
10% Maratha reservation to continue this year, hearing on fresh pleas from July 18
The matter was previously heard by a bench led by then-Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya. However, proceedings halted after his transfer to the Delhi High Court in January. Following this, some students approached the Supreme Court, citing harm to their admission prospects due to the ongoing legal uncertainty. The top court subsequently directed the Bombay High Court to constitute a new full bench, which has now taken charge.During Wednesday's hearing, senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, representing the petitioners, urged the bench to expedite proceedings as the academic admission cycle was underway. He argued that, unlike job appointments, delayed admissions would be harder to rectify, even with the interim order in place.advertisementAdvocate General Dr Birendra Saraf, appearing for the Maharashtra government, said the state needed more time to respond to the latest petition filed in court. He maintained that the interim order provided adequate safeguards and questioned the urgency shown by the petitioners. He also suggested that the petitioners withdraw the new plea if they were unwilling to allow time for the state to respond.After considering the submissions, the bench scheduled the hearing for five weeks later.The SEBC Act, passed on February 20 last year by the Eknath Shinde-led Maharashtra government, followed recommendations by the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) led by retired Justice Sunil Shukre. The commission had concluded that "exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations" warranted reservation for the Maratha community beyond the 50 per cent cap mandated by the Supreme Court.The legislation, which came just ahead of the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, sparked a series of public interest litigations and petitions challenging its constitutional validity. Simultaneously, numerous intervention applications have been filed by Maratha organisations defending the reservation and opposing the petitions.In addition to the reservation issue, petitions have also been filed questioning the legality of Justice Shukre's appointment as chairperson of the MSBCC.Must Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Make RTI Act part of varsity curriculum: Karnataka Information Commission
BENGALURU: The Karnataka Information Commission has recommended several measures to the State Government to strengthen the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, including introducing RTI-related curriculum for undergraduate and postgraduate students. The move aims to foster awareness among youth and improve transparency and accountability in government administration. The State Information Commissioner recently met Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh and submitted a detailed list of recommendations ahead of a high-level meeting on RTI scheduled for July 14, to be chaired by Additional Chief Secretary Gaurav Gupta. The Commission has proposed integrating the RTI Act into university curriculum and competitive exams conducted by the KPSC, KEA, and other recruitment bodies. It further recommended that passing RTI-related examinations be made a criterion for promotions and pay reviews in the government sector. The Commission also highlighted the need for RTI training in institutions such as the Administrative Training Institute (Mysuru), District Training Institutes, and the Monetary Policy Institute (Bengaluru).


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Discrimination against SC community remains: Kerala High Court
KOCHI: The Kerala High Court has observed that despite protective provisions for Scheduled Caste communities in the Constitution and laws like the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, discrimination and ostracisation against them have not been fully eradicated. Justice V G Arun said the Scheduled Castes in India have faced systemic ignominy like exclusion, untouchability and violence rooted in centuries-old caste hierarchy. They had restricted access to resources, land and quality education. Still, the discrimination continues. 'One cannot be oblivious of the fact that the tolerance level of persons from vulnerable sections will not be the same as that of those who have not suffered any such ignominy. To put it pithily, only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches,' the court said. The HC made the remarks while dismissing a petition filed by C K Kusuman, former principal of DB College in Kottayam's Keezhoor, seeking to quash the case against him for allegedly making casteist remarks against an assistant professor in 2022. Advocate Thomas J Anakkallunkal, the assistant professor's counsel, said the principal made the comments with the deliberate intention of insulting him by reason of his parentage. The remarks were made during the staff meeting of the college, the counsel said. The court said the question of whether the insulting remark made inside the hall can be perceived as something done within public view can only be decided based on evidence, and the HC cannot conduct a mini-trial or microscopic scrutiny of documents.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bihar Chief Electoral Officer: ‘EC legal team will look at SC suggestions…will release App to speed up process'
TWO days after the Supreme Court's suggestion that the Election Commission include Aadhaar, ration card and voter ID in the list of documents in its intensive revision in Bihar, state Chief Electoral Officer Vinod Singh Gunjiyal, 2007 batch IAS officer, spoke to The Indian Express. Excerpts: People hardly have a measure of the work we had… from printing of enumeration forms to its distribution, our staff are working very hard. We have uploaded 56 per cent forms (4.39 cr) in the system and collected forms from 76 per cent (5.98 crore) of the total 7.89 crore existing electors. We have to work on the break-up of this number. The numbers I mention include all forms submitted — with or without one of the 11 documents. We took out advertisements in newspapers twice that voters can submit forms with or without one of 11 documents. There is no need to panic — documents can be submitted by August 30. A BLO (Booth Level Officer) will attach those documents with respective uploaded forms. We also know that there's been a surge in domicile applications (one of the 11 documents) by voters. They can submit it to us by 30 August. An Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) who is, generally, Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Land Record Deputy Collector (LRDC); Additional District Magistrate (ADM) and or any other similar rank officer, will go as per provisions of Article 326 of RP Act. The ERO/SDM has the revenue record, record of development schemes; the BDO (block development officer) or CO (circle officer) has the history, geography…who all got Indira Awaas, who has what land record. An ERO has to be satisfied about veracity of a voter. If he is not satisfied, he will serve notice to an existing elector through BLO as part of the principle of natural justice. Of course. That's why due process will be followed. One often complains about improper land record. But the older a land record, the better it is. If it is in name of your grandfather, it is good enough. An ERO will look into all these things. Still, if one's claim of being a voter is rejected, he or she can appeal before the District Magistrate. That is not very likely since most local officers will verify a voter at their end itself. During the phase of claims and objections (August 1-30), BLOs will collect documents from those who had not submitted it with their forms. All such voters will fall in the category of new voters, who can apply with form 6 after August 1, online or offline. We are ensuring new voters will be part of electoral roll for upcoming 2025 Assembly polls. ECI's legal team will looking at the suggestions of the Supreme Court. ECI goes per mandate of Article 326. We are here to follow ECI's order. There are learned people in Honourable Supreme Court and ECI. Let them discuss and decide. Ayog ka mandate hai: sahi electors rahna chahiye, galat katna chahiye. ECI has been going only as per its mandate under Article 326. We are here to follow the EC's orders. We have been working hard at every level to complete the process. We have 24 per cent more forms to collect, we still have some time to do so. We have learnt that relatives of such people have been getting signed forms. Some people in rural areas have come back to villages as well. We are also devising an App in the coming two days to facilitate two stages: form submission and document upload through one's mobile phone.