
MUDA Case: SC Ruling Brings Relief For Siddaramaiah Amid Power-Sharing Dispute With Shivakumar
The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Karnataka High Court's ruling, which quashed the ED's plea to issue notices and summon Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's wife BM Parvathi in the MUDA land allotment case, has brought temporary legal relief and fresh political momentum.
For Siddaramaiah, the timing could not have been more strategic. The pressure from his deputy DK Shivakumar's camp to honour an 'unwritten" power-sharing formula has been intense.
The Supreme Court order, which criticised the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for being used in political battles, has landed squarely in Siddaramaiah's favour, strengthening his position just when his hold over the chief minister's chair was being questioned.
'This is a shot in the arm. The timing couldn't be better," said a close aide of Siddaramaiah, as talk of a mid-term transfer of power to Shivakumar resurfaced in party circles.
At the heart of the controversy is the decision to allot 14 sites worth Rs 56 crore to BM Parvathi as compensation for land inherited from her family and acquired by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Although this decision was made during the BJP's tenure, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India flagged procedural irregularities, opening the door for political attacks.
The issue escalated when the ED entered the scene, summoning Parvathi and minister Byrathi Suresh under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). This brought the fight to the chief minister's doorstep, marking the first time a member of his family was directly in the spotlight.
For someone who has built his reputation on a clean image without corruption charges, the MUDA case damaged his image. Even within the Congress, there were murmurs about whether he had slipped.
The Supreme Court, however, firmly dismissed the ED's appeal while the Chief Justice of India (CJI) made a blunt remark: 'Let political battles be fought amongst the electorate. Why are you being used for it?"
Siddaramaiah called it the 'slap of justice" on the face of the BJP and accused the Centre of engineering a political vendetta. The emotional tone of his response, that the case caused 'immense mental distress" to his family, was also politically calculated.
He is once again positioning himself as the Congress CM who can stare down the BJP. A senior Congress leader, on condition of anonymity, said: 'He's the only one who can look Modi in the eye and say what he wants. The CBI and ED can't touch him as he has remained non-corrupt, and this verdict reinforces that image. He'll use this to raise his profile in the state as well as nationally."
In Delhi, the messaging has been equally clear. At the recent Congress OBC Advisory Council meeting in Bengaluru, Siddaramaiah not only presided but did so with the weight of someone not planning to exit.
Party chief Mallikarjun Kharge and senior Congress leaders pronounced Siddaramaiah as the CM, while insiders said that he made it clear to the high command, during the closed-door meetings, that he will abide by their decision but hopes to finish his five-year term.
The Shivakumar factor, however, remains unresolved. What will be the stance when the high command asks Siddaramaiah to hand over the reins to his current deputy?
At a Sadhana Samavesha event in Mysuru, Siddaramaiah's refusal to even name his deputy on stage raised eyebrows and confirmed what many have suspected. When reminded by a party worker to include Shivakumar's name in his speech, he said: 'DK Shivakumar is in Bengaluru and not on stage. We only welcome those present here. We cannot extend greetings to someone sitting at home."
It wasn't just irritation. It was a signal. With pressure building from Shivakumar's supporters and talk of rotation agreements resurfacing, Siddaramaiah's very public rebuke made one thing clear: he's not going anywhere.
The MUDA case had put Siddaramaiah in a tight spot, not just as CM, but on a personal level. It also came at a time when he took over the reins as the Congress CM for the second time, particularly as a strong OBC leader alongside Kharge. The fact that it involved his wife, even if the land was later returned, complicated the narrative and the 'clean record" he had spent years cultivating.
'The best part about Siddaramaiah is his moral clarity. He's never wavered from his support for marginalised communities and backward classes. He represents a voice that has long been ignored and maligned," said political analyst Harish Ramaswamy. 'Unlike many OBC leaders, Lalu and others, who've been tainted by scams, Siddaramaiah has largely kept a clean image. That's what gives him the moral strength to challenge even PM Modi."
Ramaswamy said in the MUDA case, too, his wife should have avoided the allotment altogether. 'That is one visible weak spot. When I've met him, even in his own home, it's clear that he keeps his wife away from public life. So, this case came as a surprise. Fourteen sites allotted to her raised questions. It perplexed many," he said.
So, will the Supreme Court ruling help him in the long run? It looks like.
'It definitely will. He's the kind of leader who knows how to use a moment like this. He speaks his mind, takes on the RSS and BJP openly, and nobody can intimidate him, not the CBI, not any agency, as he prides himself on his clean, corruption-free image," he added.
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
muda scam Siddaramaiah
view comments
Location :
Bengaluru, India, India
First Published:
July 22, 2025, 00:58 IST
News politics MUDA Case: SC Ruling Brings Relief For Siddaramaiah Amid Power-Sharing Dispute With Shivakumar
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC flags lapses in SC/ST Act cases; directs DGP to enforce strict compliance with rules
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has flagged the procedural lapses committed by the investigating officers while dealing with complaints of caste discrimination filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and directed the Tamil Nadu DGP to ensure strict compliance with the law. "In several matters relating to complaints made under SC/ST (PoA), procedural lapses are being noticed. The second respondent shall communicate a copy of this order to all SPs who shall ensure strict compliance with the provisions of the SC/ST (PoA) Act and the Rules, particularly Rule 7 relating to the rank of the IO and time-bound filing of the final report,' said Justice P Velmurugan in a recent order. Citing a Supreme Court order, he said when a complaint discloses a cognizable offence under the provisions of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, no preliminary enquiry is permissible either under this Act or the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and the enquiry on the complaint shall be held by an officer in the rank of a DSP and not by an Inspector as provided under section 7 (1) of the Act.


NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rs 295 Crore Spent On PM Modi's Foreign Visits From 2021 To 2024: Centre
New Delhi: Over Rs 67 crore was incurred on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to five countries, including the US and France, in 2025, while the total expenditure figures related to his foreign trips from 2021 till 2024 stood at nearly Rs 295 crore, according to data shared by the government. As per the country-wise and year-wise data, the corresponding figures for PM Modi's visits to Mauritius, Cyprus, Canada and Croatia, and Ghana, Trinidad & Tobago, Argentina, Brazil and Namibia this year were not available. For these visits, the column for 'total expenditure' in the data shared by Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh on Thursday, in his written response to a query by Trinamool Congress MP Derek O'Brien in Rajya Sabha, said -- "Bills under settlement. Total expenditure not yet available." Of these visits, the costliest one was to France, which incurred over Rs 25 crore, while the one PM Modi undertook to the US in June 2023 incurred over Rs 22 crore. On March 20, the ministry had shared data in in Rajya Sabha, according to which nearly Rs 258 crore was incurred on 38 foreign visits of PM Modi between May 2022 and December 2024. In 2025, PM Modi had travelled to France and the US from February 10-13. In Paris, he held bilateral talks with President Emmanuel Macron and attended an AI Summit, while in the US he met and held talks with President Donald Trump, among other engagements. According to the data shared, the country-wise figures for these five countries PM Modi visited in 2025 are -- Rs 25,59,82,902 (France); Rs 16,54,84,302 (US); Rs 4,92,81,208 (Thailand); Rs 4,46,21,690 (Sri Lanka) and Rs 15,54,03,792.47 (Saudi Arabia). The cumulative figures for the preceding four years are -- about Rs 109 crore (2024) spanning 16 countries including Russia, Ukraine, the US and Brazil; nearly 93 crore (2023); Rs 55.82 crore (2022) and about Rs 36 crore (2021). In 2021, PM Modi visited Bangladesh (Rs 1,00,71,288 -- total expenditure); the US (Rs 19,63,27,806); Italy (Rs 6,90,49,376); and the UK (Rs 8,57,41,408) according to data shared by Singh in his response. His trips in 2022 included visits to Germany (Rs 9,44,41,562 -- total expenditure); Denmark (Rs 5,47,46,921); France (Rs 1,95,03,918); Nepal (Rs 80,01,483) and Japan (Rs 8,68,99,372), it said. The details related to public engagements, number of attendees, and expenditure on advertising and broadcasting of engagements were also shared in another set of tabulated data. For PM Modi's 2023 visit to Egypt, the expenditure on advertising and broadcasting was Rs 11.90 lakh, according to the data.


India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Dharmasthala mass-burial case: 5 big questions that raise a stink
Charges of a chilling rape-murder and mass burials have rocked the serene temple town of Dharmasthala in Karnataka. Allegations by a sanitation worker-turned-whistleblower — that he was forced to bury and cremate hundreds of bodies, mostly of women and minors, many showing signs of sexual assault and violence between 1998 and 2014 — have shaken society. The outcry from activists and lawyers has only grown louder, prompting the Karnataka government to order a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the charges of mass burials, in which members of the Dharmasthala temple administration were allegedly whistleblower's complaint to the Dharmasthala police on July 3 sparked public outrage and revived memories of the unresolved 2012 Sowjanya rape-murder case — where, despite years of investigations, court battles, and public outcry, justice was never served. The perpetrator of the crime remains unknown, and the lone accused was eventually the whistleblower's fresh complaint and growing demands for a thorough investigation, including by the Karnataka Women's Commission, the Siddaramaiah-led Karnataka government formed an SIT on July 20, to probe the allegations of mass burials, sexual violence, and systematic cover-ups. However, the BJP, while backing the SIT probe, has alleged a conspiracy."There is no wrongdoing in Dharmasthala. If a SIT wants to investigate, let it be done. There is no problem with that,' said former CM and BJP leader BS Yediyurappa."The state government has formed an SIT, the investigation has to happen at the earliest... We are also aware of the conspiracies behind it [the allegations]. If any attempts are made to destroy the system there keeping this issue, we will think about what to do further," said Karnataka BJP President BY Vijayendra, according to a PTI despite the formation of the SIT and growing public pressure, several critical questions remain unanswered, casting doubt on the renewed allegations, the families' responses, the course of investigations, and the handling of this long-simmering are five key questions that demand clarity.1. HOW HUNDREDS OF BURIALS AND CREMATIONS REMAINED SECRET?The whistleblower claimed hundreds of bodies were buried or burned in secret, often near the Netravathi River, over nearly two town's importance, visited by thousands of pilgrims daily, and frequented by politicians and celebrities, raises scepticism about how such large-scale operations went whistleblower alleged that bodies were disposed of in locations chosen for quick decomposition, but the lack of prior reports or suspicions in a tightly-knit community is of the whistleblower have argued that systemic failures in local law enforcement may have enabled the alleged secrecy, with allegations of police inaction when families reported missing persons. The SIT must investigate how such alleged crimes evaded scrutiny in the high-profile spiritual centre.2. WHY AREN'T MORE FAMILIES OF VICTIMS COMING FORWARD?advertisementThe whistleblower's claim of hundreds of victims suggests a staggering number of families affected. Yet only Sujatha Bhat, whose daughter Ananya disappeared in 2003, has filed complaints since the allegations surfaced earlier this absence of reports from families raises questions about the scale of the claims or potential fear of Karnataka State Commission for Women has noted a history of inadequate police response to missing persons cases, which may have discouraged families of potential SIT's mandate includes probing disappearances, but the lack of proactive family testimonies remains a critical gap and may hurt the investigation.3. WHY DID THE WHISTLEBLOWER EMERGE AFTER A DECADE OF SILENCE?The whistleblower, a former sanitation worker at the Dharmasthala, claimed he fled the town in 2014 after years of threats and trauma, particularly following the alleged assault on a family sudden reappearance now, after a decade in hiding in a neighbouring state, has sparked curiosity as to why now?The whistleblower, in his complaint, cited guilt and a desire for justice for the dead for his appearance. Reports said that along with the complaint, he attached images of skeletal remains he exhumed for his prolonged silence raises questions about his motivations or external influences. The SIT will ovboiusly verify his claims and assess why he chose this moment to come forward after a decade-long silence.4. WHY DIDN'T THESE CLAIMS SURFACE DURING THE 2012-13 SOWJANYA PROTESTS?The 2012 rape and murder of 17-year-old Sowjanya in Dharmasthala, and the State's response, triggered massive protests and allegations of police inaction and interference by influential the whistleblower's claims of mass burials of hundreds did not emerge during that period when the case was rape-murder was also probed by the absence of claims is striking, given the public outrage and demands for justice over a decade ago. The SIT must explore whether systemic cover-ups or fear suppressed such revelations or if the whistleblower's claims lack historical advocates from Karnataka have urged the government to establish a dedicated helpline for victims' families. This might help the families of the alleged victims to come WHY HAVEN'T POLICE BEGUN EXHUMING ALLEGED BODIES?Despite the SIT's formation on July 20, and the whistleblower's offer to identify burial sites, no exhumations have been reported as of police have sought court permission to conduct tests like brain mapping and narco-analysis on the whistleblower, but said that excavating the alleged burial sites would be done at the appropriate time, even though such a step could clearly establish whether the whistleblower's claims hold water or not. And if his claims on the scale of the crime are has raised concerns about the investigation's pace and intent, given that previous probes have been alleged to be superficial, delayed, or influenced by powerful of the whistleblower have flagged potential leaks of the whistleblower's statements, which amplify the possible tampering risks. The SIT must act swiftly to verify the physical evidence and address public scepticism about the investigation's integrity, as that's the only way the allegations can be put to the SIT will be probing the allegations, the nation is awaiting answers to the pressing questions, which will determine whether justice is served or if investigations in Dharmasthala reach a dead end like it did in the Sowjanya rape-murder case.- Ends advertisement