Evolutionary origins of the potato revealed - and a tomato was involved
By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The potato is one of the world's food staples, first cultivated thousands of years ago in the Andes region of South America before spreading globally from the 16th century. But despite its importance to humankind, the evolutionary origins of the potato have remained puzzling - until now.
A new analysis of 450 genomes from cultivated potatoes and 56 genomes of wild potato species has revealed that the potato lineage originated through natural interbreeding between a wild tomato plant and a potato-like species in South America about 9 million years ago.
This hybridization event led to the appearance of the nascent potato plant's tuber, an enlarged structure housing nutrients underground, according to the researchers, who also identified two crucial genes involved in tuber formation. Whereas in a tomato plant the edible part is the fruit, in the potato plant it is the tuber.
"Potatoes are truly one of humanity's most remarkable food staples, combining extraordinary versatility, nutritional value and cultural ubiquity in ways few crops can match," said Sanwen Huang, a genome biologist and plant breeder at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and senior author of the study published on Friday in the journal Cell.
"People eat potatoes using virtually every cooking method - baking, roasting, boiling, steaming and frying. Despite being stereotyped as carbohydrates, potatoes offer vitamin C, potassium, fiber and resistant starch, and are naturally gluten-free, low-fat and satiating - a nutrient-dense calorie source," Huang added.
Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that resists digestion in the small intestine and ferments in the large intestine, feeding beneficial bacteria in the gut.
The modern-day potato plant's scientific name is Solanum tuberosum. Its two parents identified in the study were plants that were the ancestors of a potato-like species now found in Peru named Etuberosum, which closely resembles the potato plant but lacks a tuber, and the tomato plant.
These two plants themselves shared a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago, and were able to naturally interbreed when the fortuitous hybridization event occurred five million years after they had diverged from each other.
"This event led to a reshuffling of genes such that the new lineage produced tubers, allowing these plants to expand into the newly created cold, dry habitats in the rising Andes mountain chain," said botanist Sandra Knapp of the Natural History Museum in London, a co-author of the study.
This hybridization event coincided with the rapid uplift of the Andes. With a tuber, the potato plant was able to adapt to the changing regional environment and thrive in the harsh conditions of the mountains.
"Tubers can store nutrients for cold adaptation, and enable asexual reproduction to meet the challenge of the reduced fertility in cold conditions. These allowed the plant to survive and rapidly expand," Huang said.
The study's findings, according to the researchers, may help guide improved cultivated potato breeding to address environmental challenges that crops presently face due to factors such as climate change.
There currently are roughly 5,000 potato varieties. The potato is the world's third most important food crop, after rice and wheat, for human consumption, according to the Peru-based International Potato Center research organization. China is the world's leading potato producer.
"It always is hard to remove all the deleterious mutations in potato genomes in breeding, and this study opens a new door to make a potato free of deleterious mutations using the tomato as the chassis of synthetic biology," Huang said.
The study also may open the door to generate a new crop species that could produce tomato fruit above ground and potato tubers below ground, according to Zhiyang Zhang, a postdoctoral researcher at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
The potato and tomato are members of the nightshade family of flowering plants that also includes tobacco and peppers, among others. The study did not investigate the evolutionary origins of other tuberous root crops that originated in South America such as the sweet potato and yuca, which are members of different families of flowering plants.
While the parts of the tomato and potato plants that people eat are quite different, the plants themselves are very similar.
"We use different parts of these two species, fruits in tomatoes and tubers in potatoes," Knapp said. "If you look at the flowers or leaves, these are very similar. And if you are lucky enough to let your potato plant produce fruits, they look just like little green tomatoes. But don't eat them. They are not very nice."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Wire
14 hours ago
- Geek Wire
Space entrepreneurs see defense projects as a future frontier for funding and innovation
The Golden Dome is envisioned as a network of satellite sensors and interceptors that could protect America from incoming missiles. (Lockheed Martin Illustration) Will the Golden Dome be a golden opportunity for commercial space ventures? That may be a bit of an exaggeration. But at a Seattle Tech Week presentation on the space industry, a panel of entrepreneurs agreed that military projects — including a plan to create a missile defense shield along the lines of Israel's Iron Dome by as early as 2028 — seem to be the most promising vehicles for getting commercial space ventures off the ground. Part of the reason for that has to do with the uncertainty that's currently surrounding America's civilian space program. At the same time that the White House is pushing plans for the $175 billion Golden Dome project, it's seeking to trim billions of dollars from NASA's budget. 'It's so interesting right now, because I think there's more uncertainty around civil space funding than there's ever been before, and more bullishness on defense space funding than there's ever been before,' said Erika Wagner, who left Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin space venture last year to lead The Exploration Company's U.S. business development team. Seattle-area space companies have been among the beneficiaries of the Pentagon's surge of support — ranging from the $25 million in Space Force funding granted to Seattle-based Integrate in June to the $2.4 billion in Space Force launch contracts set aside for Kent-based Blue Origin earlier this year. Gravitics, Starfish Space and Portal Space Systems are among other Seattle-area space ventures benefiting from recent Pentagon contracts. AE Industrial Partners' Eugene Kim, Starcloud's Philip Johnston, The Exploration Company's Erika Wagner, Portal Space Systems' Jeff Thornburg and Perkins Coie's Ben Straughan participate in a Seattle Tech Week panel on the space industry. (GeekWire Photo / Alan Boyle) The typical route for defense-oriented space startups is to win a series of grants issued through the Pentagon's Small Business Innovation Research program, or SBIR. But SBIR grants can take you only so far, said Jeff Thornburg, Bothell-based Portal Space Systems' founder and CEO. 'If it's just cool tech for cool tech's sake, you'll only get through about Phase 1 or Phase 2 SBIRs, and it'll never cross the 'Valley of Death,'' Thornburg said at Thursday afternoon's session. 'The Valley of Death is basically when you've taken the idea as far as you can, you don't have any other customer pull, and it costs so much money to develop that you have no way to get there, and the company kind of folds.' Portal and Gravitics managed to avoid the Valley of Death by winning support from SpaceWERX's STRATFI program, which can unlock tens of millions of dollars in public and private funding. Portal is using its funding to develop a sun-powered orbital transport vehicle called Supernova, while Gravitics is working on an orbital carrier for space vehicles. Thornburg said that the U.S. military can be 'the world's most difficult and demanding customer,' and cautioned that it's not easy to build relationships with the Pentagon officials who make the decisions on funding. 'If you're going to take on the defense customer, and you should probably consider it if you're an entrepreneur out there, you really have to do the homework,' he said. 'Are you answering a warfighter need?' The AI connection Artificial intelligence may well be one of those needs. At a Seattle Tech Week session held earlier in the day, a different set of space entrepreneurs suggested that there was a significant intersection between the AI frontier and the space frontier. For example, Planetary Systems AI is focused on using AI tools to help the Pentagon make sense of the flood of data streaming down from space sensors. 'We help with some of the automation and decision making, from pre-launch all the way to in-orbit … in a battle management perspective as well as for space operations,' said Cindy Chin, the New York-based company's founder and CEO. Such tools are expected to play an increasing role in space traffic management as more and more satellites are launched into low Earth orbit. Over the course of just six years, the Seattle area has become the world's most prolific producer of such satellites, primarily due to the rise of SpaceX's Starlink constellation and preparations for Amazon's Project Kuiper constellation. Starfish Space co-founder Austin Link said AI tools are already built into his company's satellite navigation systems. 'It's not like we're going and asking ChatGPT, 'Hey, should we burn the thrusters now?' At least, not yet,' he said. 'But there are a lot of autonomous decision making and a lot of complex algorithms that are flying the vehicle. That is effectively AI, at least in certain definitions.' Starfish Space's Austin Link, Planetary Systems AI's Cindy Chin, Radian Aerospace's Livingston Holder and Wilson Sonsini's Curt Blake discuss the state of the space industry at a Seattle Tech Week event. (GeekWire Photo / Alan Boyle) Space infrastructure could also ease the pressure that power-hungry AI data centers are putting on earthly resources. Two companies that have a significant presence in the Seattle area, Starcloud and Sophia Space, are developing systems that could open the way for solar-powered satellites to operate as orbital data centers. Starcloud CEO and co-founder Philip Johnston said his company initially set up shop in Southern California but relocated to Redmond, Wash., after a month. 'If you want somebody who knows about building a satellite … 90% of them are specifically in Redmond, because you have Kuiper and Starlink,' he said. Shifts in the market for space services — due to the AI angle as well as America's evolving national security needs — could well lead to long-term tectonic shifts in the space industry, Thornburg said. 'I'm kind of excited to see what happens with these 'neo-prime' relationships, Anduril and Palantir, and their partnerships with up-and-coming entrepreneurs to offer a different solution space for defense, and then how that can get applied to commercial [space applications]. Because I think that might be an X factor here that maybe everyone's not always contemplating,' he said. Other space shots from Seattle Tech Week Mining on the final frontier: It's been seven years since the Redmond-based asteroid mining venture known as Planetary Resources fizzled out, but Johnston said that space mining might be a market niche whose time has finally come. For examples, he pointed to Seattle-based Interlune, which aims to harvest helium-3 and other resources from the moon; and California-based AstroForge, which is setting the stage for extracting resources from asteroids. 'That is going to be an absolutely enormous business. It's very dependent on low-cost launch, though. Whether that happens in the next five years or the next 10 years is up for debate,' he said. It's been seven years since the Redmond-based asteroid mining venture known as Planetary Resources fizzled out, but Johnston said that space mining might be a market niche whose time has finally come. For examples, he pointed to Seattle-based Interlune, which aims to harvest helium-3 and other resources from the moon; and California-based AstroForge, which is setting the stage for extracting resources from asteroids. 'That is going to be an absolutely enormous business. It's very dependent on low-cost launch, though. Whether that happens in the next five years or the next 10 years is up for debate,' he said. What about an orbital smash-up? The afternoon session's panel was split on whether a catastrophic satellite collision event known as the Kessler syndrome would occur in the next five years, but the panelists agreed that international efforts would be made in the next five years to try to head off such an event. The afternoon session's panel was split on whether a catastrophic satellite collision event known as the Kessler syndrome would occur in the next five years, but the panelists agreed that international efforts would be made in the next five years to try to head off such an event. When will we put people on the moon? When the panelists were asked to project when astronauts would once again land on the moon, they guessed dates ranging from 2030 to 2035. For what it's worth, NASA's current timetable calls for the Artemis 3 mission to put a crew on the lunar surface in 2027. When the panelists were asked to project when astronauts would once again land on the moon, they guessed dates ranging from 2030 to 2035. For what it's worth, NASA's current timetable calls for the Artemis 3 mission to put a crew on the lunar surface in 2027. What about Mars? The panelists' projections for the first crewed landing on the Red Planet ranged from 2040 (or earlier) to 2060 — which is much later than Elon Musk's current goal of putting humans on Mars in 2028 or so. Johnston said he made a bet with someone that billionaire techie Jared Isaacman would 'be the first person on Mars before 2040.' Thursday morning's Seattle Tech Week session about the space industry was presented by Silicon Valley Bank and Wilson Sonsini, while the afternoon session was presented by Perkins Coie and Space Happy Hour.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
The mystery of the first potatoes has finally been solved – and a tomato was involved
The potato, a global food staple first cultivated thousands of years ago in the Andes region of South America before its worldwide spread from the 16th century, has long presented a puzzling evolutionary mystery. Now, a new analysis has finally unravelled its origins. Scientists have revealed that the potato lineage emerged approximately nine million years ago in South America, through a natural interbreeding event between a wild tomato plant and a potato-like species. This significant discovery, based on the genomic analysis of 450 cultivated potatoes and 56 wild species, explains how this vital crop came to be. This ancient hybridisation event is understood to have led to the appearance of the nascent potato plant's distinctive tuber – the enlarged structure housing nutrients underground, according to the researchers. While the edible part of a tomato plant is its fruit, the potato's value lies in this subterranean growth. The study also identified two crucial genes involved in tuber formation, deepening our understanding of this essential crop. "Potatoes are truly one of humanity's most remarkable food staples, combining extraordinary versatility, nutritional value and cultural ubiquity in ways few crops can match," said Sanwen Huang, a genome biologist and plant breeder at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and senior author of the study published on Friday in the journal Cell. "People eat potatoes using virtually every cooking method - baking, roasting, boiling, steaming and frying. Despite being stereotyped as carbohydrates, potatoes offer vitamin C, potassium, fiber and resistant starch, and are naturally gluten-free, low-fat and satiating - a nutrient-dense calorie source," Huang added. Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that resists digestion in the small intestine and ferments in the large intestine, feeding beneficial bacteria in the gut. The modern-day potato plant's scientific name is Solanum tuberosum. Its two parents identified in the study were plants that were the ancestors of a potato-like species now found in Peru named Etuberosum, which closely resembles the potato plant but lacks a tuber, and the tomato plant. These two plants themselves shared a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago, and were able to naturally interbreed when the fortuitous hybridization event occurred five million years after they had diverged from each other. "This event led to a reshuffling of genes such that the new lineage produced tubers, allowing these plants to expand into the newly created cold, dry habitats in the rising Andes mountain chain," said botanist Sandra Knapp of the Natural History Museum in London, a co-author of the study. This hybridization event coincided with the rapid uplift of the Andes. With a tuber, the potato plant was able to adapt to the changing regional environment and thrive in the harsh conditions of the mountains. "Tubers can store nutrients for cold adaptation, and enable asexual reproduction to meet the challenge of the reduced fertility in cold conditions. These allowed the plant to survive and rapidly expand," Huang said. The study's findings, according to the researchers, may help guide improved cultivated potato breeding to address environmental challenges that crops presently face due to factors such as climate change. There currently are roughly 5,000 potato varieties. The potato is the world's third most important food crop, after rice and wheat, for human consumption, according to the Peru-based International Potato Center research organization. China is the world's leading potato producer. "It always is hard to remove all the deleterious mutations in potato genomes in breeding, and this study opens a new door to make a potato free of deleterious mutations using the tomato as the chassis of synthetic biology," Huang said. The study also may open the door to generate a new crop species that could produce tomato fruit above ground and potato tubers below ground, according to Zhiyang Zhang, a postdoctoral researcher at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The potato and tomato are members of the nightshade family of flowering plants that also includes tobacco and peppers, among others. The study did not investigate the evolutionary origins of other tuberous root crops that originated in South America such as the sweet potato and yuca, which are members of different families of flowering plants. While the parts of the tomato and potato plants that people eat are quite different, the plants themselves are very similar. "We use different parts of these two species, fruits in tomatoes and tubers in potatoes," Knapp said. "If you look at the flowers or leaves, these are very similar. And if you are lucky enough to let your potato plant produce fruits, they look just like little green tomatoes. But don't eat them. They are not very nice."
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian Fights Back Against $85 Million Space Shuttle Kipnapping To Texas
When President Donald Trump signed the "Big, Beautiful Bill" into law at the White House on July 4, he also set aside $85 million for a Congress-authorized heist of the Space Shuttle Discovery. The Smithsonian Institution isn't taking this lying down, stating that it maintains full ownership of Discovery and the Shuttle will remain at the National Air and Space Museum. The spacecraft's potential kidnapping to Houston faces several other hurdles, including the fact that $85 million is not enough to cover half the bill for the 1,200-mile move. After Discovery's retirement in 2011, NASA gave the Space Shuttle to the National Air and Space Museum. The spacecraft was then flown to Washington Dulles International Airport the next year. After the piggyback flight, Discovery was placed at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, the museum's annex just south of the airport, where it has been on display since. However, Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn weren't satisfied with the full-scale Shuttle replica at the Johnson Space Center in their home state. They wanted a bona fide spacecraft. The duo attempted to push through the "Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act" before sneaking the budget allocation into Trump's megabill. Read more: These Are The Best Tires For Your Car, Truck Or SUV, According To Consumer Reports The Federal Government Doesn't Even Own Discovery Anymore There are multiple issues with Cruz and Cornyn's plan. First, the federal government doesn't own the Space Shuttle Discovery. The Smithsonian sent a message to Congress reiterating that NASA's 2011 agreement transferred ownership of the spacecraft to the museum's collection, removing the spacecraft from government control. Chris Browne, director of the Air and Space Museum, told the Washington Business Journal: "Our position is that the Discovery is staying right where it is." Second, the plan's cost is astronomical. The move to Houston is estimated to cost at least $300 million, dwarfing the $85 million budget. It doesn't factor in that both Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, NASA's pair of extensively modified Boeing 747 planes, have been retired since 2012. The Shuttle can't be broken down into parts and must be transported intact, making the move's logistics a nightmare. It's like attempting to rob a bank by stealing the entire vault. Cruz and Cornyn haven't thought this through. NASA isn't in the magic business; otherwise, the Artemis Program would still be on schedule. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.