Hurley-wielding man who went to confront another man is met with hatchet
A judge has commented 'hatchet trumps hurley' after hearing that a 22 year old man who went to confront another man at his home armed with a hurley was met by the man armed with a hatchet.
At Kilrush District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett told west Clare man, Nathan Downes 'put the hurley away and call the Gardai the next time'.
Judge Gabbett told Mr Downes of St Michael's Place, Kilmihil in west Clare that 'taking the law into your own hands is not ideal'.
In the case, Mr Downes pleaded guilty to producing a hurley in the course of a dispute outside a house at Doonagurroge, Killimer in west Clare contrary to Section 11 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act on January 19th 2024.
Giving an outline of the case against Mr Downes, Sgt John Burke said that Mr Downes was in dispute with another man and on arriving at his home waved the hurley around unlawfully.
Sgt Burke said that the incident was captured on CCTV and that Mr Downes has no previous convictions.
Solicitor for Mr Downes, Patrick Moylan said that there was a background to the incident.
He said: 'Mr Downes's father had been accosted earlier by this person. Mr Downes's father is very ill. He has COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and uses a nebuliser five times a day.'
Mr Moylan said that Nathan Downes 'took the unwise route of going to the man's home and verbally accosted the man at this house'.
Mr Moylan said that this man was a far more serious person than Mr Downes had bargained for and the CCTV showed the person at the house with a hatchet.
Mr Moylan said that Mr Downes did have a hurley in his possession at the house and has pleaded guilty to that offence.
In response, Judge Gabbett remarked: 'Hatchet trumps hurley.'
Mr Moylan said that his client apologises.
Stock photo
News in 90 Seconds - June 11th
Judge Gabbett said that he would strike out the weapons charge if Mr Downes paid €200 to the court poor box or Court Discretionary Fund (CDF).
Striking out the charge after Mr Downes paid over the €200, Judge Gabbett said: 'I am conscious of your future. A conviction has serious consequences. It is really serious. This is your first chance-last chance. If you take me seriously, you won't be back.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
'He smelled rotten': Vile rapist jailed for sexually assaulting 3 girls
A vile predator and convicted rapist who sexually assaulted three young girls in County Donegal has been jailed. Louis Feeney, who has 85 previous convictions - for offences including rape and sexually assault - was handed a five-year prison sentence at Letterkenny Circuit Court. The 74-year-old, with an address at Killowen Street, Coleraine, subjected the three girls to incidents that caused 'very significant harm'. Feeney, who was extradited from Northern Ireland in March, is also facing sentence later this year over a large consignment of drugs 20 years ago. A car in which Feeney was the lone occupant was intercepted and Gardai located 1,840 grams of cocaine. The drugs were worth €128,000 at the time and the court heard would now have a potential street value of €200,000. In June of this year, Feeney pleaded guilty to a charge of being in possession of controlled drugs for unlawful sale or supply. Earlier in the year, Feeney - who has been in custody at Castlerea Prison since his arrest after being handed across the border by the PSNI - pleaded guilty to five sample counts of sexually assaulting young girls at various locations in Donegal. Judge Maguire said the incidents had a 'devastating impact' on the victims and continued to permeate and infect all aspects of their lives. He said: 'The harm done was very significant. The injured parties were very young and vulnerable, being of an age up to secondary school. 'Further sadness was the isolation they felt not knowing that the others were going through it.' When a brother of a victim asked Feeney for sweets he said the boy's sister would 'have to do something for me'. The boy asked what he meant and Feeney told him: 'She knows what I mean'. On another occasion, he offered a girl some money if she stayed where she was. Judge Maguire, who commended the victims for the 'powerful' impact statements submitted, said the assaults were predatory in nature and for Feeney's sexual gratification. Feeney has 85 previous convictions in Northern Ireland, including 23 relating to sexual crimes and some of which include sexual assault of a child. Feeney has also been convicted of rape and is on the Sex Offenders Register. Judge Maguire said Feeney doesn't appear to have anything near to full insight and protested at having a lack of memory. Noting that the maximum penalty on each count was five years, Judge Maguire determined that a proportionate global headline sentence was one of five years. He said that while Feeney did not cooperate in interviews, he did plead guilty. He said that Feeney was elderly 'but not so old that he is immediately at risk of dying in prison'. Having regard to the totality principle, Judge Maguire sentenced Feeney to five years in prison and said he was not suspending any portion. At a sentencing hearing earlier in the week, Feeney asked that he be able to attend via video link for the judgement. However, he was hauled before the court and stood in the dock to hear Judge Maguire deliver his judgement after the court consulted with the victims. In total, Feeney was charged with nine counts of sexual assault against three victims in Donegal on dates between 1993 and 2005. Feeney pleaded guilty to five counts on a full facts basis, while the other counts were taken into consideration. Detective Garda Robin Doyle outlined the case to State barrister Ms Fiona Crawford BL. One of the complainants told how she was 10 years old when one of the incidents occurred. Feeney placed his hand down her trousers and inside her underwear, touching her private parts with his hands. The court heard that the incident 'lasted for a few minutes'. The complainant told Gardai that it 'was weird' and recalled Feeney smelling of body odour and cigarettes. Another incident occurred at a time when the complainant was in secondary school. She recalled how Feeney rubbed her underwear before placing his hand inside. She told him to stop and he did not say anything in response, but continued to sexually assault her. Detective Garda Doyle told Ms Crawford that the complainant recalled being at another location when Feeney approached her from behind and placed his hand down the front of her trousers while 'rubbing himself against me'. 'He didn't talk or anything,' she told Gardai. She said that Feeney would get 'quite crabbit' if questioned and he would always carry on as if nothing happened. This complainant also outlined how Feeney rubbed himself up against her at another location and then placed his hand under her top. He proceeded to place his hand down her underwear and began to rub his fingers 'all over'. The woman told investigating Gardai that Feeney 'was getting a thrill from this' and she told how he kissed her on another occasion and she tried to push him away. This incident stuck with her in later years 'as the smell of him was rotten' she said. On a further occasion, Feeney approached the girl and placed his hand on her back, under her top, before moving it around and feeling her breasts. A second complainant told how Feeney rubbed her shoulders with cold hands and then placed his hands in the area around her breasts. When she nudged him to stop and started to walk away, Feeney offered her money to stay. Feeney later started to rub her shoulders again before kneeling down and putting a hand on her leg. The girl stood up and walked away at this stage. The court was told how a third complainant in the matter told Gardai how Feeney told her to lay down on a floor before getting on top of her. She said Feeney felt all around her body and then placed his hands inside her top and her underwear. She recalled 'the smell of fags' from Feeney, who sexually assaulted her on another occasion when he also placed a hand inside her clothing before stopping when he heard someone else approaching. When Detective Garda Doyle initially interviewed Feeney, he denied all of the allegations. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week The court heard victim impact statements from all three victims. One told how she felt that her innocence was robbed by Feeney and she is now filled with 'confusion and constant worry'. She said he took over her childhood and added: 'He robbed me of my childhood memories and my innocence. He had no right to take this from any child.' She added: 'It's not something that will go away. I have to live with this for the rest of my life.' A second victim said the assaults still have an effect, physically, emotionally and spiritually. 'I felt that my innocence was taken away from me very young and I no longer felt safe or protected,' she said. She recalled how she often tried to hide what had happened and covered it up. She told no-one as she felt shame and said: 'There was always the shadow of the hidden secret.' The woman recalled having difficulty connecting emotionally and how it affected many more aspects of her life. 'I carried a sense of confusion,' she said. 'I spent many years thinking about coming forward and opening up, but I was overwhelmed by the shame and the sorrow it would bring.' Her innocence and security were replaced by anxiety and sadness, which shaped the way she saw both herself and the world around her. 'The memories of the abuse haunt me,' she said. Asked by his barrister, Mr Peter Nolan BL, if he had anything to say, Feeney said from the witness box: 'I am sorry for giving you all the trouble. I am sorry.' Mr Nolan said his client has a long and very serious criminal history. 'We are not shying away from that in any shape or form,' Mr Nolan said. He said the probation and welfare report contained 'little redemption' and Feeney has been placed as a high risk of reoffending. The probation report added that Feeney has 'demonstrated little to no regard' for his victims or the effects that his crimes have had. Feeney, who has been deemed unsuitable for community service, was adopted at a young age having spent the first four years of his life in a children's home, the court heard. He has never been able to trace his birth parents. The last he saw of a brother was at his adopted mother's funeral in 1998 and Feeney has lived between hostels and boarding houses. Mr Nolan said Feeney secured housing in 2011 and was there until his incarceration. The court was told that Feeney did have some history of employment, including as a milkman, a factory worker and a council labourer while he was a 'roadie' for a show band for a period of time. Mr Nolan asked Judge Maguire to take account of Feeney's age and for 'whatever leniency' he could give. 'He will probably die in prison,' Mr Nolan said with reference to the pending drugs charge. 'Light at the end of the tunnel for this 74-year-old man, I don't think it's possible.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man accused of threatening customer with a hammer while working at Aldi
The court heard Aaron Dempsey had been a member of staff when there was a dispute with the alleged victim, A man has been sent for trial accused of brandishing a hammer while working at a supermarket and threatening a customer. Aaron Dempsey (30) is alleged to have produced the hammer during a dispute at an Aldi in north Dublin. He had a book of evidence served on him when he appeared in Dublin District Court. Judge Michèle Finan sent him forward to Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. Mr Dempsey, of Elm Mount Road, Beaumont, is charged with producing an implement capable of causing serious injury in a manner likely to intimidate. The incident is alleged to have happened at Aldi, Santry Avenue, on June 26 last year. A prosecuting solicitor said the DPP was consenting to the accused being returned for trial to the current sittings of the circuit court. He was remanded on continuing bail Judge Finan gave Mr Dempsey the formal notice that he had 14 days to provide any alibi details to the prosecution. She also ordered the State to furnish the defence with the accused's garda interview video. He was remanded on continuing bail to appear in the circuit court later this month. Previously, the court heard Mr Dempsey had been a member of staff when there was a dispute with the alleged victim, during which 'the accused produced a hammer and threatened the customer'. The DPP had consented to the case being heard in the district court, but Judge Finan refused jurisdiction after hearing the outline of the prosecution's case. The charge is under section 11 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act. Aaron Dempsey. Photo: Paddy Cummins News in 90 Seconds - July 26th
Irish Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Former bride weeps in court over failure to get back 'priceless' wedding flowers
A Co Louth woman has wept in court over not being able to get back her 'priceless' and 'irreplaceable' wedding flowers from a woman who was hired to preserve and frame the flowers. At the Small Claims Court at Ennis District Court, former bride, Michelle Markey became visibly upset after telling Judge Alec Gabbett of her failed efforts to obtain the return of her wedding flowers from Co Clare woman, Charlotte Roche. Ms Markey of Oriel Rd, Collon, Co Louth told Judge Gabbett: "My priceless flowers. I gave them away - I would have kept them if I had known I would never get my wedding flowers back." Judge Gabbett said that "wedding flowers hold sentimental value, some people put them on their mother's graves". He told Ms Markey: "I get that sentimentality aspect." The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett: "I gave away my - I'm sorry..." and momentarily began to cry before quickly recomposing herself. In response, Judge Gabbett said: "You are okay. It is fine. Take your time. You find the whole thing upsetting because the lack of communication is the biggest issue?" Ms Markey agreed. She said that the flowers are 'irreplaceable'. She said: "I do have evidence to show that this is not an isolated incident and reviews on a website show that this has happened to other brides." There was no appearance in court by Charlotte Roche of Laghtagoona, Corofin, Co Clare who agreed to provide the floral service to Ms Markey. Ms Markey was claiming €350 for the loss of her wedding flowers and Judge Gabbett granted her a decree of €200 for the replacement of the flowers against Ms Roche. He said: "That is the best I can do for you." Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett that she entered a service agreement on October 9, 2023 with Ms Roche when a €50 deposit was paid to Ms Roche for drying, preserving, artwork and framing of wedding day flowers. Ms Markey said that Ms Roche set up a new company, Lush Flower Art Ltd, in 2024. She said that the flowers were received by Ms Roche on November 7, 2023 and Ms Markey said that she was told that 16 weeks would be allowed for the completion of the artworks. She said that after multiple emails and texts between December 2023 and November 2024, including several requests to return the flowers, on November 23, 2024 she was informed via email by Ms Roche that she would not be progressing with the piece. She said: "I requested a return of deposit and flowers and neither was received at this time." Ms Markey said that Ms Roche cancelled the service over a review she had left on a weddings website. Ms Markey said that the deposit was returned on January 4 but no return of flowers and subsequent requests for return of flowers were ignored. Representing herself, Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett she travelled 200km to be in court in Ennis on a six-hour round trip from Co Louth "and had to organise childcare and take a day off work". After seeing that the next Small Claims case on the list was a Kerrie Horgan vs Charlotte Roche (Bradley), Judge Gabbett remarked 'Oh dear'. There was no appearance by either party in that case and Judge Gabbett adjourned that case to September. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
