Trump withdraws from UNESCO because it recognises Palestine
"UNESCO's decision to admit the 'State of Palestine' as a Member State is highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization," the State Department said.
"Continued involvement in UNESCO is not in the national interest of the United States".
The withdrawal, per the rules, will not take effect until 31 December, 2026.
US President Donald Trump withdrew from UNESCO during his first term for the very same reason, before his successor Joe Biden rejoined the agency.
And under former president Barack Obama, US funding to UNESCO was suspended when it first recognised Palestine as a member in 2011.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US court rules that Trump's ban on birthright citizenship is unconstitutional
President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship was deemed unconstitutional by a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Trump's order violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment – the latest blow to Trump in a series of legal back-and-forth rulings on the issue. Under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, all children born in the US automatically become American citizens, but the Trump administration is looking to abolish that right for people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. However, opposition has been fierce. Several district judges have blocked Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship. The appeals court on Wednesday affirmed a Seattle district court's nationwide injunction, calling the measure "necessary" to protect states from potential harm if Trump's order took effect. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Late last month, the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lower court judges to pause executive orders issued by Trump, while hearing the birthright case. In its 6-3 ruling, which was ideologically divided with liberal judges dissenting against the ruling, the court said that nationwide injunctions or pauses issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts". Trump hailed the ruling as a "giant win". US Supreme Court limits judges from blocking Trump order on birthright citizenship Read More » But this week, according to the appeals court, an injunction limited to the state level is as ineffective as not blocking the order at all, because of the complications that can arise if people move between states with different citizenship rules. "The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree," Judge Ronald Gould wrote. In the Supreme Court's June ruling, the judges did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order to end "birthright citizenship". This loophole has consequently prompted a raft of class action lawsuits to be filed challenging the legality of the Executive Order itself. Earlier this month, a federal judge granted class-action status to any child who would potentially be denied citizenship under Trump's order, and issued a preliminary halt to it as legal proceedings carry on.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
UAE and US working to 'get chips moving' after AI deal
After this week's debut of the White House's Artificial Intelligence Action Plan, the UAE is ready to expedite its AI partnership with the US. This follows President Donald Trump's visit to Abu Dhabi in May, when he announced the US-UAE AI Acceleration Partnership, which included plans for a 5GW UAE-US AI Campus. Those plans allow for the UAE to obtain powerful CPUs and GPUs from the US which are necessary to build up AI infrastructure. Once completed, part of the campus, dubbed Stargate UAE, will be among the largest AI data centres in the world. Security guarantees to protect the UAE AI technology from falling into the wrong hands were are major aspect of the deal. Also bolstering the deal, Mr Trump's much-anticipated AI plan, unveiled on Wednesday, seeks to reduce regulatory barriers in place to build up AI infrastructure in the US, while pushing for increasing the prevalence of US AI technology around the world. That bodes well for the UAE, and other countries with similar AI aspirations. It's also a sharp contrast to the former president Joe Biden's policies. His administration sought tighter export controls on US chips to prevent them from being used in China. 'The UAE welcomes President Trump's AI Action Plan and is ready to fast track our strategic AI partnership with the US,' Yousef Al Otaiba, UAE Minister of State and ambassador to the US, said on Wednesday. 'As a trusted partner, we are working closely with leading US companies to adopt and scale American technology in the UAE and beyond.' Some pundits aren't sold however, and they're trying to exert influence to slow the US-UAE AI Acceleration Partnership. In an opinion article in The Washington Post, Christopher Chivvis and Sam Winter-Levy from the Carnegie Endowment, a US-based think tank, expressed concern about China somehow getting access to the US AI technology, among other things. 'To now approve the offshoring of the data centres that will house so many of the resulting chips to another conflict-prone region would be a major unforced error – one that will prove difficult to reverse,' they wrote. The UAE has addressed this by committing to a $1.4 trillion investment framework for AI infrastructure in the US. Regardless, the Wall Street Journal also reported that some in the White House have sought to take a closer look at the recently announced UAE deal, amid concerns about US technology diffusion. But last week, the White House cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence adviser beat back those concerns, and reaffirmed the US partnership with the UAE. 'These are countries that are long-standing partners and allies of the US going back many years,' White House AI chief David Sacks said during a round-table discussion at the Pennsylvania Energy and AI Summit, referring to the UAE. Mr Sacks added that the Trump administration thought that if US technology wasn't used in AI projects around the world, China-owned Huawei would step in to fill the vacuum. 'We don't want to create demand for Huawei,' he explained, also describing some of the chip smuggling scenarios that have become prevalent in media reports as quixotic. He said the newest standard data centres technology hardware is approximately 2.4m tall, with servers weighing 1,600kg, and that it's 'very easy to see' if they're being transported. 'I know that our Gulf State partners would honour our security agreement,' he said just hours before President Trump appeared at the event in Pennsylvania. 'This is ultimately a trust-but-verify situation, and all we have to do is send an inspector to a data centre and they can count the racks,' Mr Sacks explained, reiterating that he felt the scenarios of AI hardware smuggling were 'blown wildly out of proportion.' Meanwhile, there's no indication from the White House or Department of Commerce, which is ultimately responsible for allowing the export of US technology, that criticism of the UAE deal is gaining traction. In a statement to The National, the UAE ambassador expressed continued optimism about the AI plans with the US announced back in May. 'Signed just 60 days ago in Abu Dhabi, the UAE-US investment and Ai partnership will deliver enormous benefits to both countries,' Mr Al Otaiba said. 'High level teams have been actively engaging to advance the agreement, to get chips moving and to accelerate technology co-operation.'
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Columbia University to pay $220m, undertake major reforms in bid to restore federal funding
Columbia University announced on Wednesday that it would pay more than $220m to the Trump administration to restore federal research funding it lost after being accused of not doing enough to combat antisemitism on campus. The agreement, months in the making, will see Columbia pay a $200 million settlement to the federal government over three years, and $21 million to settle alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees. The agreement will also have the senior vice provost conduct a "thorough review" of the Center for Palestine Studies, the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies, the Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies, the Middle East Institute, the global hubs in Tel Aviv and Amman, the School of International and Public Affairs, the Middle East policy major and other programmes focused on the Middle East. In addition, the university is not allowed to maintain programmes that "promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotas, diversity targets or similar efforts", which could threaten several departments and fellowships. The university will also be prohibited from implementing affirmative action in its admissions policies. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The agreement also asks Columbia to reduce its dependence on international students, and asks for the university to provide, upon request, "all disciplinary actions involving student visa-holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions and arrest records" that the university is aware of. Claire Shipman, acting president of Columbia University, said in a statement: "This agreement resolves multiple federal agency investigations and protects Columbia's academic mission, research enterprise and independence." Shipman said the agreement would allow billions of dollars in federal research funding to resume, and that the university would retain control over its academic and operational decisions since the federal government would not dictate what it teaches, who teaches, or which students they could admit. Shipman also said the university did "not agree with the government's conclusion that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act" but did not deny the "very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism". She denied the university had capitulated to President Donald Trump's administration's demands. The university and the federal government are also appointing a monitor to ensure they both stick to their agreements. The new monitor, Bart M Schwartz, is the co-founder and chairman of an organisation that sponsored an event in June about "helping Israel heal and rebuild". Schwartz will provide a report every six months. The agreement also sees the establishment of a whistle-blower hotline for the university to raise complaints to. Demands The Trump administration froze $400m in federal grants in March over its claims that the Ivy League institution failed to tackle antisemitism on campus. Shipman said it also placed the majority of $1.3bn a year in federal funding on hold. Columbia University suspends or expels almost 80 students for pro-Palestine protest Read More » It also issued nine demands to the university, including adopting the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which academics and members of the Jewish community have criticised as conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism. The university pushed back on some of the administration's demands in March, such as putting the renowned Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies (MESAAS) department under academic receivership. Instead, they put MESAAS under review. They did not abolish the University Judicial Board. Instead, it was moved under the Office of the Provost. They agreed to some demands, such as a mask ban on campus. Ahead of its deal on Wednesday, Columbia suspended or expelled almost 80 students for pro-Palestine protests. The suspensions will last between one and three years and will require students to write an apology letter if they wish to return to the university.
