
The shared history of California & Mexico, why anti-ICE protestors were waving Mexican flags
These protests began on June 6 in Los Angeles after military-style ICE raids resulted in the detention of 44 people, mostly of Mexican heritage. California, especially the city of Los Angeles, has been the epicentre of these protests.
This is in no small part due to almost 40% of Californians being Hispanic, and more than 30% tracing their ancestry to Mexico, with whom the state shares a border as well as deep historic, cultural, and economic ties. Here's a brief history.
The Spanish colonisation of the New World began in the late 15th century and continued till the end of the 19th century. At its peak, Spanish territory in the Americas touched Alaska in the north and extended to Tierra del Fuego in the southern tip of South America.
The southern tip of the Baja peninsula (today the Mexican states of Baja California and Baja California Sur) was spotted by Conquistadors in the 16th century. They erroneously likened their 'discovery' to the mythical island of Californias mentioned in the Spanish novel Las Sergas de Esplandián (The Adventures of Esplandián) written in 1510 by Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo.
Upon venturing inward, the conquistadors realised that the region was not an island as previously imagined. The peninsular region came to be called Baja California, while the territories to its north, which today make up the American state of California, were called Alta California.
Another two centuries would pass before the Spanish colonial project, driven by the edict 'gold, God and glory', would claim the Californias for the empire. There are a few different reasons for this.
* One, Spaniards were kept busy elsewhere. The Viceroyalty of New Spain was formally established in 1535 with its capital in Mexico City, and would swell to include territories ranging from the Philippines to the Caribbean and northern parts of South America.
* Two, the discovery of gold and silver deposits in Mexico, central America and South America, as well as the lack of (known) deposits in California, discouraged conquistadors from making the difficult, often deadly journey.
Spanish interest in the region picked up when Russia looked to settle in the Californias in the mid-18th century. While Jesuit missionaries had been proselytising in the region for decades at that point, King Charles of Spain formally ordered the colonisation of California in 1761.
Junípero Serra, regarded today as the patron saint of California, would go on to establish 21 missions which 'developed' the region. The Californian economy would be defined by agriculture and livestock-rearing.
But colonisation was also devastating for Native Americans, who had been inhabiting the region for many millennia. 'Mission Indians' were forcefully converted to Catholicism and forced to work as farm labour. Demographer Sherburne F Cook estimates that the population of indigenous Californians fell from 310,000 in 1769 to only 25,000 in 1910. (The Population of the California Indians 1769-1970, Sherburne F. Cook, 1976)
The Spanish empire saw a steep decline in the 19th century. As Napoleon Bonaparte pummelled Spain in Europe, the Bourbon monarchy struggled to suppress revolutionary tendencies across its colonies.
Growing resentment over Spanish rule, stemming from rampant economic exploitation and social inequalities, set the stage for the Mexican War of Independence in 1810. Mexico would formally secede from Spain in 1821. But the new republic was far from politically stable, and witnessed 40 different governments before 1848.
The undivided Californias province had been split into two — Alta California and Baja California — in 1804. While the new Mexican republic retained this division, the territories immediately witnessed a host of changes.
For one, all restrictions on trade with foreigners were eased, allowing the Californian settlers or 'Californios', to trade in commodities, finished goods and luxuries. Trade with Anglo-Americans helped initiate the economic detachment of Alta California from central Mexico, as ships transported Californian hides and tallow in exchange for English and American manufactured goods. The Mexican government struggled to assert control over these territories, which grew closer to the US economically.
Foreigners in the Californian territories were also given land-holding rights after converting to Catholicism, spurring immigration by hordes of US citizens between the 1820s and the 1840s. As American interest in the Californias surged, the US and Mexico signed the Treaty of Limits in 1828, recognising the borders between the two nations according to the 1819 Adams-Onis Treaty between Spain and the US (in which the Spanish Crown ceded Florida to the US).
This treaty was further amended in 1836 when the Republic of Texas became independent from Mexico.
The concept of 'Manifest Destiny', a belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable, drove the United States' westward expansion in the 19th century. And it was this belief, along with ever-growing Anglo-Saxon connections to erstwhile Spanish territories in the American West, that set the stage for the Mexican-American War of 1846-48.
In 1845, Texas became the 28th state of the US, prompting Mexico to sever all ties with Washington. But US President James K Polk wanted more territory, including Alta California and present-day New Mexico. When his offer to purchase these territories was rebuffed, he moved US troops into Texas and Mexican territory, and claimed all land between Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers in January 1846.
Mexico retaliated in April, causing 16 casualties among the American troops, triggering a wave of nationalism in the US, and a declaration of war by the Congress. The 16-month-long war saw the US military leverage strategy, brutality and luck, eventually capturing Mexico City. When the war ended in 1848, the US acquired present-day California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming from Mexico for only $15 million.
That said, even before the war had completely ended, the discovery of gold in 1848 at Sutter's Mill in Sierra Nevada, California, had set off what was known as the California Gold Rush. More than 300,000 people moved to California over the next four years, hoping to, quite literally, strike gold. California was officially given statehood by the US in 1850.
Seeing the Mexican flag waved during anti-ICE protests was an affront for many, a rejection of the United States and American identity. But ask the protestors and they will tell you a different story.
'It's about refusing to be erased,' Mexican journalist Enrique Acevedo wrote for The Washington Post. '…Mexican identity isn't foreign [in Los Angeles]. It's foundational. This was Mexico once and remains part of the memory, culture, street names, food and families who never crossed a border because the border crossed them. In that context, the Mexican flag isn't necessarily a symbol of separation or rejection. Sometimes, it's a claim: We are both. We are Mexican and American, not divided but layered…,' he wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Unconstitutional tactics': US federal judge blocks ICE raids in California counties; Trump admin accused of racial profiling
A US federal judge ordered the Donald Trump administration to halt broad immigration stops and arrests across seven California counties, including Los Angeles, following allegations of racial profiling and 'unconstitutional tactics' by federal immigration agents. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Attorneys general from 18 Democratic-led states supported the court orders, which came after a similar ruling in April that barred warrantless arrests by border agents in parts of eastern California. The ruling, issued Friday by Judge Maame E Frimpong, came after immigrant advocacy groups filed a lawsuit accusing US immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) of detaining brown-skinned individuals. The lawsuit names three detained immigrants and two US citizens, one of whom was held despite showing valid identification. Plaintiffs claim agents targeted individuals who 'looked Hispanic' or wore construction work clothes. ACLU attorney Mohammad Tajsar pointed to a car wash raid where all but two white workers were detained. The lawsuit names three detained immigrants and two US citizens, one of whom was held despite showing valid identification. The department of homeland security denied the claims, calling them 'categorically FALSE.' Judge Frimpong's order also requires ICE to grant attorneys access to detainees, addressing concerns over denied legal representation. The decision comes amid growing protests in Southern California, where immigration raids have taken place at car washes, swap meets, and parking lots. Trump says he's ordered department of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem and White House border czar Tom Homan to direct ICE agents to use 'whatever means is necessary' to arrest protesters who assault them in the future. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His remarks followed a confrontation during a raid at a Southern California cannabis farm, where four U.S. citizens were arrested for assaulting or resisting agents. Authorities also announced a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of a suspect who allegedly fired at federal agents during the raid.


India Gazette
39 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Bangalore University clarifies allegations of discrimination against Dalit faculty
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India] July 12 (ANI): Bangalore University has issued a clarification through an official letter to the SC/ST Teachers Association, stating that the allegation of following an anti-Dalit policy is not true. The university highlighted that it has always given due representation and priority to teachers from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, in an official statement. The response was made with reference to a letter from the Association that raised concerns about discrimination in statutory appointments, violation of reservation norms, and delay in filling backlog posts. The university clarified that appointments of statutory posts such as Vice-Chancellor, Registrar, Finance Officer, and Registrar (Evaluation) are made directly by the Government. Therefore, the university has no role in these appointments. It is unfortunate that these appointments are being viewed as discriminatory. At the university level, wherever appointments are within its control, SC/ST faculty members have been given preference. Out of 30 administrative positions like Directors, Coordinators, Special Officers, and Nodal Officers, 22 posts are held by SC/ST teachers. Further, four faculty members were transferred to Bangalore University from other universities by the State Government with the Governor's approval, considering the shortage of permanent teaching staff. Currently, out of 126 teaching staff at the university, 80 belong to SC/ST communities, which is 63.5% of the total faculty. The university also pointed out that no other public university in Karnataka has filled backlog vacancies to the extent that Bangalore University has. Out of the 55 backlog posts identified by the Social Welfare Department, 35 have already been filled, and the process to fill the remaining is underway. In the academic year 2024-25, 44 faculty members were promoted as Associate Professors, out of which 29 belong to SC/ST categories. The university reaffirmed its commitment to social justice and equal representation in all appointments. (ANI)