&w=3840&q=100)
Gadkari says govt working on rare earth alternatives: 'Will be solved soon'
Swati Gandhi New Delhi
Union minister Nitin Gadkari assured that Indian startups, research institutions, and engineering colleges are working hard to find solutions for several problems, including finding alternatives to rare earth magnets.
Speaking to Business Standard, Gadkari talked about the government's multi-pronged push for self-reliance and assured that the problem of restrictions on rare earth magnets will be solved soon.
The minister's remarks come amid China's export restrictions on seven heavy and medium rare earth elements and magnets. These elements include samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, which are crucial for sectors like defence, energy, and auto, especially electric vehicles (EVs).
India looks beyond China for rare earths
HD Kumaraswamy, the minister for heavy industries, on Tuesday said the government is now in talks with Japan and Vietnam for rare earths. The Centre also aims to announce an incentive scheme for processing rare earth oxides into magnets, which could take up to two years. Kumaraswamy further said a decision regarding this is expected in 15-20 days.
India concerned over essential bitumen supplies?
Asked whether the Centre is concerned over bitumen supplies being impacted because of the Israel-Iran conflict, Gadkari said that trials are currently underway where a one-kilometre road was built using bio-bitumen, where the lignin is procured using stubble.
The minister said that Indian Oil has commenced a project in Haryana's Panipat district, under which, stubble is being used to generate bio-bitumen, ethanol, and sustainable aviation fuel.
Calling for India to become 'Atmanirbhar', Gadkari said that India must become self-reliant in everything, adding that the imports should come down, while exports should go up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
25% tariff a negotiation tool; India must use August talks wisely: Anurag Singh
So realistically, buying more aircraft or defense equipment is what's likely. And that's not unreasonable — India does need both. So if those purchases help balance trade, it could be a win-win. The US has imposed a 25% tariff on India, a move seen as a pressure tactic to push India into trade negotiations. While surprising, it's viewed as manageable, with potential for Indian exporters and American importers to absorb the impact. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "Ultimately, the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay with," says Anurag Singh , Managing Partner, Ansid Capital.I'm a little surprised by the notion that India was in the best position to strike a deal. Every other major trading partner among the top 10 with the United States has already struck a deal — except India. So, it was inevitable that some kind of tariff was coming. Threats only work to a certain point. Once a deadline is set, if Trump had deferred even this one, it would have looked weak on his in that context, it's not a big deal. This is a choice India made. Yes, it is a pressure tactic, of course. If tomorrow India agrees to what the US administration wants — say, opening certain sectors — then the tariff could be reduced from 25% to 20%, even down to 15%, depending on what India is willing to the problem is, it's not very clear what India was actually willing to put on the table. We've heard about India's red lines — what it wouldn't accept — but not much about what it would concede. In that absence, this decision doesn't feel like a big loss. If this is the choice India made, that's fine. We should accept it and move the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay there's no breakdown here. Let's understand this — most countries already face around 20% tariffs. So India getting hit with 25% isn't out of the at countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam — even the European Union. The EU accepted a 15% tariff after essentially opening its economy to near free trade with the in comparison, if India got 25% and didn't have to open much more of its economy beyond what it's already importing, that's not a bad said, when the US delegation visits, the focus will likely be on addressing the $40 billion trade deficit the US has with India. India exports about $85 billion worth of goods to the US and imports around $45 billion — leaving a gap of $40 billion.I'm sure the US administration will push for India to buy more to help bridge that gap. Likely suggestions will include buying more aircraft from Boeing or more energy products. But the latter might not work, as US energy prices may not be competitive for realistically, buying more aircraft or defense equipment is what's likely. And that's not unreasonable — India does need both. So if those purchases help balance trade, it could be a win-win.
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US policy towards India takes 'unfortunate turn', says Kaushik Basu
Agencies Trump's India tariffs Former World Bank Chief Economist Kaushik Basu on Thursday said the US economic policy towards India has taken an unfortunate turn, noting that President Donald Trump's harsh stance against New Delhi appears baffling. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods from August 1, amid signs of a stalemate in the ongoing bilateral trade negotiations between the two countries. "US economic policy towards India has taken an unfortunate turn," Basu told PTI. He further said that, while arguing that the US has a big trade deficit with India, the US announced a hefty tariff on Indian imports. " But the US trade deficit with India is just USD 41 billion, nowhere near the deficit with China (USD 270 billion) or even small countries like Vietnam (USD 113 billion)," Basu said. He pointed out that President Trump also described India as a "big abuser." "This harsh stance against India seems baffling, but it is a natural outcome of India having become an unquestioning supporter of Donald Trump," Basu said. According to him, the US now takes India for granted as never before. India used to be known for its independent voice, not subservient to any other country. Basu, currently a professor of economics at Cornell University, explained that an important target of US policy is India's agriculture and dairy sectors. "If India gives in to US demands and does a deal along the lines the US is demanding, this will have a negative impact on India's farmers and the agriculture sector," he said. Given that India's agriculture sector is already suffering, with a recent increase in surplus labour, Basu said he hopes both the United States and India will show sensitivity to the situation. Trump, announcing the tariff, listed India's high tariffs, its procurement of "vast majority" of military equipment and energy from Russia, as well as "obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers". India will be paying a "tariff of 25 per cent plus a penalty" from August 1, he said, adding "we have a massive trade deficit with India". The US president, in a social media post, however, described India as a "friend". "While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers," Trump said. Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine, he added. "All things not good! India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25 per cent plus a penalty for the above starting on August 1," the US president said. There is no immediate reaction from India to Trump's announcement. A team from the US is scheduled to visit India next month for the next round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement. India and the US teams concluded the fifth round of talks for the agreement last week in Washington. India's chief negotiator and special secretary in the Department of Commerce Rajesh Agrawal, and Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch held the deliberations.
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Shrimp stocks Avanti Feeds, Waterbase, others fall up to 7% after Trump threatens 25% tariff and penalty on India
Avanti Feeds, Apex Frozen Foods, and Waterbase Ltd witnessed steep declines as investors priced in concerns over a potential impact on exports. Avanti Feeds tumbled 6.6% to Rs 645, Apex Frozen Foods slipped 6.5% to Rs 225.05, and Waterbase fell 4.5% to Rs 49.16. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads High exposure, rising duties Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Economic fallout expected Shares of India's leading shrimp exporters tumbled as much as 7% on Thursday, July 31, after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff and unspecified penalties on Indian goods, citing continued business ties with Russia. Apex Frozen Foods , and Waterbase Ltd saw sharp declines as investors reacted to the potential hit to exports. Avanti Feeds shares dropped 6.6% to Rs 645, Apex Frozen Foods fell 6.5% to Rs 225.05, while Waterbase shed 4.5% to Rs declines follow Trump's Wednesday evening announcement that India will face a 25% tariff on all its exports to the United States, alongside an unspecified financial penalty for its dealings with Russia, including defence and oil U.S. is a crucial market for India's shrimp exporters. Avanti Feeds, generated 77% of its revenue from North America in the March 2025 quarter, slightly down from 80% in the same quarter last year. Apex Frozen Foods, according to its March quarter investor presentation, derived 53% of its revenue from the currently accounts for about 20% of global shrimp production, estimated to remain flat at 1.2 million metric tonnes this fiscal. Nearly 48% of these exports are destined for the U.S., according to Avanti Feeds' latest annual the newly announced measures, Indian shrimp exports to the U.S. were subject to an effective duty of 17.7%, including 5.7% in countervailing duties and 1.8% in anti-dumping duties. The new tariff will raise this to 25%, excluding the additional penalty announced by the U.S. Ashok Gulati told PTI on Wednesday that the decision to impose a higher tariff on Indian goods was 'very bad' and 'shocking.' Gulati, who expected a 10–15% hike, said the 25% tariff would 'severely impact' India's shrimp exports, adding that Ecuador, with its lower duties and closer proximity to the U.S., stood to exported shrimp worth approximately $4.88 billion in FY25, accounting for 66% of the country's total seafood exports. The U.S. and China remain India's top markets for shrimp, with the U.S. absorbing nearly half of all raw shrimp new tariffs are expected to come into effect from August 1.
