Michelangelo Imperfect At National Gallery Of Denmark: A Bold And Poetic Celebration Of A Renaissance Giant
Michelangelo Imperfect–a breathtaking new Michelangelo Buonarroti exhibition at the Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK) National Gallery of Denmark–is the most comprehensive display of the Renaissance artist's sculptural work in 150 years.
Not since the celebration of the 400th anniversary of Michelangelo's birth in Florence in 1875 has so comprehensive a selection of the artist's sculptural production been gathered in one place.
A true Renaissance man, Michelangelo cemented his legacy as one of the most talented artists in history with his iconic Sistine Chapel fresco at the Vatican and design for the dome of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. His sculptures are known worldwide and SMK presents many of his most celebrated works in Michelangelo Imperfect including a bronze David and Carrara marble Pietà.
If one were to point to a single artist who has contributed fundamentally to the modern perception of art as self-expression in Western culture, it would be the Italian artist Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475–1564). His iconic statue David shows us why. Viewed from the left, the almost five-metre-tall figure is a classically idealised, alert young man ready for battle – but when seen from the other side he changes expression, revealing doubt and hesitation. Michelangelo insisted on reflecting the often conflicted and contradictory inner lives of his figures. He was not the first to do so, but he did it with such consistency that it changed the course of art.
Michelangelo Imperfect, SMK Denmark © Lee Sharrock
Michelangelo's focus was almost exclusively on the human body, especially the male form, in which he found endless scope for expressing thoughts, emotions and tensions. He invariably strove for greatness, reaching for the impossible. Already in his lifetime, he was described as 'il divino' – the divine. But his art also revolves around the imperfect, the unfinished and the fragile; around being in a state of becoming, anxious, wavering and hesitating. This is apparent in his biblical, mythological and allegorical subjects alike.
The exhibition's curator Matthias Wivel says: 'This is the impossible exhibition: You would never be able to gather Michelangelo's original sculptures in one place. But with SMK's collection of historical reproductions in plaster and newly produced facsimiles of the highest quality, we are able to present a perhaps imperfect, yet strikingly complete, overall account of a body of work that changed art forever and remains remarkably poignant today.'
Michelangelo Imperfect, SMK Denmark © Lee Sharrock
The basis for SMK's exhibition is its exquisite collection of historical casts after Michelangelo sculptures in the Royal Cast Collection. Most of these were commissioned and cast in 1895–98 for the then-new National Gallery of Denmark (today SMK). Some were added in the twentieth- and early twenty-first century. The collection encompasses the majority of Michelangelo's most famous sculptures.
In order to get as close as possible to a complete presentation of the Renaissance master's sculptures, SMK complements these historical plaster casts with newly commissioned and -produced 3D-modelled and cast sculptures – so-called facsimiles – produced in Madrid by Factum Foundation, world leaders in the production of facsimiles, reconstructions and rematerialisations of artworks.
This enables SMK to bring together under one roof reproductions of masterpieces that in the original are located in many different places and with only a few exceptions are never moved, either because they are too fragile to travel, too difficult to move, or, quite simply, too culturally significant. The exhibition also includes original sculptural models (maquettes), drawings, and letters from Michelangelo's own hand.
Michelangelo Imperfect, SMK Denmark © Lee Sharrock
Curator, Matthias Wivel comments: 'This will be a unique opportunity to experience Michelangelo's sculptural art as a whole. At the same time, it offers a chance to reflect on the role played by reproduction and copying in art and in our understanding of art. Reproductions have always been part of the way we create and perceive art, but have been somewhat neglected in a museum context in recent times. We see great potential here.'
Michelangelo Imperfect is at SMK Copenhagen until 31st August, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘A Meat Stall With the Holy Family Giving Alms' by Pieter Aertsen: More Than What Meets the Eye
Think of Dutch and Flemish still lifes, and what's likely to come to mind is a tabletop set with fruits and hard cheeses, or a lush bouquet against a blank wall, dotted with a butterfly or two. Not so in Pieter Aertsen's 'A Meat Stall With the Holy Family Giving Alms.' Painted in 1551 and hanging now at the North Carolina Museum of Art, it's considered the founding work of the Northern still-life tradition, but that hallmark picturesqueness is reserved for just a few of the objects at the stand: glistening silver-scaled fish, burnished metals, a pink-veined leaf of chard. Otherwise, the painting brims with the gristly and visceral. Lopped-off pigs' feet sit next to a leg ham, whose cross-sectioned muscle gapes at us. Goopy, translucent fat drips off a cut of suet. The sausages' lumpy casings are unavoidably intestinal. If the picture can claim a focal point, it's the near-life-size cow's head, partly skinned to reveal muscle and veins, and with a searching eye that's trained right on us. To top it all off, Aertsen puts us up close, as if we're customers.
New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
My Mother, the Artist, Discovered at 90
In the past month, I have been selling and giving away paintings. They are not the work of a famous artist or even my own output. No, they are the 400-painting oeuvre of my 90-year-old mother. A literature scholar by profession, she retired long ago from teaching and had painted nearly every day for 30 years due to a fiendish work ethic. But four months ago, she was diagnosed with cancer. I have been helping her with her chemotherapy appointments, among other only-child caretaker duties. For me, there has been a parallel quest, though: to sell or give away some of her oil paintings, many of which are still stored in her apartment. Finding homes for the paintings while she is still with me has taken on a strange urgency — I want her to know where they will dwell. I ask the new owner of each painting to send me a photograph to show her where it hangs. Yet there is more to it than that. As a result of cataloging and handling her work, I understand better what it is that she was doing, painting away, often alone, with only a few people — her fellow amateur artist retiree friends and the like — ever seeing most of what she made. Paintings can be seen as commemorating time or capturing individual subjectivity. While decades of art criticism have put these truisms in question, for my mother painting did give shape to her way of seeing. Why hadn't I paid more attention to her paintings before? Looking anew, I found out things about her that I had never bothered to think about — children, of course, don't tend to dwell on their parents' ambitions or reveries. My guess is that painting made her feel free, outside of time, age, self-criticism, self-doubt and even social class. My mother painted when she was young, and her abstract oils hung in our living room. I didn't think about them very much when I was a kid, although their very '60s color schemes might explain why my favorite color is orange. Then she took a long break, a career to attend to, a child to raise, teaching, with its small pleasures mixed with blue-book-grading drudgery. But after her early retirement from the City University of New York system — the buyouts of the 1990s — she suddenly had time for art classes. She describes it as 'a whole second life.' Some days, she'd paint all day long, sometimes just in the mornings. She painted in the Berkshires with painting friends and in a studio in an old-time artists' building in Union Square, a relic of an art scene in Manhattan that barely exists. All of this — being able to retire early, obtaining a reasonably priced studio to paint in (with excellent light, praise be), even an accessibly priced summer home — was, admittedly, part of an entire system of affordability that has basically vanished from many of our major cities. My mother was generationally lucky in this way. Over the years, my mom was in group exhibitions but never sought out a gallery show. To this day, she has a mixture of self-effacement and pride about her work. Her paintings may not be 'worth' a gallery show, in her mind, but they certainly shouldn't be cast out on the streets. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
7 days ago
- New York Times
This Groundbreaking Artist Vanished. A Decade of Sleuthing Reveals Her Greatness.
In the prime of her art career, before the money dipped too low and the landlord sold her ramshackle Chelsea loft, Mavis Pusey would roam New York City, gauging its ever-changing condition. It was the 1970s and early 1980s, and there was much that compelled her: the ruin and repair, clearance and construction, the dance of buildings and workers and passers-by. She sometimes took photographs to remember the forms that she noticed. The round windows like portholes cut into construction fences. The peculiar slant of some boards on a truck bed. A pile of bricks. Two utility workers on a cherry picker, its mechanical arm raised high. Back in the studio, these references might work themselves into one of her large-scale oil paintings, a drawing in graphite or marker, or an etching, lithograph or silk-screen. They integrated her visual vocabulary — a language of stacked, swirling, tumbling geometric forms, abstract yet abrim with life. To Pusey, who was born in Retreat, Jamaica, in 1928 and came to New York City in 1958 — first to study fashion design, and then fine art — the urban condition, it seems, was bittersweet but always vital, and her art sought its ambivalent essence. 'I love buildings that are being torn down, though I hate to see them torn down,' she said, in one of her rare art talks for which a transcription or tape survives. 'They have a sadness, they have an excitement about them; you will see sadness and yet you see forms and movement and emotion. And because I like them, I fantasize about what happened inside of them.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
