Pregnant woman denied health coverage, facing $20K bill to have baby in Manitoba
Nikka Worth has been denied health coverage and is expecting to pay thousands of dollars out of pocket to have her baby in Manitoba. Uploaded June 16, 2025. (Danton Unger/CTV News Winnipeg)
A pregnant woman will have to pay thousands of dollars to have her baby in Manitoba after being denied health coverage and losing an appeal.
Nikka and Andrew Worth are expecting their first child, a baby girl, at the end of the month. However, the pregnancy is being paid for out of pocket after Manitoba Health denied coverage to Nikka.
'We are at the last stretch. I'm nine months pregnant and no matter what – we will be taken care of,' Nikka told CTV News. 'But it's just that we want to fight for what's fair.'
As CTV News first reported, the couple met last year while Nikka was visiting Canada from the Philippines. They fell in love and got married in September. Shortly after, they found out their little family was about to grow.
Read more: 'It doesn't feel right': Pregnant woman denied health coverage over provincial 'grey area'
The problem is Nikka – a Filipino citizen – is currently in Canada on a visitor record – an extended visitor visa that expires in November.
She has been waiting for her permanent residence to be approved. Until it is, Nikka said she's been told she is not eligible for provincial health coverage – despite the fact she's married to a Manitoba resident and the child she's carrying will be a Canadian citizen.
'Canadian health care, I think, is a real point of pride for a lot of Canadians,' said Andrew. 'This has been kind of disillusioning to myself.'
Andrew said what makes the situation even more frustrating, is the fact that there are exceptions in Manitoba's rules. According to the province, the spouse of a work permit holder would be eligible for health coverage, but not the spouse of a Canadian citizen.
The couple took their case to the Manitoba Health Appeal Board, but it was dismissed earlier this month.
'Unfortunately, the specific wording found within the Act… does not allow for health benefits to be extended to the spouse until they are determined to be a 'resident,'' the board said in a decision obtained by CTV News.
CTV News reached out to the Health Minister for comment. A spokesperson from the provincial cabinet communications team responded by email.
'Manitoba provides insurance based on your residency status, which is determined by the federal government,' the email reads, adding if the federal government determines you are a resident, you would be covered by Manitoba.
'Manitoba stipulates that insurance is tied to residency in the Health Services Insurance Act.'
All this means Nikka and Andrew will have to cover the cost of the pregnancy.
They've already spent about $5,000 on prenatal care and ultrasounds. As for the actual delivery, they've been told a single night in hospital will cost nearly $6,000. If there are any complications, a night in the ICU would cost them more than $16,000.
Altogether, in order to bring their baby home, Nikka and Andrew are expecting to pay more than $20,000.
They say there is a silver lining, as they've been told the baby will be covered by Manitoba Health.
To cover the costs, the couple have taken out a line of credit from the bank and launched a GoFundMe.
'We would just have to pay it off like you pay off a car,' Andrew said. 'We're going to have to take on debt to have a child in Canada, which seems almost ludicrous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department expands hours
The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) says the Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department will increase its hours of operation starting Sunday. In a statement sent Saturday afternoon, the SHA said starting June 29, the emergency department will be open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. 'The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) has made progress in stabilizing its physician staffing and is taking a phased approach in resuming SCH ED's full operational hours,' SHA said in the statement. This follows a temporary reduction in hours announced earlier this spring, during which the emergency department operated from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. due to physician availability constraints. Since February, the Saskatoon City Hospital emergency department has operated with reduced hours, with several extensions due to ongoing physician availability challenges. The SHA says this phased approach aims to provide better support across Saskatoon's emergency departments during the summer months, while work continues on the planned addition of 109 acute care beds at Saskatoon City Hospital. The SHA says it remains committed to a full resumption of hours at Saskatoon City Hospital in the coming months.
CTV News
11 hours ago
- CTV News
B.C. nurse suspended 12 months for sexual relationship with client
A B.C. nurse's registration has been suspended for 12 months as discipline for a sexual relationship the worker had with a client, according to the regulatory body. The B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives described the relationship, which happened between July and September of 2023, as 'personal and sexual.' The nurse, who is not named in the consent agreement reached with the college earlier this week due to privacy regulations, 'documented that at the time of the conduct, they suffered from a health condition that was a factor in their conduct,' reads an online summary. 'Intimate' relationships between nurses and clients are prohibited, even if they are consensual, the college said, adding that a breach of professional boundaries can harm the patient. 'The nurse-client relationship is the foundation of nursing practice across all populations and cultures and in all practice settings. It is therapeutic and focuses on the needs of the client. It is based on trust, respect and professional intimacy, and it requires the appropriate use of authority,' the summary reads. According to the college, the nurse agreed to have their registration suspended for 12 months and a six-month ban on working in community nursing. If they return to the job, the nurse will be required to be 'followed by' a counsellor for a year. 'The inquiry committee is satisfied that the terms will address the professional and practice concerns that arose and will protect the public,' the BCCNM wrote.
CTV News
12 hours ago
- CTV News
‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth
Danielle Smith said she welcomes a debate in court after an Alberta judge put a hold on a provincial law that bans doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth on Friday. On her Saturday radio show, Your Province, Your Premier, Danielle Smith said she believed her government's case was solid, measured, evidence-based – and on the side of young patients that Justice Allison Kuntz said faced 'irreparable harm' if she didn't issue a temporary injunction against the law before it fully came into effect. 'The evidence shows that singling out health care for gender diverse youth and making it subject to government control will cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth by reinforcing the discrimination and prejudice they are already subjected to,' Kuntz wrote in the judgment. The law, passed late last year but not fully in effect, would have prevented doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16. 'I think the court was in error,' Smith said. 'That's part of the reason why we're taking it to court. The court had said there will be irreparable harm if the law goes ahead. I feel the reverse. I feel there will be irreparable harm to children who get sterilized at the age of 10 years old – and so we want those kids to have their day in court. 'We want those who were counselled to have sex change operations prematurely who now feel like they weren't protected to be able to be witnesses so we don't make these kinds of mistakes.' Kuntz wrote that denying access to this care not only risks causing youth emotional harm but also exposes them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity. 'Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth,' Kuntz wrote. 'Gender diverse youth will bear the entire burden of that speculation.' Smith said there's a long history of governments making decisions that have caused harm. 'We had a sterilization of those who were committed to mental institutions that we had to do a major payout on,' she said. 'There are Indigenous women who are challenging their sterilization that happened at the hands of doctors that they want to make a criminal code provision on that–we shouldn't be capricious in taking away a person's right to have children. 'So we want to battle this out,' she added.' And the way you do that is you go to the higher levels of court.' Last month, the Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors launched a legal case challenging the constitutionality of the bill, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience. Alberta's other two pieces of transgender legislation — banning transgender women from competing in women's sports and preventing youth under 16 from changing their name or pronouns in the school system without parental consent — have yet to be challenged in court. The education bill also requires parents to opt in for their children to receive lessons in school on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity. 'Demonizing vulnerable kids': Nenshi Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said in a statement that his party was pleased to see the court decision, calling it a 'great day for young Albertans who simply want to live authentically and safely.' 'The court has determined what we already knew that this ban could cause irreparable harm to gender diverse young Albertans,' Nenshi said. 'This was never about doing the right thing: it was always about demonizing vulnerable kids to boost Danielle Smith's political fortunes.' LGBTQ+ advocacy groups Egale Canada and the Skipping Stone Foundation took the case to court, and in a statement Egale said the decision was a 'historic win.' Also listed as applicants in the case are five transgender youth who will be directly affected. Egale's legal director Bennett Jensen said Friday that the decision was a 'huge relief' for the youth involved. '(The legislation) does not solve any real issues in the medical system,' Jensen said in an interview. 'It simply creates them and targets an already very vulnerable, small group of young people with further discrimination, and that's what the judge found.' Despite the Friday decision, Smith expressed confidence moving forward. 'We actually think we've got a very solid case,' she said. 'We think we've been measured, we think we've been evidence-based, and we think we're on the side of kids. 'So we want to see how long that process will play out, but we think it's really important for these issues to be debated in court.' With files from The Canadian Press and Aaron Sousa
