Green Cards in limbo: What to know as replacement wait times surge across the US
From 1 January to 31 March 2025, USCIS took an average of 8.3 months to process an I-90 application. Just a few months earlier, between October and December 2024, the median wait time was less than a month, about 0.8 months.
ALSO READ| World's most expensive golden visa costs $6.2 million. It is not UK, France, or Italy
US immigration system is under immense pressure
Immigration courts currently face a record-breaking 3.7 million pending cases. Green card holders are required to file Form I-90 every 10 years or sooner if their cards are lost, damaged, or contain errors.
The agency's website currently states that '80 per cent of cases for 'initial issuance or replacements' for I-90 are completed within 21.5 months,' while 10-year renewal cases are completed in '12.5 months' for 80 per cent of applicants.
Notably, between January and March 2025, USCIS received over 285,000 I-90 applications. That's a significant increase from the 189,000 submitted in the previous quarter. By the end of March, there were more than 356,000 I-90 applications still pending up from 265,000 just three months earlier.
This isn't the first time USCIS has struggled with fluctuating processing times. In FY2024, the agency had dramatically improved processing, bringing the average down to 1.1 months from 9.1 months in 2023. In 2022, the average was 1.2 months, while it stood at 5.2 months in 2021.
Interestingly, USCIS announced in September 2024 that green cards would remain valid for 36 months beyond the listed expiration date for lawful permanent residents who had filed for renewal.
ALSO READ| Marrying for Green Card? Here's what USCIS warns could happen
'These receipt notices can be presented with an expired Green Card as evidence of continued status and employment authorization. This extension is expected to help applicants who experience longer processing times, because they will receive proof of lawful permanent resident status as they await their renewed Green Card,' USCIS noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
7 Years in the USA = Green Card? अमेरिका में नया Immigration Bill कर सकता है 11 Million लोगों को Legalize!
नेहा उपाध्याय Authored by: • नेहा उपाध्याय Contributed by: | Navbharat Times• 26 Jul 2025, 5:30 pm 7 Years in the USA = Green Card? अमेरिका में नया Immigration Bill कर सकता है 11 Million लोगों को Legalize!
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Born in the US but not American? USCIS's plan to restrict birthright citizenship puts student families at risk
USCIS plans to implement Donald Trump's Executive Order to end automatic birthright citizenship to children born in the US. A sweeping new executive order by President Donald Trump aims to end automatic birthright citizenship for most children born in the United States, sparking intense debate and legal uncertainty. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has now drafted an implementation plan that, if enforced, would deny automatic citizenship to babies born to non-citizen parents, including those in the US on temporary visas such as H-1B, H-4, F-1, or B-1. For international students and families pursuing education or professional careers in the US, this change could disrupt long-term goals. With court battles ahead, those on student and work visas now face fresh anxieties, not just about their own immigration pathways, but about the future legal status of children born on American soil. What the executive order changes Trump's executive order, signed on January 20, directs that only children born to US citizens or lawful permanent residents (green card holders) will automatically receive American citizenship. If both parents are on temporary or non-immigrant visas—whether student, worker, tourist, or undocumented, their US-born children would not be granted citizenship at birth. Instead, such children would inherit the immigration status of their mother, a major departure from the longstanding guarantee of birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, in place since 1868. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Japanese AI invention allows you to speak 68 languages instantly. The idea? Genius. Enence 2.0 Undo How this affects student and professional families International students from across the globe come to the US on F-1 visas for higher education, often followed by work opportunities through Optional Practical Training (OPT) or H-1B visas. Many hope to build careers and families while navigating a complex immigration system. Under the proposed policy, if an international student or temporary worker gives birth in the US, the child would no longer receive citizenship by birth. This undermines assumptions many families made when investing in US education or employment, and raises doubts about the long-term benefits of living legally in the country. The risk of statelessness and legal battles The new rule may create a class of US-born children who are neither citizens of the United States nor guaranteed nationality by their parents' home countries, especially in nations where citizenship is not automatically granted by descent. These children could become effectively stateless, lacking access to basic legal protections, social services, and future mobility. This risk disproportionately affects students and professionals from countries with complex or restrictive citizenship laws, creating deep anxiety among families planning to start a life while studying or working in the US. Currently, courts have blocked the executive order through preliminary injunctions. However, USCIS has laid out an implementation roadmap for if and when those injunctions are lifted. Legal scholars widely believe the order violates the Fourteenth Amendment, but recent US Supreme Court decisions have made it harder for federal judges to block nationwide enforcement. This means the order could be implemented in some states while others continue to recognize birthright citizenship, leading to confusing outcomes where a child's rights may depend on the state in which they are born. Impact on education, healthcare, and future rights Without US citizenship, children born to international students or skilled workers may be ineligible for essential services, including public education, in-state tuition, financial aid, healthcare, and even the legal right to work upon reaching adulthood. Schools, hospitals, and universities may be forced to verify parental immigration status before enrolling or treating children, effectively turning educational and healthcare institutions into enforcement zones. This could erode trust and deter prospective international applicants from choosing the US for study or work. Changing the meaning of the American Dream Supporters argue the policy will reduce 'birth tourism' and discourage undocumented migration. But critics say it challenges the very foundation of the American promise, that the US is a place where anyone, regardless of origin, can build a future based on fairness and opportunity. For thousands of law-abiding students and professionals who came to the US legally and contribute to its academic and tech ecosystems, this move could send a discouraging message: that even if you follow the rules, your children may not belong. What happens next The order's fate lies in the courts, but the social and psychological impact has already begun. Universities, legal advocates, and immigrant communities are calling for clarity, urging the federal government to protect the interests of international families who have invested years and resources into building futures in the US Advisors recommend international students and workers stay informed, seek legal guidance, and consider backup options such as understanding dual citizenship laws or exploring countries with more stable immigration policies. USCIS's plan to implement Trump's birthright citizenship order marks a major shift in US immigration policy. If enforced, it would impact thousands of student families and skilled professionals, creating legal ambiguity and raising concerns about equal rights, long-term residency, and national identity. As lawsuits proceed and policies evolve, the future of many international families in the US remains precarious. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
US visa interview rules set to get tougher from 2 September; here's how it may impact your visa application
The US Department of State has made new changes to strengthen security in its non-immigrant visa interview waiver programme, which will be implemented from 2 September, 2025, according to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) press release. It will lead to delays in appointments, Houston-based immigration attorney Steven Brown stated. The non-immigrant visa categories consist of tourist and business visas (B-1/B-2), student visas (F and M), work visas (H-1B), and exchange visas (J). Diplomatic visas come under categories A and G. The new guidelines stated the majority of non-immigrant visa applicants, comprising those under the age of 14 and over the age of 79 will be required to undergo compulsory consular interviews. However, exceptions apply to certain categories, including A-1, A-2, C-3 (excluding attendants of officials), G-1 to G-4, NATO-1 to NATO-6, TECRO E-1, and individuals holding diplomatic or official visas. A notable exception applies to individuals renewing a full-validity B-1, B-2, B1/B2 visa, or a Mexican Border Crossing Card/Foil, provided the renewal is done within 12 months of the previous visa's expiration. To qualify, the applicant must have been at least 18 years old at the time the original visa was issued and must apply from their country of nationality or residence. However, they must also have no prior visa refusals (unless overturned or waived) and no apparent or potential ineligibility. Even in such cases, consular officers retain broad discretion to require an interview on a case-by-case basis. Even when interview waivers are available, consular officers still have the discretion to require an interview on a case-by-case basis for any reason. This policy overrides the Interview Waiver update issued on 18 February, 2025. According to USCIS, 'consular officers may still require in-person interviews on a case-by-case basis for any reason. Applicants should check embassy and consulate websites for more detailed information about visa application requirements and procedures, and to learn more about the embassy or consulate's operating status and services.' 'My reading of this is that they are basically getting rid of Dropbox (interview waivers) for most categories. This will lead to longer waits for appointments and is significantly less efficient for renewals of visas. Also requiring interviews for children is patently absurd,' Brown stated on X. Earlier this month, the United States introduced a new $250 Visa Integrity Fee, scheduled to take effect in 2026. This fee, which functions as a security deposit, is pegged to inflation and may be refunded if visa holders fulfil compliance conditions. The fee is part of Trump's wide-ranging immigration reform included in the recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law on 4 July.
