
Minn. Senate President Bobby Joe Champion steps back as ethics panel chair amid conflict-of-interest concerns
ethics committee
in the wake of concerns that he did not disclose a conflict of interest when bringing forward legislation that would send grant money to a local nonprofit.
The
Minnesota Reformer first reported
the connection last week. The nonprofit online news outlet said Champion, a Democrat representing north Minneapolis, in 2022 worked in his private capacity as an attorney for Rev. Jerry McAfee and his nonprofit Salem Inc.—a connection he did not share when he brought forward legislation this session that would steer a $1 million state grant to McAfee's 21 Days of Peace violence prevention organization.
Champion told the Reformer he did the work pro bono and that he didn't need to disclose it because it preceded the 2023-2024 legislative session, during which he also advocated for funding for 21 Days of Peace.
On Monday in a statement, he said he would temporarily step aside as chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Ethics pending advice from the panel, which Senate rules allow members to do should an issue arise.
"I understand that questions have been raised about a potential conflict of interest regarding my work as a senator and a private practice attorney. Out of an abundance of caution, I have asked the Senate Ethics Subcommittee for an advisory opinion," Champion said.
During a Monday afternoon meeting of the Senate Jobs and Economic Development Committee, Champion, who is the chairman, walked through the draft of the budget bill that includes grants for community organizations offering workforce development and job training.
Sen. Rich Draheim, R-Madison Lake, asked Champion if, in light of the Reformer report, he could assure the committee that he "had no legal contracts with any of the named organizations in this bill."
Champion replied that it's "challenging" when "someone tries to smear your name with what's written in the papers," but that he "1,000%" did not represent anyone in the large budget proposal that will be worked on through the
end of the session
.
"I just want to make sure that I assure you I am not representing anyone that is outlined on our sheet—not pro bono, not for a fee, nothing," Champion said.
This story will be updated.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate strikes deal to approve funding bills ahead of August recess
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), head of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced Friday afternoon that the chamber will be moving forward to pass its first tranche of government funding bills for fiscal year 2026. The chamber will vote on three full-year funding plans that cover the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, legislative branch operations, military construction and rural development. Senators will first vote on a series of amendments from both sides of the aisle as part of the process, and a final vote is expected Friday night. 'It's taken a great deal of work, good faith and negotiation to get to this point,' Collins said upon announcing the development from the Senate floor on Friday. The deal comes after days of uncertainty on both sides of the aisle over whether the chamber would be able to pass any funding bills before its August recess. The evolving package had undergone several revisions this week. Republican leaders dealt with frustration in their ranks over some of the funding levels in the legislative branch funding bill, while Democratic resistance to the Trump administration's relocation plans for the FBI's headquarters weighed down efforts to pass the annual Justice Department funding bill. In remarks on the Senate floor, Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, called the bills 'the best chance we have to get the best outcome for folks back home,' while pushing members against another funding stopgap, also known as a continuing resolution (CR), like what the party was forced to swallow in March to keep the government open. 'We cannot have another slush fund CR that gives away more power to Trump,' she said. Together, the bills would provide more than $180 billion in discretionary funding for the agencies for fiscal 2026 – well over half of which would go toward the annual VA and military construction funding plan. Lawmakers are hoping to pass further funding legislation when they return from recess in September, as Congress braces for what could be a messy funding fight to keep the government open beyond the start of the fiscal year in October.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Khanna: ‘Time has come' to recognize Palestinian state
At least 11 progressive House Democrats, including Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), have signed onto a letter calling for the U.S. to recognize a Palestinian state in the wake of moves by several American allies to do so before the United Nations convenes in September. 'Recognizing a Palestinian state is an idea whose time has come. The response of my colleagues has been overwhelming,' Khanna wrote on X. 'We will build support and release prior to the UN convening.' The letter was first reported by Jewish Insider. In the same post, Khanna charged that someone had leaked the letter to the paper in order to 'sabotage' the effort. Signatories, Jewish Insider reported, include Texas Democrats Reps. Greg Casar, Veronica Escobar, Lloyd Doggett and Al Green, alongside Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.). Prominent progressives Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) also signed on. Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, has also signed the letter, Khanna's office confirmed to The Hill. The letter follows announcements from France, Canada and the United Kingdom that they would move towards recognizing a Palestinian state. France plans to do so at the U.N. in September, while Canada said recognition was contingent on demilitarization and holding democratic elections without Hamas. The U.K. plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September if a ceasefire is not reached by then. The moves by the members of the Group of Seven are largely symbolic, but they signal growing diplomatic pressure on Israel over a worsening hunger and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. A draft of the letter from Democratic lawmakers circulated July 31 states that recognition by the U.S. — an unlikely prospect regardless — would be contingent on a Palestinian state recognizing Israel and adopting 'a framework to guarantee Israel's security, including the disarmament of and relinquishing of power by Hamas.' 'We believe recognizing Palestinian statehood and obligating Palestinian leaders to abide by the international law binding on states and their governments will make that far more achievable and sustainable than decades of statelessness and repression have,' the draft letter reads. The Palestinian Authority is currently an observer state at the United Nations, meaning it cannot vote (the Vatican holds the same status). There have been efforts to make the Palestinian Authority a full member state, which requires the assent of the U.N. Security Council, where the U.S. holds veto power, alongside a two-thirds vote from the U.N. general assembly. The United States blocked a move for full Palestinian membership in April 2024.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can GOP shock Dems in Aug. 5 special election to succeed Ruggerio in RI Senate?
The first test of how Rhode Island Republicans' message is playing in the state during the second Trump administration comes Aug. 5 in the special Senate election to replace the late Dominick Ruggerio. The GOP's Alex Asermely takes on Democratic nominee Stefano Famiglietti in the race to represent Senate District 4, covering most of North Providence and a section of northwest Providence. Republicans face an uphill battle in the Senate district, which Democrat Ruggerio represented since 1984 and which has been controlled by his extended family for more than half a century. And Ruggerio hadn't had a general election opponent since two independent candidates were on the ballot in 2012. Famiglietti, with support from the state's Democratic establishment and businesses, outspent Asermely in the campaign by more than three to one, about $32,000 to $9,000. Asermely may benefit from the fact that the district has become somewhat more conservative in recent years, in part due to boundary changes that made it more difficult terrain for Democratic primary challengers. And North Providence is among the suburbs that have tilted red since 2016. Both Asermely, 39, and Famiglietti, 33, are attorneys and residents of North Providence. Famiglietti defeated three other Democrats in the July primary. Asermely was unopposed for the GOP nomination. Where do they stand on the issues? Asemely is running on business friendliness and cutting taxes. Famiglietti's top priority is bringing back more state aid to North Providence. Gun control, a big issue in the recent General Assembly session, has not been a top issue in this race, with both candidates saying they opposed the recently passed ban on sales of assault-style weapons. And, unlike Famiglietti's primary opponents, neither candidate is calling for Mayor Charles Lombardi to step down over allegations that town employees did work on his property. "At this junction, Mayor Lombardi is facing just civil accusations and not any criminal charges," Famiglietti said. "While the accusations are severe and bears watching, we certainly cannot solely allow such accusations to determine guilt or innocence." Asermely said it's a town rather than a State House matter. Truck tolls They do, however, differ on some other big issues. The state budget assumes the truck toll network will relaunch sometime next year and provide $10 million in state revenue, although details remain scant. Is Gov. Dan McKee right to turn the tolls back on? "No, absolutely not, as it is an impediment to commerce," Asermely said. "It is an unfair burden on small businesses that gets passed on to the consumers." Famiglietti: "Yes, I am in favor of turning the truck tolls back on, as it is the most effective way to raise revenue to repair our roads and bridges without directly impacting the taxpayers. With that said, I will never be in favor of tolling passenger vehicles." Hospitals Despite extensive efforts by the state to help shore up financially struggling hospitals, the CharterCare hospitals that included Fatima of North Providence are still searching for investors to help facilitate a turnaround plan. Should the state do whatever it takes to keep them afloat? "The state should use any and all resources to save these facilities," Famiglietti said. "Both facilities are essential to our local health care system as well as our state's health care system. The loss of these facilities would cause an unbearable strain that would adversely affect care in our state." Asermely: "These are private businesses. It is not the duty of the taxpayers to bail them out. The taxpayers contribute enough through private pay, insurance, Medicare, & Medicaid. Under no circumstances should services be cut, as this is a management issue." Washington Bridge The Democratic and Republican candidates also have differing report cards for the Rhode Island Department of Transportation's handling of the westbound Washington Bridge emergency. Famiglietti said while the bridge closure has adversely affected residents, "the steps taken to allow for continued flow of traffic while safeguarding public safety have been prudent. However, we must take care that all of our roads and bridges are monitored and repaired to avoid situations like this in the future." Asermely blasted the pace of the rebuild effort and DOT's answers for how the problem arose.. "No, it has not progressed fast enough and work seems to be sporadic and slow," he said. "Transparency has been a disaster and this should have never happened in the first place." Housing Neither candidate is a fan of state efforts to build more housing by overriding local restrictions on construction or ending mandates for homes to sit on large properties. "There is little available property in Senate District 4," Asermely said. "The use of that property should be defined by the market, not the legislature." Famiglietti: "I do not support allowing more unfettered housing in District 4. My experience on the North Providence Town Council has shown me the negative effects increasing housing density has on our already densely populated community." Pensions Both candidates support restoring cost of living adjustment payments to public-sector retirees that were cut in 2011, but neither supports raising taxes to do it. School lunches Neither candidate supports providing universal free school lunch, as in Massachusetts and Connecticut. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Senate District 4 special election: Where candidates stand on issues Solve the daily Crossword