logo
When will the West learn? — Sheila Ramalingam

When will the West learn? — Sheila Ramalingam

Malay Mail3 days ago

JUNE 27 — The world once again watched in alarm as the United States launched military strikes against Iran, citing concerns over its nuclear weapons development.
The international reaction has been largely cautious, with many nations urging diplomacy over aggression. But for those who remember the early 2000s, this latest development feels eerily familiar.
History, it seems, is repeating itself; and the lessons of the past remain unheeded.
In 2003, the United States, backed by Britain, Australia, and other allies, invaded Iraq under the claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).
That assertion was later proven to be false. No WMDs were ever found, and the war, arguably based on a fabricated premise, led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, destabilised an entire region, and fuelled a generation of extremism.
Yet, two decades later, not a single senior figure from the United States or Britain faced civil or criminal liability.
No tribunal, no sanctions, no legal consequences for initiating what some international law experts have labelled a 'crime of aggression'.
The architects of the war continued their careers, published memoirs, gave lectures, and disappeared into quiet obscurity. Justice, for Iraq and for the world, was never served.
Now, the same narrative is playing out with Iran. Allegations of nuclear weapons development, despite Iran's repeated insistence that its nuclear program is civilian in nature, are being used to justify military action.
Meanwhile, the same countries that invaded Iraq with righteous fury remain silent about North Korea, a nation that has not only developed nuclear weapons but has conducted multiple missile tests aimed at showcasing its long-range strike capabilities.
North Korea's Hwasong-14 and -15 missiles, launched in 2017, demonstrated potential range to strike United States territories. As recently as 2024, North Korea conducted mock nuclear warhead launches and fired dozens of short-range ballistic missiles in defiance of US-South Korean military drills.
Despite these provocations, the United States has refrained from military strikes. Why the double standard?
U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Air Force General Dan Caine, speaks during a press conference on Iran's nuclear sites at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2025. — Reuters pic
The answer may lie in geography, risk, and resources. North Korea, while dangerous, does not sit atop vast oil reserves.
It is also bordered by China, a military and nuclear superpower, making any aggressive miscalculation potentially catastrophic.
Iran and Iraq, on the other hand, are oil-rich nations located in a region where the United States has long sought influence through both diplomacy and force.
Control of oil routes, access to resources, and support for regional allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia have all contributed to the Middle East being a frequent target of Western military interventions.
But what is often overlooked in this calculus is the human and cultural cost of these interventions.
Iraq is not just a battlefield: it is Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilisation, home to some of the world's earliest writings, laws, and cities.
Iran is not merely a 'nuclear threat': it is Persia, a land of poets, scientists, and empires that shaped human history. To reduce these nations to talking points in a geopolitical chess game is to insult their legacy and ignore their potential.
If we continue to allow military might to dictate global norms without accountability, we not only erode the principles of international law, we risk destroying civilisations that have enriched humanity for millennia.
The world deserves better than a system where power excuses everything and history is rewritten by the victors.
The cradle of Mesopotamia, the gardens of Persia, the philosophies, the poetry, the science – these are not threats. They are treasures. And if they are lost, it will not be the fault of tyrants alone, but of those who stood by while empires masked greed as justice.
Let us finally hold to account those who manipulate truth to justify violence.
If the West is sincere in its pursuit of justice, it must understand that peace is not imposed; it is earned through humility, restraint, and the courage to see others as equals.
* Dr Sheila Ramalingam is the Deputy Executive Director of UMLEAD, International Institute of Public Policy and Management (INPUMA), and Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices may not stay elevated even with Mideast tensions
Oil prices may not stay elevated even with Mideast tensions

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Oil prices may not stay elevated even with Mideast tensions

PETALING JAYA: While a ceasefire has been agreed between Iran and Israel, analysts have already contemplated how a potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran would affect oil supply and crude oil prices. The Strait handles about 20% of the world's oil transit and around 25% to 30% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. Countries like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Kuwait, Iraq and Qatar rely heavily on the strait to export oil and gas, which are crucial to their national budgets. Maybank Investment Bank Research (Maybank IB Research) said in a note, should the strait be actually closed, there could disruptions in the supply of oil that put pressure on its forecast of Brent crude oil at US$67 per barrel for this year and its 'neutral' rating for the oil and gas sector. Its top picks in the sector are Dialog Group Bhd and Bumi Armada Bhd . 'Crude prices could rise in the short term, depending on how long the closure lasts. During previous periods of tension, oil prices did not stay elevated for long, as there were no supply disruptions. 'Iran itself exports oil via the Strait of Hormuz. Closing the Strait would potentially hurt its own economy, isolate it diplomatically and may invite retaliation. 'Based on our findings, we understand that the strait has never been completely closed to shipping, although it has been threatened many times historically during the Iran-Iraq Tanker War in the 1980s, the European Union (EU) and US imposed sanctions on Iran in 2011, and when the US withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and imposed sanctions in 2018 to 2019. 'Despite tensions in the past, the strait remained open,' the research house said. On June 22 Iran's Parliament approved a resolution that would allow for the closing of the Strait of Hormuz. However, this is only the first step. The final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. Maybank IB Research said that, without the authorisation, Parliament's approval alone is not enough. 'So far, we understand that no formal order has been issued by the Council, but we believe that the closure of strait remains a possible option, albeit remote,' it noted.

Iran casts doubt on Israel's ceasefire commitment after war halts nuclear talks
Iran casts doubt on Israel's ceasefire commitment after war halts nuclear talks

Malay Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Iran casts doubt on Israel's ceasefire commitment after war halts nuclear talks

TEHRAN, June 30 — Iran warned Sunday that it had little faith in Israel's commitment to a fragile ceasefire that ended the most intense and destructive confrontation between the two foes to date. The 12-day war erupted on June 13, when Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran that killed top military commanders and scientists linked to its nuclear programme. Tehran responded with ballistic missile attacks on Israeli cities. Israel said its aim was to keep the Islamic republic from developing an atomic weapon — an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. The fighting derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, which later joined its ally Israel's campaign with strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. 'We did not start the war, but we have responded to the aggressor with all our power,' Iranian armed forces chief of staff Abdolrahim Mousavi was quoted as saying by state television, referring to Israel. 'We have serious doubts over the enemy's compliance with its commitments including the ceasefire, we are ready to respond with force' if attacked again, he added, six days into the ceasefire. IAEA dispute The conflict rattled the already shaky relationship between Iran and the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran has rejected the IAEA's request to inspect its bombed nuclear sites, accusing its chief Rafael Grossi of 'betraying his duties' by failing to condemn the Israeli and US attacks. Iranian lawmakers voted this week to suspend cooperation with the agency. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Grossi's request to visit the targeted facilities 'meaningless' and 'possibly malign in intent'. Tehran also cited a June 12 IAEA resolution criticising Iran's lack of nuclear transparency as a pretext used by Israel to justify launching its offensive the following day. The backlash drew a sharp rebuke from Germany and Argentina, Grossi's home country. 'I commend Director General Rafael Grossi and his team for their unrelenting professionalism. Threats against them from within Iran are deeply troubling and must stop,' German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul wrote on X. Argentina's foreign ministry said it 'categorically condemns the threats against him coming from Iran'. Neither specified which threats they were referring to, but Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed. Speaking to US broadcaster CBS on Sunday, Iranian ambassador to the United Nations Amir Saeid Iravani denied there was any threat to nuclear inspectors in Iran, insisting they were 'in safe conditions' but their work was suspended. Damage questioned The United States carried out strikes on three key facilities used for Iran's atomic programme. In the days after, Trump said the United States would bomb Iran again 'without question' if intelligence indicated it was able to enrich uranium to military grade. Speaking to CBS on Saturday, Grossi said Iran could 'in a matter of months' return to enriching uranium. Questions remain as to how much damage the US strikes did to Iran's nuclear programme, with Trump and his officials insisting it had been 'obliterated'. On Sunday, however, The Washington Post reported that the United States had intercepted calls between Iranian officials who said the damage was less than expected. That followed an early 'low confidence' US military intelligence report that said the nuclear programme had been set back months, not years. Israel has said Iran's programme was delayed by years, while Tehran has downplayed the damage. The IAEA said Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 percent, far above the levels needed for civilian nuclear power, although Grossi previously noted there had been no indication before the strikes that Iran was working to build an atomic weapon. Israel has maintained ambiguity about its own nuclear arsenal, neither officially confirming nor denying it exists, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has estimated it has 90 nuclear warheads. 'A new road' Iran's health ministry says at least 627 civilians were killed and 4,900 injured during the war with Israel. Retaliatory missile attacks by Iran on Israel killed 28 people, Israeli authorities say. During the war, Iran arrested dozens of people it accused of spying for Israel. Iran's parliament on Sunday voted to ban the unauthorised use of communications equipment, including tech billionaire Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, said the official news agency IRNA. On Sunday, Washington's envoy to Turkey said the Iran-Israel war could pave the way for a new Middle East. 'What just happened between Israel and Iran is an opportunity for all of us to say: 'Time out. Let's create a new road',' Ambassador Tom Barrack, who is also the US special envoy to Syria, told the Anadolu state news agency. 'The Middle East is ready to have a new dialogue, people are tired of the same old story,' he added. — AFP

Qatar urges Israel, Hamas to seize ‘window of opportunity' for Gaza truce
Qatar urges Israel, Hamas to seize ‘window of opportunity' for Gaza truce

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Qatar urges Israel, Hamas to seize ‘window of opportunity' for Gaza truce

US President Donald Trump voiced optimism about a new ceasefire in Gaza. (AP pic) DOHA : Gaza mediators are engaging with Israel and Hamas to build on momentum from this week's ceasefire with Iran and work towards a truce in the Palestinian territory, Qatar foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said. Israel and Iran on Tuesday agreed to a ceasefire brokered by the US and Qatar just hours after the Islamic republic launched a salvo of missiles towards the wealthy Gulf state, targeting the American military base hosted there. The unprecedented attack on Qatari soil followed Washington's intervention into a days-long war between Israel and Iran which saw US warplanes strike Iranian nuclear facilities, prompting promises of retaliation from Tehran. In an interview with AFP on Friday, Ansari said Doha – with fellow Gaza mediators in Washington and Cairo – was now 'trying to use the momentum that was created by the ceasefire between Iran and Israel to restart the talks over Gaza'. 'If we don't utilise this window of opportunity and this momentum, it's an opportunity lost amongst many in the near past. We don't want to see that again,' the spokesman, who is also an adviser to Qatar's prime minister, said. US President Donald Trump voiced optimism on Friday about a new ceasefire in Gaza saying an agreement involving Israel and Hamas could come as early as next week. Mediators have been engaged in months of back-and-forth negotiations with the warring parties aimed at ending 20 months of war in Gaza, with Ansari explaining there were no current talks between the sides but that Qatar was 'heavily involved in talking to every side separately'. A two-month truce, which was agreed as Trump came into office in January, collapsed in March with Israel intensifying military operations in Gaza afterwards. 'We have seen US pressure and what it can accomplish,' Ansari said referring to the January truce which saw dozens of hostages held by Hamas released in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. The Qatari official said particularly in the context of US enforcement of the Israel-Iran truce, it was 'not a far-fetched idea' that pressure from Washington would achieve a fresh truce in Gaza. 'We are working with them very, very closely to make sure that the right pressure is applied from the international community as a whole, especially from the US, to see both parties at the negotiating table,' Ansari said. There were no casualties on Monday when Iran targeted Al Udeid, the Middle East's biggest US base and headquarters of its regional command. Ansari said that as leaders were weighing their response to the attack, a call came from the US president to Qatar's emir, saying 'there is a possibility for regional stability… and that Israel has agreed to a ceasefire'. 'Qatar could have taken the decision to escalate,' Ansari said. 'But because there was a chance for peace… we opted for that,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store