New US remittance tax proposal: What it means for NRIs sending money to India
A significant tax development is on the horizon for non-resident Indians in the US. The US government's House Ways and Means Committee has advanced a sweeping bill titled the 'One Big Beautiful" Tax Act, aimed at extending several provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and introducing new tax measures.
Among these proposals is the introduction of a 5% tax on remittances sent abroad, a measure that could directly impact thousands of NRIs who regularly transfer funds to their families in India.
While the bill is subject to a Senate review and further debate, a majority of US Republican Party leaders aim to finalize it by 4 July. If passed in its current form, the remittance transfer tax will take effect on transfers made after 31 December 2025.
Let's break down what this proposed tax means, especially for NRIs on H1B, L1, or F1 visas and Green Card holders.
What is remittance transfer tax?
Under the proposed Chapter 36C, Section 4475 of the US's Internal Revenue Code, a 5% tax will be levied on remittance transfers—that is, money sent by individuals from the US to recipients in other countries, including India.
This tax is not based on income but on the amount being transferred abroad. For example, if you send $10,000 to India, you could be required to pay an additional $500 in tax.
When will this tax apply?
If enacted, the remittance transfer tax would apply to all qualifying transfers made on or after 1 January 2026. The accompanying refund and reporting provisions will apply to tax years ending after that date.
Also read | How the India-UK Double Contribution Convention benefits employers and employees
Who will be affected?
This tax primarily affects non-citizen residents in the US, including NRIs on H1B, L1, or F1 visas, Green Card holders, and any individual who is not a verified US citizen or national. If you fall into any of these categories and send money to India, you could soon be required to pay this new tax.
The proposed legislation provides a narrow exemption for verified US citizens and nationals and transfers made through 'qualified remittance providers" who have agreements with the US's Internal Revenue Service department to verify a sender's citizenship status.
If a US citizen ends up paying the tax, they can claim a refundable tax credit, but only if they provide a valid social security number and supporting documentation.
How will the tax be collected?
The tax is collected at the point of transfer by the remittance provider, such as as bank or a money transfer service. The service provider will collect the 5% tax from the sender and deposit the tax with the US treasury department on a quarterly basis.
If a provider fails to collect the tax at the time of transfer, they will become liable for the payment instead.
Also read | ITR filing: Why you shouldn't rush to file taxes as soon as the portal opens
Anti-abuse provisions
To prevent circumvention of the remittance transfer tax, the proposal includes anti-conduit and anti-abuse rules. This means any indirect or creative structure used to avoid paying the remittance tax—such as funnelling money through third parties or shell accounts—could trigger enforcement actions and penalties.
Let's say you are an H1B visa holder in the US and you send $20,000 to your parents in India in February 2026. Under the proposed law:
This is over and above any other fees or charges that may already apply to international remittances.
Also read | BluSmart lessons: Investors must look beyond high-growth stories
What should NRIs start preparing for?
Here are a few practical steps NRIs can consider:
Final thoughts
While this tax is not yet law, it represents a significant shift in US tax policy on foreign remittances. If passed, it will increase the cost of sending money abroad for a large segment of the NRI community, particularly those who are not US citizens.
NRIs in the US should closely monitor legislative developments and consider speaking with a cross-border tax specialist to understand the full implications. What begins as a small percentage today can lead to a meaningful cumulative impact over time, especially for those with ongoing financial obligations in India.
Ajay R. Vaswani is the founder of ARAS and Company, Chartered Accountants. This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Please consult a licenced professional.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Big Beautiful Bill: List of Republicans who will vote against Trump's spending measure
President Donald Trump's tax and spending measure, dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill', will go on the Senate floor on Saturday for debate and a vote. While a majority of Republicans, who hold majorities in Congress, are expected to back the president. However, some have come out publicly to declare that they will vote against the bill, which proposes to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs. President Donald Trump said he hopes his Big Beautiful Bill will clear the Senate(AFP) The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin considering the legislation. The timing is, however, uncertain. After the Senate, the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it reaches President Trump's desk. Read More: 'Saved him from ugly death': Trump tears into Khamenei day after his victory speech 'It's evolving,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on Friday. Trump was optimistic. His Truth Social post read: 'We can get it done. It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' Under Senate debate rules, it takes a three-fifths majority of lawmakers to pass a bill. If 51 of 100 Senators vote for it, the bill passes by a simple majority. Now, not all Republicans are voting along party lines. Sen Thom Tillis said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen Ron Johnson said he needed to see the final legislative text. Read More: Donald Trump hints at 'very big' trade deal with India after China pact Here's a complete list of Republicans opposing Trump's spending bill Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) Sen Johnson said he opposes the bill due to its insufficient spending cuts and significant contribution to the federal deficit, estimated at $2.3-$4 trillion over a decade by the Congressional Budget Office. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) Sen Tillis objects to the bill's Medicaid cuts, which could affect vulnerable constituents, and the abrupt phaseout of clean energy tax credits, which he argues risks economic disruption. Rep David Valadao (R-CA) The California Republican refuses to support any bill that cuts Medicaid or threatens healthcare access in his Central Valley district, where nearly two-thirds of constituents rely on Medicaid.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Senate Republicans race to pass Trump-backed ‘Big Beautiful Bill' ahead of July 4 deadline
At some 940 pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defence and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. read more President Donald Trump points to a reporter to take a question as he speaks to the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, in the briefing room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo) Senate Republicans are putting all the efforts to pass a key budget bill central to President Donald Trump's second-term agenda to clear a major hurdle before the self-imposed July 4 deadline. Party leaders are pressing for an initial vote on the legislation, dubbed as the 'Big Beautiful Bill' by Saturday afternoon, after releasing the latest 940-page version just past midnight. The bill, which builds on a $3.8 trillion extension of Trump-era tax cuts, narrowly cleared the House of Representatives two weeks ago. However, Senate Republicans remain divided, particularly over how deeply to slash welfare programmes to help offset the bill's steep cost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The legislation is expected to trigger an intense debate over the weekend as leaders scramble to unify the party and move forward with one of the most significant economic proposals of Trump's presidency. The legislation follows a version passed by the House of Representatives last month, which nonpartisan analysts estimated would add roughly $3 trillion to the national debt, now at $36.2 trillion. Despite those concerns, the White House has argued the bill would ultimately reduce the annual deficit by $1.4 trillion. 'By passing this bill now, we will make our nation more prosperous and secure,' Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham said in a statement. The bill is likely to face a flurry of Democratic amendments during the weekend session, though these are not expected to pass in the 53-47 Republican-controlled Senate. Intra-party disagreement remains a challenge for Republicans, especially around proposed cuts to Medicaid. Senators from states with large rural populations had objected to earlier provisions that would reduce state tax revenue for Medicaid providers. The latest draft delays those reductions and includes a $25 billion support package for rural Medicaid providers between 2028 and 2032. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The legislation also proposes raising the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes (SALT) to $40,000 with a 1% annual inflation adjustment through 2029, after which the cap would revert to $10,000. The cap would begin to phase down for individuals earning over $500,000 a year. This provision is key for House Republicans from high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, and California, whose support is critical to maintaining the party's narrow majority. Senate Republicans are employing a legislative maneuver known as budget reconciliation to bypass the usual 60-vote threshold needed to advance most legislation, allowing the bill to proceed with a simple majority in the 100-member chamber. What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill Tax cuts are the priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because without it, there would be a massive tax increase, totalling some $3.8 trillion, after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. Those existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new ones that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal, or $2,500 in the House's version. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount, if any. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to full his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defence system. The Defence Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans are seeking to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unravelling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsized the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Fund to help offset those reductions. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate various the production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments, restrictions on the development of artificial intelligence and blocks on transgender surgeries. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barrelled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Billions go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under the Senate GOP view, the cost of tax provisions would be $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is 'magic math' that obscures the costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade. With inputs from agencies
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
G-7 countries agree to the ‘Side by Side' tax deal for US companies: Here's what it means
The US and fellow Group of Seven nations have reached an agreement aimed to prevent a global tax war, by establishing a 'side-by-side' tax system. This new arrangement would exempt US companies from some elements of an existing global agreement. A key component of this deal involved the US officials agreeing to remove Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill, This provision, often referred to as the 'revenge tax' would have increased taxes on the US income of non-US-based businesses and individuals from countries whose tax policies Washington deems discriminatory. The side-by-side system could 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward,' the G-7 advanced economies said Saturday in a statement. As part of the agreement, the other G-7 members will support the US's stance in ongoing negotiations with the Group of 20 countries and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which has been hosting global talks on corporate taxes, with some proposals drawing opposition from the US. Officials from the G-7 said they look forward to coming up with a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all,' according to the statement. While some progress has been made, the issue of 'digital services taxes,' remains only partially addressed. Some countries currently levy these taxes on the profits of US-based technology companies including Meta Platforms Inc. and Inc. The effort to establish a side-by-side system will include a 'constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries,' according to the G-7 statement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday that he had asked Senate and House leadership to remove Section 899 from the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act after securing G-7 backing for the side-by-side system. Senate Republicans deleted the section in the latest version of the tax bill.
