South Ribble homes to be built on former factory site
A major housing development first mooted more than 15 years ago is finally set to get off the drawing board.More than 270 homes will be built across the Penwortham Mills site near Preston, which was previously occupied by a factory belonging to the surgical lint manufacturer Vernon Carus.The plot – part of which became home to a new Lidl store in February – has been eyed for a residential estate since the late 2000s, shortly after the firm relocated.Several proposals have been approved since then, but none has ever come to fruition, with the land having also changed hands on numerous occasions.
In April, the site was acquired by the construction firm Persimmon Homes, which told a meeting of South Ribble Borough Council's planning committee it was eager to bring the blueprint to life.It needed approval to tweak the design of the properties being built, to replace those approved under the most recent permission granted in 2022 to what was then the Trafford Housing Trust, later to become part of the L&Q Group.Rachel Graham, senior land and planning manager for Persimmon in Lancashire, said the revised range for the first phase of the "stalled" estate reflected "the already approved arrangement as closely as possible".The council's planning manager, Catherine Thomas, told members there was "hardly any difference at all" in the overall shape of the initial phase.
'Affordable homes'
The changes – which were approved without debate – relate to 49 of the homes within the first tranche of the development, for which full planning permission has already been granted.They will be made up of detached, semi-detached and terrace styles – and work on them is now expected to begin in the coming months.A similar revision will later be submitted for the remaining 68 properties within that phase.The second and third phases only have outline permission currently granted for them. This means applications for the details of house designs would have been required in future regardless of the change of ownership of the site – and Persimmon says they will come forward in due course.However, the firm is planning to build only 274 dwellings in all on Penwortham Mills – fewer than the up to 301 proposed in the application by Trafford Housing Group.Twenty-five homes are already approved for a neighbouring site where the Sumpter Horse pub stood until its demolition in January.Within the Penwortham Mills plot, the Local Democracy Reporting Service understands 83 of the properties will be discounted "affordable homes".
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Multimillionaire couple sue insurers for £1m over fire that 'engulfed' their £2m house and £300k watch collection - after firm refused to pay out because they'd failed to declare building work
A multimillionaire couple are embroiled in a £1million legal battle with their insurer after the firm did not pay up for part of rebuilding costs as well as damage to a collection of Rolexes following a house fire. The £2million home of wedding makeup artist Biborka Bellhouse and her property investment boss husband Charles Bellhouse went up in flames on December 29, 2022, with 60 firefighters and eight fire engines having to bring the blaze under control. The four-bed detached house in Park Road, Chiswick, was seriously damaged in the blaze which broke out while they were in the process of having it extended and refurbished. Following the fire, which the couple say caused them 'psychological harm', they went on to claim £16,000 towards scaffolding to make the property safe and around £140,000 for alternative accommodation and furniture from their insurers, Zurich. Although the insurance firm agreed to pay the couple around £155,000 towards these costs, they refused to pay out over £1million for claims made for rebuilding the property, as well as a luxury watch collection. Mr Bellhouse, 46, and Mrs Bellhouse, 42, claimed around £600,000 to rebuild the house and up to £475,000 for contents, which included the property investment boss's Rolex Chronograph and Patek Philippe watches. The Rolex Chronograph and the Patek were individually insured for £40,000 and £187,000 respectively, while three other Rolex watches were insured for £75,000. Now the couple are suing Zurich Insurance Plc, by taking them to the High Court in a bid to force them to pay out so they can reconstruct their destroyed home. But, the insurance firm has insisted the family had breached the terms of their cover and thus invalidated their policy as they failed to inform them about the construction of their extension. In documents submitted to the court, Mek Mesfin, representing the multi-millionaire couple, explained the fire broke out causing 'substantial damage' to their home. Neither the couple or their children were home when the incident occurred. 'Following the fire, a claim was made under the policy,' said the barrister, who went to claim Zurich has 'wrongfully and in breach of the terms of the policy' refused to accept liability beyond scaffolding and rehousing payments. '[The insurance firm] has refused to pay the claimants any sum in respect of the losses which the claimants have suffered as a consequence of the fire.' According to the barrister, only one of the valuable watches was in the home at the time of the fire, however boxes and authenticity certificates may have perished in the flames, potentially impacting the value of the other luxury accessories. 'The authentication materials, including the boxes and/or certification, for the watches were in the property during the fire. Due to the unsafe condition of the property, the claimants do not know, but assume, whether they have been damaged or destroyed,' he said. Mr Mesfin insisted his clients are entitled to indemnity and/or damages from the insurance firm if the items suffered a loss in value as a result of damage to authentication materials in the fire. The couple are also claiming 'medical expenses' of around £8,000 from Zurich, stating that they have suffered 'psychological harm' and needed therapy due to Zurich's failure to pay up. They also want around £20,000 for additional scaffolding costs and around £600,000 to rebuild the property, although they say the project may cost more. However, lawyers for Zurich say it is not obliged to pay out anything else on the policy and has 'avoided liability' due to a 'misrepresentation'. They say that when the couple took out the insurance, they had no plans to carry out any major works to their home within the next 12 months. The company says it would not have insured the house had it known the extension and renovation was planned and as such the policy is invalid. At a pre-trial hearing in the case, Judge David Hodge explained: 'Zurich asserts that in May 2022, the claimants made a deliberate or reckless, or careless, qualifying misrepresentation by misrepresenting their intention to carry out contract works to their home in the following 12 months. 'The claimants expressly the property was not likely to undergo any contract works within the next 12 months 'The claimants did then, in fact, carry out the contract works; and these caused loss and damage, both to the contract works themselves, and to the property, on 29 December 2022, when a fire occurred during the course of the contract works. 'Without the misrepresentation, Zurich would not have entered into the contract of insurance with the claimants at all. Zurich have now avoided the policy.' However, he said the couple deny making a 'qualifying misrepresentation' and insist there is 'no factual basis' for the allegations made against them. They are suing for a declaration that Zurich is obliged under the insurance policy to compensate them in respect of the claim, together with an indemnity, damages, interest and costs. In its defence, Zurich barrister Daniel Crowley says that as well as denying they are liable to pay out anything else, the insurer is counterclaiming in a bid to force the family to pay back the £169,507 it has already paid out to them. The couple and the insurers have already clashed in two preliminary hearings. The case will now return to court for a full trial unless it is settled beforehand.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'
Savers could end up having less money to put into stocks and shares if the cash Isa limit is cut, a finance expert has said. The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15. The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet. 'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them. 'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach. 'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors. 'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.' The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments. The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit. 'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products. 'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either. ' People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset. 'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals. 'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.' Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone. 'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year. 'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.' He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares. 'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.' But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. 'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.' In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year. In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now. Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.' The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas. While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide. Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations. 'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves's cash Isa raid is a blatant attack on pensioners
What are you doing with your cash savings? Let me know: I probably don't need to tell Telegraph readers not to trust Rachel Reeves. Perhaps it's no surprise – given her history of, ahem, embellishing her CV – that I don't think the Chancellor is being entirely honest about her motives around Isas. It is thought Reeves will use this month's Mansion House speech to announce a dramatic cut to the limits on cash Isas. Handily, this would not break her promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', and would land largely on the shoulders of pensioners. Currently, you can save £20,000 a year into a single Isa, or across several types, such as investment Isas or the lifetime Isa. The Chancellor previously signalled the overall limit would not change, but is now understood to be preparing to slash the amount you can put solely into cash accounts to £5,000 or even £4,000 a year. This will be justified by saying that savers need to be encouraged to invest in British companies. This, the Government would argue, generates higher returns for investors than boring old savings accounts – and gives London-listed companies a much-needed boost. But the truth is that if you're an 85-year-old saver, you probably don't want or need to invest your cash – and Reeves, of course, knows this. Indeed, it would be an incredibly risky move. If Donald Trump's latest surprise move sends your portfolio down 20pc, you might not have very much time to recover those losses. Instead, millions of cash Isa savers will simply be forced to put their money into traditional bank and savings accounts. Outside of the tax-free Isa wrapper, the interest on that cash will attract income tax just like any other earnings. The 'savings allowance' does protect some interest from income tax, but it is set pitifully low. While basic-rate payers can earn £1,000 a year tax-free, higher-rate payers only get £500 – while those earning more than £125,000 a year get... zilch. These limits have been frozen for nearly a decade, while wages and interest rates have soared. By stealth, our tax bills, whether paid as a salary or savings interest, are rapidly rising. Say the cash Isa limit does drop to £4,000 a year from April 2026. If you put the full amount in and add the remaining £16,000 into a savings account outside of an Isa paying, for example, 4.6pc, it would generate a tax bill of nearly £100. And that's not taking into account any money you already have saved. Replicate that across millions of people across Britain, and HMRC – or rather the Chancellor – will be raking it in. In January, Shawbrook Bank warned an extra 800,000 accounts would generate more than £1,000 of interest this year, triggering a tax bill. There were already more than six million accounts big enough to pass this threshold. But this analysis does not take into account further reforms to Isa limits or what evasive action savers are already taking. Some £14bn flooded into cash Isas in April, a record for a single month, as families sought to shelter their money while they still can. My advice to you is to do the same (you can find today's best cash Isa rates here). Savings passed between spouses are tax-free, and children have a very generous £9,000 Isa allowance of their own. Remember too that you can hold cash in a stocks and shares Isa, though the rates are poor, or by-proxy via 'money market' funds that invest in low-risk assets that produce a similar return to cash.
