Microsoft & Meta Beat, Copper Collapses; Banks Unveil Big Buybacks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bad news flurry, IPO market, crypto dive: Market takeaways
Yahoo Finance Markets and Data Editor Jared Blikre joins Asking for a Trend with Josh Lipton goes over the main themes from the trading day: the flurry of bad news with tariffs and jobs data, the return of the initial public offering (IPO) market with Figma's (FIG) public debut, and crypto's risk-market dive. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. Related videos Europe's most expensive city revealed, as living costs near £3,500 per month Britain's gas imports surge as Miliband abandons North Sea How much do you need in an ISA to target a £5,000 monthly passive income? My Legal & General shares are suddenly being shorted! Should I worry? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lamborghini's new $380K hybrid supercar redefines luxury tech
Lamborghini's new hybrid supercar, the Temerario, blends electrification with extreme performance — all for just $380,000. Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Pras Subramanian joins Asking for a Trend to share insights from his interview with Lamborghini president and CEO Stephan Winkelman. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. Ultra luxury car maker Lamborghini is out with its new hybrid vehicle with a price tag of $380,000. And our senior Autos reporter Pras Subramanian spoke with the company's president and got to drive the car. Pras, welcome. Yes, yes. The new Lamborghini Tamburario is out, the hybrid supercar. Now, so they've now fully electrified their line with hybrids. You know, Lamborghini was supposed to actually put out an EV pretty soon, but they've sort of had to dial that back a little bit. And, you know, before we got a chance to drive the car, I spoke to CEO Stephan Winkelmann about their EV plans. We've seen a number of companies, including yours, kind of push back the full EV timeline. What's the latest on that? Well, we decided two things after looking into the acceptance curve of battery electric vehicles, which is flattening in comparison to the previous, you know, thoughts of the global automotive industry. And therefore, also for us, it's lowering the expectation in terms of growth rate. So we decided that the follow-up of the Urus PHEV will be again a plug-in hybrid car. And then we postponed our first model a bit to understand when is the right time to come with it. So it still makes some sense for BEV in the luxury world, potentially? Potentially, but we have to see as we said here, we have to come not when the technology is ready, but when the time is ready and when it's going to be successful and when the customers are accepting it. And this is paramount for a company like ours, because we are delivering dreams and not mobility. Yeah, so delivering dreams versus mobility. They're not a mobility company. They're, you know, they're an emotional performance company. So actually, that combined with, you know, the EV story, combined with tariffs, that's been a thing that's been coming up for really expensive cars, you know, how do you handle that? What they've been doing is they've been absorbing a lot of that cost and passing on some of that to their customers. They think it's unfair to pass the whole cost down. So that's part of the sort of business decision there with the company. Then we have the new trade deal, so that's going to help them out. Uh, you know, secondly, I kind of asked about sort of the future of the company and where they kind of see this luxury EV maker, I'm sorry, luxury automaker, where they see themselves. And here's what he had to say. What do you see the next 20 years bring to Lamborghini? Lamborghini is not about volumes, no. It's about how much you earn that you can reinvest in a newest technology for the future. Because the world is more complex, life cycles are shortening, investments are getting higher, technology is evolving faster. So you have to keep up with it and so we have to grow in terms of awareness, image, and to have a solid customer base, which is appreciating our cars also in 20 years from now. And this depends a lot on us if we keep up with the newest technology, but if we continue also to be trendsetters. You know, despite some of these issues with electrification, tariffs, some sort of global uncertainty here with higher rates, things like that, Lamborghini still had first half sales a little bit higher compared to last year, which is more than you can say about a lot of luxury automakers who have been suffering recently. What about the new car? You test drove it. How did it feel? Uh, the new car is simply, I guess, pretty astounding. The predecessor was called the Huracán. This new Tamburario is 1,000, I mean 900 horsepower, almost 1,000 horsepower, right? A V8 that goes to 10,000 RPM, right? But what's really interesting about this car is that it has, it's electrified. So it has two motors in the front, right? That drive each front wheel. So basically when you kind of go around turns, it'll spin the outside wheel faster, kind of move the car around. So you almost feel like you can do anything in this car, right? Like you can go 200 miles an hour, hit the brakes, turn right really hard, and the car will do it. It's kind of like almost like magic, trickery, alien technology, whatever you want to call it. Uh, this car sort of has it all and it's super fast. I will say that because of the turbo technology and the electric motors, it's not as loud as the predecessor was, the V10, howling V10. This engine can get pretty loud, but if you're driving 10,000 RPM at that speed, you shouldn't be on any local roads. Who is, who do they take it on? Who's the rival for this new car? So Lamborghini and Ferrari have been locked in battle for a while now. Ferrari would say we're one of one Lamborghini, they're just, they're not our competition, but in reality, they really are. Uh, you have Aston Martin, right? You have McLaren. You have cars up this level, up this price, performance-wise. I've not driven the Ferrari 296, but I've heard that that car is sort of the pinnacle, and the Tamburario is probably there, if not, maybe surpasses it, I'm not sure. I've got to drive it. Yeah. Next assignment, that's what it is. Thank you, Pras. Related Videos Ford posts Q2 beat, but warns of tariff impact Boeing Q2 earnings preview: Tariffs & Air India crash in focus Labor data: Jobs report preview & immigration policy's impact Trump Gives Mexico 90-Day Reprieve from Tariffs Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Resolute Mining Limited (ASX:RSG) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 77% of the company
Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Resolute Mining implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. A look at the shareholders of Resolute Mining Limited (ASX:RSG) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 77% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Resolute Mining. See our latest analysis for Resolute Mining What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Resolute Mining? Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. We can see that Resolute Mining does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Resolute Mining's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 11% of Resolute Mining shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Helikon Investments Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 6.5% of the stock. We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Resolute Mining The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Resolute Mining Limited. It appears that the board holds about AU$191k worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of AU$1.3b. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. General Public Ownership The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Resolute Mining. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Resolute Mining better, we need to consider many other factors. I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
