Musk open to merger between his company xAI and Apple
Meanwhile, Apple has struggled to bring its own AI programs to consumers, notably delaying improvements to the Siri voice assistant until 2026. Venture capitalists started openly speculating this month that Musk and Apple make the perfect power couple in the AI world, with xAI bringing Grok to even more people using iPhones through this proposed partnership. On the All-In Podcast, investor Gavin Baker called xAI's Grok4 'the best product' in terms of AI chatbots right now, but added that 'the best product doesn't always win in technology.' 'I think there is solid industrial logic for a partnership. You could have Apple Grok, Safe Grok, whatever you want to call it,' said Baker, the Chief Investment Officer of Atreides Management LP, in a video posted to X on July 19. Musk quickly replied to the comments, saying 'Interesting idea.'
The billionaire then added 'I hope so!' while responding to another post suggesting that Apple partnering with xAI was a better option than competitors like Anthropic. A partnership between the two companies could integrate xAI's Grok chatbot into Apple's devices, such as iPhones, iPads, and Macs, potentially replacing or augmenting Siri. A relationship between Musk's AI team and the $3.1 trillion Apple could also lead to smarter, more accurate AI assistants, addressing Apple's ongoing issues with AI development.
Grok launched in 2023 as Musk's alternative to other chatbot which had sparked controversy for provided allegedly biased answers and citing information that had been made up. xAI has said that Grok is "designed to answer questions with a bit of wit," and the program has generally drawn widespread praise for its quick and accurate answers to prompts. Just just weeks ago, however, Grok 4 was engulfed in controversy for repeating far-right hate speech and white nationalist talking points about politics, race, and recent news events.
Multiple users reported on July 8 and July 9 that Grok echoed anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, including claims that Jewish people controlled Hollywood, promoted hatred toward White people, and should be imprisoned in camps. In a post on X, xAI replied to these concerns: 'We are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts. Since being made aware of the content, xAI has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X,' the company added.
Baker added that the deal Musk has been infatuated with would benefit xAI's reach significantly as well, since OpenAI's ChatGPT is currently used by nearly 800 million weekly active users, according to Demandsage. 'There's been a lot of news about Apple thinking about buying Perplexity or Mistral, but that's just a Band-Aid. Those companies don't get Apple what they need,' Baker said. To the investor's point, Perplexity AI is a search-engine-style AI company known for information retrieval and fact-finding tasks. It's currently valued at $18 billion. Mistral AI is a French AI firm valued at roughly $6.2 billion that's focused on easy-to-use, open-source language models. They've worked with partners like Cisco to help with tasks like research and automation.
On the other hand, xAI and its Grok chatbot stand out with a current valuation of up to $200 billion and a distribution reaching 35.1 million monthly active users. Baker explained that 'xAI and Apple are natural partners,' especially after OpenAI made a multi-billion-dollar deal to create new devices that use their AI technology without relying on the iPhone. In May, OpenAI bought former Apple designer Jony Ive's hardware startup for a reported $6.5 billion.
That deal brought Ive on as the AI company's new creative head, with the vision of building specialized gadgets that can use generative AI and ChatGPT without needing a smartphone or computer. While a deal between xAI and Apple is still only speculation, Musk recently turned heads by announcing that xAI was working on a new project called 'Baby Grok' which would be a new app designed to provide 'kid-friendly content.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Restaurant experts reveal the biggest red flags that should send you RUNNING toward the exit?
With the average cost of dining out in America continuing to rise, getting value for the experience is more important than ever. Currently, a typical person will spend around $166 a month at restaurants, according to the Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts. Between 2019 and 2024, that amount soared by 14 percent, however standards have not always risen in keeping with the trend. At its best, restaurant dining entails thoughtful service, top-notch food, and a welcoming environment. But at its worst, going out to eat means being insulted by staff, forgotten about in a noisy restaurant, and or even finding a hair in your undercooked chicken. Often trying out new restaurants can feel like a shot in the dark. It's hard to tell if your experience will be serene and fulfilling or off-putting and difficult. Fortunately, chefs, restaurant experts, and critics have offered their two cents when it comes to restaurant red flags. Whether you're reading reviews online or simply stumble in the door, these eight signs could help you identify a five-star experience from a total dumpster fire. No visible management Salar Sheik told Fox News Digital, that if a restaurant has no visible management team, it may be a good indicator to turn around. 'Great managers are visible,' said the LA-based restaurant consultant. 'They touch tables, support staff and keep the energy up.' A manager isn't just employed to make sure a restaurant runs smoothly behind the scenes. Part of their job is to ensure guest satisfaction. Often, they greet customers, check on tables, and even assist servers. 'If you can't tell who's in charge, it might be because no one is,' said Sheik. The manager should be visible and accessible. The staff argues with you Another indicator that a restaurant may not be worth your time is rude or argumentative staff. That could be a mean that service standards in the restaurant are too low. Candy Hom, an Atlanta based Food-critic and chef, told All Recipes 'If they mess something up, they should try to make it up to you.' For example, Hom attended a restaurant with a group of friends and the waiter split the check five ways, instead of six as they requested. She said the server 'blamed the fact that he usually has tables of five and not six'. 'Even if the food was good, the experience was ruined,' she explained. It's empty A restaurant that's empty during lunch or dinner rushes should raise some alarms. In some cases new businesses may have trouble bringing in clientele during meal time, but Sheik said that most of the time there should be at least a few other patrons 'Consistently empty restaurants often point to a loss of community trust - whether from poor service, declining quality or mismanagement,' according to Sheik. Slow service can also mean that ingredients sit for longer, making the food less fresh. It's full of influencers On the flip side, a crowded restaurant isn't always a good thing either. Sheik said, 'If it feels more like a photo shoot than a place to break bread, odds are the experience is built more for the 'gram than the guest.' Nowadays many restaurants in major cities host internet personalities in exchange for having their food featured online. Attending a restaurant where that's frequently the case can result in an inauthentic experience. Hom added, 'When every post or review is from a hosted experience, I can't trust that.' Staff are treated poorly If you notice poorly treated staff or low team morale, it may be best to take your business elsewhere. Nadia Chaudhury, the regional editor of Eater for the northeast, told All Recipes: 'If I hear and read about staffers alleging not-great work environments and management issues over and over again from trusted sources … I take those to heart.' Scoping out your restaurant online beforehand could key you in to some of these problems. It's dirty Restaurant cleanliness is an important aspect of the overall experience. If tables, chairs, menus or even the bathroom aren't clean, that could indicate abysmal sanitary standards. 'If those aren't clean, I guarantee you the kitchen's not being held to a higher standard,' said Sheik. 'If the team can't manage that, they're likely failing at much more complex things, too.' Servers don't know the menu Poor training is a great indicator for service value. Sheik said that servers should always be certain of what the restaurant offers. 'If your server has to guess ingredients or check on every question, it signals poor training and a lack of pride in the product,' said Sheik. Menu knowledge can even be life or death. Accurate allergen information is crucial, not only in enhancing the restaurant experience, but also in ensuring the safety of patrons. You're being aggressively upsold Of course, restaurants are supposed to sell you on their offerings. Whether that be the happy hour special or menu item of the day. However, Sheik said if it feels inauthentic or incessant, it may be best to take your business elsewhere 'Suggestive selling is part of the job,' he said Sheik. 'But when it feels like a script or desperation, it often means the restaurant is struggling to hit numbers and pushing sales at the cost of genuine hospitality.' Restaurant dining is supposed to be a fun experience. But lack of knowledge of the restaurant industry and naivete can ruin a perfectly good dinner. Thanks to industry experts, customers are well equipped at avoiding the red flags and finding the perfect place for dinner.
BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
Boeing defence workers set to strike in new blow to aviation giant
More than three thousand Boeing defence workers are set to go on strike on Monday, in a fresh blow to the embattled aviation comes after union members at operations in Missouri and Illinois, who build F-15 fighter jets and other military aircraft, voted against the firm's latest offer over pay, work schedules and pensions."We're disappointed our employees rejected an offer that featured 40% average wage growth", Dan Gillian, who is the vice president of Boeing's Air Dominance unit, said in a is struggling to turn itself around after a series of problems, including safety issues and a damaging seven-week walkout by passenger plane workers last year. The planned walkout is being led by a local branch of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) based in St Louis, where Boeing's defence manufacturing hub is located."Members have spoken loud and clear, they deserve a contract that reflects their skill, dedication, and the critical role they play in our nation's defence," Tom Boelling, a top official from the union, said in a statement."We stand shoulder to shoulder with these working families as they fight for fairness and respect on the job."It would be the first strike at Boeing's defence business since 1996, when work stopped for more than three is one of America's largest unions, representing roughly 600,000 members in the aerospace, defence, shipbuilding and manufacturing has been hit by a series of crises in recent years, including two fatal crashes and a dramatic mid-air blowout of a piece of one of its 2018, a Boeing 737 crashed after taking off from Jakarta, Indonesia, killing all 189 people on board. A few months later, another 157 people died when a Boeing plane crashed shortly after take-off in in 2024, a panel fitted over an unused emergency exit of a Boeing 737 Max came off mid-flight.A strike last year by about 30,000 workers at its passenger jet business cost Boeing billions of dollars, adding to the form's financial company delivered just 348 aircraft to its customers last year, its lowest output since the pandemic.
Daily Mirror
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Listed: Ten most 'AI exposed' jobs AND the roles humans still dominate
The jobs market is already cooling, with companies scaling back on hiring and increasing lay-offs in response to the Chancellor's National Insurance hike and a rise in the minimum wage. One in ten graduates have already altered their career plans due to fears that artificial intelligence (AI) will jeopardise their job prospects. University leavers aiming for careers in graphic design, coding, film and art are particularly worried about the impact of AI, with many fearing the rapidly evolving technology could make their jobs redundant. These concerns arise as Britain's job market continues to cool, with firms cutting back on recruitment and increasing redundancies in response to the Chancellor's National Insurance increase and a rise in the minimum wage. According to a survey of 4,072 individuals by university and career advisers Prospects, 10 percent stated they had changed their career plans because of AI, a figure that rises to 11 percent among graduates. The primary reason given was worry that their chosen jobs could become redundant. Opportunities in the creative industries were highlighted as being particularly at risk from AI's rapid progression. Risks and opportunities Chris Rea from Prospects noted that while many graduates are avoiding certain careers due to AI, others are exploring new industries because of the opportunities the technology offers, reports the Express. Jeremy Swan, from the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services, said technological advances are forcing graduates to seek roles where they cannot be easily substituted by AI. He stated: "I think it's about re-framing people's thinking, so that they can see there are opportunities out there that look slightly different than what they're used to." Mr Swan said AI has left many students and graduates feeling "really uncertain about where they stand". Data from job search platform Adzuna reveals entry-level positions have plummeted by 32 percent since Chat GPT launched in November 2022. Mr Swan added: "There's a lot of uncertainty that's come off the back of AI, people worrying how it's going to affect their chosen career paths, and we would just say this is where decent career support matters more than ever." Jobs least exposed to AI: Logging equipment operators. Motorboat operators. Orderlies. Floor sanders and finishers. Pile driver operators. Rail-track laying and maintenance equipment. Foundry moulders and coremakers. Water treatment plant and system operators. Bridge and lock tenders. Dredge operators. Jobs most exposed to AI: Interpreters and translators. Historians. Passenger attendants. Sales representatives of services. Writers and authors. Customer service representatives. CNC tool programmers. Telephone operators. Ticket agents and travel clerks. Broadcast announcers and radio DJs. Recruitment has declined LinkedIn data reveals that UK hiring dropped by 6.7 percent in June compared to May, following a 3.9 percent increase the previous month. Official statistics also show that unemployment rose to a four-year high of 4.7 percent in the three months leading up to May. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey recently suggested that larger interest rate cuts may be necessary if the jobs market continues to slow down. City traders predict rates could be reduced from 4.25 percent to 4 percent at Thursday's Monetary Policy Committee meeting. University graduates are now facing an increasingly challenging job market as employers reduce graduate recruitment. Data from Adzuna shows that graduate job listings have plummeted by nearly 23 percent in the year to April as rising taxes lead businesses to cut back on entry-level hiring. Meanwhile, increases to the national living wage mean many graduate schemes now only offer salaries equivalent to the minimum wage, which is currently £12.21 per hour or £25,500 a year for full-time workers. Major employer KPMG has reduced its recruitment scheme, hiring just 942 graduates and school leavers last year compared with 1,399 in 2023. The company expects to hire around 1,000 this year. The competition for entry-level roles is more intense than ever, leading many graduates to utilise AI for assistance with job applications. According to a survey by Prospects, 43 percent have used AI to edit or draft a cover letter, while 26 percent have employed it for answering questions on application forms. However, Mr Swan suspects that students might be under-reporting their use of AI. He advised students to ensure they use "these tools in an ethical way", even if AI can provide a starting point for CVs or cover letters.
