logo
US-Iran latest: White House claims bombing was ‘overwhelming success'

US-Iran latest: White House claims bombing was ‘overwhelming success'

Times3 days ago

Binyamin Netanyahu, in a just released video, says Israel 'achieved a great victory' against Iran.'This victory opens up an opportunity for a dramatic expansion of the peace agreements. We are working hard on this,' he said.
'Along with the release of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas, there is a window of opportunity here that must not be missed. Not even a single day can be wasted.'
The Israeli leader's comments come hours after a report claimed that he and Donald Trump had agreed to end the war in Gaza within a fortnight, and begin a process where some unnamed Arab states sign a peace deal with Israel.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, has said following the US actions in Iran over the weekend, 'we look forward to sustaining a long and durable peace' in the Middle East. She was speaking during an ongoing press briefing in Washington.
During his briefing, General Dan Caine lauded the American troops who remained at the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which Iran attacked on Monday. He said just 44 soldiers stayed to operate the two Patriot missile batteries and protect the entire air base.
'You know that you're going to have approximately two minutes, 120 seconds, to either succeed or fail,' Caine said, adding: 'They absolutely crushed it.'
President Trump not only enjoyed being referred to as 'Daddy' by Nato chief Mark Rutte, he is seeking to raise cash by selling 'the official TRUMP DADDY shirt'.
A minimum donation of $35 will buy a bright orange T-shirt emblazoned with Trump's mugshot and the word 'daddy' in black capital letters. The shirt colour may have been chosen to reflect Rutte's native Netherlands where the Nato summit was held.
'When Biden was President, we were LAUGHED at on the world stage,' Trump wrote in an email to supporters.
'But thanks to your favourite President (ME!) we are respected once again,' he added.
'Moments ago, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called me DADDY on the world stage. How nice! So for a limited time, I want YOU to own the official TRUMP DADDY shirt!'
Rutte used the word in a joint press conference with Trump on Wednesday as the president was describing Iran and Israel fighting 'like two kids in a schoolyard.'
Rutte said: 'Daddy sometimes has to use strong language.' it was a reference to Trump's outburst on Tuesday that the two countries 'don't know what the f*** they're doing.'
The t-shirt is only legally available to US citizens because it is being sold by a political campaign. The shirt is being offered by the Trump National Committee, a fundraising vehicle, which gives 77 per cent of the cash to Trump's Never Surrender campaign used for his legal, consulting, travel, staffing and other expenses and funding candidates.
During Pete Hegseth's briefing, a senior US gave a video presentation, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs.
General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones used in Iran.
He declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community.
Caine also said he would not change his assessment due to politics.
'I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done,' he said.
Binyamin Netanyahu has asked a court to postpone his upcoming testimony in his long-running corruption trial, after Donald Trump called for the case to be cancelled altogether.
In a filing to the tribunal, Amit Hadad, Netanyahu's lawyer, said the premier's testimony should be delayed in light of 'regional and global developments'.
'The court is respectfully requested to order the cancellation of the hearings in which the prime minister was scheduled to testify in the coming two weeks,' the filing said.
It said Netanyahu was 'compelled to devote all his time and energy to managing national, diplomatic and security issues of the utmost importance'.
Trump on Wednesday described the case against Netanyahu as a 'witch hunt'.
Binyamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump have agreed the conflict in Gaza would end within two weeks following the strikes in Iran, media in Israel have reported.
The pair also spoke about expanding the Abraham Accords, Israel Hayom, the Hebrew-language newspaper, claimed.
According to the outlet, Trump and Netanyahu agreed in a phone call that four Arab states, including the UAE and Egypt, would jointly govern the Gaza Strip in place of Hamas, whose leadership would be expelled. All remaining hostages would be released also, said the report.
Arab countries have previously rejected taking any role in the post-war rehabilitation of Gaza and Hamas leaders have said they will not go into exile.
The paper also reported that Israel would express its support for a future two-state solution and the US will recognise Israeli sovereignty in parts of the West Bank.
Iran had enough material to produce 'a good ten' nuclear weapons, Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, claimed during his interview with a French radio station.
'Iran had enough material to produce them, perhaps a good ten or a little less. And Iran had related technologies and developments,' he told RFI.
The US attacks on Iran's nuclear programme inflicted 'enormous damage', the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has claimed.
'I think annihilated is too much, but it suffered enormous damage,' he told Radio France International. 'What I can tell you, and I think everyone agrees on this, is that there is very considerable damage.'
Binyamin Netanyahu is to visit Trump in Washington as early as the second week of July, the Israeli news channel i24 reports.
A Pentagon intelligence leak has sparked a war of words over Iran's nuclear programme, with conflicting assessments from US intelligence agencies and the White House fuelling heated debate.
Former Pentagon official Jim Townsend joins us to unpack the challenges of intelligence and examine the fraught relationship between the White House and the intelligence community.
President Trump's comparison of the Iran strikes to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 has stirred anger in Japan.
Earlier this week, Trump said the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities helped end the recent war in the Middle East like the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan brought World War II to a close.
'It's scary that a person with such a view is serving as leader,' said Masao Tomonaga, a survivor from Nagasaki.
Shiro Suzuki, the mayor of Nagasaki, said the 'use of atomic weapons should never be tolerated for any purpose'.
Toshiyuki Mimaki, who was a child in Hiroshima when the bombing took place, said: 'How can the president of America say such a thing? I just don't understand. What he said is totally unacceptable.'
Mimaki is a leader of Nihon Hidankyo, a group of survivors that won a Nobel Peace Prize last year.
The Hiroshima city assembly on Thursday unanimously adopted a resolution calling for the peaceful settlement of all conflicts, saying Trump's remark apparently justifying the atomic bombing 'cannot be overlooked or accepted,' Japan's NHK national television reported.
Israel wanted to eliminate Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, according to its defence minister, Israel Katz.
In a television interview due to be broadcast on Israeli television tonight, Katz says Israel could not find an operational opportunity to do so.
The UN atomic energy watchdog said on Thursday that it had not received an official communication from Iran after media reports earlier in the day said a parliamentary bill to suspend co-operation with the organisation had received final approval.
'We are aware of these reports. As of now, the IAEA has not received an official communication from Iran on this matter,' the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a statement.
Despite President Trump and Pete Hegseth's assertions that Iran's nuclear capabilities had been 'obliterated', European capitals believe the country's enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact.
The Financial Times quotes two people who have been briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, who say that EU capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408kg of weapons-grade enriched uranium was not concentrated in Fordow where US strikes hit.
The assessments call into question Trump and Hegseth's claims that Iran's nuclear ambitions had been severely curtailed.
Those quoted said EU governments were still awaiting full intelligence reports on the damage to Fordow, but that one initial report suggested 'extensive damage, but not full structural destruction'.
A key missing element was evidence for President Trump's hasty conclusion in the immediate aftermath of the bombing that the Fordow facility was 'obliterated' (David Charter writes, in Washington).
Several times Pete Hegseth urged caution as intelligence was collected and assessed, or attacked the media for jumping to conclusions in the other direction without waiting for better evidence. In other words, his presentation today only underlined that the president used exaggerated rhetoric — which may prove to be justified — but cannot yet be substantiated.
Another key unknown element is the fate of Iran's uranium. Hegseth at first evaded a question on its whereabouts by saying: 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations.'
Pressed on evidence that trucks were seen at the site two days before the bombing, Hegseth then attacked the bona fides of one of the journalists from his former employer, Fox News, one of the most experienced in the room.
Asked a third time about the fate of Iran's uranium he answered that he was 'not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise'.
Pete Hegseth's job today was to come out and mop up the mess caused by the leak of a snippet of early intelligence suggesting the Iran bombing mission was less than the total 'obliteration' claimed by President Trump, (David Charter writes, in Washington).
Since then several other assessments have been released by the US and Israel to suggest that extensive damage was caused by Saturday's raids.
• Iran intel leak: who is the 'low-level loser' who exposed Trump?
In the continued absence of conclusive intelligence, the US defence secretary and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, shared details of the development, testing, planning and deployment of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (Mop) bomb, known as the bunker-buster, which they said was developed with this very mission in mind.
Caine gave insight into the Defence Threat Reduction Agency and how two of its staff had been dedicated for 15 years on studying Iran's deeply buried Fordow facility and working out its vulnerabilities.
Trump has responded to suggestions that Iran had moved stocks of uranium in trucks from its Fordow site before the US strikes.
Writing on Truth Social, the president said: 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!'
Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has requested a two-week pause in his corruption trial testimony.
Amit Hadad, for the defence, stated that Netanyahu must devote his time to 'diplomatic, national and security issues of the first order', in the wake of the recent war with Iran.
His request came after President Trump said on Truth Social, that Netanyahu's trial 'should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY'.
He also suggested a 'Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State'.
The Israeli prime minister denies charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, for which he has been on trial since 2020.
It had long been assumed that at least one of Iran's main nuclear facilities — the uranium enrichment plant at Fordow — was hidden so deeply beneath a mountain that it would prove extremely difficult for Israel to destroy it.
Israel heavily attacked Natanz, the other enrichment site, Isfahan, where solid uranium was converted to gas for enrichment and then back again, and other sites. It left Fordow to the Americans.
Israel's whole attack on Iran was, therefore, a gamble. If the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, did not persuade President Trump to join the assault with his B-2s and his GBU-57 'bunker busters', it might fail at the Fordow hurdle or, at best, only inflict a minor setback to the nuclear programme.
• Read in full: Iran's setback after US strikes may only be temporary
Asked whether he believes highly enriched uranium was moved out of the nuclear sites before Saturday's strikes, Hegseth said there was 'nothing to suggest' anything was moved out by the Iranians ahead of time.
Dan Caine says that the 30,000lb bunker-busters behaved as the military expected, but that it will not provide a damage assessment due to it being a job for the intelligence community.
'We don't mark our own homework,' he said.
Dan Caine, the air force general, says that two intelligence officials were investigating the Iranian nuclear site at Fordow for 15 years. They knew it 'wasn't being built for any peaceful purposes … they realised we didn't have a weapon [to take out the plant],' he said.
'Operation Midnight Hammer was the culmination of their work.
'The weapons were designed, planned and delivered to achieve the effects in the mission space.'
Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager.
President Trump has said on Truth Social that there is rumour that the New York Times and CNN will fire reporters 'who made up the fake stories on the Iran nuclear sites'.
Dan Caine, the air force general and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is now talking about the Iranian attacks on the US base in Qatar on Monday.
Caine described the deployment of Patriot missiles to defend the base as 'the largest single Patriot engagement in US military history'. He would not say how many rounds were fired, saying it is classified.
Hegseth says the press relied too much on a US preliminary intelligence report, which suggested little damage had been done to the sites.
'Specifically you the press corps to cheer against Trump so much, you have to hope the strikes weren't effective … [you think] 'let's take leaked information and spin it to cause doubt and manipulate the public mind'.'
Pete Hegseth has started by attacking the press over its coverage of the damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear sites facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz.
'Searching for scandals you miss historic moments,' he said.
Iran had retaliated on Monday with a missile attack on a US base in nearby Qatar, but caused no casualties.
In an apparent reference to the attack, Ayatollah Khamenei said 'such an action can be repeated in the future, too,' adding that Iran had 'access to key US centres in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary'.
'Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price,' he said.
Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, will hold a news conference shortly to offer a fresh assessment of strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
President Trump said that Hegseth, whom he dubbed the 'war' secretary, would hold a news conference to 'fight for the dignity of our great American pilots'.
Ayatollah Khamenei, 86, hasn't been seen in public since taking shelter in a secret location after the outbreak of the war on June 13, when Israel attacked Iranian nuclear facilities and targeted top military commanders and scientists.
After an American attack on June 22, that hit the nuclear sites with bunker-buster bombs, President Trump helped negotiate a ceasefire that came into effect on Tuesday.
In his appearance on Thursday, Ayatollah Khamenei sat in front of plain brown curtains to give his address, similar to his June 19 message.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, has said his country delivered a 'hand slap to the face of America' in his first televised address since the fragile ceasefire was declared in the war with Israel.
Claiming victory over Israel, Ayatollah Khamenei said the US had only intervened because 'it felt that if it did not intervene, the Zionist regime would be utterly destroyed.'
He warned the US 'will definitely pay a heavy price' should it attack Iran again. His comments came in the wake of an attack on Sunday in which American forces hit three Iranian nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt for missing uranium
U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt for missing uranium

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt for missing uranium

VIENNA, June 29 (Reuters) - The U.S. and Israeli bombing of Iranian nuclear sites creates a conundrum for U.N. inspectors in Iran: how can you tell if enriched uranium stocks, some of them near weapons grade, were buried beneath the rubble or had been secretly hidden away? Following last weekend's attacks on three of Iran's top nuclear sites - at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan - President Donald Trump said the facilities had been "obliterated" by U.S. munitions, including bunker-busting bombs. But the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, which monitors Tehran's nuclear program, has said it's unclear exactly what damage was sustained at Fordow, a plant buried deep inside a mountain that produced the bulk of Iran's most highly enriched uranium. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday it was highly likely the sensitive centrifuges used to enrich uranium inside Fordow were badly damaged. It's far less clear whether Iran's 9 tonnes of enriched uranium - more than 400 kg of it enriched to close to weapons grade - were destroyed. Western governments are scrambling to determine what's become of it. Reuters spoke to more than a dozen current and former officials involved in efforts to contain Iran's nuclear program who said the bombing may have provided the perfect cover for Iran to make its uranium stockpiles disappear and any IAEA investigation would likely be lengthy and arduous. Olli Heinonen, previously the IAEA's top inspector from 2005 to 2010, said the search will probably involve complicated recovery of materials from damaged buildings as well as forensics and environmental sampling, which take a long time. "There could be materials which are inaccessible, distributed under the rubble or lost during the bombing," said Heinonen, who dealt extensively with Iran while at the IAEA and now works at the Stimson Center think-tank in Washington. Iran's more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% purity - a short step from the roughly 90% of weapons grade - are enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Even a fraction of that left unaccounted for would be a grave concern for Western powers that believe Iran is at least keeping the option of nuclear weapons open. There are indications Iran may have moved some of its enriched uranium before it could be struck. IAEA chief Grossi said Iran informed him on June 13, the day of Israel's first attacks, that it was taking measures to protect its nuclear equipment and materials. While it did not elaborate, he said that suggests it was moved. A Western diplomat involved in the dossier, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue, said most of the enriched uranium at Fordow would appear to have been moved days in advance of the attacks, "almost as if they knew it was coming". Some experts have said a line of vehicles including trucks visible on satellite imagery outside Fordow before it was hit suggests enriched uranium there was moved elsewhere, though U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved it. Trump has also dismissed such concerns. In an interview due to air on Sunday with Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures", he insisted the Iranians "didn't move anything." "It's very dangerous to do. It is very heavy - very, very heavy. It's a very hard thing to do," Trump said. "Plus we didn't give much notice because they didn't know we were coming until just, you know, then." The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The State Department referred Reuters to Trump's public remarks. A second Western diplomat said it would be a major challenge to verify the condition of the uranium stockpile, citing a long list of past disputes between the IAEA and Tehran, including Iran's failure to credibly explain uranium traces found at undeclared sites. "It'll be a game of cat and mouse." Iran says it has fulfilled all its obligations towards the watchdog. Before Israel launched its 12-day military campaign aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities, the IAEA had regular access to Iran's enrichment sites and monitored what was inside them around the clock as part of the 191-nation Non-Proliferation Treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, to which Iran is a party. Now, rubble and ash blur the picture. What's more, Iran has threatened to stop working with the IAEA. Furious at the non-proliferation regime's failure to protect it from strikes many countries see as unlawful, Iran's parliament voted on Wednesday to suspend cooperation. Tehran says a resolution this month passed by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks, which began the next day, by providing an element of diplomatic cover. The IAEA denies that. Iran has repeatedly denied that it has an active program to develop a nuclear bomb. And U.S. intelligence - dismissed by Trump before the airstrikes - had said there was no evidence Tehran was taking steps toward developing one. However, experts say there is no reason for enriching uranium to 60% for a civilian nuclear program, which can run on less than 5% enrichment. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its stock of enriched uranium. The IAEA then has to verify Iran's account by means including inspections, but its powers are limited - it inspects Iran's declared nuclear facilities but cannot carry out snap inspections at undeclared locations. Iran has an unknown number of extra centrifuges stored at locations the U.N. nuclear watchdog is unaware of, the IAEA has said, with which it might be able to set up a new or secret enrichment site. That makes hunting down the material that can be enriched further, particularly that closest to bomb grade, all the more important. "Iran's stockpile of 60% enriched uranium may not have been part of the 'mission' but it is a significant part of the proliferation risk - particularly if centrifuges are unaccounted for," Kelsey Davenport of the Washington-based Arms Control Association said on X on Friday. The IAEA can and does receive intelligence from member states, which include the United States and Israel, but says it takes nothing at face value and independently verifies tip-offs. Having pummelled the sites housing the uranium, Israel and the U.S. are seen as the countries most likely to accuse Iran of hiding it or restarting enrichment, officials say. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office did not respond to a request for comment for this story. U.N. inspectors' futile hunt for large caches of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which preceded the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, showed the enormous difficulty of verifying foreign powers' assertions about hidden stockpiles of material when there is little tangible information to go on. As in Iraq, inspectors could end up chasing shadows. "If the Iranians come clean with the 400 kg of HEU (highly enriched uranium) then the problem is manageable, but if they don't then nobody will ever be sure what happened to it," a third Western diplomat said. The IAEA, which answers to 180 member states, has said it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear development is entirely peaceful, but has no credible indications of a coordinated weapons program. The U.S. this week backed the IAEA's verification and monitoring work and urged Tehran to ensure its inspectors in the country are safe. It is a long journey from there to accounting for every gram of enriched uranium, the IAEA's standard. The above-ground plant at Natanz, the smaller of the two facilities enriching uranium up to 60 percent, was flattened in the strikes, the IAEA said, suggesting a small portion of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile may have been destroyed. Fordow, Iran's most deeply buried enrichment plant, which was producing the bulk of 60%-enriched uranium, was first seriously hit last weekend when the United States dropped its biggest conventional bombs on it. The damage to its underground halls is unclear. An underground area in Isfahan where much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium was stored was also bombed, causing damage to the tunnel entrances leading to it. The agency has not been able to carry out inspections since Israel's bombing campaign began, leaving the outside world with more questions than answers. Grossi said on Wednesday the conditions at the bombed sites would make it difficult for IAEA inspectors to work there - suggesting it could take time. "There is rubble, there could be unexploded ordnance," he said. Heinonen, the former chief IAEA inspector, said it was vital the agency be transparent in real time about what its inspectors have been able to verify independently, including any uncertainties, and what remained unknown. "Member states can then make their own risk assessments," he said.

New satellite photos show secret activity at Iran nuclear site after US bombing
New satellite photos show secret activity at Iran nuclear site after US bombing

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

New satellite photos show secret activity at Iran nuclear site after US bombing

New satellite photos have revealed that Iran is trying to piece together its nuclear site after the US sensationally bombed it last week. Heavy machinery was seen at the Fordow site as it appeared Iran has intensified its construction and excavation of the nuclear site after US B-2 bombers struck it last Saturday in Operation Midnight Hammer. Activity was seen near the tunnel entrances and near the points where the American buster bombs struck in Trump's early-morning attack. It is unclear how much uranium was left at the site during the bomb, but officials said there is no contamination after the strikes. Earthwork also showed signs tunnel entrances might have been sealed off before the attacks, Newsweek reported. Similar construction activity was seen at the Fordow site prior to the strikes, where Iranians were seen shipping contents from the nuclear site to another location a half a mile away. Despite the extent of the damage being up to question, International Atomic Energy Agency - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Fordow's centrifuges were 'no longer operational' and suffered 'enormous damage.' A leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency , a US government intelligence group, suggested there was 'low confidence' that that Middle Eastern country's program had been set back. Even Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said the United States hit Tehran's nuclear sites but achieved 'nothing significant.' 'Anyone who heard [Trump's] remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words - they could do nothing,' the 86-year-old Iranian leader said. The Trump Administration - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard - pushed back on the report. Hegseth slammed the media for diminishing the strikes, which Trump compared to Hiroshima. 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he said at a press conference. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. Trump has threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN for reporting on the preliminary report. The Times reported Thursday that Trump's personal lawyer Alejandro Brito had reached out to the newspaper and said the article had damaged the president's reputation. The letter demanded The Times 'retract and apologize for' the story, calling it 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic.' The newspaper's lawyer responded by noting that Trump administration officials had confirmed the existence of the report after The Times published its findings. 'No retraction is needed,' The Times' lawyer David McCraw said in a letter. 'No apology will be forthcoming. We told the truth to the best of our ability. We will continue to do so.' A spokesperson for CNN told The Times that the cable news network had responded to Trump's lawyer in a similar fashion. Operation Midnight Hammer marked the end of a 45-year stand-off between the United States and Iran. Trump warned Iran not to try and rebuild its nuclear program. 'I don't think they'll ever do it again,' he said while attending a NATO summit. 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich.' But the president also didn't rule out another airstrike if necessary. When asked whether the US would strike again if Iran built its nuclear enrichment program, he replied: 'Sure.' In total, the US launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites.

Iran could begin enriching uranium for nuclear bomb 'within months' in WW3 fears
Iran could begin enriching uranium for nuclear bomb 'within months' in WW3 fears

Daily Mirror

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Iran could begin enriching uranium for nuclear bomb 'within months' in WW3 fears

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said US strikes had not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear sites, as Donald Trump claimed, and that they could begin enriching uranium again soon Iran could start enriching uranium again - for a possible bomb - in 'a matter of months', the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the US strikes on three Iranian sites last weekend had caused severe but 'not total' damage, contradicting Donald Trump 's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'totally obliterated'. ‌ 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' Grossi said. Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran on June 13, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. ‌ The US later joined the strikes, dropping bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities - Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. On Saturday Grossi told CBS News that Tehran could have 'in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium'. He added that Iran still possessed the 'industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again'. The IAEA is not the first body to suggest that Iran's nuclear abilities could still continue. A leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment also found the US strikes probably only set the programme back by months. US president Donald Trump responded furiously by declaring that Iran's nuclear sites were 'completely destroyed' and accused the media of 'an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history'. For now, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire, but Trump has said he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found that it could enrich uranium to concerning levels. In a speech on Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had achieved nothing significant. ‌ But its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said 'excessive and serious' damage was done. Iran's already-strained relationship with the IAEA was further challenged on Wednesday, when its parliament moved to suspend cooperation with the atomic watchdog, accusing the IAEA of siding with Israel and the US. On Friday, Araghchi said on X that 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent'. Israel and the US attacked Iran after the IAEA last month found Tehran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, and for civilian use only. Despite the Iranian refusal to work with his organisation, Grossi said that he hoped he could still negotiate with Tehran. ‌ 'I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one,' he said. Under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, Iran was not permitted to enrich uranium above 3.67% purity - the level required for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants - and was not allowed to carry out any enrichment at its Fordo plant for 15 years. However, Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions. Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to enrichment. It resumed enrichment at Fordo in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, according to the IAEA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store