logo
Want to try lab-grown salmon? The US just approved it.

Want to try lab-grown salmon? The US just approved it.

This story was originally published by Grist and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration
For the first time ever, a lab-grown seafood company has met the United States Food and Drug Administration's requirements for demonstrating the safety of a new cell-cultured product. Wildtype's cultivated salmon is now for sale in Portland, Oregon.
This marks the first time that lab-grown seafood (also known as 'cultivated seafood' or 'cell-cultured seafood') is available for sale anywhere in the world, according to the Good Food Institute, a think tank that advocates for alternative proteins — substitutes for conventional meat made without relying on industrial animal agriculture. It's a major milestone for the emerging cultivated protein industry, which aims to deliver real meat and seafood at scale without replicating the environmental harms of large-scale livestock operations.
It's also a sign that the Food and Drug Administration under the second Trump administration is allowing the regulatory process around lab-grown meat to continue without political interference, despite widespread Republican skepticism of the technology.
Wildtype, which manufactures sushi-grade salmon by cultivating fish cells under laboratory conditions, is the fourth cultivated protein company to receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, to sell its product in the US. The company first reached out to the FDA to discuss the safety of its cultivated salmon during the first Trump administration in 2019, said co-founder and CEO Justin Kolbeck, adding that Wildtype underwent eight rounds of questioning from the agency over the next six years. Kolbeck described the experience as 'a science-driven, data-driven process' and said the team of regulators working with Wildtype stayed largely the same across the three presidential terms.
'Did it feel like a long time in the lifespan of an early-stage startup? Yes,' said Kolbeck. 'But it is completely appropriate, in my opinion. And the reason is that this is a new way to make food. And I think consumers have a right to feel like our food authorities turned over every stone that they can think of.'
In a letter to the company, the FDA stated that it had 'no questions' about Wildtype's conclusion that its cell-cultivated salmon is 'as safe as comparable foods produced by other methods.' However, the agency did add that if Wildtype's manufacturing processes change, it should contact the FDA again for further consultation. The FDA did not respond to Grist's request for comment.
The company is now partnering with Kann, a Haitian restaurant in Portland helmed by the James Beard Award-winning chef Gregory Gourdet. The restaurant began serving Wildtype's salmon weekly on Thursdays this month; in July, the fish will be on the menu full-time.
Kolbeck said that Kann sold out of all its cultivated salmon portions on the first night of service. 'I don't think people saw this as some crazy, wild new thing,' he said. Instead, it was 'another option on the menu, which is ultimately what we're working for. We want to provide consumers with another option for seafood.'
Consumers have an increasing number of choices for alternative proteins at grocery stores and restaurants — from plant-based burgers and chicken nuggets to faux meat made from fermented fungi. Like other alternative protein companies, cultivated protein brands often position their means of production as more sustainable than animal agriculture, the leading source of methane emissions in the US. But cultivated meat differs from other alternative proteins in that it's not vegan; it is meat, just without the mass animal slaughter.
Even though federal regulators have approved only a handful of these products for sale, there has been growing political backlash to cultivated meat.
Last month, three states with Republican-led legislatures enacted bills banning or temporarily banning the sale of such products: Nebraska, Montana, and Indiana. They join three other states with similar bans: Mississippi, where a law prohibiting cultivated meat sales unanimously passed in both the state House and Senate earlier this year; Alabama; and Florida.
The governors of these states have framed these laws as necessary to protect consumers from 'fake meat' (as the Nebraska governor's office puts it) and ranchers from unfair competition in the marketplace. This posture casts doubt not just on the safety of cultivated foods, but also their legitimacy as meat. The Montana bill defines cultivated meat as 'the concept of meat … rather than from a whole slaughtered animal.'
However, recent outcry from ranchers suggests these state officials do not speak for all agricultural producers and consumers; in Nebraska, for example, ranchers have welcomed competition from cultivated protein companies.
Madeline Cohen, who heads the regulatory team at the Good Food Institute, argued these states are sacrificing a chance to create jobs and tax revenue. 'There are a small number of states that have chosen to put political wins over consumer choice and over our general free market system,' said Cohen. 'And they will now kind of be sitting on the sidelines, and they will miss out on economic opportunities.'
But Kolbeck and other proponents argue that biotechnology is needed to meet the rising demand for meat and seafood without depleting the world's natural resources. Both overfishing — which happens when wild fish are harvested at a rate faster than they can reproduce — and warming temperatures pose risks to global food security. Research has shown that climate change has already impacted fish and shellfish populations around the world. Fish farms are an increasingly common alternative to wild fisheries, but these energy-intensive operations can pollute waterways.
Kolbeck framed cultivated salmon as a way to reduce the food system's impact on aquatic ecosystems, protecting them for 'future generations so that people can continue to fish sustainably.'
'How do we take a little bit of pressure off of wild fish stocks and keep these places beautiful?' he said, referring to areas like Bristol Bay in Alaska, where the world's largest sockeye salmon fishery is located.
Suzi Gerber, head of the Association for Meat, Poultry, and Seafood Innovation, or AMPS, a cultivated protein trade group, expressed optimism about the industry's future. She noted that Trump recently released an executive order calling to boost US seafood production.
'The timing is perfect,' said Gerber. 'Wildtype and other seafood producing members of AMPS are very happy to answer this call and to ensure a bright future for American seafood alongside our agricultural colleagues in aquaculture, wild, and farmed fisheries.'
Eric Schulze, an independent consultant for cultivated meat companies and a former federal regulator, said that the FDA's thumbs-up to Wildtype should put Americans' mind at ease about cultivated meat.
'The US produces some of the safest food in the world — conventional and cultivated — and this clearance only elevates food safety and enhances consumer choice,' said Schulze. 'Everyone wins.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump
US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump

Winnipeg Free Press

time34 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats and Republicans don't agree on much, but they share a conviction that the government should help American manufacturers, one way or another. Democratic President Joe Biden handed out subsidies to chipmakers and electric vehicle manufacturers. Republican President Donald Trump is building a wall of import taxes — tariffs — around the U.S. economy to protect domestic industry from foreign competition. Yet American manufacturing has been stuck in a rut for nearly three years. And it remains to be seen whether the trend will reverse itself. The U.S. Labor Department reports that American factories shed 7,000 jobs in June for the second month in a row. Manufacturing employment is on track to drop for the third straight year. The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reported that manufacturing activity in the United States shrank in June for the fourth straight month. In fact, U.S. factories have been in decline for 30 of the 32 months since October 2022, according to ISM. 'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,'' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a maker of industrial cutting tools in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. 'We didn't get destroyed like we did in the recession of 2008. But we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment.'' Big economic factors contributed to the slowdown: A surge in inflation, arising from the unexpectedly strong economic recovery from COVID-19, raised factory expenses and prompted the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023. The higher borrowing costs added to the strain. Government policy was meant to help. Biden's tax incentives for semiconductor and clean energy production triggered a factory-building boom – investment in manufacturing facilities more than tripled from April 2021 through October 2024 – that seemed to herald a coming surge in factory production and hiring. Eventually anyway. But the factory investment spree has faded as the incoming Trump administration launched trade wars and, working with Congress, ended Biden's subsidies for green energy. Now, predicts Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline.' 'If production is flat, that suggests manufacturing employment will continue to slide,' Zandi said. 'Manufacturing is likely to suffer a recession in the coming year.'' Meanwhile, Trump is attempting to protect U.S. manufacturers — and to coax factories to relocate and produce in America — by imposing tariffs on goods made overseas. He slapped 50% taxes on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and auto parts, 10% on many other imports. In some ways, Trump's tariffs can give U.S. factories an edge. Chris Zuzick, vice president at Waukesha Metal Products, said the Sussex, Wisconsin-based manufacturer is facing stiff competition for a big contract in Texas. A foreign company offers much lower prices. But 'when you throw the tariff on, it gets us closer,'' Zuzick said. 'So that's definitely a situation where it's beneficial.'' But American factories import and use foreign products, too – machinery, chemicals, raw materials like steel and aluminum. Taxing those inputs can drive up costs and make U.S producers less competitive in world markets. Consider steel. Trump's tariffs don't just make imported steel more expensive. By putting the foreign competition at a disadvantage, the tariffs allow U.S. steelmakers to raise prices – and they have. U.S.-made steel was priced at $960 per metric ton as of June 23, more than double the world export price of $440 per ton, according to industry monitor SteelBenchmarker. In fact, U.S. steel prices are so high that Pilot Precision Products has continued to buy the steel it needs from suppliers in Austria and France — and pay Trump's tariff. Trump has also created considerable uncertainty by repeatedly tweaking and rescheduling his tariffs. Just before new import taxes were set to take effect on dozens of countries on July 9, for example, the president pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1 to allow more time for negotiation with U.S. trading partners. The flipflops have left factories, suppliers and customers bewildered about where things stand. Manufacturers voiced their complaints in the ISM survey: 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,'' a fabricated metal products company said. 'Tariffs continue to cause confusion and uncertainty for long-term procurement decisions,'' added a computer and electronics firm. 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place.'' Some may argue that things aren't necessarily bad for U.S. manufacturing; they've just returned to normal after a pandemic-related bust and boom. Factories slashed nearly 1.4 million jobs in March and April 2020 when COVID-19 forced many businesses to shut down and Americans to stay home. Then a funny thing happened: American consumers, cooped up and flush with COVID relief checks from the government, went on a spending spree, snapping up manufactured goods like air fryers, patio furniture and exercise machines. Suddenly, factories were scrambling to keep up. They brought back the workers they laid off – and then some. Factories added 379,000 jobs in 2021 — the most since 1994 — and then tacked on another 357,000 in 2022. But in 2023, factory hiring stopped growing and began backtracking as the economy returned to something closer to the pre-pandemic normal. In the end, it was a wash. Factory payrolls last month came to 12.75 million, almost exactly where they stood in February 2020 (12.74 million) just before COVID slammed the economy. 'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,'' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's White House Council of Economic Advisers. Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products said that it will take time to see if Trump's tariffs succeed in bringing factories back to America. 'The fact is that manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime,'' he said. 'It takes time to switch gears.'' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Hagopian at Pilot Precision is hopeful that tax breaks in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will help American manufacturing regain momentum. 'There may be light at the end of the tunnel that may not be a locomotive bearing down,'' he said. For now, manufacturers are likely to delay big decisions on investing or bringing on new workers until they see where Trump's tariffs settle and what impact they have on the economy, said Ned Hill, professor emeritus in economic development at Ohio State University. 'With all this uncertainty about what the rest of the year is going to look like,'' he said, 'there's a hesitancy to hire people just to lay them off in the near future.'' 'Everyone,' said Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.''

U.S. GoldMining Welcomes Increased Copper Price Momentum, Highlights Strategic Copper-Gold Potential at Whistler Project in Alaska
U.S. GoldMining Welcomes Increased Copper Price Momentum, Highlights Strategic Copper-Gold Potential at Whistler Project in Alaska

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

U.S. GoldMining Welcomes Increased Copper Price Momentum, Highlights Strategic Copper-Gold Potential at Whistler Project in Alaska

, July 14, 2025 /CNW/ - U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO) (" U.S. GoldMining" or " the Company") is advancing the Whistler Gold-Copper Project (" Whistler" or " the Project"), located in Alaska, U.S.A. As the Company progresses its previously announced initial assessment study (" PEA") (see news release dated June 9, 2025), it is closely tracking consensus and spot metal prices, and is encouraged by the price of copper which has risen approximately 14% over the past month, and is up approximately 20% compared to the same time last year. Tim Smith, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. GoldMining, commented: " We believe that the existing gold-copper-silver deposits already delineated at the Project, combined with district-scale exploration potential and proximity to existing and planned future infrastructure in south-central Alaska, makes the Project stand out among other American gold-copper projects. Whistler is further poised to benefit from recent increases in the price of gold, copper and silver, the three metals contained within the Whistler mineral resources. Current federal policy further emphasizes the advantage for U.S.-based gold-copper developers such as U.S. GoldMining, and as an American domiciled company with a project located in the Tier 1 jurisdiction of Alaska, the Company is positioned to benefit as domestic copper supply becomes increasingly vital. We believe U.S. GoldMining offers investors a compelling opportunity to gain exposure to both gold and copper upside as demand accelerates." Over the past six months, the U.S. federal administration has begun to implement initiatives to speed up the permitting processes for potential future U.S. mine development projects which are crucial to securing domestic resource security. Additionally, the Trump administration's action on trade policy, including the recent announcement of a proposed 50% tariff on foreign copper imports into the United States on July 8, 2025, which is aimed at strengthening America's critical minerals independence, sent the price of copper to all-time highs. For U.S. GoldMining, it marks a potential inflection point for the Company's flagship Project, with district-scale exploration potential and a large copper-gold-silver mineral resource in one of America's most prospective and mining-friendly jurisdictions, Alaska. The Whistler Gold–Copper Project: A U.S.A. Based Critical Metals Project Multi-metal resource: Whistler contains gold, copper and silver, aligning with U.S. critical mineral priorities. Domestic location: Whistler is the closest large undeveloped gold-copper mineral deposit to Anchorage, Alaska's largest city (see Figure 1), and therefore has good proximity to existing highways, port facilities, grid power, a skilled work force, and supply chain and services sector. The Project is also set to benefit from State infrastructure development, in particular the planned West Susitna Access Road. Located on State land, potential future mine permitting at Whistler should benefit from the State's robust permitting framework. Geopolitical hedge: U.S. domiciled projects like Whistler help reduce dependence on tariffed imports from high-risk jurisdictions. Whistler is also set to benefit from strong policy tailwinds including a supportive climate of State and Federal policies respecting responsible resource extraction in Alaska (see news releases dated January 27, 2025, and March 24, 2025). The Project, located just 100 miles from the main population center of Anchorage, in Alaska, (see Figure 1), is estimated to contain mineral resources of over 1 billion pounds (" Blbs") of copper, in addition to 3.93 million ounces (" Moz") gold and almost 19 Moz silver in the Indicated category (see Table 1), in addition to 0.3 Blbs copper, 3.31 Moz gold and 11.5 Moz silver in the Inferred category 1. Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate for the Total Project (Effective date: September 12, 2024): Notes to Table 1: Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources are subject to uncertainty as to their existence and as to their economic and legal feasibility. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. The mineral resource estimate for the Whistler, Island Mountain, and the upper portions of the Raintree West deposits have been confined by an open pit with "reasonable prospects of economic extraction" using the following assumptions: • Metal prices of US$1,850/oz gold (Au), US$4.00/lb copper (Cu) and US$23/oz silver (Ag); • Payable metal of 95% payable for Au and Ag, and 96.5% payable for Cu; • Refining costs for g of US$8.00/oz, for Ag of US$0.60/oz and for Cu of US$0.05/lb; • Offsite costs for Au of US$77.50/wmt, for Ag of US$3.50/wmt and for Cu of US$55.00/wmt; • Royalty of 3% net smelter return royalty (NSR); • Pit slopes are 50 degrees; • Mining cost of US$2.25/t for waste and mineralized material; and • Processing, general and administrative costs of US$7.90/t. The lower portion of the Raintree West deposit has been constrained by a mineable shape with "reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction" using a US$25.00/t cut-off. Metallurgical recoveries are: 70% for Au, 83% for Cu, and 65% Ag for Ag grades below 10g/t. The Ag recovery is 0% for values above 10g/t for all deposits. The NSR equations are: below 10g/t Ag: NSR (US$/t)=(100%-3%)*((Au*70%*US$54.646/t) + (Cu*83%*US$3.702*2204.62 + Ag*65%*US$0.664)), and above 10g/t Ag: NSR (US$/t)=(100%-3%)*((Au*70%*US$56.646g/t) + (Cu*83%*US$3.702*2204.62)). The Au Equivalent equations are: below 10g/t Ag: AuEq=Au + Cu*1.771 +0.0113Ag, and above 10g/t Ag: AuEq=Au + Cu*1.771. The specific gravity for each deposit and domain ranges from 2.76 to 2.91 for Island Mountain, 2.60 to 2.72 for Whistler with an average value of 2.80 for Raintree West. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 1 For further information regarding the Project and the mineral resource estimates referenced herein, refer to the technical report summary titled "S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary Initial Assessment for the Whistler Project, South Central Alaska" with an effective date of September 12, 2024, and the technical report titled "NI 43-101 2024 Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Whistler Project, South Central Alaska" with an effective date of September 12, 2024, available under the Company's respective profiles at and Technical Information Tim Smith, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. GoldMining, has supervised the preparation of this news release and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained herein. Mr. Smith is a "qualified person" as defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. About U.S. GoldMining Inc. U.S. GoldMining Inc. is an exploration and development company focused on advancing the 100% owned Whistler Gold-Copper Project, located 105 miles (170 kilometers) northwest of Anchorage, Alaska, U.S.A. The Whistler Project consists of several gold-copper porphyry deposits and exploration targets within a large regional land package entirely on State of Alaska mining claims totaling approximately 53,700 acres (217.5 square kilometers). The Whistler Project Mineral Resource Estimate comprises 294 Mt at 0.68 g/t AuEq for 6.48 Moz AuEq Indicated, plus 198 Mt at 0.65 g/t AuEq for 4.16 Moz AuEq Inferred. Visit for more information, including high resolution figures. Forward-Looking Statements Except for the statements of historical fact contained herein, the information presented in this news release constitutes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States federal securities laws and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). Such statements include statements with regard to the Company's expectations regarding the Project, potential exploration targets, future work programs, the outlook or copper markets, and the Project's exploration potential. Words such as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", estimates" and "intends" or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on U.S. GoldMining's current expectations and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and assumptions that are difficult to predict and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and other factors include, among others, the actual results of future exploration may not confirm expectations, variations in the underlying assumptions associated with the estimation or realization of mineral resources, the availability of capital to fund programs, accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry including, without limitation, those associated with the environment, delays in obtaining governmental approvals or permits, title disputes other risks inherent in the exploration and development of mineral properties and the other risk factors set forth in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at. and Canadian Securities Administrators at Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this news release. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of this date, and U.S. GoldMining does not undertake any duty to update such information except as required under applicable law.

European trade ministers meet to forge strategy after surprise 30% tariffs from Trump
European trade ministers meet to forge strategy after surprise 30% tariffs from Trump

Winnipeg Free Press

time4 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

European trade ministers meet to forge strategy after surprise 30% tariffs from Trump

BRUSSELS (AP) — European trade ministers are meeting in Brussels on Monday, following U.S. President Donald Trump's surprise announcement of 30% tariffs on the European Union. The EU is America's biggest business partner and the world's largest trading bloc. The U.S. decision will have repercussions for governments, companies and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic. 'We shouldn't impose countermeasures at this stage, but we should prepare to be ready to use all the tools in the toolbox,' said Denmark's foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, told reporters ahead of the meeting. 'So we want a deal, but there's an old saying: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war.'' The tariffs, also imposed on Mexico, are set to start on Aug. 1 and could make everything from French cheese and Italian leather goods to German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals more expensive in the U.S., and destabilize economies from Portugal to Norway. Meanwhile, Brussels decided to suspend retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods scheduled to take effect Monday in hopes of reaching a trade deal with the Trump administration by the end of the month. The 'countermeasures' by the EU, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of its 27 member countries, will be delayed until Aug. 1. Trump's letter shows 'that we have until the first of August' to negotiate, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters in Brussels on Sunday. The letters to the EU and Mexico come in the midst of an on-and-off Trump threat to impose tariffs on countries and right an imbalance in trade. Trump in April imposed tariffs on dozens of countries, before pausing them for 90 days to negotiate individual deals. As the three-month grace period ended this week, he began sending tariff letters to leaders but again has pushed back the implementation day for what he says will be just a few more weeks. If he moves forward with the tariffs, it could have ramifications for nearly every aspect of the global economy. In the wake of the new tariffs, European leaders largely closed ranks, calling for unity but also a steady hand to not provoke further acrimony. Just last week, Europe was cautiously optimistic. Officials told reporters on Friday they weren't expecting a letter like the one sent Saturday and that a trade deal was to be inked in 'the coming days.' For months, the EU has broadcast that it has strong retaliatory measures ready if talks fail. Reeling from successive rebukes from Washington, the EU is now diversifying its economic, political and defense networks, mostly in Asia. The EU top brass will visit Beijing for a summit later this month while courting other Pacific nations like South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia, whose prime minister visited Brussels over the weekend to sign a new economic partnership with the EU. It also has mega-deals in the works with Mexico and a trading bloc of South American nations known as Mercosur. While meeting with Indonesia's prime minister on Sunday, Von der Leyen said that 'when economic uncertainty meets geopolitical volatility, partners like us must come closer together.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store