Nike expects Trump tariffs to cost it $1bn
Nike has said it expects costs to increase by about $1bn (£728m) as a result of Donald Trump's tariff war as the sportswear company looks to reduce its manufacturing in China.
The market value of the company has dropped by a third over the past year and it is taking action to reduce the hit, including increasing prices in the US and sourcing from other countries.
'These tariffs represent a new and meaningful cost headwind,' said Matthew Friend, Nike's chief financial officer. 'With the new tariff rates in place today, we estimate a gross incremental cost increase to Nike of approximately $1bn. We intend to fully mitigate the impact of these headwinds over time.'
Last year almost 60% of all Nike-branded apparel was made in Vietnam, China and Cambodia. Vietnam, Indonesia and China manufactured 95% of all Nike footwear last year.
'We have strong relationships with our factory partners, and our leadership team is experienced in managing through disruption,' Friend said. 'Nike has consistently been a top payer of US duties. We will optimise our sourcing mix and allocate production differently across countries to mitigate the new cost headwind into the United States.'
He said manufacturing capacity and capability still remains important to the company, despite the 60% tariff rate imposed by the US, accounting for about 16% of footwear imports to America.
Friend said the business was working to minimise the impact on consumers.
However, he added that the company would implement a 'surgical price increase' in the US from this autumn, and will aim to reduce overheads through 'corporate cost reduction'.
Friend's comments came as Nike reported its worst quarterly earnings in more than three years, as revenues slumped 12% to $11.1bn in the three months to the end of May.
Elliott Hill, the chief executive of Nike, said: 'The results are where we planned. That said, we're not happy with where we are.'
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Mamta Valechha, an analyst at Quilter Cheviot, said: 'Nike continues to slump, with its fourth quarter the worst in at least two decades.'
She said the figures indicated Nike 'may nearly be at rock bottom', adding: 'It has been a difficult period for Nike following the pandemic, and the threat of tariffs simply is not helping the situation for the company.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge approves $7m settlement for men suing bar over ‘ladies' night' admission fee
A judge has given preliminary approval of a $7 million settlement in a lawsuit alleging a 'ladies' night' event at a San Diego bar discriminated against men and nonbinary people. The owners of the Omnia Nightclub, which closed in 2020 in the city's lively Gaslamp Quarter, were sued in 2020 after the plaintiffs claimed the themed night violated California's civil rights law. The plaintiffs alleged that they, along with other men and nonbinary people, were made to pay full price on entry, while women were let in for free or at discounted rates at the 'ladies' night' event. The men also alleged that they were frisked by security before entering the club but women were not. The claims in the class action date back to 2015. San Diego Superior Court Judge Matthew Braner gave preliminary approval to the settlement in May and a final fairness hearing is scheduled for August 29. The agreement does not include an admission of any wrongdoing by the defendants. California 's anti-discrimination statute, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, is at the heart of the case. The law prohibits businesses, including bars and nightclubs, from discriminating against customers based on sex, race, religion, gender identity and age. Alex Maystrenko and Steve Frye, the two named plaintiffs in the suit, will each receive $25,000 for their roles as the class representatives. There could be thousands of men who are eligible for a slice of the settlement, which, depending on the final number of claimants, could be between $245 and $4,000 each. Up to 40 percent of the settlement will likely go toward legal costs. Courts in California have previously ruled that gender-based promotions at venues violate the Unruh Act. A family-run San Francisco restaurant was forced to shut down at the end of last year because of a 'ladies' night' discrimination lawsuit. Alfred Rava, a San Diego-based attorney, has brought hundreds of other 'ladies' night' suits. Rava is representing two men who decided not to join the other members of the 2020 class action. 'I and my clients hardily disapprove of businesses treating patrons or consumers differently based solely on their sex,' Rava said.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Marjorie Taylor Greene offers rare GOP praise of Mamdani's campaign: ‘He talked directly to the people'
MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has offered some rare Republican praise for the New York mayoral primary campaign of Democrat Zohran Mamdani. The Georgia congresswoman initially reacted to the presumed victory of the three-term New York State assemblyman, a Muslim, with an edited image of the Statue of Liberty cloaked in a burqa. She now calls his campaign 'unique and smart.' In an appearance on Steve Bannon 's podcast War Room on Real America's Voice, Green attributed Mamdani's apparent win over the frontrunner, former Governor Andrew Cuomo, to having 'talked directly to the people.' She said Mamdani 'was focused on their issues, focused on their problems, and talking to the people about his solutions.' Greene added: 'I think it's extremely important that we get a hard focus on solving our problems, and that's what people really want. And you know that guy that won … the Democrat primary in the [New York] mayor's race. I've watched quite a few of his videos, and he did something pretty unique and very smart, even though I don't agree with anything he says.' She continued: 'He really ran a campaign where he talked directly to the people. He was focused on their issues, focused on their problems, and talking to the people about his solutions, even though his solutions are insane and they're socialist, probably communist, but … he was talking directly to the people.' 'When we are not talking to the people and not working on the people's problems, we lose the people, and the people will turn elsewhere,' she concluded. While the Georgia lawmaker is no fan of Mamdani, acknowledging his abilities on the campaign trail is of note amidst the torrent of Islamophobic bigotry otherwise directed at the man who is likely to become the next mayor of New York. The New York Young Republican Club reacted to the primary results with a 'call to action' on X. 'The radical Zohran Mamdani cannot be allowed to destroy our beloved city of New York,' the group wrote. The group urged the president to invoke the Red Scare-era Communist Control Act to yank Mamdani's citizenship and 'promptly deport him.' The club called on White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, to take action. Miller claimed New York City is the 'clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.' 'The entire Democrat party is lining up behind the diehard socialist who wants to end all immigration enforcement and abolish the prison system entirely,' he added. Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee referred to Mamdani as 'little Muhammad' and said he's 'an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York.' 'He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalization proceedings,' he added. President Donald Trump reacted to Mamdani's win on Truth Social: 'Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous.' He added: 'He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!' Mamdani, who could become the city's first Muslim and Indian-American mayor, won one of the first major Democratic primaries since the start of Trump's second stint in the White House. His platform has largely focused on a growing affordability crisis, with plans for universal childcare, free buses, and a freeze on rent increases in rent-controlled units.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court justices brawl over birthright ruling as Amy Coney Barrett rips Ketanji Brown Jackson for dissent
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson 's passionate dissent in the birthright citizenship case appeared to strike a nerve with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who used three pages of the majority opinion to chide her liberal colleague's legal argument. On Friday, the court released its decision in a case brought by President Donald Trump seeking to expand his executive authority by limiting the power of federal judges. Barrett, joined by the five conservative justices, authored the court's main opinion agreeing to narrow judges' ability to issue nationwide blocks on Trump's executive orders. Jackson authored a concurring dissent, accusing the majority of hastening 'the downfall of our governmental institutions.' The liberal justice of the court accused the majority of being 'so caught up in minutiae of the Government's self-serving, finger-pointing arguments that it misses the plot.' Barrett seemingly did not care for Jackson's sharp admonishment of the court and spent several pages dismissing Jackson's argument as a 'startling line of attack' with no legal precedent and 'many problems.' 'The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity,' Barrett wrote, referring to Justice Sonia Sotomayor's main dissenting opinion. 'Justice Jackson, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever,' Barrett added. For multiple paragraphs, Barrett brushed off her colleague's fiery dissent as illogical. 'We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,' Barrett wrote, before spending another page discussing Jackson's dissent. Barrett, a conservative who was appointed by Trump in 2020, has occasionally toed the line between the conservative wing and the liberal wing of the court, earning ire from Trump supporters. But her scathing takedown of Jackson's dissent was an eye-opening reminder of where her loyalty lies. 'Justice Jackson would do well to heed her own admonition: '[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by law.'' Jackson, a liberal appointed by former president Joe Biden in 2022, expressed intense opposition to the court's decision on Friday, believing it to be 'destructive,' 'perverse,' and 'wrong.' Jackson claimed that the decision would embolden the executive to act more as a monarchy than a democracy. 'A Martian arriving here from another planet would see these circumstances and surely wonder: 'what good is the Constitution, then?'' Jackson said in her dissent. It's not uncommon for justices to display their passion for a certain issue in opinions and dissents. It's become standard to find justices sharply disagreeing with one another in written decisions. But Barrett's relentless attack and Jackson's heated dissent was even surprising to some people online. Republican Representative Dan Crenshaw wrote 'Wow' in response to Barrett's opinion, saying she 'slapped down' Jackson's credibility. Former vice president Mike Pence called Barrett's rebuke 'brilliant.' 'Justice Barrett's brutal takedown of the dissent authored by Justice Jackson is something one wouldn't have predicted from oral arguments,' Fox News host Laura Ingraham said.
