
Qatar: Lebanese government should fulfill people's needs
Beirut, February 04 (QNA) - The State of Qatar aspires that a new Lebanese government be formed, in line with the people's yearning for progress, development and prosperity, said HE Ambassador of the State of Qatar to the Republic of Lebanon Sheikh Saud bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani.
His Excellency told Qatar News Agency (QNA) that HE Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al-Thani's visit to Beirut today and his talks with HE President of the Republic of Lebanon General Joseph Aoun demonstrate the deep fraternal relations between the two countries and affirm Doha's permanent support for Lebanon across all domains.
HE the Ambassador added that HE the Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs' talks with the Parliament Speaker, the Prime Minister-designate, and the caretaker Prime Minister addressed bilateral relations and ways to boost them. (QNA)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
Post-War pressure: Iran faces a new phase of internal confrontation
The 12-day war between Israel and Iran came to a halt without any written agreements or clear outlines for ending hostilities. While there were objective circumstances that forced both sides to stop the fighting—most notably the intervention of U.S. President Donald Trump—the manner in which the war ended clearly suggests that Israel has now added the Iranian front to its list of open arenas in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, where it reserves the right to strike whenever it deems necessary. This is reflected in the statements made by Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, who outlined a permanent plan to counter Iranian threats. This means that Israel has no intention of abandoning its strategy of dominating Iranian airspace or conducting ground operations, especially after the exposure of the extent of Israeli intelligence penetration into Iran. In practice, the war has ushered in a broader Iranian withdrawal from the areas surrounding Israel. Israel has managed to isolate the bordering fronts, dismantle the capabilities of affiliated groups, and contain the immediate threat posed by Iran. However, with the battlefield shifting into Iranian territory itself, it is fair to say that the corridor between Beirut and Tehran has effectively been severed. This also explains the immediate resumption of Israeli strikes against Hezbollah on the Lebanese front as soon as the fighting with Iran paused—a consistent Israeli approach throughout this conflict: reverting to other active fronts whenever one front is de-escalated. Now that direct hostilities with Iran have stopped, Tehran faces an uncomfortable reality: internal confrontation. Israel's apparent goal is to redirect Iran's focus inward, pushing it to grapple with its domestic crises, thereby accelerating its strategic withdrawal. Iran, which long sought to transfer the crisis into Israel, now finds itself confronting a multifaceted internal battle that spans political, security, economic, and social fronts. Politically, the crisis is becoming more evident with the absence of a clear strategy around the current impasse or return to the negotiating table. The scale of concessions Iran might need to make highlights a deep internal dilemma that may not be resolved without sweeping reforms to the structure of political representation. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's recent speech underscored the severity of this crisis. Directed only at one domestic faction 'the hardliners', it sought to boost morale and frame the outcome as a 'victory,' yet it also revealed just how detached this faction has become from reality—evident in inflated claims such as the destruction of Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, among others. Such statements triggered a harsh and humiliating response from President Trump, who reminded Khamenei that he was the one who prevented his assassination. Trump also reaffirmed that sanctions on Iran would remain in place, effectively shutting the door to any immediate diplomatic resolution and deepening the country's internal crisis. Even the European position—once supportive of reviving the nuclear deal or a similar framework—has become far more cautious. The stance of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) toward Iran's nuclear program could lay the groundwork for a more forceful international consensus, making Iran's exit from the current crisis much more complicated and contingent on fundamental internal changes. With no prospect for lifting sanctions or resuming negotiations, pressure on Iran's regime is reaching unprecedented levels. Exiting a war of this magnitude—one that targeted the regime's core institutions—requires broad internal consensus and a clear economic breakthrough, neither of which seems likely at this point. This raises the possibility of large-scale domestic unrest, potentially of a nature and scale that the regime has not previously faced and may struggle to contain. It is now evident that the crisis has shifted firmly into Iranian territory. The war that erupted on Iranian soil is just one facet of this transformation. Yet the bigger challenge that remains is Iran's ability to navigate its internal landscape and move toward viable international understandings that ease tensions. Failing that, the current crisis could quickly evolve into a complex political breakdown—one that the regime may find increasingly difficult to contain.


Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Civilian casualties mount in Lebanon as ‘Israel' attempts to justify airstrikes
Lebanon's Ministry of Health announced Friday that one woman was killed and 13 others injured following a series of 'Israeli' airstrikes on various areas in southern Lebanon. The strikes reportedly included the use of "shockwave missiles" fired at forested areas, causing massive blasts and wounding at least seven more civilians. Israeli Occupation military claimed responsibility, saying its aircraft targeted a Hezbollah site in the Shaqif area allegedly used to manage fire-control and defense systems. It said the facility was part of an underground project previously hit and later rebuilt, labeling its presence a violation of prior agreements. In response, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the assault, saying the 'Israeli' entity "continues to defy international resolutions and calls for de-escalation," and urged the international community to take meaningful action. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam also denounced the airstrikes, calling them "a blatant violation of national sovereignty and a direct threat to stability." Lebanon's Foreign Ministry, in an official letter to the UN Secretary-General, called for the renewal of UNIFIL's mandate and demanded the immediate withdrawal of 'Israeli' forces from occupied Lebanese territory, citing repeated violations. While the US-brokered ceasefire agreement stipulates Hezbollah's withdrawal from south of the Litani River in exchange for increased Lebanese Army and UNIFIL presence, the occupation has reportedly maintained a military presence in five strategic areas, an issue strongly rejected by Lebanese authorities. Meanwhile, 'Israeli' army spokesperson Avichay Adraee claimed that no civilian structures were intentionally targeted in the Nabatieh strike. He alleged that a civilian building was hit due to a secondary explosion caused by stored munitions inside the Hezbollah facility, further accusing the group of endangering civilians by storing rockets near residential areas.


Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
VIDEO: 'Israeli' airstrikes kill woman, injure 10 in southern Lebanon
The Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) launched one of their heaviest aerial assaults in recent months on Friday, striking the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh and surrounding areas in what officials described as the most severe escalation since the 66-day war. At least one woman was killed and 10 others were wounded when an IOF missile struck a residential apartment in central Nabatieh, according to a statement from Lebanon's Ministry of Health. The attack left significant damage to buildings and infrastructure, with images from the scene showing shattered homes and scorched streets. According to local reporters, the assault involved more than 20 intense airstrikes that targeted Nabatieh al-Fawqa and the nearby highlands of Kfar Tebnit. Fires broke out in the Ali Al-Taher forests as a result, and several major roads were forced to close due to the destruction and risk of further strikes. The bombardment marks a dangerous escalation in the region, drawing sharp condemnation from Lebanese officials. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam issued a statement denouncing the IOF strikes as a "blatant violation of Lebanese sovereignty" and a breach of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which established the ceasefire terms following the 2006 Lebanon war.