'All state institutions have collapsed'
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani has noted that all state institutions, including the executive, parliament, and judiciary, have collapsed.
"Judiciary is one of the pillars of the state. This pillar now exists in a limbo," the IHC's senior judge said on Tuesday.
The PML-N led coalition government in October last year bulldozed the 26th Constitutional Amendment through parliament, an amendment that introduced sweeping change in the judiciary.
The amendment changed the procedure for appointment of the chief justice of Pakistan while also changing the composition of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), giving the executive more power in the selection and elevation of judges to the superior courts.
The amendment also resulted in the formation of constitutional benches in superior courts together with an increase in the number of judges in the top court. Many of these measures were seen by critics as attempts to control and manage the judiciary by pitting judges against each other.
The IHC judge, who was hearing a petition filed by some candidates seeking directions for the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) not to conduct new Central Superior Services (CSS) exams before announcing results of the previous one, however, said he has not lost hope.
"We are not despondent, though. It is the youth that is going to do something for this country," he added,
FPSC Chairman Lt General (retd) Akhtar Nawaz Satti appeared in the court and stated that he had recently taken chargeon October 9, 2024. He requested the court to ask the candidates to refer back to the FPSC.
"We dismissed the petitioner's request [to postpone exams] because they will still have chances [to reappear in the exam] even after the 2025 exams," he said.
The court noted that the matter was referred to the FPSC to be examined from its perspective. The judge stated that there are 3,761 candidates who appeared in the 2024 exams and are now sitting for the 2025 exams as well.
"A total of 88 exam halls have been booked across the country, and all relevant papers have already been dispatched [for the 2025 exams]," FPSC chief said.
Additional Attorney General Munawar Iqbal Duggal stated that postponing these exams would create confidentiality issues. He said the exams are scheduled to commence on February 15 and that FPSC had the legal authority to conduct the next exam even if the previous results were not yet declared.
The court remarked that if results were not released, exams could continue indefinitely in 2026 and 2027. "Had the results been announced even a week earlier, these petitioners would not be before the court today. If FPSC had stated that they were announcing the results today, the petition would have been disposed of," he added.
In response, the FPSC chairman stated that if he could expedite the process, he would, but it was not feasible. The commission had decided in the larger public interest to conduct the exam on time. He assured the court that the results of the 2024 CSS exams would be announced in the last week of April.
After hearing the arguments, the court reserved its judgment and later dismissed the petition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'No concept of judges' permanent transfer'
The Karachi Bar Association and PTI leader Shoaib Shaheen Advocate have challenged the Supreme Court's order in a case related to transfer of judges to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and a subsequent change in the IHC judges' seniority list. The petitioners have contended that the June 20 verdict of a constitutional bench of the SC has misinterpreted the Constitution and wrongly inferred the concept of a permanent transfer from the Article 200 of the Constitution. Article 200 of the Constitution deals with the transfer of high court judges. It outlines the process for transferring a judge from one high court to another. According to the article, the president can transfer a judge, but only with their consent and after consultation with the chief justice of Pakistan and the chief justices of both high courts involved. The petitioners have contended there is no provision of a permanent transfer of a superior court judge in the Constitution and only the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) is entitled to fill vacant positions in high courts and the apex court. The petitions also argue that the president also does not have the authority to determine seniority of judges and urged the SC to revisit its order and declare it null and void. In a majority verdict, an SC constitutional bench on June 20 upheld the transfer of three provincial high court judges to the IHC, noting that these transfers could not be declared new appointments. However, the majority judges partially remanded the matter to the President of Pakistan to determine the seniority of the transferred judges after examining and vetting their service record "as soon as possible, including the question of whether the transfer is on a permanent or temporary basis". Later on June 29, President Asif Ali Zardari named Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar as the senior-most judge of the IHC, following a determination of judicial seniority.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
PTI banishes five MNAs from party
Listen to article The opposition, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), on Sunday expelled five members of the National Assembly for going against the party line during the vote on the 26th Constitutional Amendment in the National Assembly in October last month. According to separate notifications issued by PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, the expelled members are Aurangzeb Khichi, Zahoor Hussain Qureshi, Usman Ali, Mubarak Zeb and Ilyas Chaudhry. These independent lawmakers were supported by the PTI in the 2024 general elections. The similarly-worded notifications stated that these lawmakers violated the party instructions and voted in favour of the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill on October 21, 2024, while the party in a meeting had unanimously decided to oppose the amendment. "You are hereby declared to have violated your commitment, oath and loyalty to the Party. You have acted contrary to the instructions of the Party as you voted in favor of 26th Constitutional (Amendment) Bill 2024," said one of five notifications, sent to Qureshi. "And by [that] conduct [you] have joined another Parliamentary Party in the National Assembly. You are therefore expelled from the Party (PTI) forthwith. Needless to add that you also stand disqualified on account of the aforesaid conduct," it added. The 26th Amendment was passed with a two-thirds majority. Among the opposition parties, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) had supported the government after several rounds of negotiations. The PTI however, chose to oppose the bill. Yet the government was able to get five members on its side. Soon after the bill was passed, the PTI decided to take legal action against its lawmakers who had violated the party policy. At that time, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif had said that these lawmakers had been elected as independents; therefore, they were not bound by any party decision. The PTI's notifications on Sunday said that notices were issued to the dissenting National Assembly members on November 5, 2024 to show cause why they "should not be declared to have defected" from the party, but "you did not respond to the notice". The notifications also stated that these members deserved of disqualification from being elected representatives for joining another party. The PTI chairman demanded of the National Assembly speaker to disqualify that these members. Among the expelled members Khichi was elected to the National Assembly from NA-159 Vehari-IV; Qureshi from NA-146 Khanewal-III; Usman Ali from NA.142, Sahiwal-II; Muhammad Ilyas Choudhry from NA.62, Gujrat-I and Mubarak Zeb from NA.8, Bajaur.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
PTI expels five MNAs for backing 26th amendment, seeks disqualification
Listen to article The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Sunday formally expelled five of its National Assembly members for defying party directions and voting in favour of the 26th Constitutional Amendment — a move the party termed a 'flagrant breach of oath, loyalty, and parliamentary discipline.' The expulsions were confirmed through formal notifications issued by PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan. The lawmakers — Aurangzeb Khan Khichi, Zahoor Elahi, Usman Ali, Mubarak Zeb, and Muhammad Ilyas Chaudhry — were elected on PTI tickets and, according to the party, had pledged to uphold its parliamentary stance. An official PTI statement said the party's parliamentary meeting on September 2, 2024, had unanimously decided to oppose the 26th Amendment at all stages. These instructions were submitted to the Speaker of the National Assembly on September 5 for record. However, on October 21, the five lawmakers voted in favour of the bill, enabling the government to pass it with 225 votes — just one above the required 224. Following the vote, PTI issued show-cause notices to the MNAs on November 5, asking why they should not be disqualified for defection and breach of party discipline under Articles 62 and 63. A hearing committee was formed but none of the lawmakers responded or appeared. The party further alleged that the MNAs had joined another parliamentary party by taking seats on the treasury benches and attending its meetings, which it says constitutes formal defection under constitutional provisions. Read More: Gandapur says Imran Khan ready for talks with decision-makers 'You are hereby declared to have violated your commitment, oath, and loyalty to the party,' the notification read. 'You voted in favour of the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2024, and by conduct have joined another parliamentary party. You are therefore expelled from the party forthwith.' The PTI leadership has also requested the Election Commission of Pakistan to initiate proceedings for the disqualification of the five MNAs under Article 63A of the Constitution. The five MNAs had voted in favour of the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill, which enabled the government to secure 225 votes — one above the 224 required for passage. The 26th Amendment introduced significant changes to Pakistan's judicial structure, including revisions to the process of judicial appointments, the tenure of the Chief Justice, and the composition of the Judicial Commission.
