Madhya Pradesh HC Orders NEET UG 2025 Re-Tests Amid Power Outages
(NTA) to conduct re-tests for the NEET Undergraduate (UG) Examination 2025 for students who filed petitions before June 3, claiming their performance was affected by power outages during the initial exams in May.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Justice Subodh Abhyankar directed that the re-test results should solely determine the petitioners' ranks. The court emphasized that counseling scheduled for July 1, 2025, would be subject to the re-test results.
The court's decision came after 119 similar petitions were clubbed together, highlighting disruptions caused by severe thunderstorms in Indore and Ujjain, which led to power outages during the exams.
Petitioners argued that the lack of electricity forced them to take the exam in inadequate lighting conditions, affecting their performance.
Re-test respite only for those who filed plea before June 3
The Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, argued against the maintainability of the petition, citing alternative lighting arrangements provided during the exams.
However, the court found that even if some light was available, it might not have been sufficient for reading and writing, thus justifying the petitioners' claims.
The court clarified that the order applies only to those who filed petitions before June 3, 2025, including those from the Ujjain center and those whose results were declared before the provisional answer key release.
Petitioners who filed after June 3, 2025, are not entitled to re-examination, as they waited for the results before taking action. The court expressed confidence in the NTA's ability to prepare a paper of similar difficulty for the re-test.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC rejects plea to stay NEET-UG 2025 counselling over alleged answer-key error
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition to stay the counselling in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET-UG) 2025 examination due to an alleged error in the answer key released by the National Testing Agency (NTA) last month. The petitioner has scored 565 marks in the NEET-UG 2025 examination, securing an all-India rank of 6,783 and a general category rank of 3,195. (Representative photo) A petition was filed by NEET-UG candidate Shivam Gandhi Raina, pointing out that one of the answers was incorrect as per the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) textbook of Class 11 and has not been rectified by the NTA. Observing that the court will not interfere with a national-level examination that 'involves the careers of thousands of students,' a bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and R. Mahadevan said, 'You are right, there could be multiple answers, despite that, we will not interfere in a national level examination.' Senior advocate R. Balasubramanian, appearing for the candidate, said that it involves the career of a student and that by rectifying the error, he stands to gain five marks that might secure admission to a better medical college. He further pointed out that last year, when similar flaws were brought to the notice of the top court in the answer key of NEET, a committee of experts drawn from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) had examined the alleged errors, and based on their recommendation, results were revised. Also Read: NEET UG 2025: Over 12 lakh candidates qualified for MBBS admission 'This involves the careers of thousands of students... In the other matter last year, the matter was taken up that led to reforms. There were widespread grievances about the discrepancies and shortcomings over the conduct of the examination that the court had to tackle. We cannot tackle individual examinations. We need to tackle larger reforms,' the bench said. The court further observed that the case presented last year involved a number of students, while the present case is an individual grievance. It also informed the petitioner that a similar challenge to the NEET-UG answer key was rejected by the court on Thursday. The petitioner, who scored 565 marks in the NEET-UG 2025 examination—securing an all-India rank of 6,783 and a general category rank of 3,195—stated that he had approached the NTA, after the release of the provisional answer key on June 3, to highlight an error. However, the same error was retained in the final results.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Madras High Court Rejects Plea for NEET UG 2025 Re-Exam, Cites No Major Disruption
The Madras High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the re-conduct of the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET-UG) 2025 for students who appeared at examination centres affected by power cuts due to heavy rainfall on May 4. A Division Bench comprising Justices J. Nisha Banu and M. Jothiraman upheld an earlier ruling by Justice C. Kumarappan, who had on June 6 refused to order a re-examination. The appeal was filed by a group of candidates who claimed that the power disruption during the examination created unfair conditions, putting them at a disadvantage compared to those who wrote the test under normal circumstances. The students argued that the absence of electricity led to a complete breakdown of examination conditions at some centres, and they had been denied an equal opportunity. However, Additional Solicitor General A.R.L. Sundaresan, appearing for the Centre, countered these claims by submitting CCTV footage from the affected centres. He pointed out that the examination halls had large glass windows that allowed ample natural light, and thus the impact of the power outage was minimal. He further stated that many candidates at those centres performed well despite the weather conditions, with one answering 179 out of 180 questions and others answering more than 140 questions, showing that their performance was not hampered. Sundaresan also informed the court that the National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducted the NEET-UG, had formed an independent expert committee to assess the situation. The committee conducted field visits and statistical analysis of the candidates' performance at the affected centres. After a detailed review, the committee found no significant difference in the performance of students affected by the outage compared to others and concluded that a re-exam was not warranted. The High Court accepted the committee's findings and ruled that the judiciary should not interfere with the well-considered decision of the NTA unless it is proven to be arbitrary or unlawful. The Bench emphasised the need to maintain the integrity of large-scale competitive exams and noted that ordering a re-exam for a small group would disturb the entire merit list and affect over 22 lakh candidates who took the test. In its detailed judgment, the court stated, 'It is crucial to uphold the integrity of educational assessments. This court cannot overturn the NTA's decision, which was made after thorough field verification and an expert committee analysis, unless there is evidence of serious flaws or injustice.' With this, the court ruled that the appeal had no merit and should be dismissed, thereby affirming that the NEET-UG 2025 results will remain unchanged for all candidates, including those who appeared at centres affected by the May 4 rain and power outage.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court refuses plea to reconsider NEET-UG results, says lives and careers of students at stake
The Supreme Court on Friday (July 4, 2025) refused a plea by a National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) 2025 exam candidate to 'correct' the final answer key in accordance with the authoritative National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) standards and declare results afresh. A Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and R. Mahadevan dismissed the plea made by Shivam Gandhi Raina, represented by senior advocate R. Balasubramanium and advocate Sriram Parakkat, for an interim stay on the commencement or continuation of the counselling process. Noting that a similar petition to stay the NEET-UG answer key and results had come up and been dismissed a few days back, the apex court said it would not 'interfere in an national exam, putting the lives and careers of thousands of students at risk'. When Mr. Balasubramanium pointed out that the top court had intervened in previous years when answer keys were found to be wrong in multiple choice questions, the Bench noted that a committee of experts had been constituted in the aftermath of such judicial interventions to reform the question system. 'We cannot tackle individual grievances like this,' Justice Narasimha remarked. The petition alleged the violation of Articles 14 and 21A due to errors in the answer key. It said both the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) had failed to 'rectify demonstrably incorrect answers in the provisional as well as the final answer key, despite the submission of well-founded objections supported by authoritative academic material, thereby resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice and an unconstitutional deprivation of marks that critically impact merit and career prospects of the petitioner'. The petition referred to how the provisional answer key had three errors, specifically in questions 52, 136 (Code 47), and 140 (Code 45). 'Without delay on June 4, the petitioner submitted detailed objections with supporting evidence, including NCERT Biology, conclusively establishing that the correct answers had been erroneously marked by the NTA and MCC. However, despite these well-founded objections, the final answer key is published and the result is declared on June 14, retaining the incorrect answer for Q.136 (Code 47),' the petition pointed out.
