logo
UK-US trade deal live: Bank of England boss urges Britain to strike EU deal after historic Trump agreement

UK-US trade deal live: Bank of England boss urges Britain to strike EU deal after historic Trump agreement

Independent09-05-2025
Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey has said he hopes the UK can 'rebuild' trade relationships with the EU after striking a trade deal with the US.
In an interview, he said it would be 'beneficial' to reverse the post-Brexit reduction in UK - EU trade and that the US deal could set an example around the world.
Meanwhile, the shadow trade secretary warned that Sir Keir Starmer's trade agreement with the US is 'disappointing' and a more 'comprehensive' deal is needed.
Conservative MP Andrew Griffith said the historic deal was not a 'classic trade agreement' and there were still questions to be answered about industries like film and pharmaceuticals.
However, Labour's Jonathan Reynolds stressed the urgency of the situation, stating that "we were at risk of thousands of people losing their jobs" without an agreement.
Despite the Tories attempts to criticise the deal, with Kemi Badenoch claiming the UK had been 'shafted', Donald Trump claimed the US had been attempting to reach a deal with the UK since his first term, but those in power 'weren't getting it done'. He added that it had been made possible 'because of Brexit' and that the EU had treated them 'extremely unfairly'.
The deal will see US tariffs on cars immediately slashed from 27.5 to 10 per cent, up to 100,000 vehicles, while levies on steel and aluminium will be reduced to zero. A general 10 per cent tariff for other goods will remain.
What is chlorinated chicken and will it be sold in the UK after Trump trade deal?
The government has insisted Britain's food standards would not be compromised after the UK and the US agreed on a trade deal to eliminate a series of tariffs.
Agriculture is a key part of the new trade deal announced on Thursday by Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump. Tariffs have been reduced on US products, including beef and ethanol, in return for moves that help British cars and steel.
After the deal was announced, government sources insisted imports of hormone-treated beef or chlorinated chicken, previously described as red lines for the UK in any agreement, would remain illegal.
What is chlorinated chicken and will it be sold in the UK after Trump trade deal?
The British government said there would be no drop in food standards as a result of the UK-US trade deal
Holly Evans9 May 2025 09:55
The world is now 'very different' because of 'unprecedented global shocks', Andrew Bailey says
The world has been "very different" over the last five years as a result of "unprecedented global shocks", Andrew Bailey told the Reykjavík economic conference.
Giving a speech on responding to global shocks, the governor of the Bank of England said the "largest pandemic in a century, the largest war in Europe since 1945, and now a trade war between the world's two largest economies" have "created a very challenging environment for monetary policy".
He added: "These are not small and simple disturbances to aggregate demand, and they come against a backdrop of low productivity growth and ageing populations."
While it remains to be seen how recent changes to global trade policies will play out and what the effects on our economies will be, the effects of the pandemic and Russia's brutal war on the Ukrainian people are fresh in our minds.
"Our economies have suffered, inflation has surged. These have been hard times for businesses and households, not least those on lower incomes."
Millie Cooke 9 May 2025 09:50
Tories in chaos over trade deal response
The Conservative response to Britain's trade deal with the US has been mired in chaos.
Kemi Badenoch said Britain had been "shafted" in negotiations with Donald Trump, while shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said the agreement would be "welcomed by exporting businesses".
The chaos signals the unease in Tory ranks at having to stomach a Labour prime minister agreeing a deal which eluded successive Conservative prime ministers.
Ms Badenoch also opposed Sir Keir's trade deal with India on Tuesday, with business secretary Jonathan Reynolds asking "who do they want us to trade and do business with"?
But it is not the first time members of Ms Badenoch's shadow cabinet have publicly read from different scripts to their party leader, and is a sign of the lacking discipline in the Conservative operation as it seeks to rebuild itself in opposition.
9 May 2025 09:40
Lib Dems call for 'deepening cooperation' with EU for vital business boost
Responding to the Governor of the Bank of England's comments that the UK now needs to "rebuild" Britain's trade relationship with the EU, Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader and Treasury Spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: 'Andrew Bailey has today added his voice to what Liberal Democrats have been saying for years: that we urgently need to rebuild our trading relationship with our closest and most significant economic partners in Europe.'
'This isn't about revisiting the past, it's about boosting our economy and deepening cooperation for the future.
'Despite the Government's US deal, Trump's trade tariffs are still hitting key British industries and threatening the livelihoods of people across the UK.'
'The Government must embrace a pragmatic and ambitious approach to our relationship with the EU - cutting red tape and providing a vital boost for our businesses.'
Holly Evans9 May 2025 09:32
UK must do 'everything we can' to rebuild trade ties with EU, says Bank of England governor
The governor of the Bank of England has said the UK must do 'everything we can' to improve long-term trade by rebuilding ties with the EU.
Andrew Bailey told the BBC the deal would be 'beneficial' to 'rebuild' trade relationships with the EU, amid government talks with the EU to reset its trade and security relationship.
'It is important we do everything we can to ensure that whatever decisions are taken on the Brexit front do not damage the long-term trade position. So I hope that we can use this to start to rebuild that relationship,' he said.
Asked what impact a closer relationship between the UK and the EU would have on the economy and inflation, Mr Bailey said: "It would be beneficial. Having a more open economy to trade with the European Union. Because there has been a fall-off in goods trade with the EU over recent years."
UK must do 'everything we can' to rebuild trade ties with EU, says bank boss
Andrew Bailey spoke after a UK-US trade deal was agreed on Thursday
Holly Evans9 May 2025 09:29
UK steel director says industry remains unclear on the details of US deal
The director general of UK Steel said the exact details of the UK-US trade agreement for the industry had not yet been revealed.
Gareth Stace told Times Radio: 'The headline here is that we're really pleased with Government's negotiations ability to scrap that 25% tariff burden that we have suffered since March. But yes, we don't know the details.
'We don't know when this deal comes into force for steel, we don't know what conditions we need to meet in order to remove the 25% tariff, and we don't know, crucially also, if all steel producers that export to the US market will be included or excluded.
'There may be issues around ownership, around where the steel is made, and until we see those details, we don't know whether this heavy burden will be lifted from us.'
Mr Stace said reports that British Steel was more likely to be nationalised after the deal 'would be a good thing' on a temporary basis to drive investment across the sector.
9 May 2025 09:13
US having veto over Chinese veto reports are 'complete nonsense', says minister
Reports that the US will have a veto over Chinese investment in Britain as a result of the UK-US trade deal are 'complete nonsense', Darren Jones said.
The Telegraph reported that such a veto is part the deal, but Treasury minister Mr Jones told Times Radio: 'This story on the front page of the Telegraph is complete nonsense. I mean, I'm at a bit of a loss as to know where it's come from. I think it was a Conservative Party criticism.
'But as you said, we've not even published all of the documents yet, so I'm not quite sure how they were able to come up with that.
'I can be completely categorical with you there is no such thing as a veto on Chinese investment in this trade deal, this is not what this trade deal is about.
'It is a sectoral trade deal in relation to tariffs in key sectors, in the way that we've just been talking about. So I'd suggest the Conservative Party reads the documents and they maybe come back for a second go.'
Holly Evans9 May 2025 09:00
David Lammy: Trade deal proves UK does not need to choose between the US and EU
The connections between the UK and the US are deeply personal for so many Brits. As a teenager, I spent long summers in New York with family. I went to study at Harvard as a young man. After graduating I practised as a lawyer in San Francisco.
The world has changed a lot since then. The 2008 global financial crisis marked the end of the era of hyper-globalisation. The coronavirus pandemic exposed the danger of unreliable supply chains.
Putin 's illegal invasion of Ukraine was not only an attack on the Ukrainian people, but also the international order established in the wake of the Second World War, which imposed an energy price shock on every home in Britain.
David Lammy: Trade deal proves UK does not need to choose between the US and EU
Foreign Secretary David Lammy reflects on his links to America and nn a historic day for the UK and US with a new trade deal
Holly Evans9 May 2025 08:50
Beef industry remains 'very nervous' despite UK-US trade deal providing greater market access
The UK-US trade agreement will provide greater market access for the beef industry, a leading food industry executive said.
Neil Shand, chief executive of the National Beef Association, said 13,000 tonnes of US and British beef would be eligible to export to either country as part of the agreement but added the industry 'remains very nervous' about the current Government's policies.
Asked what the UK would gain from the deal, he told Times Radio: 'We have access to the US market. We had limited access – there's a carryover of a WTO (World Trade Organisation) deal that the US had, that existed from pre-Brexit times, and we were allowed to send small amounts of beef to the US, but this will allow our market to grow as well.
'In volume terms, there is an argument that they have a bigger access or a larger quantity into our market. But in the overall scheme of things, 13,000 tonnes is not a huge amount of beef, if you consider last year we imported 241,000 tonnes.
'We're not self-sufficient, and it is important that we are able to provide beef eating consumers with a product.'
Mr Shand said it was likely the US-imported beef would be used in the services industry instead of being sold on supermarket shelves, as leading retailers 'are not going to break rank' on British beef agreements.
Holly Evans9 May 2025 08:40
Treasury minister says UK-US trade deal urgently needed to protect working people
The UK-US trade deal needed to be urgently agreed to avoid job losses, Darren Jones has suggested.
Asked if agreeing the deal was urgent by BBC Breakfast, the Treasury minister said: 'Yes, yes, it was.'
Pressed if this was because of the threat of job losses, Mr Jones added: 'Of course, which is why it was so important that we've got the deal over the line.'
The minister was also resolute about the need to sign the deal, after being questioned about whether it left the UK better off than before Donald Trump's tariffs were first introduced.
He told the BBC: 'If I could rather be in a world where there were no tariffs, of course I would. But that's just not the world that exists. So it's not really an option on the table. The option on the table is to have not signed a trade deal with the United States and had higher tariffs, or to have signed a trade deal with the United States and had lower tariffs.
'We've signed that trade deal. We've got lower tariffs in critical manufacturing sectors in the UK. 150,000 people's livelihoods that we've protected as a consequence of that trade deal. That is, by definition, factually better off as a consequence of the action that this Government is taking to stand up for working people across the UK.'
Holly Evans
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Carney to speak in coming days, Canadian official says
Trump, Carney to speak in coming days, Canadian official says

Reuters

time6 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump, Carney to speak in coming days, Canadian official says

WASHINGTON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, also told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he was "encouraged" by recent discussions and believed a deal to bring down tariffs remained an option. "We're encouraged by the conversations with Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer, but we're not yet where we need to go to get the deal that's in the best interest of the two economies," LeBlanc said, referring to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The trade minister said he expected Carney and Trump to speak "over the next number of days." "We think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs provide greater certainty to investment," LeBlanc said. Washington linked Friday's tariff announcement in part to what it said was Canada's failure to stop fentanyl smuggling. It was the latest blow in a months-long tariff war which Trump initiated shortly after returning to power this year. Carney says Canada accounts for just 1% of U.S. fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce the volumes.

Millions of motorists will have to wait until next year to receive motor finance compensation after Supreme Court case, competition watchdog reveals
Millions of motorists will have to wait until next year to receive motor finance compensation after Supreme Court case, competition watchdog reveals

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Millions of motorists will have to wait until next year to receive motor finance compensation after Supreme Court case, competition watchdog reveals

Millions of motorists overcharged for car finance will have to wait until next year for settlements – with consultation on a proposed compensation scheme worth up to £18bn not due to launch until October. The Financial Conduct Agency announced the development this afternoon after a Supreme Court ruling on Friday – but said it would 'take time to establish a (compensation) scheme'. The FCA estimates 'most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation' per claim, with the total value of the scheme between £9bn and £18bn. Some individuals who bought several cars via hire purchase could receive multiple payouts. Officials said they hope 'to start getting people any money they are owed next year'. In the meantime, the watchdog urged people to wait rather than taking action via a claims management company or law firm as it could 'cost you a significant chunk of any money you get'. It said it has already taken action against publishers of 225 adverts 'about potentially exaggerated amounts of compensation'. The FCA's stance was today backed by Money Saving Expert guru, who told his followers on X (formerly known as Twitter) to avoid claims firms or solicitors and that 'the most important thing is to DO nothing'. The FCA said 'many motor finance firms were not complying with rules or the law by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans'. It defended its action in the wake of the court ruling, saying it 'moved quickly' on 'steps to set up a proposed compensation scheme because it wants to provide clarity and certainty to consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible'. But FCA officials stressed that 'want to ensure the integrity of the motor finance market so it works well for consumers now and in the future' and that the compensation scheme would need to 'balance principles including fairness, timeliness, and certainty'. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm.' He added: 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal.' The FCA is working on rules to govern the finance schemes, used by 2.2m people each year, to ensure lenders 'consistently, efficiently and fairly decide whether someone is owed compensation and how much'. The FCA said motorists who have already complained don't need to do anything but urged others to submit a complaint, if they think they have paid too much for motor finance. It added it would be 'working intensively and engaging widely over the coming weeks on the detail of how a scheme would work'. The Supreme Court's ruling found that hidden commissions from lenders to dealers on car loans were not in themselves unlawful, excluding several million motorists from making claims. The court said car dealers did not need to operate with a 'single-minded' duty to 'act only in their customers' best interests' when arranging finance – and rejected a claim finance companies had bribed car dealers. But it found the payment of particularly large commissions, without customers' knowledge, were unfair and affected customers in those cases should be compensated. The five judges said a case where the commission was 55pc of the total charge for credit was 'unfair' and that a failure to disclose the 'exact nature of the commission, and the concealment of the commercial tie between the dealer and the lender' was wrong. Analysts for investment bank Jefferies heralded the judgement as a 'huge win' for car financing firms as it means the companies can avoid a much larger compensation bill which some market experts forecasted could be as large as that for PPI (payment protection insurance). The scandal led to payouts totalling £50bn. To make a report about potential mis-selling of car finance, visit

FCA reveals plans for car finance compensation scheme that could lead to payouts for millions of drivers
FCA reveals plans for car finance compensation scheme that could lead to payouts for millions of drivers

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

FCA reveals plans for car finance compensation scheme that could lead to payouts for millions of drivers

Millions of drivers could still receive a pay out for 'mis-sold' car finance deals after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it is looking into a compensation scheme. On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a blow to car buyers after it sided with major lenders in the car finance scandal. Had the decision gone the other way, it could have led to £44billion of payouts dubbed 'PPI on wheels'. However, today, the FCA announced it will consult on an industry-wide redress scheme that could begin paying out from next year. The financial watchdog says it hopes the scheme will offer fairness and certainty to both customers and firms and in doing so, ensure the integrity of the car finance industry. Millions of car owners have been hoping for payouts over claims they were 'mis-sold' finance deals dating back more than a decade. Many car finance firms failed to comply with rules or the law, by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans. 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules, said Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, 'it's fair for their customers to be compensated.' He added: 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get. 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.' Who will be entitled to compensation? While some car finance customers won't get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the Supreme Court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful. The FCA will propose rules on how lenders should decide whether someone is owed compensation and how much. It says it will monitor if firms are following the rules and act if they're not. The Supreme Court agreed with several factors the FCA had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Such factors could include the size of the commission relative to the loan charge, the nature of the commission, for example, whether it is discretionary and the characteristics of the customer. How much compensation is due to car buyers? The total cost of the compensation scheme is expected to rise above £9billion with the FCA estimating that most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The consultation will launch by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. What should you do if you think you are eligible? People who have already complained don't need to do anything, according to the FCA. However, anyone who is concerned they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much for their car finance lender should complain now. There is no need to use a claims management company or law firm and doing so could cost someone around 30 per cent of any compensation paid. The FCA recognises that car finance customers want to receive any compensation owed quickly while car finance firms, lenders and investors want certainty. The regulator says it will be working hard over the coming weeks on the details of how a scheme would work. What is the car finance scandal? The majority of new cars and some second-hand cars are bought via car finance deals where drivers pay an upfront deposit, borrow the rest from a lender and pay back the loan each month with interest. Each year some two million cars are purchased this way. However, many dealers and brokers were paid a behind-the scenes commission by lenders for signing buyers up to these agreements, which some drivers claimed they did not know. WHY WAS CAR FINANCE IN THE SUPREME COURT? In October, a ruling by the Court of Appeal deemed that these 'secret' commission payments without a consumers fully informed consent were unlawful. It considered the cases of three people with car finance deals, who argued they did not know about the commission made by their car dealers. Some lenders challenged that Court of Appeal decision so the case went to the Supreme Court. WHAT DID THE SUPREME COURT RULE? It ruled in favour of lenders instead of millions of consumers. Car finance firms did not unlawfully sell products by failing to disclose commissions. Supreme Court President Lord Reed said the court allowed the appeals brought by the finance companies. It did uphold one claim that a customer's relationship with the finance company was 'unfair' and that claimant will be awarded the amount of commission plus interest. Lord Reed then said 'other customers' claims are rejected'. It's a blow for motorists who did not know about the commission payments involved in their car finance deals. WILL ANYONE GET COMPENSATION? The FCA is consulting on setting up a redress scheme for those unknowingly signed up to a discretionary commission agreement (DCA) when they took out their car loans. In a DCA, lenders allow brokers and dealers to hike interest rates on car finance to increase their commission. These were banned in 2021 by the regulator. The watchdog has been probing DCAs since January 2024. Motorists must sit tight for six weeks as the FCA decides if it will set up a compensation scheme. This could cost lenders somewhere in the region of £5billion to £13billion, accountancy firm BDO says. WHAT DOES THE FCA SAY? The FCA says: Our detailed review of the past use of motor finance has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers. Where consumers have lost out, they should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way. Some consumers have challenged their agreements with lenders through the courts. On Friday the Supreme Court ruled that in many cases commission payments could be legal, but a lender did act unfairly – and therefore unlawfully - due in part to the size of the commission it paid to the motor dealer and how it was disclosed. The Supreme Court agreed with several factors we had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA), whilst recognising it depends on the facts of each case. Such factors could include: the size of the commission relative to the charge for credit the nature of the commission, for example, whether it is discretionary the characteristics of the consumer compliance with regulatory rules the extent and manner of disclosure This clarity helps us because we have been looking at what is unfair and, prior to this judgment, there were different interpretations of the law coming from different courts. We will now consult on a redress scheme. Redress would depend on non-disclosure of the factors above and the interaction between them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store