logo
‘My disabled child will need PIP for life – I fear what will happen when I die'

‘My disabled child will need PIP for life – I fear what will happen when I die'

Daily Mirror10 hours ago
Welfare reform is a hot topic, as the Government considers whether to cut benefits for the disabled. But, while politicians wrestle with their balance sheets, one mum tells what it's really like to bring up a child with a disability
Born with the rare genetic disorder FOXP1, writer Kate Skelton's daughter Annabelle, 10, receives Disability Living Allowance which at 16, would have transitioned to PIP – one of the benefits under threat.
Here, Kate 43, who lives in Bromley, Greater London, with her NHS worker husband Philip 44, twins Alexander and Oliver, 6, son, James, 13, and Annabelle, reveals how just two weeks ago she met other children like her daughter for the very first time.

Two weeks ago Annabelle and I boarded a flight to Amsterdam. A life changing moment, it was the first time we'd ever met a child like her and the first time in 10 years I've felt like I belonged .

You see, Annabelle is one of only 652 people worldwide diagnosed with Forkhead box protein P1 syndrome (FOXP1) - a rare neurodevelopmental disorder, causing cognitive, behavioural and physical challenges.
It has resulted in her having cerebral palsy, autism, ADHD, global development delay, hypotonia and challenging behaviour. I am in awe of Annabelle's determination, fearlessness and resilience.
She has defied expectations. She can walk, dance and ride a bike. Although mostly non-verbal, she can talk in simple sentences, she sings beautifully, she gives the most amazing cuddles and has a smile that lights up every room.
She is learning to colour in and is learning to read simple words. She has an amazing laugh and sense of humour, she is funny, kind and patient.
She also faces immense challenges – physically and mentally – and, as her family, with no one who truly understands to talk to, until now, so have we.

It's not just Philip and me, either. Her brothers are impacted – they're always looking out for her, making sure she is safe.
But now, in Amsterdam at a special conference for FOXP1, we were connecting with families like us from all over the world - even the UK. Meeting them and their children, I cried tears of joy. It had taken us a decade and we'd had to fly across Europe but, finally, it was like the pieces of our jigsaw were slotting together.
After 10 years of me feeling lost, afraid and alone, we were part of a community.

I couldn't believe it when we met Zahra, from Hampshire, with her 13-year-old boy Oscar, who has FOXP1 and was diagnosed three years ago – six weeks after his dad died suddenly and unexpectedly.
Her feelings echoed my own, when she said: 'Finally meeting other children and adults with FOXP1 and their parents and carers was the best decision I've made.'

When Annabelle was born on 23 December 2014, I knew something was wrong. She had a squint and was floppy. She had a strange cry – and while her head was on the 90th centile, her body was on the 9th. She choked on my milk and didn't make eye contact.
But I could never have imagined the journey that lay before us – the hospitalisations, the battle for therapy and support, the loneliness and isolation, the fears for her future that would keep me from sleeping.
As she continually missed milestones, I raised my concerns with the medical profession.

After months of being dismissed as neurotic, things unravelled quickly when Annabelle got a cold at 10 months and ended up in intensive care with bronchiolitis and RSV, covered in wires and fighting for her life. Suddenly the hospital doctors started listening.
After a barrage of treatment and recovery, a doctor diagnosed developmental delay, and hypotonia (decreased muscle tone), saying she was 'catastrophically' disabled and may never walk or talk.'
'Buy a calendar - you are going to have a lot of appointments,' said the consultant.

A neurologist showed me her brain MRI and explained that Annabelle had an abnormal brain with enlarged ventricles and loss of white matter. I burst out crying and was told I was upsetting other patients.
When I asked the same neurologist if she might eventually have a relationship, she replied: 'If she ever has sex, it will be rape, because she will lack the mental capacity to consent.' I was utterly shell-shocked.

As our life became a whirlwind of hospitalisations and medical appointments, consultants knew no more than their belief she had a genetic condition. Not knowing what either Annabelle's – or the rest of our family's future looked like was agony.
Years of battling for support, paying for private therapies we could ill afford and struggling for any positives followed.
Finally, in 2018, we celebrated the birth of our twins, Alexander and Oliver, and - having signed up to the 100,000 genome project - Annabelle's geneticist told us she had FOXP1, before discharging her.

Through it all, I had no FOXP1 families to meet up with, have a coffee with – with whom to share our woes.
But now, in Amsterdam, we were joining 75 families like ours from 15 countries across the world - including 5 from the UK - at the two day conference.
In all, we met 49 children and adults with FOXP1 – ranging in age from 2 to 46. Meeting scientists and hearing about new research and treatments was awesome. But nothing beats meeting other people like Annabelle and other mums like me.

To my astonishment, I even met another family from London who are only about 10 miles away from us. At last, I was making connections. People I could laugh and cry with. People who understood. And as we talked, I finally started getting answers to questions that haunted me.
What will Annabelle's future look like? Will she continue to progress? Will she ever live independently? Will she ever have a job? Make friends? How do I cope with her challenging behaviour? What will happen when I die?

Until this moment, I hadn't realised that feeling lost, frightened and lonely had become my normal. I felt like I'd known these families for years.
I particularly loved seeing all the teenagers hanging out together, forming friendships. It gave me hope for Annabelle.
Zahra agreed, saying: 'Meeting so many FOXP1 families was mind blowing, overwhelming and emotional at times, but I felt so comfortable talking and sharing our stories. 'We laughed and we cried as we shared stories of life with our Foxes.'

I also met Karl Whitney – co-founder and co-president of the International FOXP1 Foundation, whose 20-year-old son, Jonah, has FOXP1 and whose YouTube video I found when Annabelle was first diagnosed.
I'd connected with some people on FOXP1 Facebook and WhatsApp groups, but it's no substitute for face-to-face contact. It was truly magical for me and worth all the nerves and the special assistance we needed with the flights.

When it was time to leave Amsterdam, I cried. I didn't want to leave the families I'd connected with behind. Annabelle has taught me to reassess what actually matters in life and to see the world in a different way. I feel incredibly lucky to have her.
Now, at last, we have found people just like her. We were no longer alone.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave
Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

Ministers are set to amend the Employment Rights Bill so that people will be entitled to protected time off in the event of a pregnancy loss, regardless of the stage at which it happens. Angela Rayner has said that the change will give 'people time away from work to grieve'. Under current rules, parents are entitled to up to two weeks of bereavement leave if a child dies before they turn 18, or they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, will see the right to 'at least one week's leave' expanded to people who lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks. The exact length of the leave will be specified in later legislation after a consultation. The Bill already makes provision to expand bereavement leave, giving employees protected time off to grieve the loss of a loved one. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the amendments will offer 'dignity and respect'. 'For many families, including mine, that have been affected by pregnancy loss, the decision around returning to work or taking sick leave to grieve properly can make an already painful experience even more difficult,' he said. 'Grief doesn't follow a timetable, and expanding rights to leave for pregnancy loss will ensure every family gets the time they need to heal without worrying about their job.' Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner similarly said that 'no-one who is going through the heartbreak of pregnancy loss should have to go back to work before they are ready'. 'I am proud that this Government is introducing a day-one right to protected time off work after experiencing pregnancy loss, giving people time away from work to grieve and spend time with their families,' she said. Vicki Robinson, chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'a hugely important step that acknowledges the often very significant impact of pre-24-week loss, not only for those experiencing the physical loss, but for their partners too'. It comes after ministers announced they would review the system of parental leave, declaring that the current system is 'not working' for families. Mr Reynolds said the Government will investigate the whole system for supporting new parents to take time off work when they have a baby, including maternity leave, paternity leave and shared arrangements.

Patients would rather see a GP than pharmacists and nurses, study finds
Patients would rather see a GP than pharmacists and nurses, study finds

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Patients would rather see a GP than pharmacists and nurses, study finds

A study found that people often like to see a GP and still prefer in-person appointments, considering them the 'gold standard'. The review of 33 existing studies, from the University of Southampton, also found patients often like to choose a specific doctor to maintain continuity of care. Trust and confidence decreased when patients wanted to see a GP but were directed to a nurse or other health worker instead, it added. The study noted people also wanted easier ways to book GP appointments, clearer phone options, shorter recorded messages, and simple online routes with quick responses. It comes after the Government published its 10-year health plan which intends to massively increase use of the NHS App, as well as recruit more GPs. An improved app will give patients more control over booking, moving and cancelling appointments, as well as quicker access to medics and other forms of care. The new study, published in the British Journal of General Practice, suggested confidence and trust scores appeared to be lower when people wanted a face-to-face appointment and received a call instead. The public also wanted clear details on the roles of different NHS workers, it found. Lead author Helen Atherton, professor of primary care research, said: 'Patients want a deeper connection with their doctor's practice, better communication, and the choice to see the right professional in the best way for them. 'The NHS needs to better understand what people want so it can shape its services to work for patients. 'Ignoring these fundamental needs will only exacerbate the issues it currently faces.' Writing in the journal, Prof Atherton and colleagues added: 'Patients wanted a nearby practice, with clean waiting rooms, easy appointment booking using simple systems and with short waiting times, and to be kept informed about the process.' In particular, researchers found that, for medication reviews and long-term conditions, patients preferred seeing someone they were familiar with. The research also suggested that, where a patient's condition was worsening, 69.5% of patients reported preferring to consult a GP than a pharmacist and 42.7% strongly agreed or agreed that they would prefer to consult with a GP rather than a pharmacist. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: 'It's really encouraging to see how much patients value the care, and continuity of care, their GP provides – there are some things that only a GP can do for their patients, but it's also important that patients don't feel somehow short-changed if they're offered an appointment with another member of our highly-skilled multi-disciplinary team. 'Not all patients need to see a GP. Procedures such as blood tests, routine management of non-complex long-term conditions, the monitoring of repeat prescriptions, or assessment of a painful joint, for example, can be carried out by some of the various other members of the team who now work in general practice, such as nursing staff, mental health professionals, clinical pharmacists and physiotherapists. 'This also alleviates workload on GPs, allowing us to spend time with those patients with complex health needs who really do need our expert medical attention. 'However, we know that even when working as part of multi-disciplinary teams, patients often struggle to access their GP when they need to – and we share their frustrations. 'This is due to decades of under-funding of general practice and poor workforce planning, which has meant patient need for our care has escalated in recent years, while GP numbers have sadly not risen in step. 'We need thousands more GPs, and the recently published 10-Year health plan commits to providing these. 'We're now looking ahead to the revised long-term workforce plan, due later this year, to see how the Government plans to recruit more GPs and keep more GPs in the profession for longer – but also address some of the nonsensical issues GPs are reporting that they can't find appropriate employment upon qualification.' Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association, said: 'It's not surprising that people want to see a GP when they go to a GP surgery but all our research and experience shows that people are very happy to visit a pharmacy if they can access treatment or advice quickly without having to wait to see a GP. 'Pharmacists are highly trained medical professionals who offer first-class care for a range of ailments quickly and conveniently and will send patients to a GP or hospital if needs be. 'Increasingly people will be able to pop into a community pharmacy and see a highly qualitied pharmacist for things like screening, check-ups, HRT, weight management or ongoing care without lengthy waits, freeing their NHS colleagues in hospitals and GPs to do more and offering patients the choice and convenience we all want to see.' Royal College of Nursing chief nursing officer, Lynn Woolsey, said: 'Nursing staff are an integral part of any general practice delivering a range of services to patients. 'They lead public health clinics, run screening and vaccination programmes, support patients in the management of chronic disease and can diagnose and prescribe.'

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave
Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

North Wales Chronicle

time3 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

Ministers are set to amend the Employment Rights Bill so that people will be entitled to protected time off in the event of a pregnancy loss, regardless of the stage at which it happens. Angela Rayner has said that the change will give 'people time away from work to grieve'. Under current rules, parents are entitled to up to two weeks of bereavement leave if a child dies before they turn 18, or they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, will see the right to 'at least one week's leave' expanded to people who lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks. The exact length of the leave will be specified in later legislation after a consultation. The Bill already makes provision to expand bereavement leave, giving employees protected time off to grieve the loss of a loved one. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the amendments will offer 'dignity and respect'. 'For many families, including mine, that have been affected by pregnancy loss, the decision around returning to work or taking sick leave to grieve properly can make an already painful experience even more difficult,' he said. 'Grief doesn't follow a timetable, and expanding rights to leave for pregnancy loss will ensure every family gets the time they need to heal without worrying about their job.' Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner similarly said that 'no-one who is going through the heartbreak of pregnancy loss should have to go back to work before they are ready'. 'I am proud that this Government is introducing a day-one right to protected time off work after experiencing pregnancy loss, giving people time away from work to grieve and spend time with their families,' she said. Vicki Robinson, chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'a hugely important step that acknowledges the often very significant impact of pre-24-week loss, not only for those experiencing the physical loss, but for their partners too'. It comes after ministers announced they would review the system of parental leave, declaring that the current system is 'not working' for families. Mr Reynolds said the Government will investigate the whole system for supporting new parents to take time off work when they have a baby, including maternity leave, paternity leave and shared arrangements.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store