Son Of Mexico's 'El Chapo' Set To Plead Guilty In US Drugs Case
Nicknamed "El Raton," or "The Mouse," Ovidio Guzman signed a deal dated June 30 indicating he would enter a guilty plea to avoid a jury trial and a potentially harsher sentence if convicted.
During a hearing scheduled to be held in a Chicago court, the guilty plea is expected to be formalized after months of negotiation with the prosecution.
Ovidio Guzman, 35, is accused of conspiring in a continuing criminal enterprise, importing and distributing fentanyl, laundering money, and using firearms.
His guilty plea will likely result in a far shorter prison term than the life sentence given to his father El Chapo following a high-profile trial held in 2018.
He could offer US authorities "valuable information" about the cartel and its protectors, Mike Vigil, former head of operations for the Drug Enforcement Administration, told AFP.
Ovidio Guzman gained prominence in October 2019 when Mexican authorities detained him -- only to release him later on orders from then president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador amid a standoff between law enforcement and gang members.
Ovidio Guzman was recaptured in January 2023, while Lopez Obrador was still in office, and later extradited to the United States.
US authorities accuse Ovidio and his three brothers of leading Los Chapitos, a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel designated by the administration of US President Donald Trump as a global "terrorist" organization.
His father, one of the world's most infamous drug traffickers, is serving a life sentence in a US prison.
The United States alleges Ovidio Guzman and his associates trafficked fentanyl into the country, where the opioid epidemic is linked to tens of thousands of deaths.
The Sinaloa cartel is one of six Mexican drug trafficking groups that Trump has designated as terrorist organizations.
Another son, Joaquin Guzman Lopez, was arrested after arriving in the United States last July on a private plane with cartel co-founder Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, who claimed he had been kidnapped.
The arrests sparked cartel infighting that has left more than 1,200 people dead and 1,400 missing in Sinaloa state, located in northwestern Mexico.
In its aggressive policy against drug cartels, the Trump administration announced additional sanctions against Los Chapitos in June for fentanyl trafficking and increased the reward to $10 million for each of the fugitive brothers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Fact check: Why does Donald Trump keep sharing AI fakes? – DW – 07/24/2025
US President Donald Trump this week posted an AI-generated video depicting the arrest of his predecessor Barack Obama. It was clearly fake — and not the first time he's shared such content. What's he trying to achieve? The debate over the use of AI-generated content by US President Donald Trump and his administration was reignited this week when Trump posted a video depicting the arrest of former President Barack Obama. The 1-minute-26-second video, postedon Trump's own Truth Social platform on Monday, opens with authentic clips of Obama and other senior Democrat politicians, past and present, declaring that "no one is above the law." It then cuts to footage appearing to show Obama being arrested by FBI agents in the Oval Office, handcuffed in the presence of Trump, and later shown behind bars in an orange jumpsuit. Of course, Obama has not been arrested. The latter part of the video is clearly generated using artificial intelligence. It even bears a watermark revealing that it has been created by a TikTok account with only around 8,000 followers that regularly posts sensationalist, pro-Trump content, some of which is AI-generated. Yet Trump still posted it to his 10.5 million followers, just as he did with a clearly fake image depicting him as the pope on May 3 and an AI-generated video of a "Gaza Riviera" on February 26. The latter example sparked particular outrage, as it presents a vision for the Gaza Strip under the controversial proposal Trump put forward in February 2025. The US president suggested a full US "takeover" and redevelopment of the territory, aiming to transform Gaza into what he described as the "Riviera of the Middle East" and resettling the Palestinian population in the process. Numerous human rights organizations and international actors have sharply condemnedTrump's plan, calling it a violation of international law and an attempt at ethnic cleansing. Last year, AI-generated content also played a role in Trump's reelection campaign, from a video showing him dancing alongside tech billionaire Elon Musk, to images portraying Democratic candidate Kamala Harris as a Soviet-style "communist." He also shared demonstrably fake images of Taylor Swift fans wearing "Swifties for Trump" T-shirts, despite the pop star's public endorsement of Harris. DW Fact check has previously investigated the impact of disinformation on the US election, including cases involving AI-generated fakes. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The fact that the content is not only fake but often patently absurd doesn't seem to bother Trump or his supporters and allies, who continue to regularly post similar motifs. So, why do they do it? "The reason Trump shares a lot of AI-generated content is the same reason that a lot of right-wing trolls share AI-generated content: to contribute to the 'meme-ification' of politics," explained Alex Mahadevan, director of MediaWise, a digital media literacy program at the Poynter Institute in Florida. "The White House itself has made AI-generated images on social media a core element of its audience engagement strategy. It's for the shock factor, the engagement factor. They're just trying to stay relevant. And unfortunately, if you look at the engagement, it works really well." Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, many observers feared that AI content would muddy the waters so that voters simply wouldn't know what to believe. Ultimately, however, according to Mahadevan, that's not quite what happened. "What AI actually ended up doing was just creating a propaganda machine on steroids," he told DW. "You can tell right away that it's AI-generated. But it's not designed to deceive the viewer; it's designed to push a political message." Such obviously fake content as the Obama video shared this week may not be designed to deceive or convince anybody, but it is intended to provoke: enraging the opposition while strengthening Trump's base. "It's rage bait," said Mahadevan. "A way to 'own the libs' [liberals], to 'own' the other side of the political aisle. When they see the other side sharing a meme or content and getting upset about it, they like that! They're doing a touchdown dance when they see that." It may seem infantile but, according to Mahadevan, it's an established form of communication. "The new right, the digital right, the trolling right have become a pretty big portion of Trump's base and this is how they talk to each other," he says. "Cool, AI-generated images. They are speaking to their base." Nevertheless, whether Trump himself explicitly means it or not, his use of fake content does contribute to a socio-political phenomenon known as the "liar's dividend" — the idea that the prevalence of manipulated media fosters general skepticism, making it easier to dismiss real content as fake. Trump capitalized on this during the election campaign, falsely claiming that a verified image of a large crowd greeting Kamala Harris off the vice-presidential plane ahead of a rally in Detroit had been altered using AI. "[We are] entering the 'nothing is true and everything is possible' phase," commented Renée DiResta, a disinformation expert and former researcher at the Stanford Internet Observatory, on Threads at the time. "The ability to plausibly cast doubt on the real is the unintended consequence of being able to generate unreality." There is, however, one final possible explanation for why Trump and his supporters continue to post content that is demonstrably fake: it reflects a vision of the world they ultimately hope could be real one day. "These pieces of content amount to more than AI slop; they help to create a digital mirror world that reflects the future that Trump imagines, however preposterous it may seem," wrote in March. "In the real world, Trump's vision of Gaza as an ethnically cleansed luxury resort may seem like political fantasy. But, on the internet, Trump Gaza already exists as a virtual beachside destination to like and to share." Mahadevan concurs, explaining: "Trump is affected by AI in the same way that regular people are. You can use AI to manifest a future or a version of yourself that you would dream of. So, I don't think it's too much of a leap to say that Trump and his acolytes are using AI to manifest how they feel the world should be." Following his reposting of the fake "Swifties for Trump" T-shirts in 2024, Trump told : "I didn't generate them. These were all made up by other people. AI is always very dangerous in that way. It's a little bit dangerous out there." But that hasn't stopped him from continuing to post such content.
Int'l Business Times
14 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Judges Order Abrego Garcia Release, Block Immediate Deportation
A Salvadoran man who was wrongly deported and then returned to the United States to face human smuggling charges should be released pending trial and not be immediately taken into immigration custody, federal judges said Wednesday. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was summarily deported in March along with more than 200 other people to a prison in El Salvador as part of US President Donald Trump's crackdown on migrants. His case has become a key test of Trump's hardline immigration policies. Most of those sent to El Salvador were alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration has designated a foreign terrorist organization. Justice Department lawyers later admitted that Abrego Garcia -- a resident of Maryland who is married to a US citizen -- was wrongly deported due to an "administrative error." Abrego Garcia had been living in the United States under protected legal status since 2019, when a judge ruled he should not be deported because he could be harmed in his home country. He was returned to the United States in June and immediately arrested on human smuggling charges in the southern state of Tennessee. Abrego Garcia's release pending trial has been repeatedly delayed at the request of his lawyers amid fears he would be picked up by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and deported again. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Tennessee ordered Abrego Garcia's release on bail on Wednesday ahead of his January 27 trial date, and a district judge in Maryland simultaneously blocked ICE from immediately taking him into custody. District Judge Paula Xinis said Abrego Garcia should be brought back to Maryland and ordered the administration to provide at least three days notice before attempting to deport him again. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, criticized the ruling. "The fact this unhinged judge is trying to tell ICE they can't arrest (Abrego Garcia)... under federal law is LAWLESS AND INSANE," McLaughlin said on X. It was not immediately clear when Abrego Garcia would be released. Federal prosecutors have opposed his release and warned that he may be deported once again if he is released from custody. Abrego Garcia is charged in Nashville, Tennessee, with smuggling undocumented migrants around the United States between 2016 and 2025. He has pleaded not guilty.
DW
16 hours ago
- DW
US judge denies bid to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts – DW – 07/23/2025
The ruling is the first in a series of attempts by US President Donald Trump to release more information related to the Epstein case, as he faces growing pressure from his MAGA supporters. A US judge has denied a bid by US President Donald Trump's administration to unseal grand jury transcripts concerning the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in Florida in the 2000s. US District Judge Robin Rosenberg found on Wednesday that the US Justice Department's request failed to fall into any of the exceptions to rules requiring grand jury material be kept secret. Wednesday's ruling has no impact on two other pending requests by the Justice Department seeking to obtain transcripts of grand jury proceedings related to later federal investigations of Epstein in New York, CNBC reported. The proceedings in question led to Epstein's criminal indictment, as well as the indictment of his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump is facing the biggest internal challenge in his second term in the White House as of yet as a result of the Epstein case. His supporters from the MAGA (Make America Great Again) campaign have lashed out at the US president after the Justice Department closed the case two weeks ago, announcing there was no more information to share. The July 7 memo declared that there was no Epstein "client list," despite claims from Attorney General Pam Bondi that she was reviewing it. The memo affirmed that the disgraced sex offender did in fact die by suicide in his prison cell. MAGA supportershave been told by their leaders for years that the "deep state" was hiding information in the Epstein case to protect Democratic Party figures they accuse of being Epstein's clients. Some MAGA leaders have even fanned conspiracy theories suggesting Epstein did not die by suicide but was murdered by orders made by said clients. Such conspiracies fueled a furious backlash from Trump's MAGA supporters regarding the Justice Department's decision to close the case, prompting the US president to authorize Bondi to release "credible" information on the case. Trump has also asked courts to unseal grand jury transcripts concerning Epstein. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video All of this is happening against the backdrop of an increasing amount of reporting on Trump's 15-year friendship with the late sex offender. Several pictures of the pair partying together document this relationship, which disintegrated in 2004 when they fell out over a property deal. At the time, Trump denounced his former ally. The White House has been furiously refuting a report by the that suggests the US president had contributed a "bawdy" letter with his signature for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. Trump has sued the publication and its owner Rupert Murdoch over the report. Also on Wednesday, the reported that Bondi in May notified Trump at a White House meeting that his name appeared multiple times in the Epstein files, citing senior administration officials. Trump was told that many other high-profile figures were also named. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
