for now; the chances are that the FCA will announce what's known as an 'opt-out' redress scheme, which means lenders will be forced to get in contact with you in order to arrange compensation. However, there is still no harm in filing a complaint because this will cover all bases, on the basis that the FCA might make the redress scheme 'opt-in', forcing consumers to do the contacting legwork themselves. Most important, however, is that Auto Express' advice is not to sign up for any of the dozens of car-finance claims-management firms you've undoubtedly seen being advertised online. Not only is doing so unnecessary, but they can also take up to 30 per cent of your winnings – even if the FCA sets up an 'opt-out' scheme in which the claims firms would have to do nothing. Thinking about buying a new car? Click here for our guide on how to buy a car online ... Find a car with the experts Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra aren't waiting around for the government grant by cutting £1,500 from their EV prices Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Five EVs under £24k have joined Dacia's Spring on the UK market. How far can you go on a budget? We find out Car Deal of the Day: MGS5 EV for under £200 a month is a true bargain Car Deal of the Day: MGS5 EV for under £200 a month is a true bargain The ZS EV's replacement is an excellent small electric SUV, and our Deal of the Day for August 4
Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Benjamin Sesko wage suspicions raised as Man Utd and Newcastle target gets transfer advice
Manchester United and Newcastle are battling for Benjamin Sesko after both tabling bids, and the 22-year old is being urged to use their interest to his advantage Benjamin Sesko has been told he could command a bigger salary than expected as Manchester United and Newcastle battle for his signature. Both Premier League teams have tabled bids for the RB Leipzig striker as they look to secure their top summer target. Newcastle were first to make a formal offer for the 22-year-old that was rejected by the Bundesliga club. The Magpies then returned with an improved bid of £69.5m plus £8.6m in add-ons on Monday. The Red Devils then made their move on Tuesday with a proposed deal worth £65.2m plus £8.6m in further payments. Sesko, who netted 21 goals in 45 appearances across all competitions last season, is believed to be training separately from the Leipzig squad as the race to sign him heats up. The Slovenian international has now been advised by former United and Wrexham goalkeeper Ben Foster to turn the situation to his advantage by using it to leverage more money in wages. The 42-year-old also urged him to choose a switch to Old Trafford rather than take on the burden of potentially having to replace Alexander Isak 's impressive goal haul at Newcastle. "If he goes to Newcastle, the Champions League is a massive draw, but he's got some big boots to fill there with Isak," said Foster on his Fozcast podcast. " As a striker, I don't know if you necessarily need that kind of excess pressure as well. "Whereas at United, he hasn't got it so much. They're not the Man United of old but in stature, it's still Manchester United. You're going to get the same wages no matter where you go. The fact that you've got two [clubs interested] means you might just be able to bump it up by an extra £50,000 a week." Newcastle have opted to chase Sesko after Isak, who scored 23 goals across all competitions last season, told the club he wants to leave St James' Park following interest from Liverpool. The reigning Premier League champions had an initial offer for Isak rejected last week, but are expected to return with a second bid. By comparison, United are looking to improve on Rasmus Hojlund, who boasted a less impressive tally of 10 goals last term. The Red Devils have already bolstered their forward line this summer by signing Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo for a combined sum of £133.5m. According to a report by the Athletic, United are eyeing other options in case they lose out to Newcastle. Chelsea forward Nicolas Jackson is one target who is understood to be on their radar and could be allowed to leave Stamford Bridge this summer subject to a reasonable offer. Meanwhile, French outlet L'Equipe claims that Paris Saint-Germain's Randal Kolo Muani is another possibility United are considering. Juventus were the original favourites for Muani, but the deal is said to have hit a stumbling block. Sesko was left out of Leipzig's squad for their pre-season game against Atalanta on Saturday. When asked for the reason for his exclusion, head coach Marcel Schafer said it was "obvious." "We won't go into detail on that, but when I say that several clubs have shown strong interest and have made approaches, it's obvious what has happened," he said.
The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
Patsy Kensit begs EastEnders bosses to get her BACK on soap as she reunites with Danny Dyer
PATSY Kensit has revealed she's desperate to return to EastEnders -and is pleading with show bosses to bring her back. The actress made the cheeky plea as she reunited with former co-star Danny Dyer, sparking fresh hopes for a comeback in Albert Square. 5 5 The star, who briefly played Emma Harding — Lola Pearce's estranged mum — said she 'absolutely loved' her time on the soap and would jump at the chance to reprise the role. Speaking during a fun catch-up with Danny Dyer (who played Mick Carter), Patsy admitted she's been dropping hints ever since she left Walford. Taking to Instagram, Patsy posted a selfie with Danny as they reunited at a Paul Strank Charitable Trust event in London. She wrote in the caption: "With the divine @officialdannydyer who I just think is sublime at the @paulstrankcharitabletrust - what a great evening! "I had a wonderful time on @bbceastenders I would love to be back on that show." Fans were quick to call for her return too, as they flooded the comment section. One wrote: "You'd be great on EastEnders 😍 Absolutely I might even start watching again." Another added: "I would absolutely love to see you back." In an interview with The Sun, Patsy admitted she would love a soap comeback after revealing that EastEnders was her "dream job" and a career highlight. Speaking on the red carpet of this year's British Soap Awards, Patsy revealed: "Soap is something that I love and I loved my time at Emmerdale and my 4 years at Holby City, but then I went into EastEnders. EastEnders fans SWITCH OFF slamming 'worst episode' as backlash grows to controversial pregnancy storyline " EastEnders was actually my dream job, I've wanted to be in that show for years. "If I could throw a wish out there it would be that Emma could come back to see Lexi (her granddaughter)." Meanwhile, Danny is rumoured to be plotting his own comeback as Mick Carter. Danny claimed to have thrown in the towel three years ago because he couldn't believe his character got paired up with Charlie Brooks' Janine and got her pregnant. Best soap affair love triangles LOVE triangles are a fundamental part of soap-land, but which ones have become the most iconic? EASTENDERS Bradley/Stacey/Max: Stacey Slater began an affair with boyfriend Bradley Branning's dad Max in 2007. Despite their romps, Stacey still married Bradley, but their deceit came out in an iconic Christmas Day episode that year. Grant/Sharon/Phil: Heading even further back in Walford history, EastEnders fans were gripped in the 90s as Sharon Watts had a one-night stand with her brother-in-law Phil Mitchell. Sharon confided in best friend Michelle Fowler - not realising it was caught on tape - and her husband Grant eventually found out and played it in front of everyone at the Queen Vic. Syed/Amira/Christian: Syed Masood was engaged to Amira before realising he had feelings for another man, Christian, which he confessed to him on his wedding day. A devout Muslim, Syed refused to admit his true sexuality and went ahead and married Amira anyway, but when they returned, the two men started an affair before being caught in the act by Amira. CORONATION STREET Shelley/Peter/Lucy: Peter Barlow took the concept of a love triangle and ran with it in Coronation Street - extending it to bigamy. He was in a relationship with Shelley Unwin but started dating Lucy Richards, and quickly married her after she fell pregnant with his son, Simon. But it didn't stop him also marrying Shelley, but he was eventually caught when Lucy turned up in Weatherfield and the two women confronted him. Ken/Deidre/Mike: Back in 1982, Deirdre Barlow started sleeping with her husband's nemesis Mike Baldwin in secret, before confessing all a year later. When Mike turned up at the marital home, Deirdre was being throttled by her husband who then kicked her out, but years later they reconciled. Maria/Aidan/Eva: In 2017, Aidan Connor started sleeping with girlfriend Eva Price's best friend, Maria Connor. Eva eventually found out and she decided to take revenge by faking a pregnancy, spending his money and planned to confront him on their wedding day. But she had a change of heart when a remorseful Aidan confessed, and decided to marry him anyway, only for Maria to arrive and expose her fake pregnancy. EMMERDALE Ross/Debbie/Pete: Debbie Dingle found herself torn between two brothers, Ross and Pete Barton in 2015 in Emmerdale. She eventually decided to marry Pete but yet again, a soap wedding day was ruined when the groom learned of his bride's betrayal via a recording played at the wedding. Chrissie/Robert/Aaron: Robert Sugden was married to Chrissie White and all seemed well - until he began a steamy affair with Aaron Dingle. Robert's ex Katie Sugden almost exposed the affair - but fell to her death before she had the chance. However, a guilty Aaron eventually cracked and told Chrissie about the affair - after which she announced it to the whole pub. Talking on Sky's Smart TV he said: "Mick's got a kid with Janine, how mad's that? That's why I left. "They f*ing put me with Janine, I thought I've gotta fk off! It's the truth!" However, he later revealed: 'I was off my nut a lot of that job . . . a lot of Valium and diazepam.' He accused show chiefs of a lack of duty of care for the cast, and also said show bosses tried to stop him from drinking real beer while filming in the Queen Vic pub. But at the NTAs, Danny said: "Bring Mick back, which is the character I played in EastEnders. "So I could be back for it. You never found my body, f*** knows where I am - bring Mick back!" Could a double return be on the cards? The new EastEnders boss Ben Wadey has already brought back some iconic characters, such as Zoe Slater and Oscar Branning. And even more returns are in the pipeline - from the likes of Max Branning, Ben Mitchell and Anthony Fox. However, fuming EastEnders fans have recently threatened to switch off their TVs as backlash grows over a controversial pregnancy twist. Suki's (Balvinder Sopal) twisted plan to manipulate Avani (Aaliyah James) into having a baby – just so she can raise it herself - has received a huge public backlash. Viewers are slamming the storyline as 'unrealistic' and 'garbage', with some even vowing to ditch the soap for good. To make matters worse, Patrick (Rudolph Walker) suddenly spiralled into a gambling problem, despite two decades of betting without a hitch. Viewers were left scratching their heads and branding the writing "tedious" and "a challenge to watch." Can the soap win viewers back? EastEnders airs on BBC One and BBC iPlayer. 5 5 5
