Labour rebels offered 11th-hour concession over welfare reform
The latest concession follows a partial U-turn last week in the face of a possible defeat over the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill.
The legislation faces its first Commons vote on Tuesday night and the 11th-hour concession on timing for the changes suggests the Labour hierarchy is still concerned about the scale of the revolt, which is set to be the largest of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership.
Disability minister Sir Stephen Timms told MPs that the Government had listened to the concerns raised about the timing of the changes.
The climbdown will cause a major headache for Chancellor Rachel Reeves as the welfare squeeze was originally meant to save £4.8 billion a year, which was subsequently reduced to £2.3 billion when the Bill was first watered down.
Tuesday's changes leave any future savings uncertain as the scale of the squeeze on Pip is unclear.
Sir Stephen's intervention, which came in the middle of debate on the legislation, followed frantic behind-the-scenes negotiations involving Cabinet ministers, Sir Keir himself and wavering Labour MPs.
Some 39 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would see the Bill fall at its first hurdle in the Commons.
A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was shelved after the first partial U-turn on the legislation last week, which restricted the Pip changes to new claimants from November 2026.
That date has now been abandoned in the latest climbdown, with any changes now only coming after Sir Stephen's review of the Pip assessment process.
Labour rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said the situation was 'a complete farce' (Richard Townshend/UK Parliament)
Sir Stephen acknowledged 'concerns that the changes to Pip are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading'.
He said the Government would now 'only make changes to Pip eligibility activities and descriptors following that review', which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026.
The concession appeared to have won round some Labour doubters.
Josh Fenton-Glynn, who was one of the 126 Labour MPs who signed the original rebel amendment to the welfare reform Bill last week, described the move as 'really good news'.
He said he wanted to support the Government at 'every opportunity' and was glad changes to personal independence payment eligibility would be delayed until after the Timms review.
But other Labour MPs appeared exasperated, with one telling the PA news agency that no-one 'knew what they were voting on anymore'.
And rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said she was determined to press for a vote on her 'reasoned amendment' which would halt the legislation in its tracks.
'The whole Bill is now unravelling and is a complete farce,' she said.
This is an utter capitulation. Labour's welfare bill is now a TOTAL waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does NOT control spending.
It's pointless. They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern. https://t.co/fJJ78lPkX0
— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) July 1, 2025
'What it won't do is stop the suffering of disabled people which is why we are determined to go ahead with the reasoned amendment and attempt to vote down the Bill at second reading.'
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch accused ministers of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'.
She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Thursday briefing: Labour is betting on an NHS overhaul to deliver real change, but can they pull it off?
Good morning. Wes Streeting's first statement as health secretary was a startling one. Just a day after Labour's historic election triumph, he declared that 'the NHS is broken'. Now, almost exactly a year later, he returns with a 10-year plan to fix it, in what's been billed as the most ambitious health reform agenda in a generation. It's hard to overstate the significance of this moment. Reforming the NHS was central to Labour's election manifesto, and last year prime minister Keir Starmer made the consequences clear: 'Reform or die,' he warned, and with it, staked the next election on his government's ability to deliver meaningful change. NHS leaders, unions, thinktanks, patient groups and other key stakeholders may not agree on every detail, but they are united on one thing: the NHS is in crisis and change is urgently needed. But what exactly is in this plan and will it make a difference? To find out, I spoke to health policy editor Denis Campbell, who has been covering the NHS for two decades. That's after the headlines. UK politics | Downing Street has said Rachel Reeves will keep her post and has not offered her resignation, after the chancellor was seen in tears at prime minister's questions. US news | The federal sex-trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs reached its conclusion on Wednesday, with the jury finding the music mogul guilty on two charges The government has said that it will seek the maximum 20-year sentence. UK news | Detectives investigating the former nurse Lucy Letby have passed evidence to prosecutors alleging she murdered and harmed more babies, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed on Wednesday. US military | Iran's nuclear program was set back roughly one to two years as a result of the US strikes on three key facilities last month, according to an assessment by the Pentagon. Covid inquiry | Discharging untested patients from hospitals to care homes during the Covid crisis was the 'least worst decision', the former health secretary Matt Hancock has told a public inquiry. At its most basic, the 10-year plan is the Labour government's detailed 150-page blueprint to get the NHS back on its feet after nearly 15 years of serious neglect, Denis Campbell told me. 'It aims to address the fact that the NHS is sadly no longer able to perform its most essential function, which is to give people who need care the care they need, when they need it.' Waiting times are too long for many of the NHS's most vital services, including GP appointments, ambulances, mental health support and surgery. 'The 10-year plan is meant to get the NHS back on its feet in a way that we as patients, voters and taxpayers will appreciate and notice, but crucially, to also modernise the health service, to make it work better and more efficiently to help deal with the fact that we live in a tech-driven age, with an ageing population and the fact that people expect health care to be much more convenient in the way that so many things in life are now,' Denis added. How will it do this? The 10-year plan proposes to do this with three big 'shifts': From hospital-based to community-based care: Services are moved out of hospitals and into community settings like GP surgeries, clinics and the promised new neighbourhood health centres. From analogue to digital: Rely more on digital tools like AI to spot problems early, speed up diagnoses and improve efficiency. From treating illness to preventing it: Focus more on keeping people healthy – by tackling smoking, obesity and misuse of alcohol – instead of just treating illness when it occurs. But, Denis told me, there are many practical questions, particularly on the first shift: 'What will these new centres actually look like? Will they be new places or expansions of existing GP practices? Who will staff them? Is there any money behind this bold vision to make it a reality?' On staffing, the NHS workforce continues to grow in England. 'There are 1.5 million people, but the NHS in England has for many years had roughly about 100,000 vacancies at any one time. So we know the NHS in England does not have the staff it needs already. 'The government is unveiling an ambitious and potentially voter-friendly plan to make the NHS more accessible, responsive, convenient and patient-friendly, with lots of consumer friendly positive language like this,' Denis said. 'But we do have to ask the hard question: if there isn't enough people hired to do what the NHS already does, where will the extra people come from to provide these extra services?' Denis added that while there has been some progress that the 10-year plan can build on, there's still a crisis to accessing care. 'Too many people wait too long. So there's clearly a big job to be done here to make the NHS as accessible as the government is saying,' he said. What has the reception been so far? Denis was being inundated with responses from thinktanks, unions, patient groups, and other stakeholders when I spoke to him. 'Many are welcoming the boldness of the government's vision, but they're questioning the practicality of delivering all of this and the timescale, what will it take to do this?' For many of these stakeholders, much of the plan is appealing, Denis added – who wouldn't want a local neighbourhood health centre where you can get an X-ray or scans, mental health support, pharmacist services and GP appointments? But there is scepticism. Denis groups the criticism into three main concerns: it will take a long time, there's no extra money for new buildings or services and there's not enough bold action on public health. 'This is billed as a 10-year health plan, not just the 10-year NHS plan. The government says it will improve the nation's health. But several thinktanks like the King's Fund are saying it doesn't include enough bold action to tackle the drivers of ill health and the fact we've got an increasingly sick population, particularly through diet and obesity and misuse of alcohol,' Campbell said. He added that the criticism is that there's no equivalent in this plan to past transformative policies like the sugar tax or indoor smoking ban. 'The NHS at the moment is not able to outrun a growing tidal wave of preventable illness that has been lapping at its shores for some years now. We have an ageing population and an increasingly sick population, will this plan make it any more able to cope with this growing burden of illness? At the moment, unfortunately the answer to that question is, 'No'.' Is this the last chance to save the NHS? The prime minister's positing that this is 'reform or die' certainly makes it seem that way, but Campbell suggested that it's a bit hyperbolic. 'The NHS is so deeply embedded in British life that no one is going to replace it with something else. But there is enormous pressure on this government to deliver. Keir Starmer promised transformative change into something people would notice and value,' he said. 'We're a year into this government, and England doesn't yet look much improved. So the pressure on this plan to deliver real, visible improvements quickly is intense. By framing it as 'reform or die' the prime minister is setting a very high bar for success.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion For our Long Wave newsletter (sign up here!), Jason Okundaye has a lovely piece on seeing Glastonbury as a 'white' festival … until he went and saw the depth of Black talent for himself. 'I can honestly say that coming back for a second year felt like coming home,' he writes. Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters This is a devastating interview with a mother trying to understand how her vulnerable 24-year-old daughter was able to access a pro-suicide forum, and have poison sent to her through the post. It exposes a litany of failures, from state institutions to the absence of effective internet regulation. Aamna Hugh Muir is serving at 120mph in this piece on why Wimbledon is wrong to drop human line judges, and why we can't (and shouldn't want to) seek to eliminate the imperfections that make sport so compelling. Charlie From skipping weddings to mocking each other's music, this roundup of every major feud between the Gallagher brothers since Oasis split in 2009 gave me a proper chuckle. Aamna Our pass notes column breaks down why breaking your morning routine can feel so disruptive to your day. The most important thing to do, of course: make sure you read First Edition … Charlie Tennis | Emma Raducanu stormed past Marketa Vondrousova in her second-round Wimbledon match in two sets, 6-3, 6-3, lining her up to face the world No 1 Aryna Sabalenka. Katie Boulter was knocked out after losing in three sets to the world No 101 Solana Sierra. Cameron Norrie came back from a set down to stun 12th seed Frances Tiafoe. Football | Switzerland were denied a fairytale start to their home Euros as Julia Stierli's own goal ultimately settled a 2-1 victory for Norway. Finland secured their first victory of the tournament in 16 years with a narrow 1-0 win against 10-player Iceland, thanks to Katariina Kosola's superb second-half strike. Cricket | India closed day one of the second men's test match with England at Edgbaston with 310 runs for 5 wickets, as Shubman Gill's scored his second century of the series. Rishabh Pant was also a standout, swapping his usual scatterbrain batting for notable self-control, restricting himself to just one glorious four and a single crisp six in the 60 minutes he was at the crease. Rachel Reeves crying on the frontbench at prime minister's questions after Labour's stunning welfare climbdown is on a number of front pages today. The Guardian splashes on 'Tears and turmoil as PM forced to defend Reeves after welfare fiasco,' the Telegraph has 'Pound falls after Reeves's tears,' the FT leads with 'Gilts and pound slump after Reeves' tears trigger fears for fiscal vigilance,' while the i Paper has 'Reeves future in doubt after tearful PMQs.' The Metro goes with 'Tears & jeers for Starmer,' the Daily Mail asks 'What – or who – caused the tears that sparked turmoil in the markets?' while the Sun splashes on 'I'm under so much pressure,' referring to what Reeves' said before her tearful moment. The Mirror was the outlier, splashing on 'Kate: My rollercoaster recovery' on the princess's experience after cancer treatment. The truth about Iran's nuclear programme After 12 days of bombing by Israel and the US last month, opinions vary about the extent of the damage caused to Iran's nuclear facilities. The Guardian's diplomatic editor, Patrick Wintour, and Rouzbeh Parsi, a historian who studies Iran's nuclear programme, tell Michael Safi what could happen next. A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad If you have an idea to bring your community together over a project, we have some tips for you. Start with a short, clear and engaging story that explains what you're doing and why it matters. Build your support from friends, neighbours, and local groups first. Pick a crowdfunding platform that fits your needs (and watch out for hidden fees). Seek grants and build partnerships with trusted local organisations to boost your credibility and resources. Use your passion to just go for it, and see what you can build. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
The Herald Scotland
29 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Yes, it's time for change, Sir Keir: time for you to go
Ruth Marr, Stirling. • We are already waiting for any (even one) of Anas Sarwar's election promises from 2024 to come true, and yet here he goes again in a desperate bid to stay relevant: 'no tax hikes if Labour win in Scotland' ("No Scots income tax rise if Labour wins, insists Sarwar", The Herald, July 2). The fiscal position in both the UK and Scotland make this assertion difficult, if not impossible to sustain, as the IFS states 'since departmental spending plans are locked in and the Government has had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner and working age benefits, tax rises seem increasingly likely' ("Welfare U-turn raises questions over Labour's tax plans", heraldscotland, July 2). Given Mr Sarwar's record on promises I know who I believe. GR Weir, Ochiltree. Read more letters John Swinney's woolly words Two articles on facing pages today (July 1) are an interesting contrast in style and content. The First Minister's contribution ("'There is nothing wrong in Scotland that cannot be fixed'") is to my (admittedly unsympathetic) eye a blancmange of aspirations and largely unfulfilled, or at least untested, promises (and, Mr Swinney, the baby boxes are a sorely over-used example of something actually done). Kevin McKenna's piece ("We are being softened up to no longer believe in the sanctity of life") about assisted dying is, in contrast, clear and unequivocal. The difference between them, which to me is crucial, is that everything the First Minister says is theoretically achievable and measurable (though not by the current administration) and is, by any standard, aimed at the common good for all of the people. Mr McKenna uses the ideology of a single and highly-organised group in society to argue for an outcome which, equally, would affect us all and, for me, would take away the right to decide when life had become unbearable. It seems wrong that the untestable and so unverifiable beliefs of that one portion of our society should be allowed to have a disproportionate influence on this or any other article of legislation of such importance. The First Minister's words are woolly but lacking in harm: Mr McKenna's, better expressed though they may be, are potentially dangerous to our democratic process. Bryan Chrystal, Edinburgh. The lesson of Ukraine Stan Grodynski (Letters, July 2) continues to write from the independent state of La La Land. His belief that an independent Scotland would not require to defend itself is counter to the fact that Scotland is essential in the defence of the gateway to the North Atlantic and the North Sea, both strategically important routes commercially and militarilly. Mr Grodynski might look to the Crimean peninsula for a good example of a very similar situation where Ukraine, in a referendum, relinquished its 30% of the USSR's nuclear arsenal in return for security guarantees. Those guarantees have been proven worthless by President Putin and the rest, as they say, is history. Peter Wright, West Kilbride. • Stan Grodynski is clearly an unhappy man, with a long list of grievances about the UK in general and the Westminster Government in particular. There is however one goodish aspect of Britain that he might like to consider, which is that he can spout his nonsense on one day, and will still be at the same address the next day. Malcolm Parkin, Kinross. Veiled allusion In 2014 we were promised the earth and all that is in it. Rishi Sunak vowed to lead us to sunlit uplands. Today a 'socialist' government lurches from one disaster to the next and London-based newspapers are seeking any number of heads to roll. The outgoing chief of the Institute of Fiscal Studies has warned that the state pension triple lock should be scrapped as soon as possible. I am reminded of Ronald Reagan's story about the woman of some mature years who walked into a bridalwear shop. An assistant asked: 'How can I help you?' "I would like a dress for my fourth wedding." "What sort of dress exactly?" "Oh, virgin white, veil and a long train – the full works." As delicately as possible the assistant inquired as to whether that would be appropriate for a fourth-time bride. "Oh, I'm just as entitled as a first-time bride." "How so?" inquired the assistant. "Well my first husband got so excited at the wedding, he collapsed and died of a heart attack." "I'm sorry to hear that. And the second?" "We had a heated argument on the way to the reception and never spoke again." "Oh dear. And the third?" "The marriage was never consummated." "Never consummated?" "He was a unionist. He just sat on the edge of the bed each night saying how great it was going to be." Alan Carmichael, Glasgow. IDF are the terrorists As I sign a petition to allow baby food into Gaza (with no hope it will make a difference) and watch coverage of yet more atrocities committed by the Israeli Defence Force, the British Establishment continues to try to squeeze the last drops of faux rage out of the comments of a couple of musicians. Hundreds of unarmed Palestinians are shot every week queuing for food because the Israeli state backed by the US closed down 400 food distribution centres run by experienced independent agencies and replaced them with four distribution centres. A reputable Israeli newspaper has reported that soldiers were told to use live ammunition to help control crowds. This is the Hunger Games added to the destruction of all schools, hospitals and homes. The rap duo at Glastonbury were wrong to shout for anyone to be killed. They should have been shouting "The IDF is a terrorist organisation". There is no other way you could describe an organisation that has carried out the atrocities it is guilty of. But British senior politicians and sections of the media want to divert attention from the horrifying reality with the trivia of paint on planes and music festival chants. And let us expose the antisemitism claim for what it really is. It has been used for years to bully people who criticise the actions of the Israeli state. It no longer works. Too many people see the reality and those who continue to use it need to question their own ethics. We know that there are many honourable people of Jewish ethnicity in and outwith Israel who are also strong critics of the government of that state. Isobel Lindsay, Biggar. What did Benjamin Netanyahu know in advance of the October 7 attack? (Image: PA) • Otto Inglis (Letters, July 1) is correct in reminding us of atrocities committed at that other music festival on October 7, 2023. What he chooses to ignore is the apparent complicity of Prime Minister Netanyahu, a situation now generally accepted, even by many of his Israeli subjects. Over a period of weeks he is known to have received information from frontier guards who saw, and heard through increased wireless activity, the necessary extensive preparations for the attack. Information is also said to have come from Egypt. In spite of the repeated warnings, frontier defences at that crucial point were not strengthened. The Prime Minister's craven response, which incidentally involved betrayal of the hostages, appears to have been made in relation to a number of current personal and political problems. But, from a longer perspective, the vastly exaggerated retaliation and unprecedented slaughter in modern times of thousands of innocent civilians, especially the children who would have formed a future Palestinian Gaza, helped to further his personal aim as founder of a greater Israel. Further proof of the real situation on October 7 and determination to distance themselves is provided by the resignations, soon after the event, of three top generals and the head of Shin Bhet, on the basis of "not on my watch." Why does our own Prime Minister, after those months of slaughter, not have the courage to join so many of us in saying the same? Murdo Grant, Rosemarkie.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
MPs declare £1million of gifts - and Nigel Farage got the most
MPs declare £1million of gifts - and Nigel Farage got the most Farage was given US trips, a helicopter ride and £2,000 tickets to a boxing match Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage MPs have received more than £1 million in gifts since the election, including foreign travel, accommodation and tickets to sporting events and concerts. Rows over free tickets and other gifts given to senior Labour figures, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, posed an early problem for the Government, which had made restoring trust in politics a major part of its election campaign. But analysis of the MPs' Register of Interests by the PA news agency shows hundreds of MPs have declared receiving gifts in the past year. Some 236 MPs declared gifts from UK sources, totalling £477,539, while 144 said they had been on overseas trips paid for by donors, charities, think tanks or foreign governments, worth another £810,761. In total, 318 MPs declared that they had received gifts in the year since the election, just under half the number sitting in the Commons. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage declared the highest value, receiving gifts worth a total of £98,709 over the past year. The bulk of these took the form of flights and accommodation on a number of trips to the United States, paid for by Reform donor Christopher Harborne and party volunteer George Cottrell. But they also include £8,413 for a helicopter journey from JC Bamford, whose owner has previously backed the Tories, and tickets worth £2,000 from boxer Derek Chisora to watch his fight against Joe Joyce last August. The biggest recipient of hospitality from UK sources was the Prime Minister, thanks to his regular attendance at Arsenal games. Sir Keir declared £11,170 worth of football tickets over the past year. A long-standing Arsenal season ticket holder, he has previously said that he is no longer able to sit in the stands because of security concerns, but has been offered a seat in the club directors' box so he can continue to attend matches with his son. The Prime Minister declared a total of £17,344 in hospitality and other gifts since the election, with other donations including tickets from Universal Music and the FA to see Taylor Swift and the loan of clothes to his wife. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch declared just one gift – £14,350 from Tory donor Neil Record to cover work space, accommodation and hospitality for a series of meetings in Gloucestershire in March this year. Article continues below While several MPs received significant sums in gifts, most declared lower amounts or none at all, with the median MP receiving £1,208 in gifts over the year. Some 49 MPs received free tickets to football matches in the past year, totalling almost £59,000. But gifts from football clubs and organisations such as the FA and the Premier League totalled more than £70,000, and included concert tickets as well as hospitality at matches. The single largest gift of sporting tickets, however, was declared by shadow business minister Greg Smith, who received hospitality worth £5,160 at last year's British Grand Prix from hosts Silverstone. Four other MPs, including Leader of the Commons Lucy Powell and shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel, also received hospitality at Silverstone last year. Eight MPs received hospitality from the Lawn Tennis Association at Wimbledon in 2024, while golf's R&A provided tickets for four MPs at the Open. Another 49 MPs received tickets to awards ceremonies including the Baftas, the Brit Awards and the British Kebab Awards, while 23 were given tickets and hospitality for horse racing events, and 21 received tickets to concerts. The most popular of those concerts were part of Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, with nine MPs receiving free tickets totalling £14,628, mostly from the Premier League and the FA. As well as the Prime Minister, they included Cabinet ministers Darren Jones, Peter Kyle, Bridget Phillipson and Wes Streeting, and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey. During the last election, Labour campaigned on a pledge to restore probity to public life after the scandals that had plagued the previous Conservative government. Last year Sir Keir sought to toughen up transparency rules for ministers, introducing a new monthly register of gifts and hospitality for ministers rather than the previous quarterly releases. He also changed the Ministerial Code in November to include the seven principles of public life directly in the rules and allow the independent adviser on ministerial standards to launch his own investigations. Article continues below But Alastair McCapra, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, warned the continued culture of gifts and hospitality in British politics risked creating a 'full-blown crisis of legitimacy'. He said: 'At the heart of this credibility gap is the shadowy relationship between business and politics. 'The entrenched culture of gifts and hospitality in British politics creates the perception of corruption, and the suspicion of back doors to access are damaging a Labour Party that campaigned on promises of transparency, integrity and a break from the past. Political scandals thrive in the gaps between information and silence. 'If the Government and the business community are serious about building back trust, they must prioritise and accept a relationship that is transparent and accountable to the public.'
