Nigeria can't take Venezuelan deportees from US, says Yusuf Tuggar
"It will be unfair for Nigeria to accept 300 Venezuelan deportees," he said, suggesting that the recent visa curbs on Nigerian travellers by the US was not "reciprocal" but a pressure tactic.Earlier this week, the US Department of State said as part of a "global reciprocity realignment", nearly all non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas issued to citizens of Nigeria, as well as those of Cameroon and Ethiopia, would now be single-entry and valid for only three months.Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has threatened to hit countries which side with the policies of the Brics alliance that go against US interests with an extra 10% tariff.Brics is an alliance of 11 developing nations designed to challenge the political and economic power of the West. They are: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, as well as Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.Nigeria is not a full member of Brics but it became the ninth partner country of the alliance in January.Mr Tuggar said the threat of tariff hikes did not "necessarily have to do with us participating in Brics."You have to also bear in mind that the US is mounting considerable pressure on African countries to accept Venezuelans to be deported from the US, some straight out of prison," he added."It will be difficult for a country like Nigeria to accept Venezuelans prisoners into Nigeria. We have enough problems of our own, we cannot accept Venezuelan deportees to Nigeria, for crying out loud," he concluded.
Instead, he said Nigeria was looking "to do deals with the US" because the country "possesses" a lot of gas, critical minerals and rare earths needed by American tech companies.When further asked what Nigeria was doing to reach a diplomatic solution, the minister said the country was discussing with the US and resolving differences.Mr Tuggar's claim comes after the Wall Street Journal quoted internal documents and sources as saying the Trump administration was pushing the leaders of Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Gabon and Guinea-Bissau to accept migrants deported by the US whose home countries refuse them or are slow to take them back.Trump also appeared to allude to this during the meeting with the five leaders on Wednesday."I hope we can bring down the high rates of people overstaying visas, and also make progress on the safe, third-country agreements," he said during opening remarks.Liberia's foreign minister denied receiving such communication from Washington.
You may also be interested in:
Six things Trump should know about Liberia after he praised leader's 'good English'Why Trump invited five African leaders to the White HouseUS cuts visa validity for applicants from three African countries
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nearly every worker at the US Institute for Peace is fired via a weekend email from DOGE
The White House and the remnants of Elon Musk's DOGE initiative ordered the shutdown of the U.S. Institute of Peace over the weekend via email telling staff they are fired, this time with the backing of a federal court. CNN and WUSA9 reported the firings Saturday, when emails were sent out to between 200 to 300 people at the agency's headquarters in Washington, D.C. — nearly the entire staff in the building. A handful remained to close out the institute's operations, per the reports. The shuttering of the D.C. office marks the apparent end of a federally-funded nonprofit whose mission involved work in key conflict zones around the world, including South Sudan, Iraq and Afghanistan. It's also the second time the Trump administration has attempted to axe the agency, the first effort having been launched in March. That initial DOGE-ing of the institute was blocked by a federal judge, but the order was reversed in late June by an appeals court. A second order of mass firings was expected after that ruling was stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit, and like the first round was issued in a late Friday evening email to all staff. Reports after the first attempt at mass firings indicated that the office was left unmonitored as employees were left in limbo, with vermin including mice and roaches attracted to the unkept headquarters and the sudden halting of cleaning services. "These actions reflect a cruel indifference toward USIP's dedicated workforce," former agency spokeswoman Liz Callihan told WUSA9 in a statement. "Beyond the harm to these committed professionals, such reckless actions will immediately end the important training, education, facilitation and research work that USIP does around the world." She added to CNN: 'We joked about it, but 'Friday night massacre 1.0,' and last night was 'Friday massacre 2.0.' So the intention is very much mental torture and emotional anguish, whether that's inflicted on the partners and individuals in these conflict environments that so desperately need our help and support, but also the staff.' Callihan further condemned the shutdown of the institute as an example of constitutional overreach. The of Peace, founded in 1984, is a nonprofit authorized and funded by Congress — not the Executive Branch. A law establishing the agency was signed by President Ronald Reagan. But the Executive Branch under Donald Trump's second administration has tested its constitutional authority to scale back or in some cases wholly dismantle agencies that owe their existence to congressionally-passed legislation. Aiding the president's team is Congress itself, which under GOP control has given DOGE's federal cuts its blessing, even given the scale of those cuts and the precedent it could set regarding the use of presidential power. Trump and the former head of his DOGE initiative, Elon Musk, underwent a very public breakup in June. The two viciously attacked each other over social media, with Musk even tweeting and deleting an accusation claiming that the president was 'in the Epstein files.' The cause of their falling out was allegedly the deficit spending contained in the Republicans' budget reconciliation package. Though Musk left the administration, the efforts of the White House and the remnants of DOGE to tear apart the government have continued. 'Having regained control of USIP, DOGE is renewing its mistreatment of USIP employees and its systematic dismantling of an institution authorized by Congress to promote peacebuilding efforts around the world,' Callihan told CNN. The institute is far from the only agency to suffer this fate. The Trump administration has sought to shutter the entire Department of Education as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a watchdog for unfair economic practices affecting U.S. consumers. Those orders were met with mixed levels of success, as the plans to scale back or shutter FEMA has been met with political controversy and courts have so far blocked the order to shut down the Education Department — which, unlike the Institute of Peace, is a Cabinet-level agency. One employee told t he Washington Post in March that shuttering the agency would have a real immediate effect in conflict zones. 'We put mediators in place to help stitch these communities back together,' they said. 'So it does have a dramatic effect on violence on the ground immediately by just pulling these assets out.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
ICE detains six-year-old leukemia patient and his family — even though they've followed every immigration rule, lawyer says
A Honduran mother and her two young children — including a six-year-old leukemia patient — attended an immigration court hearing in Los Angeles on May 29, expecting to make their case for asylum in the United States. Instead, like hundreds of other immigrants who have attended hearings only to have their cases swiftly dismissed, federal agents arrested the family and placed them in removal proceedings. The woman and her two children were sent to an immigration detention center in rural Texas, roughly 1,300 miles from home. After more than a month in detention, the family was released July 2 following a lawsuit against Donald Trump's administration, in what is believed to be the first legal challenge against the arrests of children during controversial operations inside courthouses. The woman and her children are identified only by their initials in court documents. In detention, the children 'cried every night,' according to the family's attorney. The woman's six-year-old son also experienced bruising and bone pain, both symptoms of leukemia, and missed an appointment related to his cancer treatment. His sister barely ate. 'The Trump administration's policy of detaining people at courthouses who are doing everything right, who are entirely law-abiding, who are trying to fulfill all the requirements that the U.S. government asks of them — it violates our Constitution, it violates our federal laws,' Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School director Elora Mukherjee told Salon. 'It also violates our sense of morality,' she added. 'Why are we targeting hundreds, if not thousands, of people, including children, who are doing everything right?' Thousands of people who are following immigration law — showing up for court-ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement check-ins, immigration court hearings and U.S. Customs and Immigration Services appointments — have become easy targets for arrests. The Trump administration has effectively 'de-legalized' tens of thousands of immigrants who were granted humanitarian protections to live and work in the U.S., as well as thousands of people who show up to immigration courts each week only to have their cases dismissed, with federal agents waiting to arrest them on the other side of the courtroom doors. The administration has directed immigration judges — who, unlike federal district judges, operate under the direction of the Department of Justice — to dismiss cases involving immigrants who have been in the country for less than two years, making it easier for ICE to rapidly remove them. Those actions have radically expanded a pool of 'undocumented' people to add to the president's demands for mass deportations. The six-year-old leukemia patient identified as N.M.Z. in court filings 'was seen regularly by medical personnel' at the facility, according to Homeland Security deputy secretary Tricia McLaughlin. He was living in Honduras when he was diagnosed at age 3 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a blood and bone marrow cancer. It is the most common form of cancer among children. In a post on X, Homeland Security called allegations of medical neglect 'flatly FALSE.' 'ICE ALWAYS prioritizes the health, safety, and well-being of all detainees in its care,' according to the post. 'Fortunately, the minor child in question has not undergone chemotherapy in over a year, and has been seen regularly by medical personnel since arriving at the Dilley facility.' The Honduran family legally entered the country in October 2024 using the Biden-era CBP One app that streamlined a legal process for immigrants to enter the U.S. After taking office, Trump's Homeland Security Department shut down the program and began terminating the legal status for tens of thousands of immigrants who used the app to legally enter. The administration began sending notices instructing them to leave the country 'immediately.' Roughly 985,000 people were seeking legal entry into the country before the president abruptly ended the program earlier this year. A lawsuit, filed in Texas district court, argues that the Honduran family's arrests violate their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. The family's release 'demonstrates the power we have when we fight back against harmful, un-American policies,' according to a statement from attorney Kate Gibson Kumar of the Texas Civil Rights Project, which also represented the family. 'The practice of courthouse arrests is a blatant disregard for those lawfully seeking safety through the government's own processes, and an even bigger disregard for our Constitution and the protections it provides, including due process,' she said. The South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley was closed during the Biden administration and re-opened with Trump's aggressive mass deportation agenda, which is seeking to arrest 3,000 people a day while pumping billions of dollars into expanding capacity in federal detention centers. Nearly 60,000 people are currently being held in those facilities. The Dilley detention center has come under renewed scrutiny after the Trump administration signalled plans to 'terminate' a decades-old policy that sets the standard for humane treatment of immigrant children in government custody. If the government successfully revokes the rule, children in federal immigration custody will no longer be entitled to basic protections granted under the consent agreement — including adequate food, water, and clean clothes, regardless of whether they're detained with their parents or if they're alone.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Which team make di highest profit from di Club World Cup $1bn prize pot?
Di Club World Cup get im critics but for di clubs wey bin dey involved di competition $1bn prize pot don prove to be good business. Now wey di first edition of di new-look tournament don complete, we fit analyse di financial rewards wey clubs wey compete get. BBC Sport explain di breakdown of di prize money and wetin e mean for di clubs wey get am. How much money bin dey on offer? Di new look competition bin get a prize pot of $1bn (£726m) to give out to di 32 competing clubs, out of dat money $525m dey divided between all clubs for participation and Fifa award $475m on a performance-related basis. Di money wey dem give European clubs for appearance dem share am based on sporting and commercial criteria, e mean say some clubs collect more pass odas for taking part. European clubs collect between $12.81m and $38.19m just for turning up, while teams from oda continents dem give dem a set fee - $15.21m for South America, $9.55m for North and Central America, and Asia and Africa, and $3.58m for Oceania. Fifa neva confam di individual amounts wey dem give to European clubs for taking part, so we dey use estimates from football finance website The Swiss Ramble based on Uefa club coefficient system. Di prize money figures dey converted from US dollars into pound sterling. Di big winners Tournament winners Chelsea na by far di most financially successful team, dem earn about £84m, while Paris St-Germain make about £78.4m for dia run to di final. European clubs, wey generally bin enjoy larger participation fees, make an average of around £39m while impressive runs from di likes of semi-finalists Fluminense mean say dat South American clubs make £24m on average. Money bin dey on offer for results for di group stage, wit around £1.5m for a win and £730k for a draw. Five clubs, including Pachuca and Seattle Sounders, bin lose all three group games dis one mean say dem only receive dia participation fee. Auckland City hit jackpot Despite say di prize money figures for di likes of part-time side Auckland City bin look small, di competition been dey incredibly lucrative for dem within di context of dia overall finances. Di £3.3m wey Auckland City take home na around seven times dia overall 2024 revenue of approximately £488,000, while di £67m wey Real Madrid make na just 4% of dia 2024 figure of £901m. While dis na huge positive for di part-time club, football finance expert Kieran Maguire share im concerns for di impact on oda sides from New Zealand. Im say: "Dem don earn so much money sotay e dey difficult to see anybody wey fit compete wit dem if dem invest di money for dia playing squad. "And dem get reason to do so becos e go boost dia chances of qualifying for di next Club World Cup. "E good for dem, but e no necessarily dey good for di league wen you dey try to sell a competitive league to broadcasters." Extra transfer funds For di European clubs, di extra revenue dey welcomed as dis na way of increasing dia transfer budget. In line wit Uefa rules, clubs dey limited to spending 70% of dia revenue on wages, transfers and agents' fees - so for every £50m dem earn, an extra £35m dey available for recruitment. Some clubs don already pay off dia summer transfer business sake of say dem take part for di competition. More dan 65% of Borussia Dortmund £57.9m transfer business so far dis summer dem don pay am off from dia participation for United States afta dem reach di quarter-final stage. Di £27m Dortmund bin pay to Sunderland for Jobe Bellingham already dey completely paid off. Chelsea bin spend £198m on reinforcements so far dis summer on di likes of Joao Pedro and Liam Delap - £84m of dat dey covered by dia impressive run for di Club World Cup. Despite Manchester City surprise last-16 exit to Al-Hilal, dem still earn around £38m from di tournament - wey equate to 35% of di summer business dem don conduct so far. In more simple terms, e don pay for dia £31m acquisition of Rayan Ait-Nouri from Wolves. Real Madrid bin pay Liverpool a fee of around £8.4m for Trent Alexander-Arnold to sign am one month early to dey part of dia squad for di competition - dem pay dat one off afta just three matches. "Di accountant for di football club like di idea. Di business go dey happy," na wetin finance expert Maguire tok about di competition lucrative incentives. "But I no sure say di fans dey happy, particularly European clubs, and e go be di same for players and managers. "We dey reach a crisis point as far as player welfare dey concerned. We fit enter a period of conflict between players and owners."
