1,200 students graduate at CMRIT's 22nd convocation
CMR Institute of Technology (CMRIT) celebrated its 22nd graduation day, conferring degrees on 1,200 engineering graduates from the class of 2024–25 across various disciplines on Saturday.
The ceremony honored academic toppers and student achievers in sports and entrepreneurship.
Principal Sanjay Jain in his welcome address highlighted institutional milestones over the past year. Tristha Ramamurthy, provost of CMR University, administered the Graduation Oath.
Chief guest Prashanth Prakash, founder of Accel India and co-founder of Unboxing BLR Foundation, urged graduates to embrace innovation and entrepreneurship, especially in AI-led sectors such as agriculture, defense, and IT, to contribute to a 'Viksit Bharat' focused on inclusive growth.
Guest of honour K.C. Ramamurthy, chairman of the CMR Group and former Rajya Sabha MP, congratulated graduates and emphasised lifelong learning.
Entrepreneurial student Devesh shared his startup journey, crediting faculty mentorship, while alumnus Nithin Kushalappa received the Silver Jubilee Alumni Excellence Award 2025 for his acclaimed book Dakshin.
Senior members of the CMR Group, including Jayadeep K.R. Reddy, K.C. Jagantha Reddy, B. Narasimha Murthy, and dean Chitra took part in the event.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Clearing the fog on the state of India-US relations
'The administration is bullish on India' is how a senior US official put it to me last week in Washington D.C. This sentiment would seem at odds with the broader reporting on the US-India relationship. In a Financial Times newsletter on India, one writer argued that the Indian Prime Minister (PM) 'made the mistake of counting on his warm personal connection with Trump'. The general assertion being that the Indian government has mortgaged this crucial relationship to 'personal friendships' alone. Others suggest that the US President's recent luncheon with Asim Munir, the recently decorated Pakistani Field Marshal, and his 'sneaky attempt' to bring PM Narendra Modi and Munir into the same room in the White House is 'threatening the future of US-India partnership'. Structures like TRUST were created for top political leaders to monitor progress on crucial initiatives. (REUTERS) Between social media and popular reporting, it would seem as though this relationship has been iced. Yet, in meetings with over 30 officials, experts, think tankers, and industry representatives last week, the story that emerged was diametrically opposed to the one that has been paraphrased above. Modi's engagements with Trump matter more than it is perhaps realised. It clearly provides a political basis of what can be achieved between the two countries, even at this time of shrinking administrative capacities in the US, and the many unplanned shifts in the bureaucratic body politic. To be sure, you could start the week with a meeting with official X and end up receiving a phone call from his/her successor the next day. Yet, what was clear to me was that the vision laid out by the two leaders in a lengthy joint statement following PM Modi's meeting with President Trump in February, guides the different contours of the relationship at the functional level. Notwithstanding the game of political catch between outlandish tweets and measured official responses, the guidelines for those moving the relationship across government and the private sector are more or less clear. First, there is a concerted effort to realise outcomes in the strategic technology partnership between the two sides. Under the banner of TRUST (Transforming the Relationship Utilising Strategic Technology), the administrative State and technology companies between the two countries are working towards outcomes to do more on pharmaceuticals with the view to de-risk the production of key ingredients from China; fuse infrastructure partnerships between firms invested in the present and the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI); and actively looking for ways to cooperate on extracting and processing critical minerals. The latter needs work, but the zest to find the right compact is real. Second, American private sector actors are preparing the ground to sell different kinds of reactors to meet India's nuclear energy needs. They are, at this time, hoping that the proposed legislative changes to the Indian Civil Nuclear Liability Act 2010 streamline liability clauses in consonance with global standards — delinking liabilities on suppliers and operators. Further, they remain hopeful that changes to India's Atomic Energy Act would allow private sector participation to meet India's nuclear energy needs. This is a top priority for the White House and the US President. This was made clear in several exchanges. This is 'unfinished business' following the conclusion of the 2008 US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement, as one Washington insider put it. My own sense is that progress on this front is almost as important as the conclusion of the first tranche of the trade deal between the two countries. The first tranche of this deal needs to be completed by July 9, when the US President's 90-day pause on 'reciprocal tariffs' ends. Officials suggested that there is a fair chance that the first tranche of the deal with India will be completed by this deadline. 'The trickier parts will come later,' they made plain. Third, efforts across bureaucracies in Washington D.C. that deal with India are almost uniformly focussed on the Quad Leader's Summit in October or November, which provides an opportunity for another bilateral between the two leaders. 'Deliverables' is the name of the game. Yet, at least some of the deliverables need to be real. The ongoing process is less about padding a joint statement and more about searching for right-sized deals. There is a fire in the system to make something happen by the time the leaders meet, including a considerable push to realise new AI infrastructure partnerships. 'India and Brazil are the two most important countries for the US when it comes to data centres,' as one technocrat stated. 'We need to get this right on both sides', the official made plain. In the US, this would mean producing revised rules for export controls that make it easier to access chips from the US into India. In turn, India will possibly need to negotiate certain guarantees to make sure that the chips are not off-shored. Moreover, there is a significant push to deregulate the data centre market in India, and streamline processes to encourage the expansion of AI infrastructure in India. None of this will be easy. Deregulation takes time. Negotiating guarantees can be cumbersome and is a process that cuts across several administrative buildings in and across New Delhi and other Indian states. If Indian officials conclude that data centre investments are an advantage for India, this is the bureaucratic work that will be required to realise this unique moment. It is exactly why structures like TRUST were created, for top political leaders to monitor progress on crucial initiatives. The enthusiasm for investments and partnerships will not last long. This also might be kept in mind. This is a zero-sum play. In sum, while there is little doubt that Munir, Pakistan, Twitter exchanges, and the politics that shape these expressions and incidents to an extent inform the current state of US-India ties, at times exercising officials on both sides, it is also plainly clear that the functional relationship — which produces material results — is one that is working to produce outcomes, and not without the direction of the political leadership. Rudra Chaudhuri is director, Carnegie India. The views expressed are personal.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Amazon awarded ₹23.7 crore in damages, ₹77 crore towards legal costs by Singapore arbitration body in Future Group case
Amazon has been awarded a sum of ₹ 23.7 crore by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in damages linked to the tech giant's prolonged battle with Kishore Biyani-led Future Group, a new report has said. As per a report by Bar and Bench, the SIAC ruled that Future Group had breached its contractual obligations to Amazon when it entered into an agreement with Reliance, which was in violation to the terms of the pre-existing agreement. Livemint could not independently verify the details of the sum awarded to Amazon. This article will be updated once there is a confirmation. Amazon had originally sought ₹ 1,436 crore in damages — which is the amount it invested in Future Coupons Private Limited. However, it has only been awarded ₹ 23.7 crore. The company had also sought the legal costs it incurred in the arbitration proceedings as well as cases it had fought before courts and tribunals in India. According to sources quoted by Bar and Bench, the three-member SIAC tribunal held that the Future Group had indeed breached the contract and awarded 60 per cent of the legal costs that Amazon incurred during arbitration proceedings. It also refused to grant any costs related to the initiation or defence of allied proceedings. As per estimates quoted by the legal publication, Amazon awarded ₹ 77 crore and ₹ 6 crore in legal costs and arbitration fees, as opposed to the ₹ 125 crore it spent. The three-member tribunal comprised Prof Albert Jan van den Berg, Prof Jan Paulsson and Senior Counsel Michael Hwang. Future Group and Amazon had been locked in a bitter battle for over a year following a decision by the Indian retailer to sell its Big Bazaar business to Reliance Retail, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries. The deal was opposed by NV Investment Holdings LLC on grounds that its investment of ₹ 1,400 crore in Future Coupons, which is one of promoters of Future Retail, does not allow Future to sell retail assets to certain companies, including Reliance. At stake was whether Amazon can become a bigger force in a $900 billion retail market, with 1.3 billion consumers, than Reliance.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Central Sector Scholarship Scheme 2025: CBSE asks students to apply by 31 October
Central Sector Scheme of Scholarship 2025. (AI Image) Central Sector Scholarship 2025: The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has issued a public notice inviting applications from eligible students for the Central Sector Scheme of Scholarship for College and University Students (CSSS) for the academic year 2025–26. The scholarship is sponsored by the Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, and aims to support meritorious students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds in pursuing higher education. The online application process is now open on the National Scholarship Portal ( Students seeking fresh applications or renewals for 1st year (2024), 2nd year (2023), 3rd year (2022), and 4th year (2021) are encouraged to submit their applications online. The last date to apply for both fresh and renewal scholarships is October 31, 2025. Scholarship aims to support students in higher education The Central Sector Scheme of Scholarship is designed to provide financial assistance to deserving students to help meet part of their daily expenses during their graduation and postgraduation studies. Under this scheme, selected undergraduate students receive Rs 12,000 per annum for the first three years, while postgraduate students are awarded Rs 20,000 per annum. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3.5, 4.5 BHK Homes starting at ₹4.89 Cr.* Hero Homes Learn More Undo Read the official notice here CBSE has asked all students affiliated with its institutions to apply through the National Scholarship Portal within the stipulated deadline. The board emphasised that all applications must be verified by the respective institutions. In cases where verification is required, students must present their original documents to their institute authorities. Institutional verification is mandatory The board has also issued a directive to the Nodal Officers of respective institutions to ensure timely verification of applications. Officers are expected to verify, flag defects, or reject applications as necessary via their institute login on the portal. Failure to complete this process may result in applications being marked as invalid. "All the candidates are advised to apply online within the stipulated time and get their online applications verified by the institutions (if required show the original documents to institute), else the application would be treated as INVALID," CBSE stated in its official notice. Application process available only through online portal To apply, students must visit and complete the online application process. It is crucial that both fresh applicants and those seeking renewal follow the specified procedure carefully to avoid rejection. Students and institutions are advised to adhere strictly to deadlines and verification requirements to ensure the successful processing of scholarship applications under the CSSS scheme. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
