Sabar granted leave to submit British documents in challenge against Territorial Sea Act
The said documents to be adduced are from the British archives on the colonial office correspondence leading up to and after the North Borneo Order in Council (Alteration of Boundaries) 1954 and North Borneo Order in Council (Definition of Boundaries) 1958.
Justice Alexander Siew How Wai who granted Sabar's (the plaintiff's) application on Friday, also fixed October 3 for further mention of case.
The sole defendant in this OS is the government of the Federation of Malaysia, had agreed and raised no objection to Sabar's application.
The plaintiff's OS is seeking from court a declaration that the Continental Shelf Act 1966 and Petroleum Mining Act 1966 is inapplicable, unconstitutional, invalid, null and void in the territory of Sabah after June 19, 2012;
The plaintiff further sought from court a declaration that the territory of Sabah, after the annulment of the Proclamation of Emergency of 1969 on June 19, 2012, includes the continental shelf under the North Borneo (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council 1954.
Apart from that, they also sought from court declarations that the Mining Ordinance 1960 is valid in Sabah after June 19, 2012;
They also sought a declaration that Section 3(3) Territorial Seas Act 2012 which limits the territorial waters of Sabah to three nautical miles is inapplicable, unconstitutional, invalid, null and void in Sabah as of June 22, 2012;
Finally, a declaration that the territorial waters of Sabah, after the annulment of the Proclamation of Emergency of 1969 on June 19, 2012, includes the 12 nautical miles of sea under the Convention on Territorial Seas and Contiguous Zone 1958 and North Borneo (Definition Of Boundaries) Order In Council 1958; cost and any further or other relief deems fit.
In September 2023, Sabar had filed the OS questioning the validity of the TSA 2012, which limits the State's maritime boundary to only three nautical miles.
Counsel Roland Cheng represented the plaintiff while Senior Federal Counsel Shamsul Bolhassan and Ahmad Hanir Hambaly @ Arwi acted for the defendant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
UK made ‘Armageddon scenario' plan for mass Hong Kong exodus in handover run-up
The UK government prepared a secret contingency plan dubbed 'the Armageddon scenario' in the lead-up to the 1997 handover for the evacuation of millions of Hong Kong residents who might have wanted to flee the city, according to newly unsealed documents. The British national archive documents date back to 1989 in the period immediately preceding and following the Tiananmen Square crackdown. A number of scenarios and recommendations for UK authorities were outlined in the event Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule triggered an exodus of people from the city. The documents, which were made public on Tuesday UK time, stated that the United Kingdom could 'not handle a mass evacuation alone' and that other countries would need to help, highlighting the United States as 'particularly important'. Repeated references were made to the 'Official Group on Contingency Planning for Hong Kong', which was said to have been formed following then prime minister Margaret Thatcher's meeting with the governor of Hong Kong on June 8, 1989. The governor at the time was David Wilson. The internal communications, labelled 'secret', categorised the plan into three scenarios – green, amber and red. When the most serious red phase was reached, indicating a mass exodus was under way, the British government would launch an evacuation, reception and resettlement plan, according to the file. In the contingency plan dated November in the released files, air and ship operators should be instructed to deploy earmarked aircraft and ships covered by dormant contracts immediately to Hong Kong in the red phase. Planes were expected to reach Hong Kong within 24 to 48 hours, while cruise ships were likely to have taken at least a week. The plan noted that the basic cost of moving 1 million people by sea to Taiwan would be around £165 million on the most favourable set of assumptions, while that of flying them to the island would have reached about £170 million. It set out that civilian evacuation would require the use of cruise ships and 143 of the vessels were available from 21 different countries. Costs were estimated to reach £200,000 per ship every day. The plan noted that efforts would need to be stepped up to get Southeast Asian governments to offer 'immediate, practical help', such as public appeals targeted at ethnic Chinese communities. It added that military deployments 'might be necessary', including using aircraft and vessels to assist in evacuation, as well as the deployment of land, air and sea assets to 'deter or counter Chinese military action'. But the plan noted that the capacity of military assistance in transporting a large number of people was 'small' compared with the size of the potential exodus and the capacity of the civil sector. The document said the British Royal Air Force had a readily available maximum single lift capacity of about 5,000 people. The team also drew up resettlement plans, in which the cost of reception centres would be about £5 million per 1,000 people and £5 billion per million based on past experience. The figures assumed each refugee would stay in a reception centre for six months, where basic needs would be met with some minimal English language training. The team said accommodation capacity would 'pose severe problems' in the event of an influx of arrivals. It estimated that only 400,000 properties would be available in the UK for resettlement in the short term, of which 300,000 would have to be requisitioned from the private sector. The internal documents outlined four scenarios that could trigger such an exodus, including two before and two after the 1997 handover. The report outlined one potential situation in which there would be a 'steady ebbing away of confidence' among people in Hong Kong before the handover, leading to an outflow of capital and talent from the city. Another pre-handover scenario referenced a 'panic provoked by further developments in China', such as the use of military force against Chinese civilians. It said Hong Kong people would be more sensitive than before to such developments. The post-handover scenarios were predicted to play out largely similarly – one based on people losing confidence in whether the Sino-British Joint Declaration was working, and a second that outlined a 'greater' risk of Beijing directly interfering in the city's affairs after 1997. The declaration is an agreement signed by Britain and China in 1984 to settle the future of Hong Kong. The two governments agreed China would reassume control of Hong Kong from July 1, 1997. One document, signed off by a DG Manning in August, included an attachment to a report commissioned by the South China Morning Post in 1989 outlining 'best case scenarios' on the impact of 3 million arrivals in the UK from Hong Kong. The report was produced by experts from well-known UK universities, who found that the economic costs were not 'dramatic', even in the extreme case of 3.2 million immigrants. -- SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Daily Express
14 hours ago
- Daily Express
Shafie amended Constitution for good reason
Published on: Sunday, July 27, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 27, 2025 Text Size: I refer to 'PBS: JKDM and Ambalat among the low points' (DE July 14) Datuk Joniston Bangkuai, Information Chief of PBS, said the slogan 'Rumah Kita, Kita Jaga' is not a signal of hostility towards the Federal Government, but to inspire local ownership in shaping Sabah's future and to empower local leadership and decision-making. He took aim at decisions made by the Federal Government without consulting the Sabah Government, among others, the federal announcement on the joint oil and gas development in Ambalat waters. Datuk Seri Shafie Apdal as Chief Minister had amended the Sabah Land Ordinance in November 2018 in the State Assembly, to refine the definition of land in Sabah to include the area of the continental shelf as stated in the North Borneo (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council 1954. This is to ensure protection of Sabah's rightful territories should there be any dispute in the future. The amendment is in line with the existing provisions under the MA63 and Article 1(3) of the federal constitution which provides that the territories of any State are territories comprised therein immediately before Malaysia Day. Ambalat waters is within the boundaries stated in the Order in Council 1954. It is constitutionally wrong of the Federal Government to infringe on Sabah's property (the Ambalat waters) without consultation with the Sabah Government. Dr Chong Eng Leong The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
New Straits Times
17 hours ago
- New Straits Times
SNP to 'force vote' on Palestinian statehood amid pressure on Starmer
LONDON: A minor opposition party in the British parliament on Sunday threatened to bring forward legislation on recognising Palestinian statehood and "force a vote" if Prime Minister Keir Starmer continues to oppose the move. The Scottish National Party (SNP), which pushes for the independence of Scotland, said it would table a "Palestine Recognition Bill" when parliament returns after its summer recess if Starmer did not change his position. The prime minister has committed to recognising Palestinian statehood but said it must be part of a peace process in the Middle East. The SNP threat comes after more than 220 British MPs, including dozens from Starmer's ruling Labour party, demanded Friday that the UK government follow France and recognise a Palestinian state. The call, in a letter signed by lawmakers from nine UK political parties, came less than 24 hours after French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country would formally do so at a UN meeting in September. "Unless Keir Starmer stops blocking UK recognition of Palestine, the SNP will introduce a Palestine Recognition Bill when Parliament returns in September and force a vote if necessary," said Stephen Flynn, SNP's leader in the UK parliament. "Keir Starmer must stop defending the indefensible, finally find a backbone and demand that Israel ends its war now," he added. If France formally recognises a Palestinian state it would be the first G7 country – and the most powerful European nation to date – to make the move. Starmer has come under rising domestic and international pressure over recognising Palestinian statehood, as opposition intensifies to the ongoing war in Gaza amid fears of mass starvation there. The UK leader on Saturday spoke to his French and German counterparts and outlined UK plans to airdrop aid to people in Gaza and evacuate sick and injured children, his office said. The SNP holds nine seats in the 650-seat UK parliament.--AFP
