Centrica calls for new customer ban on rival Octopus amid row over Ofgem rules
Chief executive Chris O'Shea claimed it was 'criminal' that Ofgem has not stepped in to take action against three firms that are understood to have failed to meet financial resilience targets – with Britain's biggest energy supplier Octopus among them.
He demanded that the regulator stops the suppliers from taking on new customers, claiming that Ofgem is not properly enforcing the rule that came into force earlier this year.
This could leave the sector at risk of another possible future wave of firms going bust, similar to that seen in the 2021-22 energy crisis, he warned.
On announcing half-year results, Mr O'Shea said: 'Ofgem is not applying its own rules.
'They're increasing the risk of systemic failure in the market.'
He said it was 'criminal' that Ofgem is putting the industry in a 'situation where that could happen again'.
'It's simply about protecting customers and asking the regulator to enforce its own rules,' he added.
Ofgem has not revealed which suppliers have failed the test, but Octopus – which supplies more than seven million households – has confirmed it did not meet the targets for capital adequacy by the April 1 deadline.
It said it has, however, agreed a plan with Ofgem to reach the target, which means it is not in breach of the rules.
An Octopus Energy spokesperson said: 'This is yet more naked self-interest from British Gas.
'They would do well to obsess about their customers rather than their rivals.
They added: 'We fully comply with Ofgem's rules and our resilience meant we not only thrived through the energy crisis but bailed out Bulb – saving British billpayers billions.'
Ofgem also confirmed that firms that have agreed a plan to meet resilience targets are not breaching its rules and therefore do not need to have sanctions put on them, such as being banned from taking on new customers.
A spokesperson for Ofgem said: 'Our financial resilience controls are clear that where a supplier is not meeting the capital target but has a credible and agreed plan in place that is not a breach of the rules.
'Capitalisation plans come with restrictions and controls. We expect suppliers to deliver on those plans and adhere to their restrictions and are monitoring closely.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Closed Much Wenlock 16th Century inn could be set to reopen
A closed 16th Century inn in Shropshire could be set to reopen after new plans were drawn application for a new premises license was submitted for the Inn at Harley, formerly the Plume of Feathers, off the A458 near Much venue was set to reopen two years ago and an Instagram post in May 2023 said it was in the early stages of renovation, offering nine en suite Harley View Limited, which owns public houses and bars, is hopeful in the application that the building could reopen. The proposal said the hours of operation would be from 07:00 to 01:30, with the supply of alcohol from 10:00 to 01: also want to be able to host live and recorded music indoors, as well as serving late-night consultation period has ended, with a decision to be made in due course by Shropshire Council. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I have a £900,000 pension pot, how much income will I be able to get in retirement?
I have a defined contribution pension that I built up through my working life and apart from a few years at the start of my career, I've never had a final salary scheme. My pot is worth £900,000 and I am 59 and hope to retire in two years. How much retirement income can I safely expect to get from my pension pot - and if I died would my wife face inheritance tax on it? Rob Morgan, of Charles Stanley Direct, replies: When you decide to retire you'll have two main options for your pension pot. Keep investing and draw a regular or flexible income out or buy an annuity – guaranteed income for life from an insurance company. An annuity is the safer but less flexible option. Once you have bought it you can't reverse the decision, and for lots of people 61 is too soon for an annuity purchase unless they are especially risk averse. Annuity rates are lower when purchased at a younger age meaning you lock in a less favourable income for life, and you lose flexibility. However, to give you an idea, a 61-year-old today could secure an annuity income of 6.82 per cent on a level basis and 4.44 per cent on an inflation linked basis assuming a 5-year guarantee period and 50 per cent per cent spouse's pension. So that's £46,021 a year or £29,961 a year, respectively, on a £900,000 pot after taking the maximum tax-free cash of £225,000 which could also be used to generate an income on top. Drawdown is a riskier alternative, but it can keep your pot growing further than inflation levels and therefore give you a better outcome, especially if you plan on leaving the pension pot to your wife should she outlive you. Although you can build in a spouse's pension and other guarantees into an annuity, the flexibility of leaving all the remaining pot to her is potentially good financial planning. Plus, should you unfortunately die before 75 she can also take all the money out tax-free. The good news is there would be no inheritance tax (IHT) consequences of passing the pot to your wife. There is no IHT on assets left to spouses, so she can inherit the pot and enjoy the same retirement options with it. How much can you safely take out of your pension? That then leaves the question of how have much can you safely withdraw from the pension pot in drawdown. The 'classic' answer to this is about 4 per cent, which I would also extend to any tax-free cash you invest – ideally most of it in Isas to grow your money and pay income tax free. Using the '4 per cent rule' means you could 'safely' generate £36,000 a year before tax, rising with inflation. Why 4 per cent? It's a level thought be 'safe' enough for your money to last 30 years, based on historical stock and bond returns – even through relatively poor periods. However, arguably there is no such thing as a 'safe' rate. Asset class returns significantly lower than historical averages could present difficulties, especially in the event of a market crash in the early years of retirement – a concept known as 'sequence of returns risk'. This is why some advisers suggest 3-3.5 per cent as a more conservative level, or suggest dynamic strategies where withdrawals are based partly on market performance. It's also possible that you may be able to increase the rate of withdrawals if your investments do well. You will also need to consider your pattern of spending. Expenditure in retirement is often described as 'smile' shaped. Typically, the earlier years are more active, and costly, and later years less so, before spending rises again in the case of care needs. > Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide: How to combat drawdown risk It's not an all or nothing affair? It's also worth noting that you can mix and match an annuity and drawdown and you don't have to choose one or the other. Many people like to use an annuity to match their essential spending and use drawdown for top up or more discretionary spending – and accept that they may need to be flexible about withdrawals to help preserve the pot in the event of poor investment performance. Also factor in that your State Pension will begin at 67, which serves as a guaranteed income stream increasing at present by the triple lock, which is the higher of 2.5 per cent, inflation or average wage increase, in which case you can potentially take a bit more from your pension in the early years of retirement in the knowledge you can dial back once that comes on stream. > Is it worth deferring state pension? Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide Don't forget tax There's tax to consider too. Many people automatically take their maximum tax-free pension lump sum in one go, and in many circumstances this can be a good strategy. You can use the cash in the early years of retirement, pay off any mortgage or use it to make Isa contributions to maximise tax efficiency. However, there are alternative ways of drawing on the pot to consider, notably the UFPLS – or 'uncrystallised funds pension lump sum'. This involves slicing off part of your pension and leaving the rest untouched. Every time you take money from your pension pot as an UFPLS, 25 per cent of the amount is tax-free with tax payable at your highest marginal rate of income tax on the other 75 per cent, and this can sometimes be more tax efficient and therefore offer more income. How Charles Stanley Direct can help With lots of moving parts it is hard to decide which is the right course of action, so I would encourage you to speak to a financial professional to help weigh up your options and decide what is right in your circumstances. Charles Stanley Direct offers a free, no commitment, 15-minute call with a qualified professional to discuss your needs. You can then decide whether further financial coaching or more in-depth and specific financial advice would be useful. An adviser can look at all your assets, model different scenarios and help you understand the risks and opportunities around different courses of action, as well as potentially add significant value from a tax perspective.
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newcastle 'student move out' fly-tipping hitting Heaton businesses
A business owner said fly-tipping behind his pizza shop, which increases when students move out nearby, is costing him financially. Ilhan Ozcan has run Pizzaholic in Heaton, Newcastle, since 2010 and said household rubbish being dumped in and around his large commercial bins has always been a a recent incident led Mr Ozcan to believe landlords and letting agents were also contributing to the mess, as students tend to leave the suburb in May and June.A spokesperson for Newcastle City Council said the Labour-led authority was investigating and it was aware of problems around waste disposal on Chillingham Road, particularly surrounding "student move outs". Mr Ozcan said he has had to pay three times over the past year to dispose of his takeaway shop's rubbish after his bins were filled."It is making the area dirty as well as costing me financially," he said. The bins are usually locked but Mr Ozcan said even if they were left open "for five minutes" they would be filled immediately."That's how crazy it is," he Tuesday, Mr Ozcan went into the back lane to find rubbish strewn around the bin as well as large objects including a damaged sofa."I think it's the landlords," Mr Ozcan said, adding that July was usually the time letting agents were getting properties ready for a new set of students to move into in August."I usually contact the city council but I'm sick of it," he said.A council spokesperson said: "We recognise that improper use of commercial bins places an unfair burden on business owners."While student activity may contribute to the issue, we are also investigating reports that landlords and letting agents may be involved in the disposal of waste."They added that council teams were working to address the concerns and that enforcement action would be taken where necessary. Follow BBC Newcastle on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
