Texas Adds Aoudad to the List of Animals You Can Hunt from Helicopters
Senate Bill 1245, which passed both state legislative chambers and was signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott in May, will go into effect Sept. 1. The bill expands Texas' aerial wildlife management permit system, which previously only listed feral hogs and coyotes, to include aoudad. Aerial culling efforts have helped Texas with its burgeoning feral swine population. A 2019 USDA study found that helicopter hog hunting, also called 'porkchopping,' has successfully reduced hog numbers by at least 31 percent.
Aoudad, also known as Barbary sheep, aren't native to Texas. Originating in North Africa, the species is well-suited to the rough and rugged terrain of West Texas. The animals were introduced to the state in the late 1950s primarily for exotic game ranching and hunting opportunities. Since then, this hardy big game species has flourished — often to the detriment of commercial livestock and native species such as mule deer and bighorn sheep.
'Aoudad sheep bring sheer destruction — they eat everything, spread disease, and push out native species,' representative Ed Morales, Jr, a sponsor of the bill, wrote on X.
High numbers of aoudad in dry environments can have a significant negative impact on browse resources, according to TPWD mule deer and pronghorn program leader Shawn Gray. 'The desert ecosystem is so fragile. We're not supposed to have thousands and thousands of animals on them long-term,' Gray told Texas Farm Bureau.
More than 30,000 aoudad currently roam the state of Texas. That's a major increase from the 31 animals originally released in Armstrong County in 1957. Natural predation is not enough to keep the population in check.
'A coyote is not going to take one down. The lion could take one down, but it's going to be a fight. So they're breeding faster than you can manage them with a straight hunt,' West Texas rancher Warren Cude told The Texas Tribune.
Aoudad also carry the harmful bacteria Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae (M. ovip.), which spreads in respiratory droplets and secretions and can cause severe reactions and even death in commercial sheep and goat herds.
Read Next: Aoudad in West Texas: Is the 'Poor Man's Sheep Hunt' Really a Sheep Hunt?
Texas aoudad hold plenty of appeal for hunters, whether they choose to pursue them from a chopper or stalk them on foot. Because the animals live in rugged country, they offer would-be sheep hunters the chance to pursue a challenging species without waiting a lifetime to draw a tag or pay tens of thousands of dollars to hunt native sheep. Texas considers aoudad an exotic species, so there is no closed season or bag limit, although a valid Texas hunting license is required.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
U.S. to breed billions of flies in fight against flesh-eating maggots
The Trump administration plans to breed billions of flies to airdrop over Mexico and southern Texas in an effort to stamp out the New World Screwworm (NWS). Why it matters: This highly destructive, parasitic flesh-eating maggot "is a devastating pest that causes serious and often deadly damage to livestock, wildlife, pets, and in rare cases, humans," per a U.S. Department of Agriculture post on the plan to sterilize the flies to stop the spread. "While NWS has been eradicated from the United States for decades, recent detections in Mexico as far north as Oaxaca and Veracruz, about 700 miles away from the U.S. border, led to the immediate suspension of live cattle, horse, and bison imports through U.S. ports of entry along the southern border on May 11, 2025." — USDA Flashback: U.S. officials used this biological control technique to eradicate populations of the parasite that's known scientifically as Cochliomyia hominivorax (which means " man-eater") from the U.S. in 1966, per a USDA online post. They again sterilized insects to eliminate "a small outbreak" from the Florida Keys in 2017, according to the agency. State of play: Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced Monday port re-opening plans for cattle, bison and horses from Mexico following what the USADA described in a statement as "extensive collaboration" between U.S. officials and their Mexican counterparts to "increase NWS surveillance, detection, and eradication efforts." The phased reopening of the ports along the border with Mexico will start with Douglas, Arizona, as early as this coming Monday, with more planned in New Mexico and Texas later in the month. "Mexico will also begin renovation of its sterile fruit fly facility in Metapa this week, with renovation expected to be completed by July 2026," per the statement. "Renovation of this facility will allow for production of between 60-100 million sterile NWS flies each week. This is a critical step towards reaching the goal of producing the estimated 400-500 million flies each week needed to re-establish the NWS barrier at the Darien Gap." Meanwhile, Rollins announced last month $8.5 million to establish an NWS sterile fly facility at the Moore Air Base in Hidalgo County, Texas. The facility that's due to be completed this year "could boost domestic sterile fly production by up to 300 million flies per week and could complement current production that already exists in Panama and Mexico," per a USDA statement. Separately, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott last month directed the state's Parks and Wildlife Department and Animal Health Commission to establish a joint Texas New World Screwworm Response Team due to the NWS' northward spread. What they're saying: "We have made good progress with our counterparts in Mexico to increase vital pest surveillance efforts and have boosted sterile fly dispersal efforts," Rollins said. "These quick actions by the Trump Administration have improved the conditions to allow the phased reopening of select ports on the Southern Border to livestock trade." The National Cattlemen's Beef Association said it strongly supports the sterilization drive. "The only way to protect the American cattle herd from the devastating threat of New World screwworm is by having a sufficient supply of sterile flies to push this pest away from our border," said NCBA president Buck Wehrbein, a Nebraska cattleman.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Bird Flu is far from over: Why the worst could be yet to come
The May Consumer Price Index reflected another drop in egg prices — something President Trump and other officials from the administration have misleadingly touted as a sign that their moves to reduce the cost of groceries are working. While the price decrease — albeit slight — provides welcome relief on grocery bills as children start to raid the fridge during summer break, egg prices are still 41 percent higher than they were a year ago. And the truth is, under the policies followed by both the Biden and Trump administrations, those prices will likely go back up. The main cause of the spike in egg prices has been the three-year bird flu outbreak. The U.S., under both Biden and Trump, has failed to drive an effective response to this pandemic. While Trump promised a change in direction, the USDA's new response to bird flu can be summed up with one contrast: more money for big corporations, less money for scientists. We were highly critical of the Biden administration's weak and insufficient response to bird flu, arguing that it was too slow and too deferential to industry concerns. When Trump's Agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, announced she would break with their approach and commit $1 billion to the crisis — including $100 million to develop vaccines for poultry — it seemed like a potential turning point. Less than two weeks later, Rollins flipped. After 'speaking with industry leaders,' she announced vaccines were off the table. Instead, she would focus on 'repopulation' — a term the industry invented to allow the government to bail it out not once, but twice. Meanwhile, USDA staff who were actually monitoring the outbreak are reportedly among those being laid off by Trump's DOGE team. The meat industry's iron grip on agricultural policy has clearly survived into the second Trump administration. The stubborn, ongoing spread of bird flu has driven up egg prices and the chances of a deadly human pandemic. The USDA's policy on containing it has been dictated by what's best for the profits of big chicken and egg companies and has entirely ignored the agency's other responsibility: to protect the public health and economy. It is not working. Under Biden, the USDA's strategy was based on the hope that the outbreak could be contained to a few locations and that the industry, as a whole, did not need to make any changes. The USDA asked meat and egg companies to report any infections and then kill the entire flock in order to 'stamp out' the virus before it could spread. To encourage compliance, the USDA paid these companies 'indemnity' payments — essentially bailouts that covered both the cost of the lost birds and the killing operations. This plan has been an expensive and spectacular failure. Despite $1.25 billion in bailout payments to egg and poultry producers, the virus is spreading faster than ever. Three years into this most recent outbreak, almost 40 percent of the infections in egg-laying hens have happened in just the last few months, according to the bailout data, including the emergence of a new bird flu strain, D1.1. This is not surprising. These taxpayer bailouts have removed any market incentive for these companies to behave responsibly. Bird flu continues to spread quickly through the U.S. farm system because that system is inherently a viral playground. Birds are kept in disgusting, crowded conditions that encourage viral spread. The USDA has refused to mandate any changes to these conditions, nor has it forced companies to take any meaningful preventive measures. As a result, the largest egg and meat companies, like Jennie-O, Herbuck's and Cal-Maine Foods, have received huge payments. Jennie-O has received the most bailout money, roughly $120 million, since the beginning of the outbreak. The brand is a division of Hormel Foods, which made $1.1 billion in profit in 2024. In fact, our investigation revealed that the government has paid out at least $365 million to repeat offenders. As of December, USDA data shows that 67 farms had H5N1 outbreaks twice or more, with 19 reporting three or more separate occurrences of reinfection. Supposedly, the USDA has coupled these bailouts with new requirements for companies to implement 'biosecurity measures,' such as employees showering before and after work. But there is zero practical enforcement. The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service recently admitted that its 'audit' process was worthless — it, thus far, involved no visual inspection and allowed companies to certify their own compliance by filling out a paper-based audit form. Unsurprisingly, no company has ever failed this so-called audit despite the rapid spread of disease. A new rule was released in December that was meant to increase the rigor of inspections, but the rule still allows for exceptions and 'virtual' inspections, with the company controlling what inspectors see. In fact, the majority of farms don't face any safety requirements at all. Under a loophole, industrial-scale farms are deceptively classified as 'small' producers and are exempt from implementing any biosecurity plans whatsoever before getting bailout money. But the exception applies to any farm with fewer than 75,000 laying hens, which is well over 99 percent of egg farms, housing about 77 million hens. The Trump administration came into power as sharp critics of the Biden bird flu strategy. But Rollins is now saying that the Trump administration will not only continue indemnities for the mass culling approach, but they will double down on this policy. She announced $400 million for continued indemnities plus new payments to producers for 'repopulation,' meaning buying new birds, even though companies were already paid once for the value of the destroyed birds. Recent reporting indicates these payouts will come at the expense of money for local food banks and schools that would have supported smaller, healthier farms. Rollins is now also following industry talking points on opposing vaccines for our poultry supply. Mass vaccination has been successful at limiting the spread in other countries, such as France, and the United Nations has encouraged vaccinations in its recent call for governments to step up their response. But the industry has fought hard against it here, because vaccinated birds often cannot be exported to other countries, and the industry's profits are dependent on the export market. The Trump administration's rapid capitulation to industry pressure proves what critics like us have long argued: Our food safety system is fundamentally broken. No administration, Republican or Democratic, has shown the political will to challenge the meat industry's destructive practices. Real leadership requires fundamentally reforming the industrial animal agriculture system that makes pandemics inevitable and is making all of us less healthy and less safe. Andrew deCoriolis is the executive director of Farm Forward. Gail Hansen is a public health veterinary expert, an independent consultant and former state epidemiologist and state public health veterinarian for the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Newsweek
14 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows How SNAP Bills Would Rise For States Under Trump Bill
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Senate lawmakers have passed their version of the sprawling One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and within it are some significant changes to the funding of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits that will impact every state in America. Why It Matters The bill, which is the central tenet of President Donald Trump's fiscal agenda, marks the biggest overhaul to SNAP benefits in recent years, with implications for the 40 million recipients across the country. Republicans have said the changes will better defend the integrity of the program, while critics of the bill have warned that already strained state budgets will not be able to cope with the extra financial demand, with some warnings that states could drop out of the program entirely. Senate Bill Changes Explained The bill proposes shifting more of the financial burden for the food stamps program onto states. Currently, states split the administrative costs of SNAP evenly with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), while the USDA covers the full cost of the benefits. The measures propose that states be required to pay a portion of the benefit cost, but only if they have high payment error rates. An error payment (also called an improper payment) means that the amount of benefits issued to a household was incorrect — either too high or too low. This can happen due to recipient reporting errors or miscalculations by the administering state agency. Under the Senate plan, states with an error rate less than 6 percent would not have to share the cost of benefits with the federal government. For states with rates above this, they will need to pay according to how high their error rate is: 6 to 8 percent: 5 percent cost-share 8 to 10 percent: 10 percent cost-share 10 percent or greater: 15 percent cost-share Here is what each state would be required to pay, as a percentage, based on their 2024 error rate: Support House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn "GT" Thompson and Senate Agriculture Committee Ranking Member John Boozman, both Republicans, said the USDA has "failed at maintaining program integrity" and will incentivize states to reduce improper payments. On June 29, the White House said the "mission of the program has failed" and that the bill "promotes work, responsibility, and restores SNAP to serve the truly needy." Criticism Critics have warned the measures could have far-reaching consequences on state finances and, in turn, SNAP recipients. Several states have warned they will have to pay hundreds of millions per year to shore up benefits for recipients. For example, Michigan previously warned that cost-sharing would set the state back $800 million per year under House-approved rules, which mandated states pay up to 25 percent of the cost of benefits. If increased bills on state coffers prove unaffordable, states can stop offering federal food assistance altogether. In a letter to Senate and House minority and majority leaders, all 23 Democratic Governors warned against the policy, arguing it would "effectively gut this critical food assistance that helps families with children, older adults, and working people afford the rising cost of groceries and put food on the table." "The combination of massive cost increase to states, the unpredictability of how much a state will be on the hook for from year to year, and the need for states to balance their budgets creates a significant risk that states have to leave SNAP altogether," the letter reads. What People Are Saying The White House said in a memo published on June 29: "The One Big Beautiful Bill protects and strengthens SNAP. Right now, almost three-quarters of able-bodied adults without dependents on SNAP have no earned income and the fraud rate is high. The mission of the program has failed: SNAP was intended to be temporary help for those who encounter tough times. Now, it's become so bloated that it is leaving fewer resources for those who truly need help. We are committed to preserving SNAP for the truly needy." Representative Glenn "GT" Thompson and Senator John Boozman, said in response to the USDA publication of 2024 error rates: "Another year, another troubling payment error rate in SNAP, a clear sign that the program lacks the state accountability measures hardworking taxpayers deserve. The status quo, slap-on-the-wrist penalties from USDA have failed at maintaining program integrity in SNAP. This is exactly why we need to get the One Big Beautiful Bill to the President's desk. Its historic reforms will give states skin in the game on SNAP benefits and ensure they have a real incentive to improve oversight and stop improper payments before they happen." The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities think tank said in its analysis of the Senate proposals: "The Senate Agriculture Committee proposal would slash billions in federal funding for food assistance and impose those costs on states for the first time. This would likely lead many states to cut food assistance for low-income families, worsening hunger and undermining SNAP's ability to meet greater need when the economy weakens. States could even end SNAP altogether if they decide the costs they would bear are too great." What Happens Next SNAP cost-sharing rules will come into force in 2028 if the bill becomes law. The bill now heads back to the House of Representatives, where lawmakers will cast a final vote. If it passes, it will head to President Trump's desk to be signed into law.
