Inside John Lennon and Paul McCartney's partnership and the song that shifted the 'balance of power'
It's the greatest story often told. The Beatles are not just the most successful musical act of all time; they are perhaps the most analyzed, deconstructed and dissected entertainers since the dawn of recorded music.
We think we know everything, but author Ian Leslie proves otherwise. His new book, 'John & Paul: A Love Story in Songs,' is, astonishingly, one of the few to offer a detailed narrative of John Lennon and Paul McCartney's partnership. And it's a revelation. Leslie gives a complete portrait of this remarkably fecund and frequently tortured creative partnership, which began in Liverpool in 1957 and ended in New York City on Dec. 8, 1980, with Lennon's murder.
The basic facts of their first encounter are well known. They met in the summer of 1957 at a garden party in the Liverpool suburb of Woolton, where 17-year-old Lennon was performing with his skiffle band the Quarrymen. McCartney was there to scout Lennon, who was already establishing a reputation as a riveting stage performer. McCartney, 15, ginned up the courage to approach Lennon after his set; their bond was forged over a mutual passion for Little Richard and Elvis Presley's 'Heartbreak Hotel.'
They took to songwriting with alacrity, driven by an urge to create their own material at a time when there was no precedent for a band to write its own songs. 'It entailed the two of them educating each other in the art of songwriting and doing so from scratch,' Leslie writes. 'And there was no division of labor.' One of their first joint compositions was 'Love Me Do,' which was written in 1958, four years before the Beatles recorded it. All of their songs, whether fully realized or half-baked, were dutifully logged by McCartney into an exercise book he had swiped from school.
The early songs that fans know by rote — 'She Loves You' and 'I Want to Hold Your Hand,' among others — came fast, in a mad swirl of ideas tied to a steady work ethic. Lennon and McCartney were so bound together that Leslie writes of a 'double consciousness' whereby the pair alternated vocals on the same song, as in 'A Hard Day's Night,' or twined them together into a first-person confessional like 'If I Fell.' This equipoise held for four very productive years, but there comes a moment in all love stories when one partner gets fidgety and starts to pull away. According to Leslie, that moment came in 1965, when McCartney wrote 'Yesterday' with no input from Lennon.
' 'Yesterday' feels like a shift in the balance of power,' says Leslie. 'From the beginning they were equals, and 'Yesterday' wasn't only just a hit, but the song that more artists covered than any other Beatles song. Paul even sang it onstage by himself when they performed. And it triggered John's insecurities.'
Read more: Sony reveals Beatles cast, will release all four films in April 2028
A further separation occurred in 1967 when Lennon, along with George Harrison and Ringo Starr, moved out of London into the suburbs while McCartney stayed behind, soaking in the beau monde of the city's arts scene. Leslie also writes of Lennon's use of LSD and McCartney's reluctance to follow suit. 'They weren't living near each other anymore and songwriting became more like a job with set hours,' says Leslie. But 'even as they were starting to drift apart, the songs were still astonishing.'
One-upmanship between the partners became a spur for Lennon to try harder, with McCartney responding in kind. When Lennon presented McCartney with 'Strawberry Fields Forever,' a woozy reverie loosely based on his childhood, McCartney wrote his own memory piece, 'Penny Lane.' Lennon wrote 'Imagine' a year after the Beatles broke up and thought he may have finally topped McCartney. 'When he played it for people to get feedback, the question he asked was, 'Is it better than 'Yesterday?,' ' says Leslie.
Yet even as they were rewriting the rules of pop music, the dynamic between the two began to fray, especially after the death of their manager Brian Epstein. When their revenue stream was threatened by Epstein's brother, who wanted to sell 25% of the band's future earnings to a group of merchant bankers, it sparked a multipronged legal battle in which McCartney chose his brother-in-law John L. Eastman to represent him in court proceedings, while the other three cast their lot with the brash Allen Klein. It was the beginning of the end, as has been well documented.
But it wasn't quite over. According to Leslie, there were numerous social occasions when Lennon and McCartney enjoyed each other's company after the Beatles broke up. Leslie writes that it was McCartney who helped broker a rapprochement between Lennon and his estranged wife, Yoko Ono, in 1974 during Lennon's 'Lost Weekend' period in Los Angeles, visiting Lennon at his Santa Monica beach house to deliver the news that Ono wanted to get back together. There was also a strange moment in 1976, when Lorne Michaels offered the Beatles $3,000 to reunite on 'Saturday Night Live.' McCartney happened to be visiting Lennon in New York at the time and they briefly considered shocking the world by hightailing it down to Rockefeller Center, but the idea was abandoned.
'Despite their differences, there was always this feeling with John that perhaps one day they might get together again,' says Leslie. 'John had the greatest admiration for Paul's musicianship and songwriting, and there was always this mutual respect, even when they were fighting in court. There was this unspoken dialogue between them, long after they stopped writing together.'
Get the latest book news, events and more in your inbox every Saturday.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephanie McMahon Shares How Triple H's Health Issues Affected Her Life
Stephanie McMahon revealed that she always had a strong feeling she would lose her husband, Triple H, early in life. In 2021, Triple H had a serious heart issue that nearly took his life. He had to undergo major heart surgery. The health scare ended his wrestling career, and since then, he has taken over as WWE's head of creative and has been leading the company to new heights. Stephanie McMahon opened up to John Cena on her What's Your Story podcast, reflecting on the emotional challenges she faced when Triple H nearly died. 'I almost lost Paul, my husband. And what's weird, and I haven't talked about it, is I always had a feeling that I was gonna lose him early. I just had that feeling. And after we got through everything, that feeling went away.' She explained that the experience felt like fate had changed course, 'It's like a pattern that was supposed to happen changed. And it was such a gift, truly. But then I started going through all this stuff in the company, and I realized there is nothing more important to me than my family, than my husband and my kids. And that's what matters most. And I want to give as much time as I possibly can. I've given everything I possibly have to the business, you know, and my whole life.' The experience helped her recognize what truly matters in life. She said, 'And I wanted to give back to them. And that's when I took that first leave of absence, which didn't last very long. But I knew what mattered. I know what matters now, and I believe that love is what life is all about.' 'And if you can help somebody in any way, I think that is what it's all about. You know, it's about giving back. And, I've had a lot of blessings in my life. I consider myself very blessed and I'm so grateful. And any amount that I can give back, that's what I want to do if I can. I'm not certainly not perfect. I'm sure I've hurt people's feelings along the way. I'm sure I've said something to somebody. But that's what I love about doing this.' Read More: If you use these quotes, please credit the original source and link back to WrestleZone with an h/t for the transcription. The post Stephanie McMahon Shares How Triple H's Health Issues Affected Her Life appeared first on Wrestlezone. Solve the daily Crossword


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Fantastic Four's box office drop proves Marvel is losing average moviegoers
Marvel Studios might be staring down the endgame for its cinematic universe as we know it. With The Fantastic Four: First Steps estimated for a difficult 66-percent box office drop from its respectable opening weekend of $118 million domestic, the comic book movie giant has watched its 2025 strategy lose some of the core audience that cemented the MCU as appointment viewing for years... the average moviegoers. Right now, Marvel most likely won't have one of its films situated within the top five of domestic earners at the box office for the first time since 2011 (excluding 2020, of course), just looking at Box Office Mojo. REVIEW: The Fantastic Four: First Steps plays it too safe to get it just right After running Hollywood for the better part of 15 years and change, Marvel is stuck with all three of 2025 films likely falling behind their peers in domestic box office competition. February's Captain America: Brave New World (roughly $200 million) suffered from lackluster reviews and a convoluted fit into the grander storyline, while May's Thunderbolts* (roughly $190 million) boasted good reviews but lacked marquee characters casual fans knew about. The Fantastic Four: First Steps should outgross both of those films domestically when it's all said and done, but it's unlikely to top the ultimate grosses of films like A Minecraft Movie (roughly $424 million), Lilo & Stitch (roughly $421 million and counting), Jurassic World: Rebirth (roughly $311 million and counting), Superman (roughly $306 million and counting) and even April's surprise horror hit Sinners (roughly $278 million), an original project. New films await. The new Fantastic Four film earned good notices from critics, but the substantial drop shows that, once the big fans got in their viewings during opening weekend, there weren't as many casual moviegoers left waiting to see the new MCU project as in years past. This is the third time this year that a Marvel film has shown an inability to leg out. With probable global hits like Avatar: Fire and Ash, Wicked: For Good and Zootopia 2 on the horizon, a Marvel film will also possibly miss the top 10 globally at the box office (outside of 2020) for the first time since 2011. The Fantastic Four: First Steps isn't doing big business internationally and is already proving to lack legs stateside. Compare this film's lukewarm results to 2024's Deadpool & Wolverine, a monster success with two primarily non-MCU characters that grossed roughly $637 million domestically. Marvel's biggest success since 2021's Spider-Man: No Way Home relied on two characters whose previous films were created by other studios under the generic Marvel banner. Both of those films had rampant nostalgia in their corner to go along with big-name characters. Marvel will next partner with Sony on next July's Spider-Man: Brand New Day, which will reportedly boast Mark Ruffalo's Hulk and Jon Bernthal's Punisher. We're assuming another Tom Holland Spider-Man vehicle will do big business, as will December 2026's Avengers: Doomsday that boasts Robert Downey Jr.'s MCU return. However, even those big projects lean on past glories to wrangle in the casual moviegoers. This year, a new Captain America in Anthony Mackie, a new anti-hero squad and the MCU's first go at the Fantastic Four all failed to reach past the expected audience. At least one of those films (Captain America) got awful reviews, but none of them really hit the zeitgeist in the way, say, James Gunn's Superman did just a couple of weeks before The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Perhaps that's why Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige hinted that a "reset" awaits his cinematic universe. Nostalgia can power your film to success, but even Marvel Studios has a finite amount at its disposal. Qualifying the Downey Jr. days of the MCU as nostalgic is dangerous business, as the original grand finale to that run, Avengers: Endgame, only came out about six years ago. If Marvel's best trick up its sleeve is playing the hits to get regular moviegoers off the couch and into the cinema, the studio is going to run out of that goodwill pretty quickly. Avengers: Doomsday has Downey Jr. going for it, sure, but the film has no narrative payoff on the horizon. The grander MCU storyline post-Endgame has been, to put it mildly, a jumbled mess. The thematic denouement of the Infinity Stones saga was a decade-plus in the making, and the entire globe flocked to see how it concluded. Right now, the next Avengers film seems to be hinging on brand recognition and nostalgia to get audiences to the movies. Unless your wardrobe primarily consists of Marvel t-shirts, can you plot out how this gigantic story has gone lately? While the next Avengers film will partially work at the box office because brand recognition and nostalgia are still perniciously attractive to a wider audience, you just can't expect the same impact of past Avengers films. The payoff just isn't there to nearly the same degree. Downey Jr. will be the big draw; the new characters compiling the expected Avengers ensemble is a strange hodgepodge of film and television successes and failures. The disastrous rollout of so many Disney+ streaming shows particularly diluted the brand and made the grander story nearly impossible to follow. Again, everything that's happened since Thanos turned to dust has been a gigantic shrug. If Doomsday hits and word spreads of a confusing plot, even an Avengers movie with RDJ can wither on the vine. You can't say the Marvel Cinematic Universe is dead because the machine will keep turning out just enough of its die hards to pop on opening weekend. However, Disney will only be willing to fund so much MCU content comparative to years past if these movies keep popping up and evaporating the weekend after release. Big movies need legs. They need to get casual moviegoers interested. For years, Marvel did so with admirable consistency, even if every movie didn't hit a billion dollars globally. Right now, the studio can only rely on yesterday to make tomorrow viable. The new projects aren't working as well as before; the casuals are tuning them out. Unless a project is directly harping on what's been done before, the golden age of Marvel is probably over by now. In order for there to be even the faint chance of a second one, the studio is going to have to reboot this entire ordeal and simplify all of this for general moviegoers. Until it does, expect more of those big second-weekend drops. All financial numbers this piece originate from Box Office Mojo.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tom Holland's Spider-Man Gets an Old School Spidey Suit for ‘Brand New Day'
Sony and Marvel are taking the webslinger back to basics for the upcoming 4th installment At the end of 2021's 'Spider-Man: No Way Home,' in order to save the universe Peter Parker was forced to let anyone who ever knew of his existence forget who he is. It's a literal start-over but with no friends, no money and no more super Spidey suits courtesy of Stark Industries. Fitting then that when Tom Holland returns next year for 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day,' he's getting a brand new Spider-Suit with extremely old school vibes. The actor revealed the new look in a video posted Saturday on Instagram: More from TheWrap Who Plays Galactus in 'The Fantastic Four'? Meet the Man with the Booming Voice Tom Holland's Spider-Man Gets an Old School Spidey Suit for 'Brand New Day' | Video 'Fantastic Four' Sinks 66% From Box Office Opening Weekend Everything New on Prime Video in August And in case you want to just stare for a second at the suit: Now that looks like a suit made on a budget, likely by someone barely paying their way through college as a freelance photographer for New York City's biggest tabloid. Fans of the comics will no doubt recognize those lines and baby blue highlights as clearly modeled on perhaps the defining costume of 'Spider-Man' comics. As originally designed by co-creator Steve Ditko in 1962, the costume featured the instantly iconic red mask with large white eyes rimmed in black, along with red boots, gloves, arm stripes and midsection, and webbing under the arms. But the rest was actually painted black, with blue highlights for shading. Just before he abruptly quit Marvel in 1966, Ditko stopped filling the black in, giving the suit that now-defining bright blue sections. Ditko's replacement as lead artist on 'The Amazing Spider-Man,' John Romita Sr. continued that and eventually removed the underarm webbing too. The result is the classic costume drawn pretty consistently by all 'Spider-Man' artists from the late 1960s until 1984. For example: Clearly, Sony and Marvel at least want us to think they're taking Spider-Man way back to basics. We can't wait to see more. The post Tom Holland's Spider-Man Gets an Old School Spidey Suit for 'Brand New Day' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.