logo
'One Big Beautiful Bill' could end energy tax credits, jobs for thousands of Hoosiers

'One Big Beautiful Bill' could end energy tax credits, jobs for thousands of Hoosiers

Indiana homeowners hoping to take advantage of tax credits on new clean energy upgrades and purchases could lose thousands of dollars in incentives if the U.S. House's federal budget proposal moves forward.
The federal spending plan, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, currently ends homeowner savings on solar panel and battery installations, efficient appliances and other energy-saving home improvements such as new doors and windows, biomass stoves and energy audits.
Indiana's seven Republican representatives voted to approve the bill, with the funding cuts, while the state's two Democrats voted against it.
The cuts are part of the massive House bill that is now in the U.S. Senate waiting for approval. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, introduced the bill into the House and said it, among other things, 'unlocks American energy dominance.'
People working in Indiana's clean energy sector disagree, saying the changes would hurt thousands of Hoosier home owners and workers employed in the solar industry.
Zach Schalk, senior Indiana program director for Solar United Neighbors Action, said the Senate should not approve the bill as it is currently written.
'The bill is a devastating step in the wrong direction,' Schalk said. 'It's going to make the air dirtier and our water less clean. It's going to make Hoosiers sicker and it's just not good policy for anybody.'
There are roughly 4,000 solar jobs in Indiana that could be at risk if the federal government cuts these tax credits, according to data from the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Schalk and Solar United Neighbors work with homeowners interested in going solar. Hoosiers building solar projects at home have been able to take advantage of a 30% tax credit on those purchases. The cost-saving incentive originally was set to end 2034, but the House's proposed budget would end it nearly a decade early this December.
Installing residential solar is not cheap, and projects costs widely vary but can add up to more than $20,000. The Residential Clean Energy Tax Credit provides homeowners certainty by allowing them the ability to plan a budget, Schalk said.
Homeowners who are planning for a solar project that won't be complete until 2026 will find their projects 30% more expensive if the bill is signed into law as written.
'And in Indiana, we don't have meaningful local solar incentives,' Schlak said. 'This federal tax credit is really an essential component for Hoosiers who want to go solar.'
The solar industry already has suffered direct attacks from state policy like the end of net metering, Schlak said, which raised the price of going solar and caused uncertainty in the market.
The loss of the credits also affects homeowners buying battery storage for their residential solar arrays. Battery systems also received a 30% credit, which saved Hoosiers thousands of dollars.
Darrell Boggess, a Bloomington resident, was an early adopter of solar power for his home and said tax credits are a large motivator for these expensive purchases.
'If the tax credits disappear, then the price increases by about a third and most people, including me, are price sensitive,' Boggess said. 'So, if it costs more you just don't think about buying it.'
Boggess not only fitted his home with solar panels, but purchased heat pumps, too. These systems are energy-efficient substitutes for the standard heating and cooling systems found in most homes.
'When it was below zero outside I was getting 90-degree air into the house and the temperature inside stayed constant,' Boggess said.
The solar panels, heat pumps and other upgrades have saved Boggess money. The work also has made him pay closer attention to the amount of energy his home uses.
Household appliances, like Boggess's heat pump, meant to help homeowners reduce energy use and save on bills, could also lose federal tax credits under the House bill.
The Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit provides homeowners up to $3,200 in tax credits for various new appliance purchases and other expenses with a 30% credit.
Rewiring America's CEO Ari Matusiak said about 64,000 households in Indiana used these tax credits in 2023 and saved meaningful amounts of money on their energy bills. Matusiak and Rewiring America work to help homeowners save money by going electric. The organization's research shows that if all Hoosiers upgraded their energy efficiency, Indiana would save about $3 billion each year on energy bills.
Based on Rewiring America's research about a quarter of Indiana's households rely on delivered fuels like propane to heat their homes or use inefficient electric heaters like the type that run along baseboards, Matusiak said. These homes could benefit from energy efficiency tax credits and end up saving around $3,840 every year on their energy bills.
'This is a big deal in terms of the impact of these tax credits on energy costs,' Matusiak said. 'Energy costs are rising for families and nationally they've gone up over 30 percent over last four years.'
This is a strange moment, Matusiak said, because we are having a conversation about energy affordability and the amount of energy on the grid, but these credits help grid capacity and save individuals thousands of dollars on energy bills.
'This is not the thing to be taking aim at if you're worried about those kinds of things and that's why we want to make sure people know about it,' he said.
Cutting the tax credits will not only affect Hoosiers paying utility bills, but the local jobs the credits help support cannot be offshored, Matusiak said.
Bradley Stroot owns Tuttle Heating and AC, a residential HVAC company based in Bloomington. Stroot's company focuses on installing and servicing high efficiency heat pumps in Monroe and the surrounding counties.
The 30% tax credit has made homeowners Stroot worked with much more likely to install these heat pumps, he said. The high efficiency systems often save enough energy over their lifespan that the upfront costs are worth paying. Heating and cooling a home typically makes up about half of the homeowner's energy bill, he said, and even modest increases in efficiency can mean significant savings over time.
'If Congress chooses to get rid of these tax credits it will come at the detriment of both homeowners and small businesses like ours,' Stroot said. 'A significant portion of our business is related to installing and servicing heat pumps, many of which qualify for $2,000 tax credits.'
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is now in the U.S. Senate waiting on any changes before a vote. The Senate Finance Committee released its version of the draft bill June 16, and the committee is still considering cutting the incentives.
Sen. Todd Young's spokesperson Leah Selk said in an email to IndyStar that Young's office didn't have anything to share about the clean energy tax credits. "Senator Young continues to have conversations with his colleagues and stakeholders about improving the House-passed bill and addressing our nation's debt and deficit challenges," Selk wrote.
Sen. Jim Banks did not respond to IndyStar's request for comments.
'(The bill) does not make any sense from our perspective,' Matusiak said. 'It's not a good policy decision, and certainly not good for individuals. People should let their elected officials know that.'
IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Doing its best to dismantle the Constitution': Biden slams Trump administration
'Doing its best to dismantle the Constitution': Biden slams Trump administration

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Doing its best to dismantle the Constitution': Biden slams Trump administration

Former President Joe Biden on Thursday accused President Donald Trump and his administration of trying to "dismantle the constitution." At the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala, Biden said the Trump White House "is doing its best" to go after the nation's core principles and that "they've been doing it all too often with the help of a Congress that's just sitting on the sidelines and enabled by the highest court in the nation." The speech echoed the "Soul of the Nation" theme in Biden's 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns. "In the life of our nation there are moments so stark that they divide all that came before from everything that follows. Moments that force us to confront hard truths about ourselves, our institutions and democracy itself," Biden said in his July 31 speech. "We are, in my view, at such a moment in American history." The former president also swiped at law firms that have made deals with the Trump administration, saying they were "bending to bullies." Biden, who accepted the association's C. Francis Stradford Award, called on lawyers in the room to defend the rule of law. "It means take the client that can't write the big check but needs protecting of basic fundamental rights. It means sign on to that brief that may draw the ire of people in power, but you know its the right thing to do," Biden said. Biden, Obama contrast on Trump responses Biden's remarks came just over a week after former President Barack Obama issued a statement in response to Trump's accusations of treason and the posting of an AI generated video of the 44th President being arrested. The statement, attributed to a spokesperson, called Trump's comments a "ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction" from the ongoing controversy surrounding the Trump administration's handling of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's criminal files. Trump has had his own share of criticism for Biden, both recent and in the past. In April, Trump blamed his predecessor for a poor economy, saying "This is Biden's Stock Market, not Trump's," adding that "we have to get rid of the Biden 'Overhang.'' He's also ordered an investigation of Biden's alleged "cognitive decline." At a 2022 rally in Arizona, Trump said "Biden has utterly humiliated our nation." In the rare post-presidency public appearance Thursday evening, Biden said that "the hard truth" of the Trump administration was that it aimed "to erase fairness, equality, to erase justice itself." Biden's remarks echoed his first post-presidency speech in April, when he accused Trump of "taking a hatchet" to the Social Security Administration.

Trump sharpens sanctions threat on Russia, while admitting it may not work
Trump sharpens sanctions threat on Russia, while admitting it may not work

Boston Globe

time24 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump sharpens sanctions threat on Russia, while admitting it may not work

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Administration officials gave no reasons to believe the latest engagement with Russia would be any more useful. And Trump himself, usually a true believer in the power of economic sanctions to alter the decisions of foreign leaders, admitted for the second time this week that Putin appears to be immune. Advertisement 'I don't know that sanctions bother him,' he said Thursday. Nonetheless, Trump has now executed a 180-degree turn on Russia, at least in tone, in roughly 180 days. He came to office questioning whether Russia was truly the invader of Ukraine, and hinting that the Ukrainians were responsible for their own troubles. His famous blowup with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office in February led him to briefly cut off aid to the Ukrainian military. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared that Ukraine would never join NATO -- a reversal of stated American policy -- and Vice President JD Vance spoke out against arming the Ukrainians. Russia was exempted from most tariffs. Advertisement That has been followed by a series of apparent reversals, with no public acknowledgment from Trump that he is changing strategy. He no longer relies on what he has framed as a deep past relationship with Putin in an effort to win him over. In fact, he has been quite open about his frustration that conversations about ceasefires are usually followed by Russian escalation, often in the pace of drone and missile attacks. 'I think what bothers the president the most is he has these great phone calls where everyone sort of claims yeah, we'd like to see this end, if we could find a way forward,' Rubio said in his Fox interview, 'and then he turns on the news and another city has been bombed, including those far from the front lines.' 'So at some point,' Rubio told his interviewer, Brian Kilmeade of Fox News Radio, 'he's got to make a decision here about what -- how much to continue to engage in an effort to do ceasefires if one of the two sides is not interested.' On Monday, Trump said he would give Russia about 10 to 12 days to end the war before imposing 'sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs,' a reference to sanctions on countries that trade with Russia. But there is reason to question how far Trump will push for full secondary sanctions, which would involve threatening the three countries buying much of Russia's oil and gas: China, India and Turkey. All are key to other American interests, and Trump is likely to need future favors and cooperation from them. And it is hard to imagine that China's president, Xi Jinping, would abandon Putin, his most critical partner in challenging American power. Advertisement Rubio took up the hard choices in his conversation with Kilmeade, arguing that 'the president has a lot of options.' He noted that if the United States could get at Russia's oil sales, it 'is a huge part of their revenue.' For their part, Russian officials who have long been presumed to speak with Putin's blessing have dismissed Trump's threats, portraying him in Russian media as erratic and unpredictable. 'Fifty days, it used to be 24 hours, it used to be 100 days,' Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said a few weeks ago, as Trump kept moving the deadlines. 'We've been through all this.' Democrats say Trump has other options: He could provide direct military aid to Ukraine, as Congress did during the Biden administration. Instead, he has an elaborate plan to sell arms and related technologies to Europe, which will then donate them to Ukraine. Trump once suggested he could end the war in 24 hours simply by negotiating with Putin, man to man. But now, as Trump's frustration over the conflict grows, his threats have raised questions about how much leverage the United States has with Russia -- and whether Trump is willing to use it. This article originally appeared in Advertisement

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield
Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

Hamilton Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump has increased tariffs on Canada to a staggering 35 per cent but a critical carveout is likely to shield most goods from the devastating duties. The White House has said the tariffs won't be applied to goods that are compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, also known as CUSMA. Here's what that means for Canadian companies: What is CUSMA compliance? CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Companies can claim preferential treatment under CUSMA if they meet its rules of origin. While it is different depending on the product, generally it requires a specific amount of the goods be made of products or with labour originating from Canada, Mexico or the United States. About 80 to 90 per cent of Canadian goods might be able to comply with CUSMA's rules of origin, said Michael Dobner, the national leader of economics and policy practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada. Not all exporters have filed the necessary paperwork to avoid the duties. There's been an increase in businesses claiming preferential treatment under CUSMA but it's not clear exactly how much of Canadian exports are currently compliant. Are any industries more at risk? Dobner said there's no specific industry that he expects to be hit the hardest. Certain companies may not be able to source input materials from North America to make their product. That means they would not be able to apply for preferential treatment under CUSMA and will face the 35 per cent tariff. But Dobner said 'it's the minority of the exports of Canada to the U.S.' What's the impact on small and medium-sized businesses? Small and medium-sized businesses may have not applied for CUSMA preferential status before Trump's tariffs because the process can be burdensome for enterprises of that size. Some small and medium-sized businesses might not meet CUSMA rules of origin requirements and don't have the financial flexibility to change their inputs to North American products. Dan Kelly, president and CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said many of these businesses were absorbing some or all of the costs associated with Trump's tariffs under the assumption that there would a resolution coming. Kelly said some small and medium-sized businesses facing the 35 per cent tariff may have to stop selling into the United States. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store