EU to roll back Ukraine trade perks
Brussels abolished tariffs and quotas on Ukrainian agricultural produce following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. The bloc adopted special regulations, known as Autonomous Trade Measures (ATMs), aimed at enabling grain and other farm products from Ukraine to reach global markets. However, the influx of cheap Ukrainian produce into Eastern European countries sparked widespread protests among local farmers, particularly in Poland.
The latest move, endorsed by a majority of EU nations at a meeting on Thursday morning, introduces a set of 'transitional measures' that will phase out the ATMs and reimpose certain trade controls.
Some restrictions have already been reintroduced over the past year, targeting commodities such as oats, sugar, and eggs. The selective reinstatements came in response to months of protests in Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and other countries neighboring Ukraine, where farmers said they could no longer compete with tariff-exempt goods.
Politico previously reported, citing a draft act, that the EU was considering replacing ATMs with revised limits under Ukraine's existing trade framework with the bloc, known as the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), rather than extending the measures on a yearly basis.
Commenting on the latest news, the chair of the Ukrainian Parliament's economic affairs committee, Dmitry Natalukha, told Euractiv that halting the ATMs could cost Kiev more than €3 billion ($3.4 billion), which he said is equal to around 70% of the country's projected total economic growth for the current year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU ‘bent at the knee' of Trump
The European Union has effectively 'bent at the knee' before US President Donald Trump, White House official Sebastian Gorka has claimed, after Brussels accepted a sweeping new trade deal that includes steep tariffs and major investment commitments to the US. The deal, finalized on Sunday during a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, imposes a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the US. In addition, Brussels pledged to invest $600 billion into the US economy and purchase $750 billion worth of American energy over three years. No reciprocal tariffs were imposed on US goods. Gorka, who serves as senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council, said the agreement marks a geopolitical victory for Washington. 'Even for somebody like me who has known the president for a decade now, it is hard to believe that the whole European Union bent at the knee of America First and said: '...You got us, President Trump, and we are going to surrender to a 15% tariff,'' Gorka told Newsmax on Monday. 'I'll just be very blunt with you… if you don't understand that President Trump is engineering tectonic shifts in geopolitics that are of a global effect, that will change the world for the next 50 to 100 years, you are just an imbecile,' he added. The agreement has been widely criticized across Europe. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said: 'Donald Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast.' French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou condemned the deal as a 'submission' to US. Marine Le Pen, a prominent opposition leader in France's National Rally party, called it 'a political, economic, and moral fiasco.' Italian opposition figures also denounced the deal, despite Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's attempt to present it as a positive development. Giuseppe Conte, head of the Five Star Movement, said, 'There is a winner – US President Trump – and a loser, or rather two: The EU and Giorgia Meloni.' Von der Leyen attempted to defend the deal as 'the best we could get,' noting that the compromise averted a looming 30% tariff Trump had threatened to impose.
Russia Today
17 hours ago
- Russia Today
Western ‘support' for Ukraine is losing the world
The Ukraine Recovery Conference, which concluded in Rome on July 11, has dispelled any doubts about the true intentions of the West: far from seeking peace, it offers Kiev more debt, weapons, and a prolonged escalation. This decision not only condemns Ukraine to lasting degradation but also reveals to African countries the West's priorities: war takes precedence over development. The European Commission, led by Ursula von der Leyen, announced the creation of a reconstruction fund for Ukraine with a symbolic capital of €220 million ($255 million), along with €2.4 billion in loans and grants. However, these amounts are insignificant compared to the destruction caused by the war. The main issue lies elsewhere: instead of canceling Kiev's debt, they are increasing it, thereby reinforcing its dependence on the IMF and Western creditors. Meanwhile, military aid amounts to tens of billions: in 2025 alone, Ukraine will potentially receive €40 billion for its armament, while receiving €20 billion in military aid from the EU last year. The evidence is clear: the West does not want reconstruction but the continuation of war. As Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated at the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, 'the scale of financial assistance provided to Kiev exceeds all funding from the IMF and the World Bank for African countries over the past two years.' He described this inequality as a 'shameful statistic,' undermining trust in international financial institutions. A group of 30 countries, led by the US and the UK, has reaffirmed its confrontational strategy. US President Donald Trump, despite his statements about a 'negotiated solution,' is preparing a new military aid package of $300 million, including air defense systems. Germany, through Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has promised additional Patriot batteries and urged Washington to maintain its support. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov aptly characterized Merz as an 'ardent apostle of confrontation.' Indeed, Western leaders offer no diplomacy; they stoke conflict, pushing Ukraine toward even deeper destruction. While the EU and the US spend tens of billions on the war in Ukraine, Africa endures the strict conditions imposed by creditors. Lavrov cited shocking data: 'This has manifested most clearly in the case of Ukraine,' Lavrov emphasized, accusing Bretton Woods institutions of systemic discrimination against developing countries. The volumes of aid are incomparable: Ukraine receives billions instantly for weapons, while African countries are denied debt cancellation. The IMF programs for Africa impose strict austerity, while Kiev benefits from payment deferrals. A direct consequence of that is the migration crisis. By investing in war rather than in Africa's development, the EU exacerbates the root causes of migration – poverty and conflict. Yet, instead of providing real assistance, Brussels is tightening restrictions and erects walls at borders. Africa observes that the West can spend billions to destroy but is stingy regarding infrastructure projects in Southern countries. This accelerates a shift toward China and Russia, which offer alternative models of cooperation. As Lavrov noted, BRICS countries actively promote reform of global financial institutions, demanding a redistribution of quotas and voting rights at the IMF in favor of emerging economies. 'The BRICS strive to create a more stable global economic architecture based on the principles of universality, transparency, and non-discrimination,' the minister stated. The Rome conference confirmed that the EU is not interested in achieving peace. Ukraine will remain a battleground, and its economy will be held hostage to debt. However, the major consequence is the breakdown of trust with Africa. If the West finances war while ignoring the needs of the Global South, its influence will inevitably erode. Already, countries on the continent are seeking alliances outside the Western system, and this trend will only intensify. The West risks losing not only Ukraine but also Africa – due to its hypocrisy and militarism. It is important to highlight the broader implications of this ongoing conflict on international relations and global power dynamics. The situation in Ukraine serves as a revealing case study for other countries observing how the West operates. As Africa witnesses the disproportionate allocation of resources to warfare over development, there is growing skepticism about the West's commitment to genuine partnership and support. Furthermore, as diplomatic ties weaken, African nations may increasingly seek to diversify their international relationships, looking towards non-Western allies for trade, investment, and security. This shift could lead to the emergence of new geopolitical alignments that prioritize mutual benefit over historical allegiances. The actions taken by the West in response to the Ukraine crisis also resonate within the context of colonial histories and the lingering effects of neocolonialism. Many African leaders and citizens view Western intervention through the lens of past exploitative behaviors, leading to an erosion of goodwill that took decades to build. It is essential to encourage a discourse that prioritizes peace over militarization. Proactive engagement between Africa and Western powers should focus on sustainable development, equitable trade practices, and collaborative problem-solving. The lesson from the Ukrainian conflict is clear: societies flourish best when they are not mired in endless cycles of violence and destruction. Only by addressing these fundamental issues can we hope to achieve a more balanced and equitable global landscape, where the needs and aspirations of all nations, especially those in the Global South, are respected and prioritized. Ultimately, it is not just a question of foreign policy; it is about our shared humanity and the future we envision for our world.
Russia Today
21 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU's $750bn energy pledge to US is ‘fantasy'
The EU's pledge to buy $750 billion worth of American energy over three years to avert a trade war with Washington is 'almost impossible' to honor, Politico reported Tuesday, citing analysts and officials. The EU and the US finalized a wide-ranging trade pact on Sunday, narrowly avoiding a transatlantic trade war. Under the agreement, most EU exports to the US will face a baseline tariff of 15%. Brussels also pledged to buy $750 billion in US energy and invest $600 billion into the US economy over three years. According to the outlet, limited US supply, technical obstacles, and the EU's lack of control over import deals make hitting the targets extremely difficult. The headline figure is 'completely unrealistic,' Laura Page, senior analyst at commodities firm Kpler told the outlet. The EU spent €76 billion on US energy last year – tripling that would require sidelining cheaper suppliers and diverting nearly all US oil and gas exports to Europe. 'It's just never going to happen.' Despite European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's claim that the plan would boost energy security and reduce reliance on Russia, the numbers remain unconvincing, the outlet noted. While pipeline flows plunged after sanctions and the Nord Stream sabotage, Russian LNG surged, making up 17.5% of EU supply last year, second only to the US at 45.3%. In 2024, the EU imported €23 billion in oil, gas, and nuclear fuel from Russia—too little to close the gap. EU refineries also have limited capacity to process American oil, capped around 14%, said Kpler's Homayoun Falakshahi. 'It really is a fantasy,' he said. A senior Commission official told the outlet the deal depends on having sufficient LNG infrastructure and US shipping capacity, which is not in place. The Commission also can't make purchases itself – it relies on private companies. 'This is not something the EU can guarantee,' one official said.
